Recent Posts


Opposition drops Net Zero and suddenly Labor are not so keen on hosting a $2b Climate Conference?

By Jo Nova

Just after the Coalition announced they would put cheaper energy ahead of global weather control, Anthony Albanese has been struck with cold feet about hosting the Climate COP31 giant junket in Adelaide.

After campaigning for this for three years like it was the Olympics, Anthony Albanese is now suddenly worried about Germany.  If Australia and Turkey don’t sort this out between them, the climate circus will default to the poor Germans who will have to host COP31 — something they’ve said they don’t want to do.

Albanese puts COP31 truce on the table after blast from Turkey

By Ben Packham, The Australian

Anthony Albanese has signalled his government is prepared to cede the hosting of next year’s UN climate conference to Turkey but says he wants to salvage some benefits for Pacific Island countries.

The Prime Minister was yet to withdraw Australia’s bid but said on Tuesday that if Turkey was preferred by delegates at this year’s COP (Conference of the Parties) then Australia would not challenge the decision.

He said there was “considerable concern” in the international community that the impasse between Canberra and Ankara would see the 2026 COP default to the German city of Bonn, as required by UN rules.

Amazing how fast political certainty can flip, isn’t it? One moment Anthony Albanese was hoping to stand beside Antonio Guterres on the glorious world stage and brag about how many solar panels Australia has, but now he probably wants a quiet exit.

It doesn’t help that the current COP30 is a flop where Russia, China, India and the US didn’t turn up and most countries didn’t update their plan. If the Australian opposition find their feet and wage a climate war, COP31 in Adelaide will be a sitting duck, radiating upper-class green out-of-touch vibes while voters struggle to pay their electricity bills. It would be a gift to political opponents. Two thousand million dollars is a lot to burn on a lame UN event.

The Opposition may have just saved Australia $2 billion dollars. Or maybe COP30 did.

 

 

9.9 out of 10 based on 120 ratings

104 comments to Opposition drops Net Zero and suddenly Labor are not so keen on hosting a $2b Climate Conference?

  • #
    Penguinite

    Not known as Albo Sleazy without reason!

    261

    • #
      Ted1

      And what will Albo do if turkey doesn’t want it?

      Things are happening. Will they gather pace?

      Will Bowen last the week?

      Will Albo last the month?

      100

      • #
        Johnny Rotten

        The whole thing is a turkey and whoever pays for it is a goose.

        210

      • #
        Ted1

        And what, at 2:07 pm if Bonn doesn’t want it?

        100

        • #
          Johnny Rotten

          Have it in the Arctic or Antarctica.

          120

          • #
            John PAK

            Don’t these folk have telephones or “Zoom”. I manage building confabs with overseas people and it costs virtually nothing. We all go away and do some work and later in the week we have another group discussion.
            Even in The Australian Parliament most matters are discussed with the majority sitting in their own offices watching on via video link. Unless an individual minister wishes to speak there is no need for them to actually be there.

            60

        • #
          Jon Rattin

          It seems the unelected UN has its succession plan well organised. If next year”s candidates don’t accept the bid to host COP they can foist the responsibility on to the following year’s host city irrespective of the inconvenience. Grifter genius.

          60

        • #
          Bob Close

          They may as well have it there as it’s only the EU and Australia that believe in this climate scam.
          It least the delegates from Europe won’t have to travel far and so decrease their carbon footprints!

          00

  • #
    Tim Whittle

    I’m in Business and we’re finding it tough. With this Country’s politics (Libs still want Carbon Capture – WHAT???) and the Chinese Economy peeking at the abyss I have real doubts about our potential for survival and am saring at a poverty stricken retirement, it’s too late to stem the flow. I am very depressed and OMG I hate Leftists.

    690

    • #
      David Maddison

      I am very depressed and OMG I hate Leftists.

      Tim, nearly everyone I know and myself, all conservatives, like you are very depressed due to consideration of Australia’s future, or lack thereof, and the severe economic damage being done to businesses, personal savings, investments and retirement plans by Government policy. Plus the prospect of new and confiscatory taxes and no effective Opposition political party to stop or question Government policy.

      511

    • #
      Graham Richards

      Get used to it if Ley & her ilk remain as the opposition leaders. At the drop of a hat they’ll grab at their “ security “ blanket….the Paris Agreement / Accord & drag us all kicking & screaming back to net zero and the awaiting economic disaster!
      Don’t let the media or anybody convince you otherwise!

