JoNova

A science presenter, writer, speaker & former TV host; author of The Skeptic's Handbook (over 200,000 copies distributed & available in 15 languages).


Handbooks


Advertising


Australian Speakers Agency



GoldNerds

The nerds have the numbers on precious metals investments on the ASX



The Skeptics Handbook

Think it has been debunked? See here.

The Skeptics Handbook II

Climate Money Paper



Archives

Men worse for climate change than women (so if enough transition, will that stop the floods?)

Men cause all the bad things (except for this study which mostly written by women):

Men Are Worse for Climate Change Than Women Because They Love Meat and Cars

By Anya Zoledziowski, Vice

Men emit 16 percent more greenhouse gases than women because they tend to spend more money on fuel and eat more meat, among other things, a new study has found.

Men Are Worse for Climate Change Than Women Because They Love Meat and Cars

It’s just another man-hating, high-fashion opinion article with a peer reviewed badge and some meaningless data.

With similar reasoning I might as well write: “Women are bad for climate change because they live longer and love hair dryers.” We all know women like to turn up the heater too. And they have babies, that’s got to be bad.

But men, clearly, were the target du jour, and the “experiment” such as it wasn’t, was to compare spending of single men and single women, as if we could get finer control of atmospheric systems by getting boys to drive less, eat more indoor lettuce (that’s a thing) and get their furnishings secondhand off Gumtree.

I’m sure men eat more meat than women but they also have bigger bodies, more lean mass and need more protein, and it seems a tad unfair to expect them to adopt a female-body-composition in the quest to cool the world. (But it’s probably a transphobic sin to ask the question.)  A search of the paper turned up zero instances of the term “lean mass” or “body composition”. Nutrition was not something that had occurred to researchers. If men would just eat more soy, they argued, we’d be that much closer to controlling global temperatures.

There was also no mention of lifespan, but there were three mentions of “soy”.

It all came back to spending habits – This was the kind of study you’d expect if an accountant was cross-bred with a social scientist and given a grant to solve climate change:

“These expenditures are as you would expect in a gender stereotype: Women spend more money on health care, furnishings, buy more food, clothes. Men spend more money on eating out, alcohol and tobacco, and more money on cars and fuels,” said the study’s lead author, Annika Carlsson Kanyama, with the research company Ecoloop in Sweden.
“If men spent money the same way as women, their emissions would be similar but they are not,” Carlsson Kanyama said.

Essentially, the preordained lesson in weather control was that men need to eat less meat, more plant protein and stay at home and grow lettuce in the backyard:

Meat and dairy have “much higher emissions than all their replacements,” including tofu, soy and oat milk, and vegetables, the study says, while travel by train or “staycations” offer alternatives to air and car travel. Pork, for example, is five times more polluting than tofu, while lamb is a whopping 25 times more polluting than tofu.

Holidays were the biggest source of emissions, so the researcher-activists were advocating staycations to stop the storms:

As can be seen, the lowest emissions come from staycations and a package tour by train in Sweden. The staycation category includes activities such as concerts and massage, and the package tour by train in Sweden includes train and hotel accommodation. In Sweden, trains run on electricity and the state-owned rail company (SJ) buys only electricity generated from renewable sources for their trains (SJ, 2017, p. 11). The package tour abroad by train is assumed to go to Italy and include six nights.

Men use cars more than women: (They needed a study to show that?)

“Gender is one of many factors to take into account when talking about how we can reduce emissions,” Carlsson Kanyama said. “Lowering car use, for example. Men use cars more than women, so maybe policies should target men.”

But what if single men are driving cars to pick up single women?  There goes that accounting. There goes that policy…

The only thing this study shows is how human knowledge would be advanced if governments stopped funding science. The entire cause-and-effect chain from single-men-buying-petrol being a forcing on storm-surges-in-the-baltic-sea needs industrial size grants to keep it from collapsing on its own absurdity.

It takes a lot of money to create this much stupid.

h/t Climate Depot

Anya Zoledziowski (the author of the news article, not the study) can be reached on twitter: @anyazoledz She refers to herself as a social justice reporter and ‘hipster f*ck’.

REFERENCE (really)
Kanyama et al (2021) Shifting expenditure on food, holidays, and furnishings could lower greenhouse gas emissions by almost 40%, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Wiley, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13176

 

9.6 out of 10 based on 70 ratings

221 comments to Men worse for climate change than women (so if enough transition, will that stop the floods?)

  • #
    John R Smith

    Women are worse for climate change because they produce more HUMANS.
    There, fixed it.

    200

  • #
    clarence.t

    And all those cosmetics.. what is used to produce them .

    Although some men are now using them nearly as much, in their efforts to become women, and thus produce less CO2.

    Its all so confusing ! 😉

    240

    • #
      Klem

      Women are the primary drivers of the environmental movement, yet they are the primary consumers in our society. It’s all so confusing!

      70

    • #
      John

      – Where are the raw materials and the end products transported from?
      – How much energy is used in their manufacture?

      And in the above I don’t simply mean the product itself but also the packaging. Have you never noticed the huge variety in the shapes and colours of the bottles?

      80

      • #
        Lawrie

        You find a $200 bottle of perfume in a 50ml bottle contained in a one litre box complete with fancy wrap that probably cost more to produce than the 50 ml of cat urine in the very expensive bottle.

        80

    • #
      ghl

      Just as the West offloads it’s carbon footprint to China, women outsource theirs to men. It was ever thus.

      120

  • #
    DevonshireDozer

    “This was the kind of study you’d expect if an accountant was cross-bred with a social scientist and given a grant to solve climate change”

    Absolutely brilliant.

    I’m coming round to the view that the difference between a conspiracy theory & the truth is, indeed, about 6 months. By the same token . . . they’re ahead of you.

    DevonshireDozer

    30

  • #
    Kevin T Kilty

    Richard Feynman in his “Lectures on Physics” explained that if you decide to begin an intellectual argue at some point, and fail to take it to its logical conclusion you can “prove” anything. It was meant to illustrate how so many classical explanations of quantum mechanical systems are false, but it is wisdom pertaining to a much wider field of topics.

    160

  • #
    Wixy

    I believe the person responsible for this is called Miss Andry! As opposed to the other lass Miss Ogyny.

    180

  • #
    GD

    Just when you think we’ve reached peak stupid.

    Unbelievably, all of this rubbish is based on the erroneous idea that mankind’s emissions of CO2 are harming, warming, and destroying the planet.

    Now that is peak stupid.

    400

    • #
      Phillip Bratby

      It says “Men emit 16 percent more greenhouse gases than women”. Since the most important greenhouse gas is water vapour, we men had better stop drinking and sweating.

      30

    • #
      David Wojick

      It is the things they are now going to do to try to stop climate change that will take us to peak stupid.

      321

      • #
        clarence.t

        And beyond !!

