Recent Posts


Lucky us, The UN deigns to not list the Great Barrier Reef as ‘in danger’ (yet again)

Corals, Fish, at Flynn Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Photo.

Photo Wise Hok Wai Lum

By Jo Nova

Who Needs World Heritage Listing Anyway?

The best managed and largest reef system in the world just avoided being listed as “in danger” yet again. Despite the reef having near record levels of coral cover for the last four years, UNESCO tut-tutted and gave Australia a conditional pass, telling us we must do a water report in 18 months and conservation report in December 2028.  Dance monkey, dance.

Not only that, but the unaudited and unelected foreign committee tells the  Australian government that we need to stop the destruction of Queensland’s forest and bushland too, because that’s making the whole planet warmer. So no more industrial wind parks in the wilderness then? Alas — The UN doesn’t care about that destruction, but they do say — like a true Nanny, that they will continue to “watch with a magnifying glass.” Which means exactly nothing. Other coral reefs in the world are being “blast fished” with home made bombs, but their governments didn’t make the mistake of begging for listing as a World Heritage Site, so they can blast away. The magnifying glass doesn’t see the exploding fish.

The Patsy Labor Government should have told the UN to get a grip — instead it said “Thank you”.

The Blob always wins

The UN threatens us with the dreaded sticker of reef sin nearly every year. They do a song and dance performance and so do we, and then we are granted mercy “with conditions” that usually involve spending millions of dollars on bureaucrats or “friends of the Blob”.

Great Barrier Reef avoids ‘in danger’ listing in World Heritage Committee draft decision

ABC News

The Great Barrier Reef has avoided an “in danger” listing in a draft decision by the World Heritage Committee.

In the document released overnight, the UNESCO Committee noted Australia’s “ongoing commitment and enhanced collaborative efforts” towards the reef’s long-term protection.

However, the UN body also raised “utmost concern” over the site’s declining coral cover after mass bleaching events in 2024 and 2025.

Their concerns are always ‘utmost’ — see Decision 47Decision 45, Decision 46, all done while the Great Barrier Reef was at the highest levels of coral cover seen since 1986.

Great Barrier Reef, GBR, coral cover. Peter Ridd.

The UN looks acts and smells like it is a proto world government, telling us what to do without our forests, farms and coral.  It costs the UN almost nothing to launch preposterous PR Bombs and extract whatever they want. And we pay the UN to do it.

Pander, pander, pander

Australia welcomes draft UNESCO decision to keep Great Barrier Reef off danger list

Australia’s government has ​lobbied for years to keep the reef – which contributes more than ​A$9.0 billion ($6.25 billion) to the economy annually – off the list, as it could damage tourism at the site, which receives more than 2 million visitors ​each year.
Assistant Tourism Minister Nita Green said the decision overnight by ​the UNESCO World Heritage Centre “recognises Australia’s continued efforts to protect and manage this ‌important ⁠icon”.
“Australia welcomes UNESCO’s decision to not list the reef as endangered, and recognise all of the work that’s been going into protecting the reef,” Green said in televised remarks from the capital ​Canberra.

Australia doesn’t need the UN Heritage Listing to prove the Great Barrier Reef is a spectacular tourism asset. We just need photos.

As I said two years ago: The Labor party sold out the nation. The only correct response was to ask UNESCO why it was wasting our taxpayer funds and launch an audit of our UN contributions. Do we get value for money, or is the UN using our funds, and their own corrupt heritage list, to extort policies that the Australian voters didn’t vote for?

It’s not about the science

REFERENCE

Peter Ridd, Reef Rebels Coral Cover Graph of AIMS data.

 

 

10 out of 10 based on 18 ratings

2 comments to Lucky us, The UN deigns to not list the Great Barrier Reef as ‘in danger’ (yet again)

  • #
    Neville

    If I want the best ongoing update on the health of the GBR I watch the latest Dr Peter Ridd videos and ignore the UN BS and nonsense.
    This costs us nothing and makes me feel confident that we are keeping up with the latest data.
    When will we wake up and save the taxpayer billions of dollars and spend that money on baseload power stations or on our roads etc?

    00

  • #
    Dennis

    Another “conditional pass” following the usual threats that are so obviously based on the economics of tourism and GBR Queensland to ensure UN compliance, in other words blackmail.

    Albanese Labor Government has cooperated, the latest being them signing the EU Free Trade Agreement complete with terms and conditions including commitment to UN net zero emissions agenda politics and UN Agenda 21 influence by EU Government on land use in Australia.

    00

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>