Remarkable things are starting to happen. The institutions of “Intelligence” say there’s no fraud, yet hundreds of people working in the US intelligence community are volunteering to help investigate the 2020 election.
CISA called the election “the most secure in US history”. The head of the Dept of Justice said there was no evidence of fraud. And the FBI sat on the Laptop from Hell for a whole year, but sorted out the Nashville bomber in 48 hours.
According to Robert Caron, a former CIA operative, a group of intelligence agents have gathered together behind the scenes to investigate what’s been going on in the US Election. It’s like a shadow CIA and FBI. Foreign interests may be able to buy off a few key rulers but they can’t buy all the patriots.
” Over 400 people from the Intelligence Community (IC), military, law enforcement, and the judiciary have formed a loose network to investigate irregularities in the 2020 election.
Caron said that the network includes former intelligence officers, analysts, operatives, military, law enforcement, and judiciary from the FBI, CIA, Military Intelligence, DIA, and National Security Agency (NSA), among others, as well as many former intelligence officers in other countries.
“The fraud was so massive and so blatant, despite what the mainstream media said, that we need to get this information out to the public,” said Caron. “That’s why more and more people from the intelligence community and law enforcement are coming out, which is unheard of.”
Apparently many intelligence officers were not happy about the Benghazi incident under Barack Obama’s rule, and that was when the unofficial team started.
One voter, four votes, isn’t that how it works?
Perhaps the intelligence officers are motived by video’s like this one:
Meanwhile the numbers are growing in Congress too.
If all mistakes favour one candidate they probably weren’t mistakes.
h/t David E.
A group of hard maths guys go through the election data with an algorithm looking for instances of unusually large sudden additions of votes in batches much faster than almost all the others, and far above the “normal” pace. “Odd” in this case means absurdly unusual — in Minnesota one dump at 5:30am was a net gain of 113,755 Biden votes at 19 standard deviations from normal or a probability of 1 in 1081. These are astronomical numbers.
This report is well worth scrolling through. Each state has a batch of graphs. The outliers are obvious without any statistics.
Note, these are not necessarily fake votes or illegitimate. They are flagging them for investigation. But they didn’t find any dumps for Trump. Hm?
Fourteen states are reported, and it’s somewhat disturbing to see dumps in states that have been off the radar like Kentucky and Maine. There were so many dumps in Pennsylvania and Virginia they had to change their definitions.
Without the step jumps in vote counting, the end graph would have been a massive landslide victory for Donald Trump. In Florida after batch #50, almost all Bidens gains were in step jumps. Some 600,000 votes were added. Imagine if Trump won Florida by 360k, but perhaps was one million votes ahead? In which case his 3% win would have been a 9% win.
Florida Voting Dumps and a close up of the “key” hours. Imagine the blue line without the step ups?
Try to imagine there is a legitimate explanation for all dumps going Bidens way. What kind of process could lead to these anomalies?
Try to imagine the New York Times discussing this study.
I note the John Droz (familiar name to climate skeptics) is on the list of authors. Thanks to them all.
Eric Quinnell (Engineer); Stan Young (Statistician); Tony Cox (Statistician); Tom Davis (IT Expert); Ray Blehar (Government Analyst, ret’d); John Droz (Physicist); and Anonymous Expert
Executive Overview
A team of unpaid citizen volunteer mathematicians, scientists, IT veterans, and engineers collaborated in a statistical vote analyses of selected states in the 2020 Elections. The purpose of a statistical analysis is not to tell what happened (e.g., ballot stuffing, machine algorithm, etc.), but rather where (ideally by precinct) there were unusual results.
In this special report we are looking at what has been called vote “Dumps.” We are defining a Dump as being a 25,000+ vote differential between Presidential candidates, received/recorded at one time. We looked for such influxes for both candidates. The conclusion is that all we were able to find were net Biden Dumps (see next page, Table 1, where the states are listed alphabetically, and the dumps chronologically). Unless otherwise noted, all data on Table 1 are from Edison time-series analysis of rates of votes added.
Again, we cannot determine exactly what happened to cause these Dumps (e.g., ballot stuffing, something legitimate, etc.), but rather where (a State) and time(s) that these unusual results took place.
Note, these are not necessarily fake votes or illegitimate.
*A “Net Vote Dump” is defined as a 25,000+ vote differential between 2020 Presidential candidates, at one time. All were for Biden as we were not able to find any cases for Trump that met this criteria. (If any can be documented, we’d be glad to do an update and include them.)
