Recent Posts


Sunday

7 out of 10 based on 7 ratings

87 comments to Sunday

  • #

    I’m back home after four wonderful weeks in Western Australia.

    The last four days of my four weeks away were spent on what is without doubt one of the World’s best train journeys, the 4352 Kilometre trip from Perth to Sydney on the Indian Pacific. There were five off train excursions, and the train experience itself was enough. Food was spectacular, accommodation tight, but hey, it’s a train, eh! Company, you get to meet so many people.

    No internet connection for four days, and I didn’t miss a minute of that.

    Whilst in Perth, one of my nieces showed me how to take a panoramic image with my Mobile Phone. So, standing on the mullock heap at Broken Hill I took a panoramic image of the train.

    Two locomotives, and 27 carriages, and it was 630 metres long. In the main Season, its’ eight carriages longer, topping out at 800 metres plus in length, and The Ghan is even longer.

    For the relatively flat section, Perth to Adelaide, they use one locomotive, and from Adelaide to Sydney, for the mountains in NSW, they add that second locomotive.

    The link takes you to that panoramic image I took. The original image on the phone is around 9Mb, so it’s a big image. I can work it down with my image program (Adobe Elements 15) to 3MB, and I found a way to show it at my home site, so I can link it up here at Joanne’s site.

    When you select the link and the image opens up, you’ll see a plus sign over the image. Click your mouse, and the full sized image opens, and you’ll see a scroll bar at the bottom of the image, just above your computer’s task bar.

    Use that scroll bar to scroll right and left. At the far right of the image are the locomotives, and all the way left is the ‘back’ of the train. The city in the background is Broken Hill.

    I’m detailing the whole WA experience at my home site, and I’ve got so much more to get done, hopefully a Post a day for the next ten to twelve days. I took around 600 or more images, So I can pick the best of them.

    Link to Indian Pacific train image

    My most recent Post will be about my trip to the Perth Mint, and the ‘live’ gold pour, and that gets posted at 2pm Eastern Standard Time. It also mentions the One Tonne gold coin with an image of that as well.

    Tony.

    340

    • #
      Scissor

      Sounds wonderful. I took the bus from Margaret River to Perth (then Perth to Singapore to San Francisco to Denver).

      70

      • #
        Graham Richards

        Oh wow! I don’t mind a bus trip myself but would certainly be uncomfortable on a bus all the way to San Francisco.! 🤓🤓🤓

        170

    • #
      OldOzzie

      Great Photo of the Train TonyfromOz

      I have stood on that Mullock Heap a number of times, with Mining Engineer Brother in Law living in Broken Hill, and stopping point on numerous across OZ 4WD Trips

      120

    • #

      Been on the Indian Pacific a couple of times. Perth to Sydney and Sydney to Perth.

      Will try the Ghan and the Great Southern next.

      Just have to check my bank balance first.

      11

      • #

        True, it is expensive, but sooooo well worth it.

        You step onto the train in Perth, and off the train in Sydney.

        The ONLY money you need to shell out is if you purchase anything during four of the five off train excursions. With those excursions, the one at Cook in the middle of the night, and the Seppeltsfield Barossa tour are one offs, but at Kalgoorlie, Broken Hill and the Blue Mountains, you get a choice of four or five different tours.

        Accommodation, all meals, all off train tours, everything in the one cost.

        If you want to do the Ghan, then I was advised to board the train at Darwin for the trip South to Adelaide, as it’s an extra day and night aboard, and one extra off train tour.

        Tony.

        10

    • #
      Old Goat

      Tony,
      Nice to see you are enjoying your travels – the guy at the mint pouring the gold is a comedian . Did you buy any gold ?

      10

  • #
    John F. Hultquist

    Nicely done, Tony. Thanks.
    What is the object at the right bottom corner by the large rock?

    50

    • #
      James Murphy

      It could be a light, but this is mere speculation….

      30

    • #

      John,

      on top of the mullock heap, (which is totally solid) there are two structures, built by the NSW Government. One is a hoped to be restaurant, but evidently, they’ve found it hard to get an owner, as it’s quite seasonal there and probably mainly catered to tourists.

      The second structure is a modern(ish) memorial. It’s the Line Of Lode miner’s memorial, (built in conjunction with that restaurant) to commemorate the miners lost at Broken Hill.