      The conservatives in the LNP need to get stuck into the green/labor /teal influence in the party . The alternative is there for all to see.

      The current feeble net zero statements are weasel words designed to play down the demand for a complete change of direction & change of party leadership!

      410

      • #
        PeterPetrum

        Graham, I fear that you are quite correct. I have no confidence in the Libs under current leadership. The talk of carbon capture, when CO2 levels depend entirely on Henry’s Law and the balance with the huge repository of CO2 in the oceans, makes me despair at the scientific ignorance of our MPs.

        330

    • #
      RickWill

      Are you being pragmatic or principled?

      Until there is a dramatic shift, Australia is doomed. I can only see One Nation changing the course.

      Primarily the radical left governments we have had since Abbott encourage leeching. It is like reverse taxation. They take from the poor to give to the less poor while paying themselves big salaries. So you end up with a population of leeches.

      Malcolm Turnbull is probably the #1 leach in Australia. I am nowhere near his level but I have not said no to any of the handouts from any of the programs on offer – solar panels, insulation, globes, heat pumps, air conditioners, batteries etc. All these have lowered my cost of living.

      The programs have opened a lot of opportunity for small businesses as well.

      With regard big government, my youngest son is a partner in a physio practice and they are doing good business, which includes government compensation patients. They have become a recognised local provider in that area. This son takes the pragmatic perspective that he is doing better than maybe 80% of the population and a lot of people will be in difficult times ahead of him. A bit like when the bear is chasing, you only need to be faster than the slowest.

      Obviously I do not know your circumstances but it pays to look forward with a pragmatic perspective rather than hoping a change of government will make things better.

      The best you can do for Australia now is vote One Nation while making the most of your circumstances. One Nation are the only mob not supporting apartheid and machete wielding thugs being imported.

      371

      • #
        Stuart Jones

        one nation will never be able to form government, the best they can do is make changes at the edges.

        37

      • #
        Tim Whittle

        I agree re One Nation. Business wise I am diversifying, working 3 different opportunities atm on top of whay my current one does. Takes time…

        91

    • #
      Johnny Rotten

      Cheer up mate. You could be in ‘Pomgolia’ where I came am from.

      This is still a Great Country but currently being run into the ground by 3rd rate ‘Pollies’.

      This is a Continent and it will survive.

      Maybe not us Humans. LOL

      140

    • #
      Rusty of Qld

      According to the earning rates of my good old super fund the land of Oz, you know over the rainbow, Ozzie shares on 21.10.2025 were 7.85% on 17.11.2025 2.84% thank God were in good hands. Do I need to put in Sarc? I just wish I knew when the collapse is going to hit, for as sure as God made little green apples, it’s going to hit.
      Rusty not Rusrt

      160

      • #
        Asp

        Forget about your ‘good old super fund’. One of the many liabilities out there, which the UniParty does not want to discuss, is the lavish pension plan for our millions of Labor voting ‘public servants’. Once these needs have been met, you may be left with a crumb or two, if you are lucky.

        170

      • #
        Stuart Jones

        most super funds are in deep in renewables, the foreign investors took the subsidies offshore then sold the lame infrastructure to the super funds, that’s why no PM can stop the renewables scam, if they did about 10 million Ausie
        workers will lose most of their super.

        120

      • #
        yarpos

        Is all this rhetorical, for commentary sake? or are you still in shares despite your feelings?

        10

    • #
      Ted1

      Tim, don’t panic until there is no alternative.

      The Liberals lost government. The Nationals didn’t.

      How many Liberals are left? How many would it need change to the Nats to make them the senior partners?

      120

      • #
        Bob Close

        The National should be in coalition with One Nation as their policies are so similar, the Liberals not so much/

        00

    • #
      Hugh

      It’s a toss up for me as to whom I hate more – leftists or gutless tories.

      “The best… ” (ha ha) “… lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.” Yeats, “The Second Coming”.

      30

  • #
    Lawrie

    It doesn’t matter what causes COP31 to go somewhere else so long as it goes. We probably should give the Nationals and one Nation the kudos because they led the charge away from certain oblivion. Albo is the lemming that is furiously backpedaling as the abyss looms closer. Bowen is still pushing despite the brakes going on.