        120

      • #
        PeterS

        It’s just one “peak stupid” when they milked the CAGW scam for all its worth. There will be other scams to come, even much bigger ones. The only way to avoid reaching the ultimate “peak” is to get rid of these stupid people once and for all. Otherwise, we loose and they win in the end. It’s either us or them. At the moment it’s them and they are winning hands down.

        50

        • #
          ghl

          ” milked ”
          PeterS, it is a long con, they are currently milking with a professionally developed mil-spec industrial quality Hypermilking juggernaught. Present tense. I hope we are at peak milk, as temperatures aren’t so scary now.Cheap money to build with, and friendly super funds will extend the damage for generations.
          The major blame should be on Governments who never audit or investigate.

          70

          • #
            PeterS

            Who elects “our” governments? Stupid is as stupid does.

            30

          • #
            Kalm Keith

            “The major blame should be on Governments who never audit or investigate.”

            That’s the core of it.

            One thing that needs investigating is the movement of $444 million dollars from treasury to the Great Big Barrier Reef Foundation.

            I’m aware that our current PM authorised it but how can it be justified by any down to earth criteria?

            Dodgy isn’t half of it.

            00

      • #
        tom0mason

        And again it’s the left’s ‘divide and conquer’ strategy.

        80

        • #
          PeterS

          That’s the plan all along from day 1. The trouble is it’s working. Soon it will be relatives fighting each other over climate change, vaccinations and whatever else they come up with.

          40

          • #
            sophocles

            What? Haven’t you noticed all that yet?

            I’m regarded as the idiot in my family because:
            – I don’t believe CO2 causes Global Warming
            – I don’t consider 3%-4% of emissions is enough to cause Climate Change
            – I’m not going to get vaccinated have a clotting agent/experimental medication injected.
            – I regard EVs as a waste of time effort and, especially, resources
            – I regard cholecalciferol as an effective covid protection

            Global Warming is caused by the Sun. It’s the increase in atmospheric Water Vapour (what’s causing all these floods now temperatures are starting to fall)
            It’s not from CO2. Water vapour is the only atmospheric gas which carries its heat of evaporation into the air with it. Vitamin D 3 (cholecalciferol) is still all over the Med Pre-prints. EVs are pathetic, especially in Winter – I keep my batteries in the bottom of my fridge (at a constant 4 ° C to prolong their lives. I’ve got ones 10 years old in there and they still perform as new when I take ’em out and warm ’em up for use.
            .

            50

    • #
      PeterS

      I will never reach peak stupid until we get rid of these people. Otherwise, they will come up with even more stupid ideas and policies. At some stage it will be too late to do anything about it and then we are all “cooked”. Balance therefore must be restored ASAP. We can start by defunding the ABC.

      110

    • #
      John

      I’m sure we’re nowhere near reaching peak stupidity.

      Just when you think we’ve hit the bottom of the barrel someone breaks through it and starts on the barrel beneath.

      90

    • #
      John R Smith

      To paraphrase a line from the great WWII film ‘Stalag 17″ …
      “the progressives are dumb, but they ain’t stupid.”
      This stuff is like bombarding the population with propaganda leaflets so they don’t know which end is up.
      Can you defend against psychological warfare with facts and reason?
      Stupid becomes a strategic weapon.

      100

      • #
        clarence.t

        “Can you defend against psychological warfare with facts and reason?”

        You can defend your own mind if you have will-power and the ability to think for yourself…

        … but the general populace… not so much

        20

        • #

          John,
          Stupid becomes a strategic weapon.

          And thus the great vulnerability is its own ludicrous absurdity. It is ripe for the mocking, and even the children can see how daft it is…

          40

          • #
            ColA

            Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities!

            Voltaire

            20

          • #
            John R Smith

            Jo, as for me, my primary mode of communication is sarcasm, and I’m having trouble keeping up.
            But we live in truly strange times.
            Don’t know if you’re aware of John Stewart’s appearance on the Steve Colbert show …
            “Oh wait, there’s an outbreak of chocolate goodness in Hershey Pennsylvania, it couldn’t possibly have originated in the Hershey Chocolate Factory.”
            This observation required little talent, yet it landed like a nuke, and it was something that only John Stewart was allowed to say.
            I think mockery and sarcasm. even humor, are artifacts of free societies, and these are under great threat in both our countries.
            We are seeing a western version of the Red Guard and the Khmer Rouge manifest in the writer of this article.
            Stupid can go from strategic to genocidal.

            10

        • #
          Ronin

          You shouldn’t argue with a stupid person, they will just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

          50

  • #
    OriginalSteve

    You just cant make up stuff this stupid…..

    Haw haw!!

    Idiots.

    110

    • #
      PeterS

      Indeed. However, they are making this stuff up and they will continue to do so until they are stopped. Our governments won’t stop them so who will? If not stopped they will continue to come up with even more stupid ideas and some if not all will morph into government policies, such as what has already happened with the CAGW scam morphing into emission reduction policies. Welcome to the real world, not the pretend world that a few even here hold to so dearly.

      80

      • #
        OriginalSteve

        I take solace in the fact that those of us who “know stuff” about how things work ( power plants, vehicles, growing food, fixing stuff ) will likely survive whats coming much better than the weenie greenies and thier PC mates.

        The fact the globalists are learning to thrown spears and own deep underground bunkers tells you they are prepared to collapse the global system and create wars, to cover thier wicked acts.

        50

        • #
          PeterS

          Yes, for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear the writing is on the wall. Globalists are unelected evil powerhouse drivers who are currently using our mindless governments who in turn are elected mostly by gullible voters who can’t even decide who to vote for while standing in a queue at the ballot box when the obvious move to make is not to vote for either major party. What’s the definition of insanity again? Any who thinks that voting for one or the other major party will make a difference really needs to stop what they are doing and open their eyes for once. But of course they won’t so we all have to learn the lesson the hard way, sadly.

          50

    • #
      Annie

      But they just did!

      20

  • #
    Sambar

    “Meat and dairy have “much higher emissions than all their replacements,” including tofu, soy and oat milk, and vegetables, the study says, while travel by train or “staycations” offer alternatives to air and car travel. Pork, for example, is five times more polluting than tofu, while lamb is a whopping 25 times more polluting than tofu.”

    Love these kinds of statement, don’t know how comparison “emissions” are calculated, but in terms of what is good for the planet grazing animals wins over broad acre farming every time. Mates of mine that raise cattle and sheep have properties that are quite diverse. Tree cover, shelter belts, patches of scrub etc. These properties also have other wild life ranging from large native and introduced animals and birds down the scale to the little stuff, native mice etc. Now on the other hand broad acre farming sees every other living thing as the enemy. Anything that eats the crop at every stage needs to be controlledr. Large animals are endlessly moved on, one way or another. Seed eating birds, burrowing animals herbavoires of any kind frowned upon. While grazing animals may compact soils broad acre farming, even “no till” very heavilly reduces opportunities for any other non required species to survive. Nothing is as sterile as a wheat or soy field. So as the move to a plant based diet rolls on, the very ‘saving’ of wild life is compromised by the law of unintended consequences.