      As James mentioned, that object you mentioned is a pretty large spotlight, and is used to illuminate that memorial at night.

      Tony.

      50

      • #
        John F. Hultquist

        Thanks. Google Earth shows 300 acers solar panels west of there. an interesting place.
        From me to there: 8,145.07 mi (13,108.22 km)

        20

  • #
    OldOzzie

    DeepMind has detailed all the ways AGI could wreck the world

    DeepMind says AGI could arrive in 2030, and it has some ideas to keep us safe.

    As AI hype permeates the Internet, tech and business leaders are already looking toward the next step. AGI, or artificial general intelligence, refers to a machine with human-like intelligence and capabilities.

    If today’s AI systems are on a path to AGI, we will need new approaches to ensure such a machine doesn’t work against human interests.

    Unfortunately, we don’t have anything as elegant as Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics.

    Researchers at Google DeepMind have been working on this problem and have released a new technical paper (PDF) that explains how to develop AGI safely, which you can download at your convenience.

    It contains a huge amount of detail, clocking in at 108 pages before references. While some in the AI field believe AGI is a pipe dream, the authors of the DeepMind paper project that it could happen by 2030. With that in mind, they aimed to understand the risks of a human-like synthetic intelligence, which they acknowledge could lead to “severe harm.”

    All the ways AGI could harm humanity

    This work has identified four possible types of AGI risk, along with suggestions on how we might ameliorate said risks. The DeepMind team, led by company co-founder Shane Legg, categorized the negative AGI outcomes as misuse, misalignment, mistakes, and structural risks. Misuse and misalignment are discussed in the paper at length, but the latter two are only covered briefly.

    60

    • #
      Greg in NZ

      Hymn,

      “misuse, misalignment, mistakes”, yet no mention of misinformation, unless AGI pre-censored that negative outcome in anticipation…

      ThoughtCrime by Go Ogle’s DeepMind®️?

      70

    • #
      John Connor II

      AGI, or artificial general intelligence, refers to a machine with human-like intelligence and capabilities.

      I’m still waiting on that metric to be revised more in line with what we were 50 years ago rather than the soyboy loony-left clueless dumb bunnies we have now.

      True AGI? Way closer than you think.
      /before 2030

      But the question is could we even recognise a non-biological intelligence that “thinks” in ways radically different to our own.

      50

      • #
        Old Goat

        John,
        AI is already having deleterious effects on human intelligence . Why bother thinking when you can have the “answer” instantly ? Google is both a noun and a verb…

        50

  • #
    David Maddison

    Many Leftoids and others with TDS have mocked TRUMP for putting tariffs on uninhabited islands.

    Is it so hard to understand the reason behind this?

    The reason for putting tariffs on uninhabited islands is likely to avoid the possibility of exploiting loopholes by sending goods from those places tariff-free.

    231

    • #
      Simon

      How would you redirect trade through Heard Island?
      The locals are upset, they held a rally yesterday: https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1595792463990-07008351a4fb
      The truth is that some moron in the White House with no concept of geography used an AI to calculate the trade imbalance and AIs hallucinate.

      113

      • #
        Simon

        Apparently, there is ‘trade’ but it is most likely accounting error:
        “The export figures from Heard Island and McDonald Islands are even more perplexing. The territory does have a fishery but no buildings or human habitation whatsoever.
        Despite this, according to export data from the World Bank, the US imported US$1.4m (A$2.23m) of products from Heard Island and McDonald Islands in 2022, nearly all of which was “machinery and electrical” imports. It was not immediately clear what those goods were. In the five years prior, imports from Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranged from US$15,000 (A$24,000) to US$325,000 (A$518,000) per year.”

        16

        • #
          David Maddison

          The reason for putting tariffs on uninhabited islands is likely to avoid the possibility of exploiting loopholes by sending goods from those places tariff-free.

          161

          • #
            Graeme No.3

            Simon cannot reason that some place with “no buildings or human habitation whatsoever” can supposedly manufacture “machinery and electrical” imports for the USA.
            I have self suppressed comments about his intellectual capacity.

            160

        • #
          John Connor II

          Not forgetting the $60 million AUD from Heard Island fishing that ends up in high-end restaurants in the USA and 20 other countries, processed by Australian company Austral Fisheries.

          Did TDS-Simon miss that?

