Democrats certification in Pennsylvania halted as evidence is presented for election fraud

The pushback begins: Trump wins a stay on certification, and the right to put all the evidence forward at a hearing on Friday. Though as of this moment Google News Search results contain nothing but one report of a “far fetched strategy” to reverse Pennsylvania. History is in the making yet most of the 24-hour-crash-test-spectator media is absent.

UPDATE: In Nevada also a judge has ruled that there will be a hearing on Dec 3 for Republicans to present allegations of voter fraud.It could overturn the Nevada result. 

“… the signatures on hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not verified by human officials, as required by law. What’s more, they found that officials used a machine to verify signatures, apparently against the rules, and even those machines were plagued with problems.”

UPDATE: In Georgia Lin Woods Emergency Motion will get an expedited review in the Eleventh Circuit Court.

In Pennsylvania

Judge Blocks Further Certification of PA Election Results Over Mail-in Ballot Fight

By Matt Margolis, PJ News

A Pennsylvania state court issued an order blocking the certification of election results in the state, pending a hearing to be held on Friday, reports Fox News.

This is Judge Patricia McCullough’s court order. It’s not entirely clear what this means since Pennsylvania has been described as certifying the votes” already. Games of bluff are coming from both sides. Not surprisingly, officials in Pennsylvania are going to appeal this ruling.

Separately though, regardless of what is or is not certified, the elected representatives in Pennsylvania can choose to send their own electors in the event of major fraud.

Rudy Giuliani, who is leading the Trump campaign’s election legal efforts, on Wednesday suggested that Pennsylvania GOP state senators have the power to vote and choose their own electors, citing voter fraud allegations.

In the Pennsylvania Senate hearings, listen to the numbers and the reaction of the crowd at the details of one vote dump. Guiliani makes a case that 670,000 ballots should be  disallowed due to the failure to let observers watch.

Listen to the crowd in the room as a witness describes how one sided the ballots were:

  • Biden 570,000
  • Trump 3,200

Democrat main strategies appear to be Bluff, Bully and Censor

Trump tells supporters to stand tall against the bullying.”Don’t be intimidated”.

Jack Phillips, Epoch Times

President Donald Trump, calling in at a Senate Republican hearing in Pennsylvania on Wednesday, called on GOP surrogates and his supporters to not back down in the face of threats and push back as his legal team challenges the result of the election.

“If you were a Republican poll worker you were treated like a dog,” Trump said on a call as his lawyer, Jenna Ellis, held up her phone to the microphone. He was referring to complaints from sworn affidavits about poll watchers being denied access to vote-tabulation efforts on Nov. 3 and beyond in places like Philadelphia and Detroit.

“Our poll watchers were pushed out of the building … don’t be intimidated by these people,” Trump said, while also referring to threats and a pressure campaign against his legal team.

Read a description of the Philadelphia Witnesses Allegations of Obstruction, and other irregularities during the counting of ballots. Barricades were used to keep observers too far away to see, they were allowed to watch on blurred screens. Epoch Times

“Due to the distance of the workers from the erected fences, it was impossible for me or any observer to see what the workers were doing with any type of specificity,” he said. “The observers were not able to challenge any decision or determination being made about the processing of these mail-in ballots.”

The second issue Qweder said he found to be irregular was the board’s duplication process. As the days progressed, observers were informed that the board was going to be duplicating damaged mail-in ballots that could not be read by their scanners. He was told there were more than 5,000 of these damaged ballots and that the actual number was unknown and could be higher.”

The censorship continues

Twitter banned Senator Doug Mastriano’s Twitter account, possibly because he is asking why elections in Afghanistan are more secure than elections in Pennsylvania, an unpermitted question.

Imagine being an elected official with a PhD and 4 masters degrees who served in Desert Storm and was deployed 3x to Afghanistan .. but can’t speak freely on twitter. That’s what it’s come to.

He also said in the hearing that thousands of people have been contacting his office. They have been inundated.

….

Meanwhile President Trump has pardoned the long suffering Michael Flynn.

One view on Flynns 2017 confession:

 Nov 1 2017: @GenFlynn attorney ask from Mueller documents that if handed over could help Flynn against a claim that he lied. Nov 3: Mueller Thugs leak that they may charge Flynn’s son. Within weeks: Flynn pleads guilty to lying. White Collar THUGS.

9.3 out of 10 based on 49 ratings

28 comments to Democrats certification in Pennsylvania halted as evidence is presented for election fraud

  • #

    Well that got old fast.

    227

  • #
    PeterPetrum

    The laughter says it all! The audience clearly understood that, statistically, that ratio of Biden to Trump, compared to the previous trend, was just impossible.

    240

    • #

      The most obvious indication of significant fraud are the wildly inconsistent downballot results. Consider that the hate campaign used by the left didn’t only target Trump, but attacked all conservative candidates and voters; moreover, Trump actively campaigned for many of the Republican contenders that beat incumbent Democrats.