    441

    • #
      clarence.t

      Nicely put ! 🙂

      120

    • #
      Saighdear

      So where does the tofu, soy & Oatmilk come from? we can’t burn oil to pull the plow to save the corn FROM the Horse, we can’t use Oxen to pull the plow in place of the horse: they Faert too much, so where does that leave us? Put the Wife n Bairns into harness? Yes, by all accounts, that is EXACTLY what a lot of these daft fowk get up to. Leathers and chains, and studs n patterns…
      Our traditional Farm has Black ( A-A ) Cattle for Beef, The dairy has Shades of Brown Coos ( Ayrshire & a few Jersey./Guernsey for fun) whilst the sheep are all White ( NC Cheviot) – some Black Faces as specimens with the Highlanders for their Horns to attract the Towrists. but we use non-electronically controlled Machines to reduce our costs of maintenance. No we are not Luddites, just doing fine with High GMs per acre and reduced Capital costs. You want cheap healthy food, come to us! ( not an Advert, more a Principle of Life-Style ) ….

      130

      • #
        Maptram

        And where is the tofu, soy and oatmilk going to be grown when most suitable land will need to be covered in solar panels, windmills and batteries (some working, some in various stages of decay) in order to produce all the “carbon free” electricity that’s going to stop climate change

        60

      • #
        Annie

        It sounds great Saighdear!
        We are much smaller; what Aussies call a ‘hobby farm’! We have an amazing variety of wildlife here. Some, such as wombats and sulphur-crested cockatoos, possums and bowerbirds, European wasps, flies and jumping-jack ants can be a darned nuisance. Most of the time, we have a small number of Black Angus steers (have had cows/calves in the past), though the last lot were Charollais. We have some Dorper crosses to mow and manure (and, theoretically, to supply meat! Still no room in the freezer yet). No shortage of wild life anyway; loads of worms, bees, etc. There was hardly a worm to be seen when we bought the place and now it’s alive with them; also dung beetles.
        As to meat consumption, I eat plenty, possibly more than my husband (yes, I do have a husband, emphatically NOT ‘partner’ and I am a ‘Mrs’; mail addressed to ‘Ms’ gets sent back to the originator with a request to address it properly, thank you!).

        130

        • #
          TedM

          Just love sulphur crested cockatoos.

          20

          • #
            Chris

            We have Carnabys’ black with white tails and white ear muffs ( if they had external ears). All cockatoos are little buggers , they can rip off your electrical wiring , the guttering on your house and the trim on your windows . They can tear your shade house to bits, they throw honkey nuts ( gum nuts ) at you and tip prune all your trees wether they need it or not. Their beaks are so strong they can crack and eat a macadamia whereas I need to smash them with a brick. They are highly intelligent and I think have a sense of humour – they always find hassling the dog fun.
            Their screech can waken the dead.
            You can’t help but love them to bits.

            30

            • #
              Annie

              We have Black Cockatoos too; they love hakea ‘nuts’ and pine nuts; lovely birds and their sound is much gentler than their sulphur-crested brethren and they don’t come and wreck our fruit tree crops. The SC mob come in huge numbers and the racket is unbelievable; as bad as the fruit bats at dusk along the Noosa River! Or worse.

              00

          • #
        • #
          Ronin

          Good on you Annie.

          10

        • #
          Saighdear

          Oh I know : ‘sounds great’ , Annie, but reality sets in – whe have the buggers too: Pigeons and pidgeons, Craws, Possums? No – because our soil has Cu & Pb deficiency, there’s a preponderance of rabbits. And then because of the wet spells there’s the slugs -up in the Pear trees ( 10ft up young trees – never producing fruit after flowering! ) some wopses, and then there’s the Highland Midgie + biting mosquitoes and Horseflies – Oh and see this – anyone know? https://www.whatsthatbug.com/2016/06/30/male-dark-giant-horse-fly-uk/#comment-2328511 What a colorful world we live in: Enjoy! – It’s the only world we have.

          30

          • #
            Annie

            Oh dear! Yes, plenty of great and obnoxious wild life here and in the UK. While we were living in Gloucestershire we had an endless battle with squirrels, pigeons, pheasants, slugs and snails (the latter here too) and all the bugs and fungi around. I think it is part of life, this battle to grow and store food against heavy odds! Managed to store some Cox’s Orange Pippin that we are still eating and we have citrus fruit though some (especially the limes) has been frosted.
            I laughed wryly at the remembrance of Scottish midges; nightmare creatures. We caravanned by Loch Long many moons ago with all our children (40+ years ago…good grief, so long ago) and sailed on the loch in our little Mirror dinghy when it was windy and fished for mackerel when it was still; we learned to gut the fish out on the loch to cut down exposure to what our Scottish friends called Scottish Nationalist Midges who didn’t like the English! I was sailing once, making rapidly for landfall before a squall hit; too late but somehow made it without disaster!

            10

          • #
            Annie

            Just looked at the horsefly link, horrid creature. I had a nasty bite from one at my school sports day in Reading…
            We get large flies here over summer, known as March flies, though some say they are Marsh flies. Painful bite though ok afterwards. They used to drive our German Shepherd dog mad in Marysville and drove me mad trying to stop and enjoy the views while walking at Lake Mountain. You couldn’t stand still enough for long enough! Horrid things.

            10

    • #
      Chris

      Millions of birds and animals are shot and poisoned every year globally to protect crops such as soy and almonds. That’s an awful lot of high quality protein gone to waste. What really rattles my cage is being told that someone drinks soy or almond milk lattes to protect the animals.

      141

      • #
        Sambar

        And of course the use of the word “MILK” to make it sound like something it is actually not. (like plant based burgers or steak) is also interesting. Milk by definition is the fluid produced by female mammals to support their young. I just looked at the milk bottle and it DOES NOT have an ingredients list . The label simply states “contains Milk” Now read the ingredients list for ALL non milk white beverages. The first is generally “water” followed by various things like flavours, sweeteners, emulsifiers, food colour etc. The actual selling point i.e. almond milk contains a tiny portion of almonds, just to expensive for more than a few %. Why is the term “MILK” allowed to be used when in fact what is being bought is “MILK SUBSTITUTE”. White paint looks like milk yet is called paint. A look at what makes white paint white and milk sustitute white might reveal the product of mineral sands mining, titanium dioxide.

        110

        • #
          Liberator

          If you read the FSANZ food standards code, milk is cleanly defined as the secretion from a mammary gland. So in reality all these cos making plant milk are in breach of the Food Standards by calling it milk and yet nothing is done.