          120

      • #
        Nigel W

        Oh Simple Simon, that is the level of (un) Critical Thinking that would have the trade on the London Metal Exchange floating up and down the Thames in multiple mega-tonne loads…

        Daily

        20

    • #
      Old Goat

      David,
      I suspect the tariffs are intended to devalue the dollar and reshore manufacturing . The biggest problem the USA faces at the moment is the national debt and devaluing the dollar will help. Trump has had to refinance debt before and is savvy on its methods . Its a high stakes gamble , and the result may not be known in Trumps tenure .

      50

      • #
        TdeF

        And get participants (Mexico, Canada, China,..) in the slaughter of 100,000 young Americans a year by fentanyl to cease and desist. This is not only a national tragedy on an unprecedented scale but a loss of economic strength and miliary strength. And that is part of the intention. Along with pushing abortion. Undermining the US socially, militarily and economically seems to be the universal objective and part of the Art of War in a nuclear age. The idea that America can do to others even half of what they are doing to America is a real shock. America has been everyone’s patsy, but no longer.

        00

  • #
    Kalm Keith

    Tony’s train pic is amazing.

    From Friday, did anybody else see the great white whale.

    https://joannenova.com.au/2025/04/friday-103/#comment-2841004

    It had a short run here in Novocastria.

    30

    • #
      Skepticynic

      Haven’t seen it but thanks for drawing our attention to it.
      Looks like a great movie about an epic undertaking!
      I’ll have to try and find it.

      20

  • #
    David Maddison

    Not are “far right conspiracy theory”, this is how young Chicomms think.

    https://www.news.com.au/world/asia/rightfully-theirs-china-targets-australia-as-the-next-taiwan/news-story/5ed2ac9e8b4044a8a11ed82a482cd010

    ‘Rightfully theirs’: China targets Australia as ‘the next Taiwan’

    Beijing’s best and brightest are pushing for a radical plan involving Australia – and it should make us all very nervous.

    April 5, 2025

    Is Australia the next Taiwan? The next Spratly Islands? The next Himalayan Ladakh?

    Some of China’s up-and-coming Communist Youth are asserting the land Down Under is rightfully theirs.

    Jamestown Foundation open source intelligence analyst Shijie Wang has stumbled across an online discussion among Beijing’s best and brightest young minds.

    The posts, isolated from the rest of the world behind the Chinese Communist Party’s “Great Internet Firewall”, advocate the “annexation” of Australia based on similar arguments to those being applied against the Himalayas, the East and South China Seas, the Senkaku and Spratly Islands and Taiwan.

    The ancient Chinese Empire once went there.

    Therefore, it belongs to China.

    The expansionist advocacy flared after three Chinese warships last month circumnavigated Australia for the first time.

    Along the way, the task group provoked controversy by conducting live-fire gunnery exercises beneath a busy Australia-New Zealand air traffic corridor.

    SEE LINK FOR REST NOT PAYWALLED

    Sadly, many, if not most Australian Labor, Green and Teal politicians are more loyal to the Chicomms than Australia and would gladly roll over if the Chicomms invaded. Indeed, they would likely assist the enemy.

    270

    • #
      Ronin

      “The ancient Chinese Empire once went there.

      Therefore, it belongs to China.”

      Tell ’em we need to see proof.

      90

      • #
        Skepticynic

        We have proof they visited but a visit is not a claim.

        20

        • #
          Graeme4

          I forget the title of the book that claimed that Chinese junks circumnavigated Australia, but folks found plenty of holes in the story. The book claimed that the junks moored in the Swan River in WA, totally ignoring the fact that there was a rock bar across the river mouth that made entry by anything bigger than a rowboat impossible.

          50

    • #
      Dave in the States

      Sinocentrism was and is a real thing. It is deeply ingrained into Chinese culture. This has been the case since ancient times.

      As for Taiwan, the native people of Taiwan are not ethnicly Chinese. When Taiwan was awarded to the Japanese in 1895, the people looked to the Japanese as liberators. Then Chiang Kai-shek and the defeated KMT sought refuge there.

      110

      • #
        David Maddison

        Despite the Left wanting Taiwan to fall to the Chicomms, the West cannot afford for that to happen due to them being the source of most of the advanced computer chips used by the West.

        Frankly, I’m surprised that the Chicomms didn’t invade under the O’Biden regime. Thankfully they didn’t. They won’t dare do so under TRUMP.