      60

  • #
    Brenda Spence

    The Kraken is released! See https://defendingtherepublic.org for a download of the case against the Georgia election registration.

    150

  • #
    RossP

    Sidney Powell has filed in Georgia and according to one of the comments has also filed in Michigan. Also note the copy of Millie Weaver’s tweet in the comments. SP’s case is attached to this for all the lawyers to look at.

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/11/26/sidney-powell-files-lawsuit-against-state-of-georgia-for-election-rigging-links-and-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-9237401

    91

    • #
      Peter C

      Civil Action.

      I was hoping for Criminal Prosecution.
      However it maybe that Sidney Powell is not able to initiate a criminal action. That is usually done by the State.

      110

  • #
    Geoff Croker

    Lot at stake. Can only hope its enough. This no longer about the election. The constitution is in play.

    140

  • #
    Treeman

    @ Jo Nova the most up to date info on US politics in Australia!

    Well done Jo, I’ve been a fan for years.

    We got shot of Krudd and his greatest scientific, economic, and moral challenges of our time!

    We waited for years to be vindicated over the 1011 Brisbane floods.

    This will be a super sweet victory if the US election is overturned because of voting rigging/fraud/malware etc etc etc.

    It also happens here in Aust if I don’t miss my mark

    150

    • #
      Peter C

      It also happens here in Aust if I don’t miss my mark

      Likely True. Senator Birmingham is either not interested or preoccupied.

      “Dear Minister Birmingham,

      Some time ago I wrote to the Minister responsible for the AEC, Senator Mattias Cormann. I have not received a response.
      Senator Cormann has now retired. As the new minister responsible for the AEC can I ask you to review the matters I referred to and confirm that the breaches of our electoral act are being investigated and prosecuted.

      Birmingham, Simon (Senator)
      Mon, Nov 9, 12:38 PM
      to me

      Thank you for your email. It has been forwarded to our Ministerial Office in Canberra. “

      80

  • #
    PeterPetrum

    The video if the public hearing in Pen State has been removed. I only watched half of it before dinner and am dismayed that I can not watch the test. Was this YouTube? Talk about censorship!

    120

  • #
    Matty

    Dems….or their media agents, have started saying that there is no connection between Smartmatic and Dominion….
    But that would seem to to confirm that Smartmatic is a stinker? Sidney Powell says they are inextricably intertwined….”like they were trying to get caught”.

    70

  • #
    Tarquin Wombat-Carruthers

    “Air circulation device, meet excrement!”

    60

  • #
  • #

    Hi Jo, this is my sister Annette’s work. We could not believe our eyes. I said to her stunned,”Are you sure this is the official vote count?” It is supposedly the New York Times data everyone has been working from. She found similar issues in other states, but nothing so marked as Georgia https://parler.com/post/25d464318eef45e8b27cc928c8144ee3

    80

    • #
      Brenda Spence

      can you explain what this is saying for “tech dummies” please.

      20

      • #

        At 2020-11-06T02:32:41 GMT Trump and Biden were on equal votes after a big vote dump heavily for Biden. For the next 19 hours they both vote climb at EXACTLY the same increment each time (see yellow and green). Now this is despite the actual Mumber varied – so 166 votes for Trump and exactly 166 votes for Biden then next batch in next hour both count dump was 17 for Trump and 17 votes for Biden..they were both the same so – and it goes on for 19 hours.. !! There is then another vote dump ~4800 (red) for Biden. For another 21 hours the vote increment for each is again the same. Then there is another vote dump of ~4800 (red) for Biden. You guessed it, they then go at the same amount of vote increase again. Either the timestamp vote is wrong (taken from NYT) or this is straight up Fraud ..Some more detail “Column 1 is the time stamp in GMT, column 2 is the total vote count, columns 3 and 4 are the Trump, Biden ratio vote split, columns 5 and 6 are the Trump and Biden vote count. Columns 7 and 8 are the incremental vote counts and column 9 is the Biden/Trump incremental vote ratio.” Until they level pegged the data was as one would expect some times more votes for Trump sometime more for Biden but never exactly the same.. the weirdest one is the minus for Trump – now in all my years of election watching I have never seen votes go backward – until a recount..

        130

  • #
    PeterS

    After watching the video it appears the only difference between how the election was handled there and how elections are held in certain despot countries is in those other countries they often had armed soldiers controlling who can vote for whom. This is an utter disgrace. If all this is not rectified, there will be a civil war and the Democrats and MSM will have blood on their hands.

    50

  • #
    Tim

    Joanne Nova You are a National Treasure. Its a pity the Australian of the year has closed, otherwise I would put in a nomination for you and encourage other to do so to.

    190

  • #
    tygrus

    The rules & processes used by each state/city/district can vary greatly across USA including the voting process to select the next President. Without full Federal oversight, it’s very hard to regulate the process.