          60

          • #
            Bill Burrows

            This argument was analogously raised in Qld courts in the 1950s. Arnotts were sued for marketing Milk Arrowroot biscuits with the complainant stating there was no ‘milk’ in the product. Arnotts agreed but said they were only prepared to change their marketing if the complainant could prove their were substances originating in dogs to be found in ‘dog biscuits’. Case dismissed.

            50

    • #
      OriginalSteve

      Yeah the N W O plan is to force everyone to bow to their pagan, earth-worshipping religion, and force people onto a vegie diet….

      50

      • #
        PeterS

        Not to mention to be forced to have vaccinations. I wonder if we will ever return back to the times when babies are sacrificed to the gods. We already murder millions of them every year so what’s the difference?

        40

        • #
          Chris

          Its happened Peter! Today in ‘The Australian’. Coronavirus Pregnant women deemed a priority group for Pfizer.

          A joint statement from ‘The Australian Technical Advisory Group and Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ ” Pregnant women should be routinely offered Pfizer.”

          00

  • #
    WokeBuster

    Hence forth, I’m going to insist my wife fill up the car from now on. I don’t care how cold it is outside.

    200

    • #
      Annie

      I quite often do the car fill; it depends on who is driving when the fuel-level drops enough. Also do the 10lt container fill for the mowers, etc.

      30

  • #
    Dave in the States

    It takes a lot of money to create this much stupid.

    You need to trademark that Gem!

    180

  • #
    Contemptible Blackguard

    Yeah but I fart more when I eat Tofu and the explosions can be heard from far away!

    80

  • #
    TimiBoy

    She missed the “wit” at the end of “hipster f*ck.”

    101

  • #
    Raving

    Men cause all the bad things (except for this study which mostly written by women):

    Uh huh

    Fashion accounts for around 10% of greenhouse gas emissions from human activity

    60

  • #
    Pteratestis

    This proves that the biggest crime perpetrated on knowledge is classifying ‘Social Science’ and ‘Climate Science’ as a Science.
    They are nothing more than religious sect’s !

    20

  • #
    Raving

    The staycation category includes activities such as concerts and massage

    Yes some interesting possibilities there

    40

  • #
    Robber

    Has April Fool’s Day come around again already?

    40

  • #
    el gordo

    ‘Men spend more money on eating out ….’

    Its a lie.

    40

    • #
      PeterS

      Well with the way things are going with the draconian lockdowns hardly anyone will be eating out for some time, not until the case numbers are back to zero and nearly everyone is vaccinated, which clearly will be never. We shall see what other plans they come up with once they realise they can’t reach those goals. Perhaps they will start vaccinating us to eat less meat. That would be the next logical step given some scientists are calling for a cut in meat consumption to reduce the risk of new viruses and that vaccine passports would be a good way to make it so.

      30

  • #
    TdeF

    Only 16%? I would have thought 100%. Men are much bigger, more muscle mass, higher metabolism and eat perhaps twice as much and die younger which is something everyone knows, but only a ‘study’ could come up with a mere 16%.

    And all living things are made from carbon dioxide and water and generate CO2. Almost all are carbon lifeforms. Solar energy powers the entire living world through hydrated carbon dioxide, known as carbohydrates, the combination of solar energy, carbon dioxide and water through photosynthesis. If CO2 is a problem, life on earth is the real problem. Get rid of all living things and save the planet, but for whom?

    Now if the world was only populated by small vegetarian lesbian Asian women, it would be a far better place, apparently. But the competition for clothes and handbags and shoes would lead to WWIII. Which would be fought with handbags.

    190

    • #
      TdeF

      I have read that there are some lifeforms near deep volcanic vents in the Marianas trench which use a sulphur cycle, but as they said on Startrek, that’s not life as we know it, Jim.

      20

      • #
        TdeF

        And how many people believe that a 50 tonne tree is made from CO2? Or us? Or that the energy for our brains and muscles comes entirely from combustion, generating CO2? Have we become a world of ignorant self haters? Possibly.

        40

    • #
      TdeF

      And the world would need many more Louis Vuitton and Burberry stores.

      30

  • #

    Crazyness is limitless…..

    80

  • #
    David Maddison

    “Scientific” papers from the Left frequently mention the supposed evils of eating meat.

    We all know it is on the agenda of the UN for we proles to eat “insect protein” to “save the planet” and we hear of more and more mentions of it.

    Naturally, the Elites will stay with steak, just like they’ll keep flying their private jets.

    Also, I believe the supposed harm in terms of CO2 (what the Left illiterati call “carbon”) emissions of livestock agriculture are highly questionable both on the basis of actual data and in the false hypothesis that CO2 is bad for the planet.

    60

    • #
      Sambar

      David, eating insects will produce yet more examples of “the law of unintended consequences” as i mentioned up at #8. To produce large tonnages of insects they need to be fed. Just as the artificial demand for ethanol redirected food crops into alcohol production, causing a spike in food crop prices and a subsequent shortage of some staple grains and legumes. So we need to increase production of “insect food crops” to the detriment of human food production. Crazy. Currently grazing animals do a pretty good job of converting herbage to meat proteins but lets stuff up this process and try to mass farm insects. Have no idea how to do a comparison between insect protein versus grazing animal protein kilograms per hectare produced but I would put money on grazing animals. Back to saving biodiversity, grazing animals eat a wide range of plant types. insect food will require monoculture production to maxiimize output. I cannot see eating insects as being the way forward.

      50

  • #
    Penguinite

    ladies, please disregard this nonscience. This is just an attempt to pit females against males. Misandry in full flight!

    170

  • #
    David Maddison

    Paul Joseph Watson talks about the phenomenon of weak Leftist feminised men ( what he calls “soy boys”) and the correlation with soy consumption.

    Very funny and alarming but no surprise.

    https://youtu.be/Dlpqcc_hNdM

    81

  • #
    Steve of Cornubia

    My wife has her own car but rarely drives it anywhere. When we’re together, she doesn’t like to drive and so I almost always adopt the chauffeur role, albeit with highly detailed instructions from the co-driver regarding speed, distance to the car in front, which lane to use and where/how to park.

    220

  • #
    David Maddison

    Vegetarians eat my food’s food.

    170

  • #
    Clyde Spencer

    “Men use cars more than women, so maybe policies should target men.”

    Apparently Soccer Moms weren’t considered when this claim was invented.

    60

  • #
    David Maddison

    It is absurd to make distinctions about resource consumption between men and women.

    Much male activity is done in support of women both on an individual basis and global basis.

    For example, it is typically men who produce food in organised agriculture as exists in Western Society and it is usually men who make major decisions about how society is run (usually with strong influence from women in the background).

    The only way such a study as this would make sense, even if there was a point to it, is if men and women lived completely independent lives in separate independent societies with no interaction between men and women except for men providing their DNA as required for breeding.