        70

    • #
      Rowjay

      The ancient Chinese Empire once went there.

      There are an awful lot if islands between us and mainland China – I suppose they never set foot on them on the way to Australia.

      60

    • #
      KP

      “advocate the “annexation” of Australia based on similar arguments to those being applied against”..Greenland…

      Annexation seems to be getting popular these days.

      30

      • #
        Old Goat

        KP,
        Judging on what has happened to the “countries” being currently “annexed” (Ukraine and Gaza) we should steer well away….

        30

    • #
      TedM

      China’s answer in the Sthn Hemisphere to the US wish to acquire Greenland in the north?

      10

  • #
    David Maddison

    An even more unthinkable outcome than a Labor win in the next federal election is Greens/Teals having the balance of power.

    Despite the date of the following article, I don’t think this is an April Fool’s joke. Adam Bandt is the joke.

    https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/federal-election/economists-warning-over-greens-demands-over-tax-spending-agenda/news-story/739fcc20d5bc8af97a24bc30016fa1bf

    Economists warning over Greens’ demands over tax, spending agenda

    Adam Bandt’s $110bn list of demands for negotiating a minority government this federal election will cost Aussie jobs, economists have warned.

    April 1, 2025

    A Greens’ fantasy to raise billions of dollars by taxing billionaires and mining companies to pay for its huge spending agenda will drive away investment, cost Australian jobs and ultimately fail to raise the revenue it claims, economists have warned.

    PAYWALLED

    140

    • #
      el+gordo

      Labor is delusional.

      ‘Taxpayers will contribute $4000 for an average household battery installation under a $2.3b election commitment by the PM, with Labor promising the policy will push electricity prices down for ‘everyone’. (Oz)

      100

      • #
        Graeme No.3

        Electricity prices down by $275?

        80

      • #
        David Maddison

        There are about 9 million households in Australia.

        I’m guessing the cost of a typical battery is $12,000 (let’s say) and that a vast majority of households don’t already have batteries.

        So if the consumer contributes $4000 that means that the consumer/taxpayer has to contribute $8,000.

        That means that our taxes will have to contribute $72,000,000,000 or $72 billion to this insanity (9 million X $8,000).

        Is no politician sufficiently numerate to do such basic arithmetic?

        Where do they get the $2.3 billion from?

        120

        • #
          Brenda Spence

          Not all 9 million households will be able to make use of the subsidy. How many millions live in high rise apartments or rentals? Totally stupid idea to fool a few for a non problem.

          70

      • #
        Yarpos

        Not one “journalist” asks why do we suddenly need batteries that need a subsidy? Why can i just have a wall outlet that provides reliable, affordable power. You know, like my parents had.

        Instead they just help normalise Bowens energy lunacy.

        150

        • #
          TedM

          Correct Yarpos, journalists strangely (or possibly not so strangely silent). Another question for journalists to ask on the public’s behalf, “since when did domestic power supply become the responsibility of the householder”.

          40

      • #
        OldOzzie

        The estimated costs of building a nuclear power plant vary from $14 billion to $30 billion.

        About one-third of these costs are “indirect”, including the cost of land, licensing, engineering, construction, and other owner costs. Direct costs include the reactor and turbine equipment, as well as all other systems and equipment required to produce energy.

        The table below shows a breakdown of costs to build a nuclear power plant*:

        Factors Estimated Costs

        Licensing and permits $700 million – $1.5 billion
        Land $28 million – $60 million
        Engineering $2.34 billion – $5.00 billion
        Construction $1.48 billion – $3.18 billion
        Reactor equipment $2.93 billion – $6.27 billion
        Turbine equipment $2.45 billion – $5.25 billion
        Structure and improvements $2.31 billion – $4.95 billion
        Electric equipment $854 million – $1.83 billion
        Heat rejection system $420 million – $900 million
        Miscellaneous equipment $294 million – $630 million
        Other costs $196 million – $420 million

        *Costs in the table are calculated based on power plant capital investment cost estimates published by the Department of Energy and considering the reported costs of building new nuclear reactors by the Vogtle power plant in Georgia. Vogtle is the first and only nuclear power plant approved to be built in the US since the 1970s.