    Not only COP31 having second thoughts but I would suggest there are a few wind and solar proponents having second thoughts about their new investments. Nothing like uncertainty to frighten the horses.

    530

  • #
    David Maddison

    Australia can’t afford to throw away another one or two billion dollars of taxpayer money on this nonsense.

    But any failure to host will not be because politicians understand or care how much money thst is. They are mostly innumerate and don’t know how much one billion represents and don’t care how they spend our hard-earned money either.

    It’s good news if Turkey or Germany take it.

    Why should our taxes be spent for the sole purpose of demonstrating to the world how stupid we are for our fanatical commitment to the anthropogenic global warming scam?

    490

    • #
      Graeme No.3

      I suggest that the best solution is for Bowen to be sent to Germany and organise the next Conference in Bonn. Delayed for a few weeks until winter sets in there.
      Possibly Albo could go as well, but it is hard to get him to stay in one place for any time.

      340

    • #
      Stuart Jones

      I was looking forward to protesting here in Adelaide, shutting down north tce like the lefties do would be fun.

      90

      • #
        Jon Rattin

        Why not? I’ve personally witnessed deranged Leftists attacking police and March For Australia protesters in Melbourne recently. After all that- one arrest for a Brunswick woman who resisted police. She deliberately drove an e-bike into the MFA protest group (injuring an elderly woman) but she was only charged with resisting arrest.

        20

    • #
      Lawrie

      My understanding is that the host country pays for the delegates, their travel, accommodation and meals. No wonder poor countries send many delegates to partake of the hosts largesse. Bludgers all. The 55000 parasites descending on Brazil this week are there for a free feed not to save the world and to ensure they get to go to the next COP. Maybe this one could be the last.

      20

  • #
    Neville

    It’s just a pity that hardly anyone understands that Australia and the entire SH is already a NET ZERO SINK according to the CSIRO.
    Why should we waste another two BILLION $ just because we haven’t got the guts to state the obvious and stand up to their BS and the Labor con merchants and liars.

    450

    • #
      RickWill

      Nothing to boast about.

      My gardens are are thriving and returning the love from my lifelong efforts to release more carbon from the Earth than most have done.

      160

      • #
        Johnny Rotten

        Ploughing carbon into the earth helps with water retention. How about that. Crops and plants grow better.

        Pumping CO2 into a Greenhouse helps with plant growth.

        [SNIP]

        110

      • #
        Geoff Sherrington

        RickWill,
        Wife and I have been serious horticultural hobbyists since the late 1970s, concentrating mostly on camellias and rhododendrons. We are placed to observe changes in growth rates over that 50 years of CO2 change.
        The last week we have had 6 tones of new garden soil delivered because the original mix of builders rubble has become too depleted. Many wheelbarrows of dud and new soil are being moved around.
        Despite this slow change in old soil fertility depletion, we both believe that our camellias have several better growth indications in the last 20 years at our present home. New growth is more abundant and faster in Spring, leaf abundance on the bush is thicker, leaf size is larger, flowers stay presentable for longer. We cannot be sure that this is because of CO2, but it is a good candidate. Geoff S

        220

    • #
      Rusty of Qld

      Hi Nev, ever since 2013 when the Senate inquiry reported that Australia is a Carbon Dioxide sink, I thought “that’s it the scam is over”. However, I failed to understand just how obtuse and/or self-serving the major political parties are and their running dog/enablers the MSM. Its almost like there is some other (sinister) purpose behind this destruction of our society.

      [Pay heed to your email and screen name spellings. Twice I’ve had to correct them. Next time, it stays in the bin. – LVA]

      70

  • #
    Tony Tea

    Labor going cold on COP31 is another ploy to hide Bowen.

    240

  • #
    Johnny Rotten

    And that would have been 2 Billion South Pacific Pesos to rack up on the Australia Inc. Credit Card.

    For current and future Taxpayers to be saddled with.

    LayBore (Marxists in disguise) – They just love spending other people’s money.

    210

  • #
    Neville

    Dr Hansen was correct when he called the Paris COP “a fake, BS and a fraud ” etc.
    Just great to see this summary from Robert Bradley jr and yet the OECD countries have WASTED TRILLIONs of $ on this UN lunacy and all for a guaranteed ZERO return.
    Is there any sense in Australia WASTING trillions of $ more on this scam and destroying thousands of klms of our pristine wilderness areas?

