Recent Posts


China goes gangbusters building 52 big coal plants in 2025

Shuozhou coal power plant.

Shuozhou coal power plant. by Kleineolive 

By Jo Nova

It’s almost like China doesn’t give a toss about climate change, eh?

Just quietly, while everyone was gushing tears over a two year extension to a fifty year old Australian plant,  China added a gargantuan number of brand new coal plants.

Australia’s total coal fleet stands at 26 gigawatts in capacity. Yet China added three times that capacity in a single year.

Overall, China brought 78 gigawatts of new coal power capacity online in 2025, a sharp uptick from previous years, according to the joint report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air and Global Energy Monitor.

The graph below represents how many gigawatts were added, but only in the largest turbines size. China added 52 gigawatts of energy from one gigawatt units. Presumably the rest of the 78GW came from smaller sized turbines. And here’s the thing, while everyone will pretend this is the peak and tell us “it will decline soon”, another 83 gigawatts of coal plants has already started construction, and another 161GW is newly proposed or applied for.

These coal plants are apparently only being used at 50% capacity, but the thing is, if China ever needs to ramp up its energy supply, like say, in a time of war, it could double it in days.

 

But China is just replacing the old dirty coal plants, right?

That’s what they want you to think.  See the tiny black bars, top left,  marked  “Retired”

All the coal power Australia has built in the last 50 years, China just effectively  added that in the last four months.

According to a research report published on February 3, more than 50 large coal-fired power plants will be connected to the grid in 2025. These are individual boiler and turbine sets with a capacity of at least one gigawatt. In the ten years prior, the number was less than 20 per year. Depending on consumption, one gigawatt can supply several hundred thousand to over two million households with electricity. — Euronews

Euronews asks —  if wind and solar are booming in China …why is it building so many new coal plants?

The answer apparently is that there were blackouts in 2021-22, and it takes a few years to get through the paperwork accelerate the construction. (Thinking about the timing, unless they can build coal plants in three years, they must have already had a set of coal plants in the approval or construction phase, and they pushed them through faster than expected to create such a boom). Supposedly this is that wave of new plants in response to those blackouts.

h/t to Eric Worrall at WUWT, and Pierre Gosselin at NoTricksZone, plus Leith van Onselen on Macroeconomics.

PS: For those in Perth — I’ll be speaking on Wednesday night next week in Belmont. More details to follow on that soon.

Source of Graphs: CREA: Global Energy Monitor

 

10 out of 10 based on 101 ratings

Friday

9.5 out of 10 based on 13 ratings

The NVES carbon tax on petrol cars is the perfect gift for China

We can't sell you the car you want until the fuel efficiency standard has wiped out the cheap ones.

By Jo Nova

Australian Mums and Dads who want a petrol or diesel car will soon be effectively paying money to China to make EV’s cheaper for inner city socialites.

Make no mistake, despite the propaganda, Australia now has a carbon tax on petrol and diesel cars and the revenue will go straight to companies that sell EVs — which means the cash will flow to China more than anywhere else.

The news today:

“Mazda, Nissan, Hyundai and Subaru face multi-million-dollar penalties under NVES”

by Jake Evans, the ABC

The New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) requires car makers to meet emissions limits on the total cars they sell each year, incurring a $50 liability for every gram of CO2/km over that limit, which must be paid as a penalty or traded with greener car makers that accrued credits.

The liabilities are due to be paid in three years’ time, meaning the car makers can also reduce their liability by selling more cleaner cars in the next two years.

In the first six months of the NVES, Mazda has incurred a $25.4 million liability, Subaru a $7 million liability, Nissan a $10.8 million liability and Hyundai a $4.2 million liability.

President Xi will be very happy.

BYD and rivals bank millions in Australia’s carbon credit car scheme NVES

By Danielle Collis, News.com.au

China’s BYD has emerged as the biggest winner of the Federal Government’s green car push, amassing millions of tradeable carbon credits in the first official results under the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES).