        For example, the construction of the third and fourth reactors at Plant Vogtle in the United States, which began in 2009, was originally scheduled to start up in 2016 and 2017 at a cost of around $14 billion. However, they actually came online in 2023 and 2024, with the total cost of the project exceeding [ $30 billion].

        30

        • #
          OldOzzie

          Economics of Nuclear Power

          – Nuclear power is cost-competitive with other forms of electricity generation, except where there is direct access to low-cost fossil fuels.

          – Fuel costs for nuclear plants are a minor proportion of total generating costs, though capital costs are greater than those for coal-fired plants and much greater than those for gas-fired plants.

          – System costs for nuclear power (as well as coal and gas-fired generation) are very much lower than for intermittent renewables.

          -Providing incentives for long-term, high-capital investment in deregulated markets driven by short-term price signals presents a challenge in securing a diversified and reliable electricity supply system.

          – In assessing the economics of nuclear power, decommissioning and waste disposal costs are fully taken into account.

          – Nuclear power plant construction is typical of large infrastructure projects around the world, whose costs and delivery challenges tend to be under-estimated.

          Assessing the relative costs of new generating plants utilizing different technologies is a complex matter and the results depend crucially on location. Coal is, and will probably remain, economically attractive in countries such as China and Australia, as long as carbon emissions are cost-free or not fully costed.

          Gas is also competitive for base-load power in many places, particularly using combined-cycle plants. Nuclear power plants are expensive to build but relatively cheap to run.

          The basic economics metric for any generating plant is the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE).

          It is the total cost to build and operate a power plant over its lifetime divided by the total electricity output dispatched from the plant over that period, hence typically cost per megawatt hour.

          On a levelized (i.e. lifetime) basis, nuclear power is an economic source of electricity generation, combining the advantages of security, reliability and very low greenhouse gas emissions.

          30

          • #
            OldOzzie

            Australia’s major exports in 2024 include iron ores and concentrates, coal, and petroleum gases, which together account for 62.6% of overall export sales.

            Coal, solid fuels made from coal: Valued at $55.8 billion, a decrease of 13.1% from the previous year.

            Petroleum gases: Valued at $46.9 billion, a decrease of 7.8% from the previous year.

            Problem there is, that’s where Australia’s Tax Surplus (the one spent by Labor Albo/Chalmers Economics/Blackout Bowen – Just throw it away at the Wind Renewables) was/is coming from

            – Meanwhile Countries with Brains

            South Korea has been reducing its imports of coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG) by increasing its reliance on nuclear power.

            Between 2019 and 2024, nuclear power generation in South Korea expanded by 29%, from 146 terawatt hours (TWh) to 189 TWh, which allowed utilities to reduce coal-fired power output by 26% and still elevate overall electricity supplies by 6% during that same period.

            Over the first quarter of 2025, South Korea’s imports of thermal coal were down 23% from the same quarter a year ago, while LNG imports were down 16%.

            In 2024, South Korea was the world’s fourth-largest importer of thermal coal and third-largest importer of LNG, but this trend is reversing as nuclear power’s share of the country’s electricity generation has surpassed that of coal and gas-fired plants for the first time.

            With four additional reactors under construction, nuclear power’s role in South Korea’s energy mix is expected to continue growing.

            South Korea’s shift towards nuclear power is part of a broader strategy to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and cut emissions.

            Despite these long-term goals, the immediate impact of increased nuclear power generation has been a significant reduction in coal and LNG imports, demonstrating the potential for nuclear power to displace costly and high-polluting fuels from power production.

            30

            • #
              Graeme No.3

              And a nuclear plant could last 90 years, whereas a coal plant about half that.
              Offshore wind ‘farms’ about 15 years at best. Onshore wind ‘farms’ less than 30 years (very generously) even though many are ‘upgraded’ after 9 to 16 years.

              It just came to me that ‘farms’ refers to the Tax ‘farmers’ of the old regime in France. Most of them got a short sharp refusal after The Revolution.