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/11/18/paris-agreement-dead-at-ten-james-hansen-was-right/

    160

    • #
      RickWill

      The only thing he was correct about.

      His radiation cartoon is a crime against physics and he claims to be a physicist.

      His life story is one of following Manabe down the Climate Change™ rabbit hole and digging too deep to extract himself. His legacy will be the infamy of creating the fairy tale that the scam was built on.

      The scam is in its dying days.

      150

      • #
        Ted1

        Hope so.

        There have been other times, but this the last man standing should come down very hard.

        But where to n.ext? They are still shufflin.g leaders.

        Maybe next week we’ll know

        20

  • #
    Ross

    Gets me why this gabfest is held every year?? All part of the pysop to keep the media profile up, I suppose. Thanks again to Donald Trump for calling out the climate hoax. If it wasn’t for Mr Trump, the LNP coalition would be still sitting on the fence.

    350

    • #

      Are you kidding? This is one big holiday for the minions and a junket for the pollies. It’s a reward for service. The NGOs pay for their most loyal workers, the Universities send along some profs, and the BBC and ABC enjoy a two week trip at taxpayers expense. Likewise the “team” in the public service. A highlight of the year.

      Parties in the evening, hobnobbing with the rich and powerful and often celebrities too.

      This year may seem very lame compared to past events.

      270

  • #
    Neville

    Dr Hansen was very annoyed when he called the Paris COP “a fake, BS and a fra-d ” etc.
    Just great to see this summary from Robert Bradley jr and yet the OECD countries have WASTED TRILLIONs of $ on this UN lunacy and all for a guaranteed ZERO return.
    Is there any sense in Australia WASTING trillions of $ more on this scam and destroying thousands of klms of our pristine wilderness areas?

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/11/18/paris-agreement-dead-at-ten-james-hansen-was-right/

    100

  • #
    Honk R Smith

    I hear you have vast nearly unoccupied landscapes, where an unprepared, accustomed to luxury, urban type person could get hopelessly lost or stung or bitten by something poisonous.
    You could host the conference in one of those places.
    I don’t want anything bad to happen.
    I just think if they travel all that way they should be treated to an authentic experience.

    270

  • #
    Tony Dique

    This is what winning looks like. Making the blob do what we say, not the other way around. People need to be made aware of the fact that Net Zero is dead

    140

  • #
    Kalm Keith

    To add to Neville’s start above regarding “the obvious” and “the BS” we can expand on this by confirming that firstly, The True Science denies the role of CO2 as an agent of Man Made Global Warming and second, the topic is covered by extraordinary amounts of “BS” and constant repetition of “Their Truth” throughout the Media.

    One “tell” is the use of the term “greenhouse gas” to imply things about CO2 that are obviously wrong.
    Yes! CO2 is added to greenhouses but if it is added to the greenhouse its purpose is solely to act as plant food and assist growth.
    Maybe all politicians should be made to research and understand the functioning components of Greenhouses!

    160

  • #
    yarpos

    Just Albo being Albo and blowing in the wind.

    60

  • #
    david

    Honk R Smith

    I nominate Eromanga for COP 31.

    Population of less than 90 and the furthest spot from the ocean in Australia.

    No airport and where mulga snakes and western inland taipans, one of the worlds most poisonous snakes, are in every backyard.

    It’s a quiet town where they talk no BS.

    There are opal mines and shafts not far away and this would be an excursion the attendees would never forget.

    Oh and I nearly forgot. There’s oil in the Eromanga basin!

    190

  • #
    Dave B

    Cant happen soon enough.

    These COP’s are just farce and meaningless virtue signalling

    130

    • #
      David of Cooyal in Oz

      I had to stop and pause, and check if I’d posted this and forgotten my own ID.
      Well said.
      Cheers,
      Dave B

      00

  • #
    TdeF

    What is amazing is Net Zero itself. 300 years of development of science, Newton’s Laws of motion for solid objects and equilibrium for liquids and gases and suddenly we have science written by opportunists.

    The presumption that Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere is random, that the atmosphere is a big bucket to which we can add CO2 with engines and remove it by growing trees is just ridiculous. In reality CO2 is in rapid vast equilibrium exchange with the 98% dissolved in the vast oceans which cover the planet.