According to the NVES unit holdings table, BYD’s two regulated entities generated 4,234,294 credits and 2,048,530 credits respectively in just six months, more than 6.2 million in total.

Several other Chinese automakers also recorded substantial surpluses, including Chery (438,633), Great Wall Motor (405,198), SAIC Motors (377,601), Zhejiang Geely (620,233) and Zeekr (259,440).

The secret car tax is all lies and deception

Everything about the NVES is designed to confuse and conceal what is really happening.

This tax won’t be listed on your receipts. The government is forcing car manufacturers to be the tax collectors. The carbon credits will work like a subsidy but are not listed as one. The price rises come in 3 years time (after the next election). Or they come silently as manufacturers give up selling their cars in Australia. One day, you’ll go to a car yard and the only options left will be expensive to buy or expensive to run.

The Labor Party could have put a simple tax on cars for their carbon emissions — but people would have understood that and rebelled. Instead they copied the British ZEV and American CAFE standards schemes where car makers are punished or paid for their average fleet emissions. A car company that sells too many petrol cars compared to electric cars has to buy “carbon credits” from another company that sold more electric cars.

It has the illusion of being a free market — but it’s a tiny kernel of free enterprise wrapped in a Giant Communist Squid.  Perhaps they hope some politicians don’t run an “Axe The Carbon Tax” campaign and win 90 seats in the next election?

Basically, carmakers selling popular petrol and diesel cars will have to raise their prices to cover the cost of buying the NVES credits. So those cars will cost more, and the extra money the customer pays will be fed to the companies that mostly sell EV’s, — let’s all say  “China”.

The Government spins the NVES

Is your lie detector buzzing? The government says the NVES helps to: “save you money at the bowser.” It doesn’t say it’s at the expense of other Australians, or it only applies to people rich enough to buy an EV, or who ideally own their own garage and solar panels.

The government says “they give you more choice of new cars that are fuel-efficient, low or zero emissions” [but they don’t day they take away your choice to buy the cheapest or best car for your family]

The government pretends the NVES” reduces transport emissions, improving the air that you and your family breathe.” They don’t say that EV’s are heavier, add more tyre dust and microplastic pollution to the air, and pollute lakes in China. Nor do they mention the koalas being clubbed and the forests razed to install the “cleaner” turbines,

If the poor are not subsidizing the rich in Sydney, then the money just flows to Chinese oligarchs so they can buy themselves another Super-Yacht, and who knows, make some back-door donations to the ALP?

Australians would be angry about the NVES if they knew what was coming….

h/t Bally

 

10 out of 10 based on 98 ratings

Thursday

9.6 out of 10 based on 10 ratings

Trump may help free Cuba from Communism and the weapon is Energy

By Jo Nova

Is this the End of Communism in Cuba?

We don’t hear much about Cuba in Australia, but it is suffering rolling 16 hour blackouts, the streets are filled with rubbish, people are cooking with wood and charcoal, and the airports have run out of jet fuel.  The US is offering food aid, but only on the condition that the Cuban government does not interfere with the delivery.

The US is blockading shipments of oil to Cuba in an effort to get the communist regime to talk. Cuba relied on Venezuelan shipments of oil, but after the US captured President Maduro, Cuba lost one of their best allies, and the US has stopped the oil shipments. Trump also signed an order last month declaring Cuba to be a national security threat and he threatened to put tariffs on any nation that sent oil to Cuba. Trump has said that “Cuba is a failed state” and that he won’t mind if there is regime change. “I don’t think we need (to take) any action,Trump said on Jan. 4, adding: “Cuba looks like it’s ready to fall.”

Has Cuba Reached the Point of No Return?

— By Sarah Anderson, PJ Media

Power outages have increased throughout the nation, with some impacting hundreds of thousands of people at a time and lasting for days. Public transportation has come to a standstill, and there are reports that citizens are not currently allowed to fill up their own vehicles. Food prices are through the roof. Resorts and tourist attractions have shut down. People are using charcoal or wood to cook. Hospital and schools that were already barely functioning are not viable. Several companies and embassies from other countries have plans in place to stockpile supplies and/or evacuate their people.