**PA and VA are exceptions for the 25k differential we are using. For whatever reason (and unlike most other states) they have way too many over 25k. As a result, the PA threshold is 60k and VA is 100k.
The comment on Pennsylvania is telling:
Pennsylvania
Evidently Pennsylvania and Virginia were engaged in a contest to see which state could produce the most convoluted election data. After struggling to make heads or tails of both, we think it’s a draw. In the case of Pennsylvania, it’s impossible to provide meaningful graphs in our Report — as multiple speculative assumptions would have to be made. To give the reader a grasp of what we faced, below (Table 3) is a list of all of the large differentials (i.e., Biden minus Trump results at individual time stamps). A major problem is that there are multiple examples where someone “corrected” the data — by making huge subtractions. Whether these are justified or accurate is anyone’s guess. Rather than take on the impossible task of sorting this all out, we selected four time periods that we believe are representative of suspicious Biden minus Trump differentials (See Table 1). We leave the rest of the challenge to a masochistic reader to tackle. Feel free to share if you can make any sense of it!
The cynic in me wonders what the point the all the graphs will be and hopes it’s not just so the corrupt can plan their dumps better in future.
Ponder that the most popular man in America allegedly just lost an election to a man who polled one third his score in a popularity contest. It’s just a poll but Trump ranked first with 18% of Americans in the Gallup poll. This occurred while almost all the media were describing him as a delusional sore loser trying to overthrow democracy. Joe Biden, on the other hand, won just 6% while he is riding high in the honeymoon glow. It’s as good as it can get.
In the latest news: Republicans vote to protect the TechGiants against being sued as publishers. Section 230 protection continues. Is this the slow suicide of the Republican Party?
January 6 is going to be historic no matter which way it goes. Right now, it will never be easier for the good people of the United States to stop corruption and foreign forces from grabbing one of the last and perhaps greatest institutions of the Land of the Free.
Would you spend a week now to stand up for what’s right, to send a message that it isn’t OK for rampant cheating to go unpunished. Or will people wait until the barbarians are inside the gate?
“If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
We could have fought for our rights when we could have easily won without bloodshed, but that time is long past.
We could have fought for our rights when the victory was sure and not too costly, but that time is also past.
We are now at the moment when we must either fight, as Americans, for what is right, or surrender to the Left. The simple fact that the Left is bending every effort to divide us, demoralize us and blind us testifies to our strength. The Left would have us think that the odds are against us. Perhaps they are, but when shall we be stronger? Will it benefit us to give the mechanisms of the modern State, with all their potential for tyranny, fully into the hands of the Left? Will we doom ourselves to having to fight without any hope of victory?
Though it is not given to us to see clear victory ahead, nor can we predict the outcome, I recall over 50,000 enraged Americans descending on the Mall in DC to reopen the monuments spitefully closed by Barry Soetero. When the WW2 veterans were scheduled to come and see their memorial, tens of thousands of patriots and veterans, in violation of the law, and despite regulations forbidding it, opened the monuments and made those visits happen. I saw police cars bounced. I saw hundreds of DC police backing away rather than confront massive grass roots resistance. I saw thousands of people cheering those aged World War 2 survivors, who fought for our country. I saw thousands of people stopping traffic and piling up Barrycades around the entrances to the Spite House. I recall that, for a little while, the spirit of American independence showed itself.
And the Left recall that, too. We are far stronger than we know, stronger than the Left want us to be.
…the caravan organizers hope a large presence from Trump supporters will help Pence and Congress make the right choice.
“I think everything lays on Vice President Pence, and I think he will do the right thing and not certify those votes of the swing states in question,” said Eric, 47, of Richmond, Virginia.
“When there’s going to be millions of people descending on our nation’s capital, he will feel that, I believe,” he said. “I think he’s a good, honest man. And I think he’d do what’s right no matter what.”
“If Mike Pence is alone in that fight, that is going to be very hard for Mike,” Garrett, 29, of Oxford, Connecticut, told The Epoch Times.
The four caravan routes start in Boston; Lansing, Michigan; Nashville, Tennessee; and Gadsden, Alabama. The Michigan and Massachusetts caravans plan to converge in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, before heading to Washington via Maryland. The Tennessee and Alabama caravans are to converge in Richmond, Virginia.
“Willing to lose her job”
Harmony, 45, who’s organizing the stop in Gettysburg, said she’d be willing to lose her job in order to go.
“If there was ever a day that patriots needed to be in D.C. in person, it’s on January 6,” she said. “This is the culmination of the fight that we’ve been in for the past four years.”