    Net Zero is what comes from letting politicians tell us they are in charge of CO2 and CO2 in turn is in charge of the weather. Concepts so anti science, so unfounded in established science that they are staggeringly stupid.

    Yes, it would be great to abandon net zero. The big question is who came up with such an absurd idea, that CO2 is controllable by governments who will solve the problem by accountancy, laws and taxes and empires of tax collectors and enforcers. The only things they understand. The UN alone is demanding an annual $45Billion a year CO2 tax on world shipping. And it is not even an elected government with such powers.

    Meanwhile CO2 itself is a near perfect constant within 1% from pole to pole and changing less than 0.4% even on a yearly basis.

    What we need is a huge COP OUT.

    290

    • #
      TdeF

      COP OUT. “To “cop out” means to avoid a responsibility, challenge, or difficult situation, often by making an excuse, backing out of a commitment, or quitting, usually due to fear or laziness.

      It’s more face saving than admitting it is all idiotic nonsense. Humans do not and cannot control atmospheric CO2.

      160

    • #
      Johnny Rotten

      I like the real COPS. Hey mate, you are nicked. In the Slammer yer’ go.

      Or, as in Hawaii Five O. “Book em’ Danno”. LOL.

      30

    • #
      Boambee John

      It was Malcolm Turnbull who said words to the effect that “The laws of mathematics are all very well, but the laws of Australia take precedence.”

      He would probably feel the same about the laws of physics!

      90

      • #
        David Maddison

        The scientific ignorance (and ignorance in all areas) of our politicians is frightening.

        https://www.brookings.edu/articles/no-the-laws-of-australia-dont-override-the-laws-of-mathematics/

        When a reporter asked Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, “Won’t the laws of mathematics trump the laws of Australia?,” Mr. Turnbull reportedly responded “Well the laws of Australia prevail in Australia, I can assure you of that. The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.”

        Actually, the laws of mathematics, including the mathematical framework that enables strong cryptography, apply in Australia and in every other country. The laws of mathematics can’t be undone by wishing they didn’t exist, or by legislating them away.

        The laws of mathematics, including the mathematical framework that enables strong cryptography, apply in Australia and in every other country.

        60

        • #
          Johnny Rotten

          What a Drop Kick. The Laws of Thermodynamics rule over every Energy System.

          Turn Bull the Eastern Suburbs Waffler is a jumped up Lawyer with NFI.

          He should use his wealth to put his money where his mouth is and support Snowy 2.0

          He would be broke in two nano seconds.

          80

  • #
    Graeme4

    Article in today’s The Australian by Bjorn Lomborg points out that these gabfests have achieved nothing. The global decarbonisation rate has remained the same since the 1960s with no change after the 2015 Paris Agreement; and the EU and the U.S. spent US$700bn in 2024 on green investments but CO2 emissions continued to rise. Based on the IPCC’s own climate models, the temperature will only rise by 0.1C at the end of the next century. He advises that the rich western countries only contribute 13% of CO2 emissions.

    140

    • #
      TdeF

      It’s an amazing switch, from total CO2 to CO2 emissions. No one has ever proven they are the same thing. The closest attempt is to show they have both risen, one by 50% and the other by 3500% and argue from coincidence.

      60

      • #
        Graeme No.3

        The whole theory is based on a claim by Svante Arrhenius that CO2 would cause warming; much opposed by Planck, Einstein and Boltzmann etc. at the time.
        It was resurrected in the 1930’s and the 1960’s but buried again by colder times. It has been resurrected again to explain the recent warming (since 1980).
        It seems that Arrhenius didn’t believe in the Beer-Lambert Law. As far as I know Beer (for solutions) was in 1852 and Lambert sometime before the French revolution** (for gases) has ever been cancelled.
        ** First French Revolution, not those in the 1800’s nor those in the 1900’s and soon?

        60

        • #
          TdeF

          CO2 does cause warming. But the effect is saturated, but that is not the point at all. Arrhenius is irrelevant. The sole point is whether the 50% increase in total atmospheric CO2 is man made. It categorically is not.

          What slow slight increase there is only a short term 50% very slow increase, a drift in the equilibrium point. Atmospheric CO2 goes up and down with ocean temperature, as you would expect. Humans have almost zero effect on atmospheric CO2.

          Which is why the furphy of ’emissions’ playing on the utterly subjective idea that (all powerful) humans can change the amount of a specific gas in the atmosphere without any proof whatsoever. It’s nonsense.