While the immediate cause of Cuba’s pain is the oil embargo, decades of profligate communist economics, and brutal suppression of political dissidents meant healthy workers were fleeing, and the few resources Cuba has were wasted. Rumors suggest as many as a million people have fled out of a population of 11 million. Things were so bad, Cuba, known as ‘the sugar bowl of the world’, had to import sugar.

The communist economy builds things no one wants — like 7000 hotels rooms, no one uses:

A programme of hotel building has been under way, with 7,000 more rooms added since 2019, despite tourist numbers halving in the same period. And no one answers the question why.

The lobby is clean and the shop is open, selling beach towels and hats. The staff are welcoming, their uniforms pressed. The swimming pool is empty and there are no guests. I ask when the last came through and the receptionist tells me four years ago.

Meanwhile, in 2021 came a unification of two currencies, one pegged to the US dollar, one local, which resulted in hyperinflation that collapsed the value of state sector pay and pensions.

José Daniel Ferrer was once the only effective opposition leader in Cuba, but he spent 12 years in jail, where he saw two people beaten to death, and finally he fled. His view is ““There is nothing to lose with the fall of the regime,” he says bitterly. “Rather we will gain freedom, opportunity and prosperity.””

Rebel News interviewed people in Cuba and found some waving American flags, and others with hopeful signs that Trump will save them like he saved Venezuela.

In the soft West it is easy to forget how quickly energy can be weaponized by an adversary, especially if we don’t have our supply chains locked up.

 

 

10 out of 10 based on 90 ratings

Wednesday

9.9 out of 10 based on 9 ratings

Scientists new plan to save the world by chopping down boreal forest and tossing it in the Arctic Ocean

By Jo Nova

The latest plan to get better weather in a hundred years, is to cut down trees and dump them in the ocean.

The great northern boreal forest has expanded by 12% since 1984. Which means it has locked up all this extra carbon in it. Instead of waiting for it to catch fire and burn, the thinking is that we could cut it down now, and throw the logs in a river that leads to the Arctic ocean where they will sink (eventually, maybe) and take carbon to the sea floor.

New Scientist thought this was a good idea. Future anthropologists may file modern eco-science with arsenic cures, and radium toothpaste.

In order to save the environment, we need to cut down 180,000 square kilometers of forest and toss it into the river (every year).

How many trees do we have to kill to stop a cyclone in 2100AD?

 

These researchers and journalists are the kind of people who’ll check everything — except the core underlying assumptions that their fantasy is based on:

Humanity will need to find ways to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to compensate for industries that are hard to electrify – or even to begin reducing atmospheric CO2 levels. Direct air capture machines are expensive, however, and planting trees can backfire if they die or burn.
Several companies are burying wood, and US firm Running Tide sank 25,000 tonnes of wood chips off Iceland, although it was accused of endangering the environment and later shut down.

How many solar powered chain-saws are there in the world? Is that zero?

They have six Arctic rivers in mind, and say that if we can only cut down 30,000 square kilometers of forest on each river, that will bury about 1 billion tons of carbon, which is about 3% of our anthropogenic total emissions (ie. not much).
Previous research shows that waterlogged wood had lasted 8000 years in low oxygen Alpine lakes. How long will it last as a shipping hazard?
The only thing this study shows is how effective government funding is.

 

 

10 out of 10 based on 91 ratings

Tuesday

8.9 out of 10 based on 15 ratings

Monday

9.1 out of 10 based on 20 ratings

Sunday

9.6 out of 10 based on 15 ratings

Climate pollution causes boreal forests to grow 12% — recklessly spreading greenery in Arctic

By Jo Nova

NASA has finally studied the LandSat satellite images of vegetation down to 30 metre resolution and discovered with “unprecedented detail” that climate change is a good thing.

