Recent Posts


Blame the Vikings! Moss found in East Antarctica lived in warmer summers a thousand years ago.

Pohlia nutans

Pohlia nutans moss. Photo by Hermann Schachner

By Jo Nova

Around 1,000AD, a little delicate moss (just like the one above), lived in a spot in Antarctica which is now locked in snow and ice all year round, and considered hyper arid and perennially frozen. No one expected to find nodding thread-moss (Pohlia Nutans) on Boulder Clay Glacier.

Researchers had to drill through 11 meters of ice to find it (or what’s left of it) and managed to date it to 1,050 years before present. This puts it smack in the centre of the Medieval Warm Period, when Vikings were marauding England, showing that this part of Antarctica was warmer 1000 years ago than it is today, even though humans have poured forth 1.8 trillion tons of greenhouse gases.

At the same time as the mosses grew, there was a veritable population boom of penguins and elephant seals in the Ross Sea next door, right up until the brutal cold of the Little Ice Age wiped them out.

Pohlia nutans, needs liquid water and warmer summers. In order to grow, it has to find land that is ice free in summer has rain or melted water. Mosses can’t survive in this area now.

Thanks to Kenneth Richards at NoTricksZone for finding the study.

Antarctic Glacier. Photo.

Boulder-Clay Glacier, Figure 1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02259-4#Sec10

Spare a thought for the life of an Antarctic moss. They spend 9 or 10 months of the year buried in snow, hoping for a five or six weeks of warmth so they can grow a few millimeters. If they’re lucky they might catch some floating penguin poo dust for nutrients. If they’re not lucky the summers get cold for thousand years, and they’re buried in 11 meters of snow.

Apparently, some mosses have survived 5,000 years stuck under a glacier, and can still spring back to life, not just from spores but from dormant tissue itself.

It sort of suggests this sort of climatic mayhem has happened before?

 

Map Antarctica.

Fully 120 proxies show the Medieval Warm Period was a global phenomenon. Yet the climate industry depends on it not being true. Everything that shows the world was warmer shows that our coal plants and cars are irrelevant. That nature does it all by herself, and that thousands of IPCC experts have been selectively skewing their stories to get bigger grants, or are just too scared to say what they really thought lest they be called a “climate denier”.

That, and the media ignoring hundreds of stories like these.

Antarctic Moss

Fig. S6. Details of the two moss species embedded in the ice core: A) Bryum pseudotriquetrum (13 mm long); B) Pohlia nutans (10 mm long). Note: the scale is in cm, but the pictures are enlarged respectively 5.4 and 7.8 times.

For more information:

REFERENCE

Forte, E., Azzaro, M., Cannone, N. et al. A warming pulse in the Antarctic continent changed the landscape during the Middle Ages. Commun Earth Environ 6, 281 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02259-4

 

 

10 out of 10 based on 7 ratings

8 comments to Blame the Vikings! Moss found in East Antarctica lived in warmer summers a thousand years ago.

  • #
    Honk R Smith

    Some religions only recognize existence of history back to a certain date.
    Climate Change is one of them.

    40

  • #
    David Maddison

    As I keep saying, the anti-science religion/ideology of the Left subscribes to an Aristotlean world view in which the world is static and never changing. Any slight deviation from what they imagine is this stable, static environment of earth is treated with panic and alarm. It’s sad that so many of those of the Left, political “leaders” , senior public serpents and even “university” “academics” and CSIRO “scientists” believe this.

    00

    • #
      David Maddison

      Civilisations have thrived during the naturally warm periods of the Minoan, Egyptian, Roman and Medieval eras. (That’s one of the reasons that the Left have destroyed the education system and this sort of thing is no longer taught.)

      Plus, we are coming to the very end of a rare interglacial. As the world cools, it will be impossible for civilisation to survive without coal, gas and nuclear power stations (and real hydro where possible, not SH2).

      The idea that the earth and universe is static is a very primitive one and articulated by Aristotle in “In the Heavens” 350BCE.

      http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/heavens.1.i.html

      For in the whole range of time past, so far as our inherited records reach, no change appears to have taken place either in the whole scheme of the outermost heaven or in any of its proper parts.

      It is only in the last 100 years or so that the ideas of Alfred Wegener (1880-1930), a real climatologist, geologist, geophysicist, meteorologist and polar researcher came to be accepted that the earth is not static. Among other ideas he conceived of continental drift which led to plate tectonics.

      However, as early as 1840 Louis Agassiz (1807-1873) hypothesised that much of North America was once buried under glacial ice up to 3km deep and that climate must change.

      Milutin Milanković (1879-1958) also discovered natural cycles in the climate.

      Warmists have to do a lot of catching up with modern thinking.

      It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.
      Upton Sinclair, 1934
      ”.

      10

  • #
    Kalm Keith

    It’s a well known geological fact that oceans have fallen by at least 4.2 metres over the last seven thousand years.
    While that fall has been irregular; perhaps giving the Noah’s Ark event, the constant downward trend is undeniable.

    The most recent two thousand years has seen a fall of 1.2 metres.

    The ocean fall has a corollary: ice accumulation at the poles.

    10

  • #
    David Maddison

    Warmist “researchers” love going to exotic adventure holiday locations for their “research” and plenty have gone to Antarctica (and remote tropical islands).

    I wonder why so many missed this?

    What do they do there?

    00

  • #
    David Maddison

    Moss as mentioned above is a plant but lichens are not plants but plant-like composite organisms of a combination of fungus and algae and others.

    There has always been lichens in Antarctica even outside of the Medieval Warm Period responsible for the moss mentioned above.

    I recall studying atlases as a child and remember how the tip of the Antarctic Peninsular sometimes was coloured with a slight greenish tinge which the legend coded as indicative of the presence of lichens.

    Even the fully woke Australian Government website for the Antarctic Program admits this, and no mention of it being due to “climate change”.

    https://www.antarctica.gov.au/about-antarctica/plants/lichens/

    3 main types of lichens exist in Antarctica:

    Crustose lichens — these form a thin crust on the surface of the substrate they grow on.

    Foliose lichens — these form leaf like lobes.

    Fruticose lichens — these have a shrubby growth habit.

    Growth rate
    Lichens have very slow growth rates. In the best conditions in the Maritime Antarctic, growth rates reach 1 cm or more per 100 years.

    In the harsher environment of Continental Antarctica, growth is much slower. In the case of Buellia frigida in the McMurdo Dry Valleys region, the growth rate may be as little as 1 cm per 1,000 years.

    Habitat
    Lichens grow in most areas of the Antarctic that are capable of supporting plant life. Currently, 4 general distributions of lichens are known. These are:

    species confined to the Maritime Antarctic

    species found in the Peninsula and extending to the Lesser Antarctic

    species with a circum-Antarctic distribution

    species with very disrupted or disjunct distribution patterns.

    The Maritime Antarctic lichens are restricted to the northern Peninsula and nearby islands. Many of the lichens found in Antarctica are only in this area.

    00

Leave a Reply to Honk R Smith Cancel reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>