    A major difference was Trump told his voters to go on election day & not to pre-vote or postal. With the democrats supporting pre & postal votes, you have an unequal distribution between the different methods. It is then perfectly logical to assume you could have 47% Dem vs 50% GOP on the day votes but 90% Dem vs 10% GOP in batches of postal votes for districts. Some evidence of “here’s a list of people who are dead but voted” were investigated to find the list contained people who were living and may have voted plus people who were dead and did NOT have a postal vote in their name. Interesting to see many ballots that supported Biden but also voted for GOP senate/reps/governors so less likely to be a Democrat forging votes (you would expect all races in the ballot would be for Dems by a Dem to be worth their effort to cheat).

    But I’ll leave it to their courts to decide, they have until the 14th of December 2020 when it’s officially recorded. I’m 99% certain the results won’t change by then, Biden will be the next president. It’s a pity there aren’t decent 3rd or 4th options but another 4 years they’ll probable have a change of people and life will go on.

    01

    • #

      There are a few issues with what you have written. Firstly no honest state needs Federal oversight. Each state (the size of a country in itself) may chose to do things sightly differently but should still have no (or minimal) fraud. Take as an example the EU, another loose federation of States.

      There are some statistics of the trends in mail-in pre-poll counting in the states that began counting early – Trump was featuring better than expected there. The problem of the disputed vote batches is not only the composition of the batches, which was not 10 to 1 but in at least in one case a 1000-1 ratio, but remarkably the number of votes was a rate higher than the scanners could scan… Please take note of this fact which was explained in the video that Jo posted. (Anyone who uses scanners knows their limitations- and no matter how fast that copier is, if we have 100 pages to print or scan it takes whatever the design rate x 100 to do it, it can’t do it faster..and we may as well drink coffee waiting for it).

      Matt Braynard’s work is one of the most comprehensive on the statistics on dead, double, false address & other issues with Mail-in voting (such as no ballot is recorded despite ballot begin mailed by voter and a vote when no mail-in ballot was cast). He has a concrete list. His team made over 1 million phone calls. On his list of concrete confirmed cases (smaller than the full list of doubtful cases) they are indeed dead and they did vote. He has forwarded that list to the FBI. One or two being ‘debunked’ may or may not be useful. From the formally recorded responses to Braynard’s phone calls, Statisticians have extrapolated possible issues in hundreds of thousands in multiple states. This is just one example https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/Miller_DeclarationAndAnalyisPA_GOP_BallotRequestData_2020_Final.pdf
      The most interesting finding of the Braynard team is the ‘incapacitated’ category of mail-in (which had little oversight as to signatures etc), people when they rang them up were not incapacitated and who were out and about on their facebook pages – that list is getting longer as they had a sudden increase (not seen before in any other election) over 100 thousand to investigate.

      One question to answer is this one from Patrick Byrne “Pennsylvania reported having mailed out 1,823,148 ballots, of which 1,462,302 were returned. Yet total mail-in votes number 2,589,242? From where did the extra 2,589,242 – 1,462,302 = 1,126,940 votes come?” https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/

      That state is first to go ‘nuclear’ It is being reported in Epoch Times the Legislators are meeting to Reclaim Power. So not just the courts…!

      I would expect this week Trump’s team will pick up momentum as the evidence of fraud, irregularity and impossibility is opened up more – and it is now ‘out there’ that entities in Iran and China linked into the offshore vote counting.. and a Company associated with the former President Obama. If almost anyone could hack the election, an issue not cleaned up from 2016, why not the US government itself? Reading the Sidney Powell court cases is illuminating..

      I doubt if anyone will be happy.. Distress of nations with perplexity.

      20

  • #
    tygrus

    The rules & processes used by each state/city/district can vary greatly across USA including the voting process to select the next President. Without full Federal oversight, it’s very hard to regulate the process.

    A major difference was Trump told his voters to go on election day & not to pre-vote or postal. With the democrats supporting pre & postal votes, you have an unequal distribution between the different methods. It is then perfectly logical to assume you could have 47% Dem vs 50% GOP on the day votes but 90% Dem vs 10% GOP in batches of postal votes for districts. Some evidence of “here’s a list of people who are dead but voted” were investigated to find the list contained people who were living and may have voted plus people who were dead and did NOT have a postal vote in their name. Interesting to see many ballots that supported Biden but also voted for GOP senate/reps/governors so less likely to be a Democrat forging votes (you would expect all races in the ballot would be for Dems by a Dem to be worth their effort to cheat).

    But I’ll leave it to their courts to decide, they have until the 14th of December 2020 when it’s officially recorded. I’m 99% certain the results won’t change by then, Biden will be the next president. It’s a pity there aren’t decent 3rd or 4th options but another 4 years they’ll probable have a change of people and life will go on.

    00