“It’s so important that I would gladly lose my job or my car.”
A couple of the organizers said they were confident about Congress changing the outcome of the election.
“I’m honestly not worried. I think that if we had to take back this country I think that we could and we would,” Amelia said. “I think that there are a lot of Americans with me. I’m willing to do anything to save this constitution and to save our republic.”
Meanwhile, in Georgia, there are allegations trucks are pulling up to take away ballots to shred them
After Jovan Pulitzer exposed the Georgia election voting system both by hacking into them live and showing that there were misprinted ballots. He claimed he can analyze 500,000 ballots in only a couple of hours and he can show which ballots are fraudulent. After he spoke, the subcommittee passed a motion to audit the absentee ballots. But now on Monica Matthews radio show he claims that within hours of that the trucks were already pulling up to take away the ballots.
It’s worth listening to his interview at the link to the radio show above. He speaks very well. Though the key part about the trucks is at 34 minutes, but there is only one line, and no details. It seems odd to mention this without more detail. Who ordered the trucks? What did they take? Where are they going?
Are these ballots really being destroyed? We need more information.
Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections held a hearing to study Georgia’s Election.
Stanford Researcher and Inventor with thousands of U.S. Patents, Jovan Pulitzer, claims, real-time hacking of Dominion Voting Systems at Fulton County Polling Station.
Maybe this is why they won’t let us look at the physical ballots?
Ballots were misprinted in an area more likely to have Republican voters. There are tiny changes in the calibration marks of printed ballots that would cause the machines to misread some votes.
The ballots are not the same. In a predominantly Republican area the calibration marks are misaligned.
Does the misaligning of the calibration marks mean a shocking 93% of ballots in Fulton county required adjudication?
So 93% of votes in Fulton County were cast by the adjudicators, not the voters.
Where are those logs?
An incredible 93% of votes in Fulton County had to be adjudicated — manually entered by a person. The machines kept failing.
Watch Jovan Pulitzer discuss the need for paper ballots to be examined properly and just how much data they could get if they could see the actual ballots.
It may seem like a leap to say China is actively sabotaging the US. A more useful question might be to ask how much cheaper it is to pay off corrupt elites than to build a new aircraft carrier? Given that President Trump has stood up to President Xi and put an end to the rich game of trade deals, how much would it be worth to China to not only get rid of Trump (and all future Trump-copies) but also to stop free and fair elections in the US and to install a President they could control?
Given the trillions at stake, it appears to be a cheap strategy. What if he’s right?
“The greatest way to fight a war is not to have to fight it at all.
Not firing a bullet….” — Patrick Byne speaking of Chinese philosophy.
Years ago Patrick Byrne hoped to bring the beautiful things from Chinese culture to the USA. instead now he warns that Chinese scholars have studied the US and figured out that the greatest vulnerability is corruption, and now they’ve used that to infiltrate and stage a slow coup.
Byrne is not just the billionaire founder of Overstock, he speaks Chinese fluently and studied in China at Beijing Normal University in 1983 – 84, and a Bachelor of Arts in Chinese studies from Dartmouth College. He asserts that this is part of a 100 year plan written up in 1949 to take down the United States. He suggests that people should read the book by Michael Pillsbury: The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower. Byrne tells us that Michael Pillsbury was a China-dove his whole life until 2015 when he wrote this book and admitted he’d been wrong all along.
The voting machine in Savannah Georgia — he explains — had a wireless component that was tranmitting data to a thermostat installed on the wall, which was sending messages to an IP of a company connected to the CCP.
They’re moving fast. Byrne warns that in two months time you may be defined as a “Domestic Terrorist” for doubting the result of the 2020 Election. It’s already being discussed.
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard PhD, has written or co-written several New York Times bestsellers including Unfit for Command, The Obama Nation and Killing the Deep State. He mentions that there are rumors that new parties are being formed in the US.
“The Republican Party is committing suicide. They are not standing up for the Republican President. “
..
Patrick Byrne: China Is Taking Us Out From Within
By Li Hai, The Epoch Times
“Though we spend a trillion dollars a year between our military and our intelligence, national security circles … that trillion dollars we have and we’ve built, you know, things that can stop all their planes and their missiles and all kinds of things. But we missed the one they use, which is not a fight at all, not firing a bullet or missile at all, but taking us out from within. And that’s what’s going on.”
Byrne says that China moved the end stage of the 100 year plan for 2049 closer to 2030.