The northern boreal forests are the largest terrestrial biome in the world, and it’s warming faster than any other forest type, and loving it.

This is the catastrophe they’ve been warning us about…

Satellite record shows boreal forests expanded 12% and shifted north since 1985

What kind of pollution causes forest growth?

It’s time we got serious about the benefits of CO2.

The analysis revealed that boreal forests both grew in size and moved northward. The forests expanded by 0.844 million km² (a 12% increase) and shifted northward by 0.29° mean latitude, with gains concentrated between 64°N and 68°N. Their work also showcased the capacity of new growth to act as a carbon sink. Young boreal forests (up to 36 years) hold an estimated 1.1–5.9 petagrams of carbon (Pg C) with the potential to sequester an additional 2.3–3.8 Pg C if allowed to mature. Landsat’s long-time series of highly calibrated data allows researchers to study how ecosystems shift over decades, a crucial insight into our changing world.

What’s not to like about CO2Extinctions are declining, cyclones used to be nastier, floods were worse, Pacific Islands are growing not sinking, and sea levels used to be much higher.

REFERENCE

Min Feng et al, Northward shift of boreal tree cover confirmed by satellite record, Biogeosciences (2026). DOI: 10.5194/bg-23-1089-2026 bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/1089/2026/

 

10 out of 10 based on 118 ratings

Saturday

9.6 out of 10 based on 14 ratings

Sacré bleu! Macron blames renewables for Spain’s blackouts, France drops renewables targets, expands nuclear

Emmanuel Macron

By Jo Nova

The world is backing away from renewables

Wow. What a turnaround. President Macron, a man of The Blob, has come right out and blamed the Spanish Blackouts on renewables.  No system, he says, can be so dependent on renewables. Everyone knew this, but few in power would say the words.

Back in 2017 this was the man who had a plan to shut down 14 nuclear reactors in France. Today he plans to push through a law to reverse that. At the same time, the current French renewable energy targets have just been dropped by 20%. Instead of building 150GW of unreliable power, the new target will be about 120GW.

Back in April, Spain finally celebrated 100% renewable  energy, and within days suffered a national blackout  that caused at least five deaths and left thousands without lighting and the internet, and panic-buying petrol and food. The blackout spread as far as Portugal and Southern France.

Macron blames renewable energy for Spain’s national blackout

— By Kieran Kelly, The Telegraph

French president says European neighbour’s deadly power cuts were caused by shift towards net zero

In response to a large-scale power cut that left millions in the dark in April, the French president said no country could rely so heavily on renewable energy.

But Mr Macron said: “The Spanish power outage is not related to interconnections, but rather to the fact that no system, at least with current technology, can support such dependence on renewable energy. Stability in the energy mix is needed because otherwise, shocks that are too big occur. But it’s not just about interconnections. Networks are needed.”

Spain generates about 60 per cent of its electricity from renewable sources, including wind, hydropower and solar power, according to Red Eléctrica de España, its electricity grid operator. Around 20 per cent comes from nuclear power plants.

Supposedly renewable energy is free and nuclear plants are wildly expensive.

If renewables were cheaper, France would know — yet France chooses the nukes.

The French rebirth of nuclear power started a few years ago. But the plan to close these power plants still needs to be expunged.

Spain is aiming for 80% renewables by 2030 and the UK Labour government is aiming for 95% “clean”. But Australia is larger, hotter, and more sparsely populated, with tons of coal and gas, and has no interconnector cables to anywhere, yet we’re aiming for 82%. Fifty shades of crazy.

Photo:  Defense Visual Information Distribution Service

 

10 out of 10 based on 111 ratings

Friday

9.3 out of 10 based on 16 ratings

The EV experiment has become a bloodbath — $140 billion wasted — more to come

EV doom. The collapse of an industry. AI assisted.