              20

        • #
          KP

          Well, we know our place in the world.. Countries building nuclear power stations now-

          China 25
          India 7
          Turkey 4
          Egypt 4
          Russia 4
          South Korea 2
          Bangladesh 2
          Japan 2
          UK 2
          Ukraine 2
          Argentina, Brazil, France, Iran, Slovakia, all 1

          Its hard to find out who is doing them all, but Russia is doing 19 of them-

          ‘at the beginning of 2024, Rosatom is constructing 19 nuclear power units at 7 nuclear power plants in 6 countries: 4 each in Turkey, Egypt, China, India, two in Bangladesh and one in Iran. By 2030, almost all of them should be completed,’

          “Leningrad phase II- Total project cost was estimated at $6.6 billion”

          Leningrad 2-Unit 3 Type-VVER V-491 PWR Output 1101 Construction start 2024-03-14
          Leningrad 2-Unit 4 Type-VVER V-491 PWR Output 1101 Construction start 2025-03-20

          So $US6.6billon buys you 2200MWe

          Even if we go nuclear, the cost of being America’s lapdog will cripple us compared to what others are paying.

          00

        • #
          Old Goat

          Ozzie,
          We have the ideal site ready for it in Victoria – where we used to have the Yallourn power stations . The grid is already set up , cooling is already there and a workforce who have worked with turbines . Just have to keep the CMFEU and DEI out of it …

          10

      • #
        Graeme4

        So the Labor Party discards the RepuTex cost modelling that provided the $275 cost saving, yet embarks on another cost modelling that claims that a battery subsidy will somehow save us money. Absolutely delusional.

        60

    • #
      KP

      “taxing billionaires and mining companies to pay for its huge spending agenda will drive away investment, cost Australian jobs and ultimately fail to raise the revenue it claims, ”

      Sounds like a great argument for less and less taxation raising more and more money until we hit zero percent when the Govt gets it all!

      50

    • #
      Hanrahan

      An even more unthinkable outcome than a Labor win in the next federal election is Greens/Teals having the balance of power.

      A motherhood statement but if posters here are typical the real mood is “anyone but the unaparty” ie the Liberals.

      30

  • #
    H P

    Adam Bandt, Australia’s next Deputy Prime Minister. Albo won’t stand a chance of reeling in his ambitions. Nightmare territory.

    140

  • #
    David Maddison

    Leftoids who hate Elon Musk should realise he wasn’t born rich.

    In the early days of SpaceX he nearly went bankrupt and had to borrow money from a friend to pay his home rent.

    But Elon never gives up, he keeps trying and he learns from every failure.

    And his hard work and determination made him the world’s richest man and he is democratising space, and bring free speech to the world through X and Starlink among many other achievements.

    80

    • #
      Simon

      There was a good article on Musk in the NY Times during the weekend. Most of his political views are inherited from his grandfather, who was kicked out of the US because of is advocacy for Technocracy. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/04/opinion/elon-musk-doge-technocracy.html

      19

      • #
        David Maddison

        Notice how the billionaire heros of the Left are advocates of censorship, expensive “green” energy, compulsory injection of experimental “vaccines”, synthetic foods (meat), insect consumption, violent riots, restrictions on freedom, reduction in the standard of living of non-Elites, and love flying around the world in their private jets etc.?

        150

      • #
        David Maddison

        I think you should check those facts Simon.

        As a Leftist, you would no doubt believe everything far Left oriented Goolag AI tells you.

        I used the Goolag search term:

        “was elon musks father kicked out of the us” without quotes.

        Goolag AI says:

        No, Elon Musk’s father, Errol Musk, was not kicked out of the US; he simply chose to return to South Africa after a period of living in the US, which caused a rift with his son.

        No Deportation:
        There’s no indication that Errol Musk was ever deported or forced to leave the US; he made the choice to return to South Africa.

        In any case, what you and the article says makes no sense.

        Why would someone get kicked out of the US for a non-violent political opinion? It’s a free country.

        The article you quote seems to be another pathetic and desperate lie by the Left to harm pro-US and pro-Western conservatives.

        80

        • #
          Crakar24

          David, Simon stated elons grandfather was kicked out of the USA, you searched for the history of his father being kicked out, perhaps you should be more accurate in your searching before playing the “I will bully them until they stop posting game’

          Happy to be corrected

          Regards

          12

      • #
        TedM

        Oops, don’t let it go to your head Simon. I meant to give you a red tick. Please cancel that green one.

        20

      • #
        Harves

        Is that the same NY Times that won prizes for its fake news Russia hoax?