    80

  • #
    Geoffrey Williams

    Another nonsense study which sensible people will only laugh at.
    GeoffW

    60

  • #
    Neville

    So far this is straight out of their stupid fantasy world + delusional nonsense.
    Don’t forget Willis Eschenbach tried to find their so called climate emergency and found NOTHING. SEE link below.
    What a load of fantastic BS and fra-d. Go Willis.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/04/25/wheres-the-emergency/

    51

  • #
    Serge Wright

    When you factor in the emissions from the washing machine, dryer, dishwasher, oven, cooktop and the iron, this definitely exceeds the TV’s energy consumption. Also, staying at home requires constant heating of the house in winter and cooling in summer, as most women can only survive within a very small temperature range, unlike the average male, thus creating a large energy bill. The female emissions also become even larger when you include the constant purchase of shoes, clothing and other personal items, compared with a man’s single pair of shoes, shorts and a T shirt. 😉

    50

  • #
    el gordo

    The real issue here is that more women believe in global warming and are becoming hysterical.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/02/women-more-than-men-say-climate-change-will-harm-them-personally/

    71

  • #
    Neville

    BTW Dr John Christy addressed the GWPF and put all their claims to the test and like Willis found NOTHING. BIG SURPRISE, NOT.
    His evidence about their so called HOT SPOT was very instructive.

    https://www.thegwpf.com/putting-climate-change-claims-to-the-test/

    40

  • #
    Murray Shaw

    At least this “science” won’t cause as much damage to mankind as the “science” that escaped from the Wuhan Lab.
    Watched Fauci get taken apart by Sen. Ran Paul at the Congressional hearings. Fauci is guilty of funding that virus experimentation and needs to be fired if not jailed. No wonder he was dismissive very early about the dangers to mankind, masks were not necessary etc, then masks could help, then two masks were necessary, then three masks.
    Ran Paul is a medical doctor and Fauci had the hide to say he did not know what he was talking about.

    70

    • #
      PeterS

      Fauci is evil to the core. He admitted that he funded the research conducted at the lab yet fails to take responsibility for the outcome. He even admitted a long time ago before the pandemic that the research is worth the risk of a pandemic. How evil can one get? Even the Naz1s wouldn’t have gone this far with their own people.

      70

  • #
    Raving

    Women prefer cats. Do vegan cats exist?

    https://earthtalk.org/carbon-pawprints/

    00

  • #
    Neville

    Of course the health and wealth of humans has increased many times since 1800 and Rosling’s BBC video proves the case.
    Over the last 200,000+ years human life expectancy was under 40, but in just a few years the UK started the world on the path to health and wealth using FOSSIL FUELS.
    Dr Rosling’s 120,000 data points wrecks all the arguments of the crazy L W extremists and yet they still cling to their delusional nonsense?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkSRLYSojo

    50

  • #
    el gordo

    The feminista speaks.

    “And remember also that in fighting against man we must not come to resemble him. Even when you have conquered him, do not adopt his vices.”’ (Orwell, Animal Farm)

    31

  • #
    TomR

    There are women who eat Carnivore Diet.

    50

    • #

      ?

      I hope they take supplements.

      26

    • #
      el gordo

      G’day Tom, its been awhile, men like a carnivore diet too.

      ‘Foods to eat include beef, chicken, pork, lamb, turkey, organ meats, salmon, sardines, white fish, and small amounts of heavy cream and hard cheese. Butter, lard, and bone marrow are also allowed. Proponents of the diet emphasize eating fatty cuts of meat to reach your daily energy needs.’

      40

  • #
    John

    Just add to the list of things that climate change (real or imagined) causes – an increase in stupidity.

    70

  • #
    Neville

    OH and the CSIRO tells us that the entire SH is a co2 net SINK and the NH is the co2 net SOURCE. See link to their Cape Grim Tassie site and their quote, under seasonal variation.

    Don’t forget SH population is about 0.8 billion and NH is about 7 billion. When will these fools WAKE UP?

    https://www.csiro.au/en/research/natural-environment/atmosphere/Latest-greenhouse-gas-data
    “Seasonal variation”

    “Carbon dioxide concentrations show seasonal variations (annual cycles) that vary according to global location and altitude. Several processes contribute to carbon dioxide annual cycles: for example, uptake and release of carbon dioxide by terrestrial plants and the oceans, and the transport of carbon dioxide around the globe from source regions (the Northern Hemisphere is a net source of carbon dioxide, the Southern Hemisphere a net sink)”.

    60

    • #
      PeterS

      If there ever was a need for a Great Reset, the CSIRO certainly needs one. Over the decades it has morphed more and more into a factory mostly of fake science.

      80

    • #
      TdeF

      Interesting in that the Southern Hemisphere is much colder than the North and far less land so more ocean surface, so the sink conclusions follows trivially because world CO2 levels are set solely by ocean surface temperature. The human contribution is negligible, unless you want to get/keep a job with the UN/IPCC, CSIRO or any Australian university.

      70

    • #
      el gordo

      The annual decadal graph is interesting, matches Cook’s escalator, a chicken and egg thing.

      20

  • #
    Damo

    But women have babies and some grow into men, so women are worse!

    60

  • #
    David Maddison

    Even “our” very own CSIRO is promoting insect consumption.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-14/csiro-wants-australia-eat-bugs-edible-insect-industry-road-map/100127974

    And insect consumption “empowers” women by becoming insect farmers. Let’s forget about the primitive property rights systems in primitive countries which disempower women in the first place.

    https://www.vice.com/en/article/8q8qz4/how-eating-insects-empowers-women

    30

    • #
      Raving

      Eating shrimp crab and lobster empowers men? There was a time when nobody would touch that sea garbage. Tastes are fickle. Will you ever be able to look at a cricket in the same way again? Just asking

      00

      • #
        Analitik

        Yes, it’s difficult to relate to prisoners being fed on Maine lobsters at the turn of the last century.

        30

        • #
          Richard Owen No.3

          And when was it that apprentices in London demanded that the meals didn’t consist only of salmond and/or oysters? No more than 3 times a week.
          And Doctor Johnson feed his cat on oysters because they were so cheap.

          10

    • #
      Travis T. Jones

      The CSIRO promotes eating insects … the CSIRO says doomsday global warming will cause insects to become extinct … or already has … or something …

      Scientists fear insect populations are shrinking. Here are six ways to help

      https://blog.csiro.au/scientists-fear-insect-populations-decline-ways-to-help/

      “Despite this, factors affecting insect populations overseas – such as habitat loss, [global warming] and insecticide use – most likely also apply in Australia.
      Bushfires and drought on this continent can also affect insect populations.” (What, not floods?)

      30

  • #
    Neville

    More on Human’s global life expectancy INCREASE since the end of Dr Rosling’s video in 2010.
    The OWI DATA site lists global life exp as 70 in 2010 and today that has increased to 73. IOW 3 more years of global life exp since 2010.
    UNBELIEVABLE BUT TRUE.
    So where is their EMERGENCY or EXISTENTIAL THREAT or APOCALYPSE or CRISIS?

    https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

    30

  • #
    David Maddison

    I looked at the publication record of one of the lead authors, Annika Carlsson-Kanyama.