By Jo Nova

At some point, Western governments decided to pick winners, and set deadlines for inventions and discoveries and most car manufacturers clapped quietly. They didn’t speak up, presumably because they didn’t want to look like a climate denier. But it’s been a disastrous choice for the  auto makers that jumped onto the EV bandwagon with both feet.

A few days ago the corporate mothership for Fiat Peugeot and Chrysler,  announced a $26 billion US dollar loss and shares fell 27%. This ignominiously follows the brutal $20 billion dollar Ford write down. The CEO of Stellantis has announced a reset of the company and in a radical plan, decided to “make our customers and their preferences our guiding star.” Crikey — they will try making cars that customers actually want, rather than ones that change the weather.

Robert Bryce estimates the known losses add up to  $140 billion in the last 4 years. And that’s only the money burned by Ford, Stellantis, GM, Mercedes, Volkswagon, Rivian, and Lucid.

Other companies have signed and bragged about big deals that they later backed away from. But they haven’t necessarily announced their EV specific losses. So who knows how much Honda, Renault, Mitsubishi, Volvo, and BMW have lost?

All up, Bryce estimates that the average loss per EV has been around $25,000.

The auto industry’s gamble on electric cars has turned into a catastrophe

By Matthew Lynn, The Telegraph

In reality, it turns out that electric cars are only a small part of the overall market and that, insofar as it exists, Chinese manufacturers will capture most of the sales.

There have been two major problems. First, EVs may only be a niche product. Next, where there is a market, the new breed of Chinese brands led by BYD is walking away with it.

The traditional auto giants thought the transition was just a matter of replacing an internal combustion engine with a big battery, but it turned out that an EV was a piece of electronics with wheels attached. It has much more in common with the mobile phone market than anything the petrolheads running the industry were familiar with.

It is far easier to create a new EV company from scratch than to convert one of the traditional giants.

The blunt truth is this: the massive bet that the auto giants took on EVs has backfired spectacularly.

If China had paid off Western politicians to force their own citizens to subsidize Chinese cars they could hardly have destroyed the Western car industry any faster.

If your country is home to legacy fossil fuel carmakers then schemes like the Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) work like an anti-tariff  – It’s a ruling that punishes local industry and forces them and their customers to subsidize foreign car makers. The government sets an arbitrary target, and insists that, say, 22% of all cars sold must be EV’s. The public don’t want that many EV’s but the ZEV ruling contains the financial equalizer. If the fossil fuel car manufacturer doesn’t meet their target and sell enough EV’s they’ll have buy credits from a company that did.

Or if companies sell both kinds of cars they can raise the prices of their fossil fuel cars and use those super profits to make their own EVs cheaper. Either way, fossil fuel cars get more expensive and EVs get cheaper until the 22% target is reached.

Ultimately, the tradies and renters who buy the fossil fuel cars are subsidizing the electric cars bought by the rich. 

Australias NVES (New Vehicle Emissions Standards) is very similar to the UK scheme.

 

 

9.9 out of 10 based on 118 ratings

Thursday

10 out of 10 based on 10 ratings

Trump to wipe out “Endangerment Finding” and pardon CO2 in largest act of deregulation in US history

Ring of Sauron

By Jo Nova

Trump to throw Saurons ring into the volcano this week — soon CO2 will NOT be legally classed as pollution that endangers human life

Trump always wanted to cut the power of the “Climate Change Hoax” at the source, which was the 2009 Endangerment Finding.   It is the excuse for Big Government to get itself into your car, house, air, steaks and factories while thieving from your wallet.

A spokesman at the EPA described this as “one of the most damaging decisions in modern history” so we know it hurts The Blob.

The Endangerment Finding was the 2009 legal determination that CO2 caused everything bad, and therefore government agencies had an obligation to protect the public from it, and companies had to track emissions, cars had to be purified, emissions had to be tracked and certified.

Trump to Repeal Landmark Climate Finding in Huge Regulatory Rollback

Meridith McGraw and Benoît Morenne, The Wall Street Journal

The Trump administration is planning this week to repeal the Obama-era scientific finding that serves as the legal basis for federal greenhouse-gas regulation, according to U.S. officials, in the most far-reaching rollback of U.S. climate policy to date.