        00

    • #
      DD

      DOGE volunteer speaks about social security (5 min video):
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnNVo8pOE74

      10

  • #
    Greg in NZ

    Talking of govt-sponsored misinfo:

    “We know our planet is warming due to the release of greenhouse gases…”

    so saith ‘Doctor’ Claire Concannon, a doomsayer biologist who’s now employed by the state broadcaster to scare the living daylights out of little children – and I presume grown adults too – with her lilting Irish doomsday call-to-arms to tackle CCC™️.

    She recently travelled down to McMurdo Base in Antarctica (not sure if she planted her carbon credit pine trees there or in NZ once she returned) to interview other non-medical ‘doctors’ working on the ice, including the usual NIWA & Victoria University ‘the end is nigh’ experts.

    They’d issued an emergency press release due to their ‘findings’ – are they similar to ‘learnings’? – that 2023/24’s sea ice had fallen off a cliff. No wonder she bandied the word ‘unprecedented’ about as these scientists had, allegedly, finally discovered the Edge Of The World where all things fall off and plummet into the Great Void Of Nothingness. Or was it merely a blip?

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/ourchangingworld

    (enter at your own mind-numbing risk).

    The B-52s must’ve had her in mind when they penned their timeless tune:
    She Came From Planet Claire!

    60

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    “What Bureaucrats REALLY Say and Do Behind Closed Doors”

    “One of the most frustrating things about debating with liberals is that they continually repeat the claim that, because some action or program is described in some benign way, that the action or program actually DOES the fine and good thing that the description claims.

    DEI is all about “inclusion.” It’s right there in the NAME! Words are the only thing that matters, you see.

    Reality is not defined by words. Words are supposed to reflect reality. Liberals often get things wrong by starting at the wrong point and working their way backward.

    This story is a perfect example of how things really work much of the time. ”

    https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/04/05/what-bureaucrats-really-say-and-do-behind-closed-doors-n3801488

    30

  • #
    John Connor II

    …and we’re back to “real time” again…
    Either ditch the daylight saving nonsense or moves the clocks forward 1 hour permanently.
    Why not call it “darkness limiting” instead?

    42

  • #
    Rowjay

    President Vladimir Putin sent one of his close allies, Kirill Dmitriev, to Washington this week for diplomatic talks, the most senior Kremlin official to visit since Russia invaded Ukraine.
    Dmitriev studied at Stanford and got his MBA at Harvard before working for Goldman Sachs and McKinsey & Co. He also “has his own connections in the United States.”
    After meeting with Trump’s officials, he did a round of broadcast interviews in which he talked up normalizing relations with Washington, Arctic cooperation and a minerals deal. He even said the Kremlin could be involved in Elon Musk’s plan to put humans on Mars. Ukraine was mentioned in passing, but he did not mention it in his social-media summary of the trip.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putins-two-faced-strategy-says-approach-trump-ukraine-rcna199449

    Delay, Distract, Deceive, Demoralize, then rinse and repeat.

    30

    • #
      KP

      Good ol’ NBC propaganda-

      “At the same time, Putin ordered the mobilization of 160,000 troops, his largest in 14 years, as his drones continue their nightly bombardment of Ukrainian civilians and he plans a spring offensive — if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is to be believed.”

      His annual troop call-up for the Reserves, not related to Ukraine at all. Ukie drones bomb Russian civilians every night too, and he doesn’t need a ‘spring offensive’, he just keeps his army moving forward.

      ” even a partial or temporary truce has been blocked by the Russians.” No truth there, the Russians told the Yanks what their conditions were, the Yanks came up with something crazy and said “Accept this”, then bitched about it when Putin said ‘No’.

      “In the short term, there are few signs Russia is slowing its war.”

      The only truthful statement in the whole article! Russia has no reason to slow the war, they will continue until they win what they set out to do.

      00

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW – a covid records site

    ” I am extremely pleased to announce that, after years of hard work, our diligent C&C volunteers have opened the fully working version of their website, the Covid-19 files. The site provides a one-stop shop for searching covid-related documents of all kinds, including Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, legal court case filings, public database findings, and other materials. It’s a critical part of our long-term plan to achieve covid accountability.”

    https://c19files.org/

    More at

    https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/vigilant-saturday-april-5-2025-c?

    And on tariffs etc

    60

    • #
      another ian

      More covid scene

      “Follow The Science: Why Peter Marks Was Asked To Leave The FDA”

      “Peter Marks is not a hero of the resistance but instead has been subverting the scientific process at FDA for years.