Byrne said: “… we cannot bend a knee to this under any circumstance.”
Talking about the upcoming Jan. 6 rally in Washington, Byrne said that “this is your last chance.”
“If you bend the knee to this rigged election, they have corrupted the most elementary concept of our tradition, consent of the governed, and you never will get another chance.”
“The Assassins Mace” is a Chinese expression — to win a war without a fight by assassinating the chief with a single blow from within his own bedroom. It means a knockout sucker-punch in China Byrne said “we wondered what the Assassins mace was. Is it the new stealth fighter. Is it the aircraft carriers. Is it an EMP weapon. It is a hypersonic weapon. No. What we’re living through now is the sucker punch.
Pennsylvanians were so keen to vote in 2020 that 202,000 imaginary people voted as well.
Given that Joe Biden “won” by 81,000 votes, this alone turns that to a 121,000 vote loss. How is it that it’s taken nearly two months for this basic information to come out? And why was something so incompetent ever certified?
The 17 lawmakers rather scathingly said:
These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”
Obviously, the State Legislators need to be de-certifying. But where is the accountability if they don’t?
Be aware, this is not a claim that there were more votes than registered voters, because there are 9,090,962 registered voters in Pennsylvania. There was a 76.5% voter turnout in 2020 according to SURE (the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors). This is about the number of people recorded as voting on the day.
Presumably someone is working late tonight to find a computer glitch or list of voters left in the boot of their car, whereby 202,000 voters will appear any day now. It was “Just human error”. Or perhaps they can’t be bothered. They could just ring Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey instead.
Nonetheless, it’s just more fraud piled on fraud. Fraud to the Fourth power, squared.
HARRISBURG – A group of state lawmakers performing extensive analysis of election data today revealed troubling discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election, and as a result are questioning how the results of the presidential election could possibly have been certified by Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar and Governor Tom Wolf. These findings are in addition to prior concerns regarding actions by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Secretary, and others impacting the conduct of the election.
It seems US state governors made it easy for China to spy on the election
Russell Ramsland speaks at the Georgia Election Hearing about election data being sent directly to China.
It’s looks like… there is a smart thermostat in one of the tabulation rooms in Savannah Georgia that is reporting the votes back to China. We’re going to check that out.
In 29 States your votes were going to Frankfurt Germany…
Patrick Byrne says:
I vouch for this. I have seen the photographs, the computer forensics, and the IP traces back to China. To a corporation whose name has long been linked to CP.
Perhaps people in China were getting results before people in the US were?
Simone Gao interviews Ramsland at The Thinking Conservative
Would you like a 17% swing with that tabulator?
Fully 17% of votes were decided by adjudicators in Antrim County.
Ramsland also found in the Antrim County Report (in Michigan), that an incredible 17% of all the votes went to adjudication. There was a “68% error rate”, but because there can be up to four errors (in different parameters) per vote the actual votes switched is lass than 68%. But it means that at least, at a minimum 17% of the votes were decided by someone other than the voter. It could have been as much as 30%. How many other counties did this happen in?
Naturally the hard working adjudicators doing all the overtime were just marking up what the voters really wanted, and all their decisions were recorded in the logs so we know there was no bias. It’s all OK — except the logs that matter are gone.
Key parts of the 2020 logs were deleted manually. Someone really doesn’t want everyone to know how many adjudicated votes went to Biden in this predominantly Republican area.
Democrats are outraged, unhappy, totally fine with that.
Who needs to campaign?
Among a rapid fire list of other anomalies, ballots apparently were also printed on the wrong size paper, and with formatting errors. All of this would be easy to check but Ramsland was not allowed to see the ballots. Perhaps it wouldn’t matter if he had. It’s just one more scandal on top of 500 others for the media to ignore?
To find the secret algorithm to change votes — just read the manual
Ramsland points out that some of the things the CEO of Dominion claimed don’t even agree with his own user manuals.
The CEO of Dominion told the world that there was no algorithm that changes votes, but at 12 minutes Ramsland quotes Section 11 of the Dominion user manual. It describes the RCV algorithm or Ranked Choice Voting. It is used to pick winners. You can set that algorithm to do anything you want.We know it was used in certain races, it’s in the logs.
It came from the SMOTE Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technology — it could give more weight to an underrepresented group — like Hispanics. So all the tools were there in the software for anyone wanting to create mischief.
When too much fraud is still not enough?
For different flavours of dodgy stew, see the longer one hour video of the Georgia hearing II part 2 below. Russell Ramsland, from 6 to 14 minutes, goes through an extraordinary list of evidence.