    As expected of Leftist “academics” today it is rather light on authentic scholarly material.

    https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/person/milj-ack

    This was the most “scientific” sounding of her body of work:

    “Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Life Cycle of Carrots and Tomatoes – Methods, Data and Results from a Study of the Types and Amounts of Carrots and Tomatoes Consumed in Sweden”

    30

  • #
    Ross

    But, but… we open all those doors for women. All those opening doors creates convection which in turn drives the wind turbines on all those wind generation installations.

    20

  • #
    David-of-Cooyal-in-Oz

    But the next conclusion that that research omitted is that since men create more CO2 they make the bigger contribution to the greening of the planet, since CO2 is plant food. Contributing hugely to the natural and beneficial “carbon cycle”, knowledge of which was once taught in schools.
    Cheers
    Dave B

    60

  • #
    Terry

    Men emit 16 percent more greenhouse gases than women…

    Isn’t the “Gender Pay Gap” 18%?
    What are those “Men” secretly doing with that extra 2%?
    No, let me guess…they’re buying up PCR Testing companies?

    60

  • #
    Zigmaster

    The topic should’ve been about white Trump voting hetrosexual Evangelical Christian male policemen being worse for climate change . That would’ve just about covered all bases.

    70

  • #
    PeterS

    We need to remember these extremists and the like are not very good at thinking things through by themselves, and they are “simply following orders” from their masters who unlike during Naz1 Germany are today by and large hidden to protect their identities as much as possible. Another group who were “just following orders” and their masters were exposed at the Nuremberg Trails. I look forward to seeing it repeated.

    30

  • #
    Ross

    Almost the award for the junk science article of the week. I say almost. The other half likes to watch ABC TV breakfast during her early morning exercise session, mostly because no ads. There was one of those bottom of screen pull through news item summaries. Apparently a group of scientists have found that cockatoos actually learn from each other, you know, like mimic each other. My goodness who would have thought? Another one – CSIRO have issued a few tweets over the last couple of weeks. They have proudly announced they are being funded to determine if there are any treatments (apart from vaxs)for COVID. I kid you not.

    50

    • #
      Terry

      They have proudly announced they are being funded to determine if there are any treatments (apart from vaxs)for COVID.

      So, take the cash and pull a couple of papers on Ivermectin and HCQ from the bottom draw.
      Act suitably surprised by results (who wouldda thunk!)…then, don’t tell anyone and put the papers back in the bottom draw (to be ignored the next time we have a novel virus “Pandemic”).
      (Other Peoples’) Money well spent. Seems like tough work being a pseudo-scientist…but someone has to do it, apparently.

      70

      • #
        Analitik

        No, the CSIRO will be much more diligent in discrediting any proposed existing treatments – they will engineer studies that are guaranteed to fail by using inadequate or excessive dosages at inappropriate times (like the veterans study in the US where they administered massive doses of Hydroxychloroquine when patients were at death’s door).

        I actually heard they were going to investigate blood serum and plasma treatments.

        10

  • #
    Annie

    “if governments stopped funding science”; correction to that; “if governments stopped funding pseudo-science”.

    80

    • #
      PeterS

      That’s like asking for our government to stop funding the ABC propaganda machine. It ain’t going to happen with the current crop of politicians.

      60

      • #
        el gordo

        They cannot stop funding the ABC overnight because it will be seen as a right wing bloodless coup.

        Better to wait and enjoy the moment, already the ABC is slowly moving back to the centre on climate change. That is, they will try and present alternative scientific viewpoints and let the people decide.

        The floods in China and Europe are just the start of extreme weather events and the people demand the truth. Is this really caused by CO2?

        Women of the world are pretty gullible on the issue, because the maternal instinct has clouded their judgement, so we need Aunty to sober up.

        32

        • #
          PeterS

          I don’t watch the ABC so I don’t know if they are backsliding. I doubt it very much that is the case since the push for emission reductions is gathering pace everywhere.

          40

          • #
            Analitik

            I’m hoping it’s a sign of desperation that they are ramping up the rhetoric in the face of ennui due to the predictions from the models never eventuating.

            20

            • #
              PeterS

              It’s true that their mantra will one day wear too thinly but there will be others to take its place. The current vaccine hysteria and scaremongering is ripe to become that replacement. Give a little bit longer and they will be telling us we must have vaccine passports for our own good and people without them will be stopped from entering various places of work and business. I wonder if that will be the moment people rise up and collectively say NO! Time will tell.

              20

        • #
          Ronin

          Women are social creatures, so tend to go with the crowd.

          20

          • #
            el gordo

            Which is why we need to get the ABC back to the centre, the science is not settled and people need a chance to evaluate different viewpoints.

            Women are fascinating.

            10

  • #
    tom0mason

    Some here may be interested in a study showing the differences between plant and animal meat. Freely available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-93100-3.epdf.

    Scientific Reports | (2021) 11:13828 | A metabolomics comparison of plant‑based meat and grass‑fed meat indicates large nutritional differences despite comparable Nutrition Facts panels Stephan van Vliet et al.

    Metabolomics analysis. We found that a total of 171 out of 190 annotated metabolites (90%) were differ-ent (p < 0.05) between beef and the plant-based alternative. Several compounds were found either exclusively (22 metabolites total) or in greater quantities in beef (51 metabolites total) compared with the plant-based meat alternative (all, p < 0.05). Nutrients only found in beef included allantoin (alkaloid; anti-oxidant)12, anserine (dipeptide; anti-oxidant)13, cysteamine (amine; anti-oxidant)14, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6, ω-3 essen-tial fatty acid)15, glucosamine (hexoamines; collagen biosynthesis)16, hydroxyproline (non-protein amino acid; collagen biosynthesis)17, gamma-aminobutyric acid (non-protein amino acid; anti-hypertensive)18, spermine (biogenic polyamine; anti-oxidant)19, niacinamide (vitamin B3; neuroprotective)20, and squalene (terpenoid phenolic; anti-bacterial)21.
    Several other compounds were found exclusively (31 metabolites total) or in greater quantities (67 metabolites total) in the plant-based meat alternative when compared to beef (Supplemental Table 1) (all, p < 0.05). Nutrients only found in the plant-based meat alternative included 2-hydroxy-3-methylvaleric acid (pentanoic acids; flavor)22, 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (phenolic; anti-oxidant)23, aconitic acid (carboxylic acid; flavor)24, ascorbate (vitamin C; anti-oxidant)25, beta-sitosterol (phytosterol; anti-carcinogenic)26, campesterol (phytosterol; anti-carcinogenic)26, loganin (terpenoid phenolic; anti-inflammatory)27, melezitose or similar disaccharides (flavor)28, monolaurin (glyceride; anti-microbial)29, phenylacetic acid (phenylacetates; anti-oxidant)30, sorbic acid (unsaturated fatty acid; food preservative)31, sulfurol (phenolic; flavor)32, syringic acid (phenolic; anti-oxidant)33, trilaurin (glyceride; anti-microbial)29, and tyrosol (phenolic; anti-oxidant)34.