          60

          • #
            Petet C

            CO2 does cause warming. But the effect is saturated,

            That is just as well.
            You have explained to us many times that increased CO2 is the result of global warming, not the cause.
            If CO2 did cause warming there would the risk of a vicious cycle. A positive feed back loop where warming causes more CO2 and more CO2 causes more warming!

            30

            • #
              TdeF

              Yes, sorry about the repetition. But it’s like a logic soup looping back to this irrational net zero concept which has no basis in science.

              It feeds on a public presumption that if you output CO2 from your car, atmospheric CO2 goes up permanently. Momentarily and locally it does. In a room it can go from 420ppm to 1200ppm very quickly. But open a window.

              On a planetary scale humans are irrelevant. I have taken enough trips at 37,000 feet for thousands of hours to know that the world is almost empty of human life. And cars do not exist without people. CO2 and O2 levels are not set by us. Nor water vapour in the air, the third biggest gas. But for some reason people are prepared to believe CO2 from fossil fuels hangs around indefinitely and does not disappear into the oceans, which is the whole truth.

              Equilibrium is all around us. Prey/predator. Fish in in a lake. Gases in the air and water. The balance is restored almost immediately with CO2. And China is the same as the North Pole or South pole. It’s just so obvious and yet we are told emissions matter.

              Consider fish breathing like all life on earth. Where do they get the oxygen? What process means they have any oxygen. Who decides how much is in the water? Who decides how much Co2 is in the water or the air? not humans.

              70

            • #

              Nature doesn’t favour positive feedback loops.
              On balance it’s a cautious checking system.

              10

    • #
      David Maddison

      For all these trillions of dollars invested in fighting a natural rise in CO2, mainly in the form of a massive wealth transfer from the poor to rich Leftist Elites, can someone please point out on the CO2 vs time graph what the effect has been?

      70

      • #
        TdeF

        Precisely. Or even the effect of massive bushfires in Australia or Indonesia or Brazil or California or volcanoes or the worldwide lockdown in 2020 of most cars in most countries and most planes and buses. No effect on CO2! So what point electric cars? CO2 is as close to a flat near horizontal straight line as you could get. And exponential growth of CO2 emissions has not been reflected in total CO2. 3500% increase in emissions in 100 years and 40% increase in CO2.

        The connection between ’emissions’ and CO2 has never been established. It just doesn’t add up.

        50

  • #
    el+gordo

    This is a follow up story from Gosselin and he is on the right track, CO2 ice core data should be discredited.

    https://notrickszone.com/2025/11/16/new-study-suggests-ice-cores-are-wrong-co2-levels-were-high-in-early-holocene/

    31

  • #
    Johnny Rotten

    The Climate Alarmists, Blob, Deep State and LayBore in Australia are not good at playing cards. They are now being well and truly Trumped Big Time.

    Such Fun to sit back and watch the House of Cards fall.

    Merry Christmas to one and All and for a very Happy New Year.

    Early Daze I know but the writing is on the Wall.

    There is a Tsunami of Reality heading their way and they are now like a poor Deer in the headlights. Oh Dear.

    120

  • #
    Simon

    New paper out this week, heatwaves are systematically hotter, longer and more frequent the longer net zero is delayed:
    https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2752-5295/ae0ea4/meta
    There is no Plan B nor a Planet B.

    119

    • #
      Neville

      Lennia Luekin’s short summary on the saturation of co2 in our atmosphere is only 2 + minutes and the graph at about 1 minute 25 seconds is easy to understand as the co2 level increases.
      The first 20 ppm does most of the warming and then a quick downward warming trend until it flatlines today.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV2KozyIusg

      90

    • #
      TdeF

      Fossil fuel emissions, the basis of the fantasy net zero, are tiny and irrelevant in terms of total CO2. Prove otherwise or go away.

      100

    • #
      Johnny Rotten

      Ha ha ha. You can read a Paper? The Sydney Moaning Herald? Bog Paper?

      Use it for a fish and chip wrapper. And the fish and chips are cooked in oil and using gas for cooking.

      A Bird Chopper Wind Turbine or Solar DC panel won’t do it

      Keep going simon going to the Fair. You might find a pie.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Simon_(nursery_rhyme)

      100

      • #
        Johnny Rotten

        The nursery rhyme is about a foolish or naive boy named Simon who doesn’t understand basic common sense situations.