      The media proclamation that Dr. Marks’ is “FDA’s top vaccine scientist” is ironic because he decided to give himself that position. Marks is a physician but has no clinical or scientific training in vaccines or immunology. Dr. Marks trained as an oncologist, a field far from the important and complex area of vaccine biology. At FDA in 2021, Dr. Marks removed top career vaccine scientists so he could force through the approval of the COVID vaccine to meet an arbitrary Biden administration deadline.”

      More at

      https://www.zerohedge.com/political/follow-science-why-peter-marks-was-asked-leave-fda

      20

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    “WATCH: Man Savagely Trolls Triggered Anti-Musk Agitators with a Creative ‘New Technology’ During a “Tesla Takedown” Protest in California”

    The “Retard Finder”

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/tomorrow-watch-man-savagely-trolls-triggered-anti-musk/

    20

  • #
    David Maddison

    Word of the day: kakistocracy.

    Example: Australia is a kakistocracy.

    QUOTE A kakistocracy (/kækɪˈstɒkrəsi/, /kækɪsˈtɒ-/) is a government run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens. The word was coined as early as the seventeenth century. Peter Bowler has noted in his book that there is no word for the government run by the best citizens, and that the aristarchy may be the right term, but still, it could conceivably be a kakistocracy disguised as an aristocracy. END QUOTE (Wikipedia)

    50

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    “Reading the Sky: The Secret Science Behind Cloud Shapes and Weather Prediction”

    https://scitechdaily.com/reading-the-sky-the-secret-science-behind-cloud-shapes-and-weather-prediction/

    https://instapundit.com/712656/#disqus_thread

    Something else lacking in those global models?

    20

    • #
      Greg in NZ

      Nephology is the word:

      from Greek nephos for cloud.

      Not to be confused with *necromanncy* which is the dark art as practiced by climastrologists of the Mannian Error – often simplified to ME! ME! ME!

      30

  • #
    DD

    A tip: many of us are now using Brave web browser, not least because it blocks ads in some video content. I don’t know how the various advertising models work, but I imagine that, as a result, somewhere along the line conservative commentators are missing out on income. To remedy this I now do my browsing in Brave, but when I want to view content from worthy conservative commentators and news channels, I copy the link to the video into another browser — one that doesn’t block ads — and view it there.

    30

  • #
    • #
      Peter C

      Global temperatures trending down for the last 12 months but overall there has been an increase of about 0.7C since 1998.
      What will happen next?

      40

      • #

        It doesn’t really matter. All Humans have to do is adapt just like the flora and fauna has to.

        40

      • #
        el+gordo

        BoM says we’ll enjoy this winter ‘with an increased chance of unusually high overnight temperatures nationwide.’

        10

      • #
        Scott

        Except its not temperature its divergence from a 30 year mean value which is currently 1991-2020

        How does it actually compare to the hottest periods in each area of the globe. In the US it was the 1930’s Australia late 18th and early 19th century.

        Averages hide a multitude of sins.

        You will likely find we are no hotter than those periods in our historical past

        20

        • #
          Vladimir

          BOM, being a government and also a scientific body is always correct. We nowadays fill colder only because of slowing blood flow.
          Strangely though they do not report 40-41 degrees summer days in Melbourne, as they did in past.
          Maybe it is my imagination, you know – last century the weather was better and I was 6’3″ tall, blond, very muscular…

          10

  • #
    Greg in NZ

    ‘Colder’ than 1998 and 2016 –

    has the Hokey Schtick™️ finally flipped?

    Now how to make half-a-degree sound scary…

    (oops, meant to be a reply to el gordo at #19)

    50

  • #
    Penguinite

    So Albo-Tross wants to artificially pump the economy with

    “Taxpayers will contribute $4000 for an average household battery installation under a $2.3b election commitment by the PM, with Labor promising the policy will push electricity prices down for ‘everyone’”

    This is, of course, absolute balderdash! Labor may gain a few votes but China will, once again, be the main beneficiary with Australian Tax Payers the biggest losers over the medium to long term. The batteries may last 5-10 years but the debt will last for ever.

    20

  • #
    Penguinite

    “Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong says Peter Dutton was ‘reckless’ to suggest Australia’s defence relationship with the US could be a key bargaining chip in Australia’s favour in negotiations over tariffs”.

    Of course she does she wants to kowtow to China

    20

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>