    30

  • #
    Uber

    Has anyone been keeping an eye on BOM data this year? Everyone I talk to thinks this has been one of the longest and coldest winters for a while. Yet the monthly averages for Sydney (for example) on Weatherzone have temps way above the average. I’m calling BS on that.

    120

  • #

    NASA/RSS has been reporting measured average global Total Precipitable Water (TPW AKA total atmospheric water column) monthly since Jan 1988. They measure it using satellite based instrumentation with a reported accuracy of about 1 mm (3.4%). The method is described at http://www.remss.com/measurements/atmospheric-water-vapor and all the data including the latest measurements at http://data.remss.com/vapor/monthly_1deg/tpw_v07r01_198801_202101.time_series.txt

    The correct way to calculate TPW change is described at Section 8 in http://globalclimatedrivers2.blogspot.com where TPW is simply called water vapor (WV). This calculation uses the saturation vapor pressure vs temperature for water and the accepted assumption that WV increases with temperature at the same rate that saturation vapor pressure increases with temperature.

    The methods used in GCMs either calculate the WV with the result being that relative humidity (RH) remains approximately constant with increasing temperature or it is simply assumed that RH remains constant with increasing temperature. The WV increase rate calculated assuming constant typical RH (which can be done using a psychrometric chart) is not significantly different from the WV increase rate calculated using saturated vapor pressure vs temperature.

    The results of the three methods are shown graphically in Fig 2.8.1 at http://globalclimatedrivers2.blogspot.com . As shown, the measured WV has been increasing faster than possible from measured average global temperature increase. This demonstrates that the human contribution to warming has been caused by WV increase not CO2 increase.

    This means that limiting CO2 which is the object of the Green New Deal will have no significant effect on climate. I wonder why NASA/RSS has stopped reporting measured WV.

    70

    • #
      Earl

      Need to look both ways?
      Thanks for your work and great information. Does cloud seeding factor in what is happening with atmospheric water vapor? Seems the exploits of both China and UAE have had dramatic effects in the last couple of days for both countries. UAE has attributed their “success” to cloud seeding but seems no one is mentioning the possible link in China’s case despite its long history and “successes” such as cleaning up the weather for the 2008 Olympic Games. With so many countries now following a cloud seeding program (India, Indonesia, USA etc) instead of just looking at the rain falling down is anyone looking at the excess chemicals that fall up?
      The article linked above for China comments how:
      “Scientific American has documented a “strange pumping effect” whereby monsoon winds sweep pollution from India and China to incredible altitudes – as high as 18 kilometers. From there, the pollutants are spread globally through strong horizontal winds in the stratosphere.” Enter THAT man Bill Gates and his chalk in space idea.

      Cheers

      40

  • #
    Flok

    If climate change was a woman and all those men scientists trying to understand it.

    It’s a trap.

    30

    • #
      Ronin

      If you can understand why a pizza is round, comes in a square box and is cut into triangular pieces then you will understand women.

      90

  • #

    ‘The results of the three methods are shown graphically in Fig 2.8.1 at http://globalclimatedrivers2.blogspot.com . As shown, the measured WV has been increasing faster than possible from measured average global temperature increase. This demonstrates that the human contribution to warming has been caused by WV increase not CO2 increase.’

    Yes to the above. Svennsmark on galactic cosmic rays and ::

    40

  • #
    Liberator

    And the contribution of weddings? Most guys just want a small intimate affair, but no, huge bash costing $$$$$$. The impact on the environment must be massive. Everyone knows that weddings are all about and for the women…

    50

    • #
      OldOzzie

      Liberator,

      it is an important day for a Woman as well as a Man – my wife and I’s parents were too poor to pay for our wedding, so My wife and I paid for the lot – Wedding Cars, Flowers, Brides and Bridesmaids dresses , going away outfit, Reception, Food, all drinks, Priest, photographer etc – Best Day of my Life.

      Had trouble explaining this concept to our 3 kids, whose weddings we did pay for.

      100

  • #
    David Maddison

    An interesting general article about carnivore diets in humans. Do you need supplements such as Vit C on a carnivore diet? Perhaps not. More research is needed on humans on pure carnivorous diets.

    https://www.amplemeal.com/blogs/home/a-balanced-look-at-the-carnivore-diet

    20

  • #
    Peter Qualey

    Soooo, if I eat soy, have my bits lopped off
    and wear heels then the planet is saved.

    …no way. Heels just kill my feet!

    80

  • #
    Lance

    A signature fact of civilization is that successful civilizations create protein rich diets as a consequence of their dietary superiority over vegetarian/agrarian diets.

    Let a vegan get between me and my steak, beer, and potatoes, and I’ll guarantee you the little squint won’t understand how that salad got crammed down their throats. 🙂

    Ranch dressing might go well with a salad, but it tastes better on chicken, steak, and chips.

    90

    • #
      PeterS

      You left out my favourite meat, lamb chops, but I do like all of them including pork. If they start saying I must stop eating them I will throw a brick at them.

      50

  • #
    Analitik

    We love football, MEAT pies, kangaroos and Holden CARS..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGW-WX77zjY

    70

  • #
    Steve of Cornubia

    Just had a Pig & Chicken Fruit sarnie for lunch. Please don’t tell.

    40

  • #
    MP

    Just to keep pushing #@it up hill and *#ssing into the wind.

    Everybody, these are areas to avoid Saturday at 12:00, do not get dragged into the fray of antivaxers and people concerned about their rights, or those prophylactic pushers.
    Stay indoors and avoid all responsibility.

    https://myemail.constantcontact.com/AVN-News–Updates-on-Worldwide-Freedom-Rally–July-24th–WeWillAllBeThere.html?soid=1101800214009&aid=ffuEmfGPSoA

    03

  • #
    GlenM

    I think something is wrong with the minima readings. Ballina NSW is 1.5c above average, but all are complaining how cold it is. Strange.

    50

  • #
  • #
    Ronin

    Climate change and covid, we’re all in this together, except some are in first, some in business but most of us are in cattle class.

    50

    • #
      PeterS

      What they actually mean when they say “we’re all in this together” is they and the unelected evil powerhouse leaders of the world are working together to “help” us (to become slaves after culling much of the population). It’s a WIP as they need to develop more advanced humanoid robots to take the place of humans in many areas. It’s getting there. Some recent advancements are amazing.

      10

  • #
    clarence.t

    OT, was just looking at UK electricity supply

    Here is the chart for 22nd July

    (Grey is nuclear, Orange is gas, Brown is biomass, Aqua is wind, black is coal, yellow is solar, pink is interconnects)

    Really hard to see that wind !!

    https://i.postimg.cc/CLjM5QnP/UK-Electricity-22-Jul.jpg

    From https://gridwatch.co.uk/demand

    20

  • #
    yarpos

    I , for one , completely comply with the stereotype.