        In the rhyme, Simon tries to interact with various people, like asking a pieman (a man selling pies) for a pie without having any money, or doing other silly things that show his lack of understanding.

        The rhyme is meant to be humorous, showing Simon’s simplicity and childish foolishness.

        Fits you like a glove Simon.

        101

    • #
      yarpos

      Oh dear, the emotive “there is no planet B”

      Things must be desperate. Consider my heartstrings tugged.

      80

    • #
      David Maddison

      There is no Plan B nor a Planet B.

      I’m sure Mr Musk would be quite happy to take you to Mars.

      71

  • #
    Neville

    Here’s an audio of the Bolt report last night and at about 1 minute 35 seconds Andrew Bolt reveals that 495 Aussie loafers are attending with the BO Bowen loony.
    What a disgusting joke and definitely no change to our climate or weather but many more millions of $ WASTED and for a ZERO return.

    https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/the-bolt-report/id1107866169

    130

    • #
      Dennis

      Andrew Bolt also selected some of the delegates and what organisation they represent, so many obviously on a junket, a holiday to Brazil at the expense of taxpayers/ratepayers.

      80

  • #
    Dennis

    New bumper sticker;

    COP OUT

    60

  • #
    Neville

    Climate Realism checks out Prince William’s silly speech at COP 30 and they’re not impressed.
    In fact not much better than his silly Dad.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVS23–kXfc&t=11s

    50

  • #
    Dennis

    COP and Net Zero Politics

    Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.

    At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

    “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.

    Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

    The only economic model in the last 150 years that has ever worked at all is capitalism. The evidence is prima facie: From a feudal order that lasted a thousand years, produced zero growth and kept workdays long and lifespans short, the countries that have embraced free-market capitalism have enjoyed a system in which output has increased 70-fold, work days have been halved and lifespans doubled.

    Figueres is perhaps the perfect person for the job of transforming “the economic development model” because she’s really never seen it work. “If you look at Ms. Figueres’ Wikipedia page,” notes Cato economist Dan Mitchell: Making the world look at their right hand while they choke developed economies with their left.

    60

    • #
      Johnny Rotten

      The Market Economy works.

      Socialism, Marxism, Communism or any other “ism” never made a mobile phone, computer or a Saturn Rocket. It never made the Steam Engine/Train or the Car. Or Medicines.

      All they could do is destroy and kill millions and millions of innocents.

      And they are still at it.

      Time to stop them.

      50

  • #
    TdeF

    Perhaps we should have net zero for H2O as well?

    After all combustion produces as much H2O as CO2. And the H2O will build up in the atmosphere and we will all find it hard to breathe in super high humidity which lasts forever. Or conversely it falls as rain and the sea levels will rise until we drown in our beds.

    Do people believe this? Of course not. They know that no matter how much it rains, there is equilibrium. But they argue fossil fuel CO2 is huge, billions of tons.

    Except that even at current record emission levels, all the exhausts in all the world add only 1% of CO2 to the air and it goes straight into the ocean. As the amount of CO2 already in the ocean is 50x as much as the air, the annual contribution to total CO2 is only 0.02%. This scare that we are changing the amount of CO2 in the air has been disproven by radio carbon dating since 1958. The air is not old enough!

    It is unbelievable that innumerate college footballer Al Gore has fooled a planet load of people for 37 years. And that the entire scientific community says nothing, except those retired.

    70

  • #

    Look at the picture at the start. Confiscate their wealth, and you’d pay off all of Australia’s National debt.
    Then Labor could go on another spending spree with a fresh Bankcard.

    50

  • #
    Tony Tea

    Labor has officially pulled the pin. Their polling must have been a worry.

    40

  • #
    yarpos

    I wonder what this line buried in the quoted story means in Albos fevered mind?

    “but says he wants to salvage some benefits for Pacific Island countries.”

    What beneits are at risk in the Turkey vs Australia choice? Does he just spew out words trying to sound important or relevant? God he is tiresome.

    40

  • #
    neil

    The most hilarious part is the claim that they are saving face because Chris Bowen will be “setting the agenda”. That embarrassing intellectual minnow couldn’t set the agenda for a two year olds birthday party.

    Why do I have a different emoji/icon after 15 years?

    30