Imagine a world where the mainstream media and public affairs shows were playing footage like this. The election would be over already. There would have been mass protests in the streets outside State Legislatures if the media were on the side of fair elections. Such is the power of those who control the national conversation.
The task for patriots today: Build new lines of communication.
Friday week ago, a four hour meeting took place with President Trump, Sidney Powell, Rudy Guiliani, Michael Powell and key Whitehouse legal staff. Patrick Byrne (billionaire Founder of Overstock, fighter against Wall St corruption) was there.
“Betrayed from within”
Byrne has done several interviews in the last week. This one with Jerome Corsi was probably the most detailed. Worth watching, as an extraordinary history unfolds. He tells a tale of insider white-anting at the Whitehouse where senior legal staff have apparently been offered million dollar salary packages by outsiders and threatened to be “cancelled”, if they don’t play the right game, which is to talk Trump into conceding. The senior team are leaning on the juniors. The self-serving lawyers are shockingly disrespectful, sexist and Byrne would sack them in an instant if they worked for him.
According to Byrne — Trump is the smartest man in the room — or words to that effect (Byrne has a PhD from Stanford) — Trump is a gentleman, patient, and very different to what the media portrays, and “too nice” almost to a flaw. Byrne is a small L Libertarian who didn’t vote for Trump, but appears to have become one of his biggest supporters since meeting him. But he stresses, and from Trump’s point of view too — this is not about Trump or Biden, it’s about the Republic. Trump needs this battle “like a hole in the head” and would happily concede and “have a great life” if only the election had been run fairly and the future of the USA did not depend on it.
He stresses that there was no mention at all of the insurrection act or martial law at the meeting despite the 100% fabrication of that claim in the New York Times.
He was happy that Trump agreed to the plan he, Powell and Flynn wanted within half an hour, but they spent the next three hours working against the nay-saying lawyers, and do nothing cowards. The meeting was so heated it almost came to punches.
According to Byrne, the evidence is all there, it will be revealed and they have traced electronic communications from election machines directly back to China. (More on that in the next post).
Mass Protests coming Jan 4, 5, 6, 2021
Patrick Byrne finishes with a plea for anyone who loves their country to get to the mass protest on Jan 4, 5 and 6 in Washington D.C. And for people who can’t make it there — to aim for their state legislatures on the same days.
See his twitter feed for quotes:@PatrickByrne. Where — coincidentally — posted 4 hours ago a message “Is this odd?” and shows a video of what looks like a glowing long running fireball in the sky. It just goes on too long, too slowly, to be a meteor. What is it? Commenters suggest a plane contrail in sunlight. Mike says: It’s the RV from Nashville re-entering the atmosphere
———————————————–
PS: Tomorrow the site may be down for a short time due to maintenance. Apologies for the inconvenience. Please check back later to find a hopefully faster site.
Filmed in the first ten days after the US election.
“Maybe a Serbian guy should tell Americans what they should do”
Our dictator Milosevic stole the election. He used all the tactics you see now.
In October 2000, my country done something extraordinary. After being obedient for ten years, after sitting in tanks to pointlessly die, after many treasons and hopeless future… my country somehow decided it was time to do something, to fight for freedom.
It started with strikes and civil disobedience. All of Serbia came to Belgrade. Basically everyone who could walk went to the protest.
Somehow when they have seen the sea of people they decided … to back off.
“They are never going to be as weak as now
and you are never going to be as strong as you are now”
If you lose now, it will be game over.
Once it has hold, socialism will never leave…
If you don’t believe me ask a billion people.
Do you have the guts to take to the streets and take what is yours?
What we really need is a short video that even Democrats could watch — something that can work towards restoring the national conversation — instead of having two separate realities.
Man In America have made a mini Documentary “The Plot to Steal America”. The first 9 minutes, which Donald Trump just tweeted, is one of the best short form hooks to get the attention of the average voter and introduce them to both the dire state of the US election and also the media.
UPDATE: Video removed from Youtube (because it might educate Americans?) Copy from BitChute substituted. (If I post a Youtube, but you can find a copy on Bitchute or Rumble I will happily swap. We don’t need to feed the machine.) Thanks Kat H.
The second half of the video leaps a bit too quickly into the Communist Goals, with not enough convincing explanation to justify the ambitious narrative. Perhaps it is aimed at the patriots out there who are already on side.
As if to answer this, in their second video, Man in America talk about CCP influence, and they do spell it out.