The reversal targets the 2009 “endangerment finding,” which concluded that six greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health and welfare. The finding provided the legal underpinning for the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate rules, which limited emissions from power plants and tightened fuel-economy standards for vehicles under the Clean Air Act.

“This amounts to the largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States,” EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in an interview.

Officials said the rollback would equate to more than $1 trillion in regulation cuts, though they didn’t provide details on how they came up with the number. They said that rescinding the finding would result in an average per-vehicle cost savings of more than $2,400. Public health and environmental groups have said federal climate regulations help prevent hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year.

Big-Government hellfire is tied to the Endangerment Finding. Like Sauron’s ring of power  it was sacred,  must not be questioned, binds all others, and centralizes control in the hands of a central authority (like the EPA). And like The One Ring of Middle Earth it would corrupt even the good hearted.

The immediate effect of this is said to be on cars. But there will be legal wrangling. Environmental groups will challenge the finding in court, dragging out the process for years. The Environmental Defence fund called the endangerment finding “a vital tool”. Eventually this opens the door to reducing rules in other areas like power plants, and oil and gas infrastructure.

One official estimated this would save a trillion dollars in regulatory costs — which also means a trillion dollars worth of dependent workers will need to find other jobs.

Thanks to Helen D and Climate Depot.

 

 

10 out of 10 based on 126 ratings

Wednesday

9.4 out of 10 based on 12 ratings

Dept of Climate Change gives $1.6m in trips to Brazil as reward for prophets, activists, sycophants

By Jo Nova

Cynics are wondering what, exactly Australia got for spending $1.6 million sending 75 people on a two week junket in Brazil last year?

Australia, of course, got nothing, but this is the bread and butter currency for The Blob.  How else can you convince bored bureaucrats to pretend warming causes cooling, and maintain the righteous indignation!

Getting a free trip to Brazil surely ranks pretty high on bragging lists at Saturday night dinners. That shine helps make up for the mental effort of selling your soul and pretending that Sunday night’s pot roast causes floods in Dhaka.

It also provides the inspiration to keep the next generation of Blobocrats focused. The underlings learn that people who shed tears about climate change get rewarded, while the critics don’t. Just one ill advised remark, one careless joke, could compromise the plane tickets.

Australia spends $1.6m sending 75 officials to Brazil for UN climate climate summit

Responses to Senate estimates questions on notice have revealed Department of Climate Change and Energy sent 32 officials, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade sent nine officials, and the Department of Agriculture sent one official to Belém, Brazil in November last year for the UN Conference of the Parties summit.

And the Department of Climate Change budgeted $1.6m for their 32 officials to fly to Brazil, it said.

And this $395,000 (described below)– it’s just an investment for the future. One day a Youth Climate Coalition leader will end up in a heavily edited documentary promoting your Department. Think of this as advertising money and it all makes sense….

The department also revealed it disbursed a $395,000 grant program for other organisations to attend the COP30 summit. This included groups like the Aboriginal Carbon Fund, Australian Youth Climate Coalition, United Nations Youth Australia, and Women’s Environmental Leadership Australia.

Remember, even as the Departments of Fisheries, Forestry and Agriculture enjoy their tours of the Amazon,  that some fishermen, farmers and foresters have lost their jobs in Australia due to whimsical policy changes. Labor has recklessly damaged these industries, while the Departmental Chosen Ones use their tax dollars to party in Latin America.  See The Australian detail the $1.5m taxpayer bill for 75 public servants to attend UN climate change summit.

 

These C.O.P.s are always the same,
The delegates jet off without shame,
As fortnight junkets do appeal,
They delay the big ‘deal’,
Reached late on the last night, they claim.

–Ruairi

 

9.9 out of 10 based on 106 ratings

Tuesday

9.6 out of 10 based on 9 ratings