    I am Secretary of the local car club, we have 4 cars for 2 people (used to be 5), I am often seen driving a 350 Chev powered Jaguar, in the warm weather when wife is having girly lunches I host blokey BBQ meat and red wine lunches on our deck (they forgot red wine , surely that’s evil somehow) Oh the horror, if only I believed their BS and cared.

    91

  • #
    Tarquin Wombat-Carruthers

    So girls, when dating, choose the tofu-consuming guy with the tandem bicycle, his loaner-helmet and hemp clothing over the meat-eating Ferrari/Jaguar/Ford owner. Close your eyes, lie back and think of your planet-saving virtue! But you may want to make sure he bathes occasionally!

    60

  • #
    Anton

    Feminists have won the battle of the sexes. This is obvious in children’s books and TV soaps and adverts, which are a barometer of our culture. Female characters are mainly smart, confident and attractive, whereas men are shabbily dressed losers and wimps, or evil. Provision and childbearing are the respective gifts of husband and wife to one another, and comprise the social contract between men and women. (Only women can have children, and while they are doing so they cannot provide for themselves.) Feminists acknowledge only one half of it, and in a process of cultural emasculation they have altered society to do the same. The Welfare State now subsidises women who get pregnant without ever marrying, yet penalises the men who impregnate them. The resulting society has yet to prove it is viable for more than one lifetime.

    100

  • #
    CHRIS

    “I am Woman, here me roar”…the anthem of the 1970s. Fifty years later, nothing much has changed. Women have won the Sex War, and thus society goes down the drain (gurgle gurgle gurgle).

    20

  • #
    WXcycles

    The female half-tribe is slowly discovering they’ve won ashes. An unnecessary gender blitzkrieg they were foolish enough to go along with, and have lost all chance for love, fulfillment and the reason to be in the process. Better make sure your clone, or pet egg is a female, because boys growing up now are going to detest their mothers and other females in the post-2000 ‘connected’ but completely disconnected world these boys are lobbed into.

    It’s always easier to burn the local supermarket than it is to go shopping in the ashes. So what now sisters? Given most men will want nothing more to do with you? Brothers, fathers and sons won’t visit anymore or talk to you. It’s easy to pretend these unfolding repercussions wont matter. Most women will discover too late the damage is done, and it’s permanent. Males have given up on females in droves as they don’t want to deal with a ‘lady’ again. It’s revealing to listen to ordinary men describe their most recent relationships with women. I did this back in March and April, and not one of the men I spoke to had a high opinion of females or wanted another relationship with one. It was shocking to hear, but was to same story of how badly a man was treated by a female, usually several of them in a row, quite often as a group. All of the worst aspects of females are on open display these days and boy are they horrible vile people.

    Females worth knowing are rare. 30 years ago that was not the case. Currently I do know only 3 ladies that I like to talk with when I see them, but most females are incredibly nasty and vindictive people. They are skilled at false hate and making others suffer unnecessarily with lies. The nastiest most dishonest people I’ve met have all been females. I’ve met two genuinely nasty males during the past 25 years and both were criminals and former inmates. Men rarely behave in nasty ways, I can count the nasty ones I deal with on one hand. But females seem to have a barely hidden sea of bottomless venom. The naive notion females are a ‘fairer sex’ has proven another abominable lie. I doubt any male would believe it anymore. In my experience males are the people who treat people fairly, and always have. I can’t trust females, few men do, I’ve been back-stabbed by females far too many times and its always for no justifiable reason. Just overflowing female nastiness, no point looking for a specific reason for it, it’s because they are female. Men don’t do this, even the rough ones are generally honorable and fair, they actually go out of their way to help others. But females rarely do that. If they do, beware, they’re setting you up. They’ll do something really nasty, soon. Pointless blaming them for it, it;s what they do, what fills them with cheap thrills. Females who are not causing needless dramas or spitefully harming a man is probably occupied taking 3 dozen selfies, or an an image of their avocado on toast, just in case someone ever wants to know exactly what that looked like.

    And males are responsible for the imaginary climate-change, complete with an imaginary ‘crisis’, ’cause appendage. Why am I not surprised to hear this coming from a feminist ‘VICE’ TV maleophobe waffling a stream of feral lies about the oppressive imaginary patriarchy? Life must be tough under such male oppression. These horrid people just spew hatred at men at every opportunity. There is no point at which they intend to stop.

    I don’t believe they even have a cause to be doing it. It’s truly causeless, they just can’t stop is all. It would not occur to them that maybe it’s them. three decades ago you’d never hear from these quacks, they’d be in a psyche-ward for 2 or 3 month of the year, or at a pub, or chasing a man to pay the rent for them, and make his life hell. But now they all have a mobile phone for those 2 or 3 months when they really shouldn’t have one. So the causeless hatred of all things male spews into the either without restraint.

    Bad gender! Stop destroying my femi-climate-fantasy!

    I feel sorry for the young girls who fail to understand that the male-haters are probably having another bipolar episode and have a mobile phone with them to let everyone know the gory details of their delusional state of mind. That seems to be what is giving females everywhere this notion that it’s OK to destroy all relationships with the men in their lives. I do wonder what if anything will ever break-up this endless vicious string of lies and attacks on men who’ve done nothing to them.

    30

  • #
    another ian

    “I Thought I’d Only Go Blind”

    http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/2021/07/23/i-thought-id-only-go-blind/

    “‘Right-handed man’ almost masturbates to death: medical case study”

    This fellow redefined “mind-blowing sex” after he suffered a life-threatening stroke while repeatedly masturbating. Now, medical experts are saying he’s lucky he escaped the ultimate unhappy ending.

    He should have used his left hand.”

    00

  • #
    Phil O'Sophical

    “Men worse for climate change than women.” A meaningless sentence. Why accept the premise? Why even discuss it?
    It embodies many* scientifically illiterate frauds being perpetrated on humanity to facilitate the Great Reset.

    First it accepts the myth that CO2 is responsible for the small slow and steady incremental rise in temperature;
    second it accepts the myth that human CO2 output is large enough to affect the rise in CO2, hence temperature;
    third it ignores the fact that a rise in CO2 is a very good thing – it’s what Earth needs for life to flourish;
    fourth it accepts that the gradual natural rise in temperature is a bad thing;
    fifth it accepts that man has not the time nor ingenuity to mitigate any undesirable consequences should they occur.

    *Many, related to the subject; far worse is the Covid and vaccine scam with which, God willing, a second Nuremberg will deal.

    And should any untoward effects develop, there will be ample time for mitigating strategies to deal with them to be developed, rather than expend billions turning the clock back on people’s lifestyles and inconvenience people

    10

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>