This is the best coverage of the Chinese Professor of Renmin University:
…
His advice is the same — switch to new social media alternatives. Gab. Parler. BitChute etc.
Craft those new lines of communication. Big Tech are trying to cut them off. We can’t let them succeed.
NottheBee report that this is road certified for the EU, but not “air certified” yet. I suspect getting a pilots license may be the barrier to this selling en masse in 2022.
…
Just for something different.
Merry Christmas to New Zealand and the East Coast of Australia
h/t Panda
…
His speech today was partly a description of the finalists for the Oscars of Election Cheating. It’s a worst of the worst list. He’s crafting a narrative for the American people, paving the way for them to accept that he doesn’t just have a legal path to victory, but that he was the legitimate winner — by a landslide.
Many Americans will be blindsided if three states decertify the electors and the whole election is suddenly up for grabs. As Scott Adams would say “he’s a master persuader” — and in this speech he’s not only describing real fraud, but carving a path for Biden-voters to walk away from their choice. A face-saving exit.
In psychology, human brains like to stick with their choices. Robert Cialdini, the man who wrote “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion” called it the principle of “Commitment and Consistency”. Once we have made a decision — we’ll do a lot of rationalization to keep justifying that pick — even when it makes no sense. To get peace or healing, Trump has to convince Biden voters that not only was Trump the rightful winner, but that Biden was not someone that deserved their vote — or their protests, should Biden become the President Un-elect.
So Trump is finding targets Biden voters can blame for making a bad choice — like the media, for hiding the Biden corruption and the links to China. ” Joe Bidens family received millions of dollars from the Chinese Communist Party. Yet the media and tech companies work together to censor this information. It was the greatest and most shocking scandal involving a Presidential Candidate in our political history.”
The key question is how many Americans will see this speech. Christmas Eve is the day for releasing news that the public won’t have time to notice. But even if Biden voters are not watching, Trump is reaching the political apparatchiks, the media, and hopefully millions of Trump voters, who can learn and copy the message, email it and tweet it. Put it on Parler. That sort of thing. Possibly it just means Trump voters are better armed for Christmas dinner conversations should anyone at the table dare to raise politics…
It’s just a subcommittee, but it’s the first official document from an elected body that examined the evidence of voter fraud and the six Senators find that the election in Georgia was “untrustworthy”.
The Judiciary recommend that the House in Georgia de-certify the Biden electoral college electors due to voter fraud, and because state officials failed to follow state election rules. As Steve Bannon and Rudy Guiliani describe it, if the lower House in Georgia does that, Arizona is two votes away from decertifying, Wisconsin is on the verge. Those three states control enough electoral college votes to deny Biden the 270 Electoral College votes he needs to have on January 6th. The election goes to a “Contingent Election” which Trump is almost certain to win. Bannon forecasts: if “one goes, they all go”. If one state braves up enough to decertify, others will step over the line too. “Courage is Contagious”, he says.
The November 3, 2020 General Election (the “Election”) was chaotic and any reported results must be viewed as untrustworthy. The Subcommittee took evidence from witnesses and received affidavits sworn under oath. The Subcommittee heard evidence that proper protocols were not used to ensure chain of custody of the ballots throughout the Election, after the opening of ballots prior to the Election, and during the recounts. The Subcommittee heard testimony that it was possible or even likely that large numbers of fraudulent ballots were introduced into the pool of ballots that were counted as voted; there is no way of tracing the ballots after they have been separated from the point of origin. The Subcommittee heard testimony of pristine ballots whose origin looked suspicious or which could not be verified and the inability of poll workers to distinguish between test ballots and absentee ballots. Signatures were not consistently verified according to law in the absentee balloting process. Poll watchers on Election Night testified that they had noted that ballots were not secured, that seals and security tags were not used, and the chain of custody was often lax or non-existent.
Debrea Heine, American Greatness: The chairman of the judiciary subcommittee in Georgia that examined evidence of fraud in the 2020 election, has released a scathing 15-page report calling the results of the 2020 election, “untrustworthy” and recommending that the certification of the results be rescinded.
And the Georgia decision was not based on the Dominion machine problems.
Governor Kemp is running at 11% approval in the polls.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
According to Robert Caron, a former CIA operative, a group of intelligence agents have gathered together behind the scenes to investigate what’s been going on in the US Election. It’s like a shadow CIA and FBI. Foreign interests may be able to buy off a few key rulers but they can’t buy all the patriots.
Recent Comments