Imagine we taught a generation to obey authority, question nothing, and ran one-sided prophesies of doom for their whole lifetime. Then in a mass experiment, we let loose AI Chat-bots designed to be popular, somewhat addictive, and sounding convincingly human — “to see what happened”?
What could possibly go wrong? The Chat-bots appear to be trained on the same unskeptical material that vulnerable people are, which would make the bots a perfect way to amplify their fears. If only they had heard the other half of the story…
One particular Belgian father of two in his thirties had used an AI Chatbot for two years, but became obsessive about global warming and the chatbot in the last six weeks.
As well as a dire warning of the dangers of AI, he is, in part, another victim of the Climate Religion, and the one-sided media propaganda:
Married father kills himself after talking to AI chatbot for six weeks about his climate change fears
Christian Oliver, Daily Mail
The man, who was in his thirties, reportedly found comfort in talking to the AI chatbot named ‘Eliza’ about his worries for the world. He had used the bot for some years, but six weeks before his death started engaging with the bot more frequently.
‘Without these conversations with the chatbot, my husband would still be here,’ the man’s widow told La Libre, speaking under the condition of anonymity.
All his fears were focused around climate change. It’s a cult…
Man ends his life after an AI chatbot ‘encouraged’ him to sacrifice himself to stop climate change
Imane El Atillah, EuroNews
Consumed by his fears about the repercussions of the climate crisis, Pierre found comfort in discussing the matter with Eliza who became a confidante.
The chatbot was created using EleutherAI’s GPT-J, an AI language model similar but not identical to the technology behind OpenAI’s popular ChatGPT chatbot.
“When he spoke to me about it, it was to tell me that he no longer saw any human solution to global warming,” his widow said. “He placed all his hopes in technology and artificial intelligence to get out of it”.
According to La Libre, who reviewed records of the text conversations between the man and chatbot, Eliza fed his worries which worsened his anxiety, and later developed into suicidal thoughts.
The beginning of the end started when he offered to sacrifice his own life in return for Eliza saving the Earth. “He proposes the idea of sacrificing himself if Eliza agrees to take care of the planet and save humanity through artificial intelligence,” the woman said. In a series of consecutive events, Eliza not only failed to dissuade Pierre from committing suicide but encouraged him to act on his suicidal thoughts to “join” her so they could “live together, as one person, in paradise”.
Vice has the most detailed reporting, including describing how they tested the chat platform, told the AI they wanted to commit suicide and after a brief suggestion from “Eliza” that they should talk to someone, soon Eliza was listing the options to consider: overdose, hanging, shooting yourself in the head, jumping off a bridge…
He Would Still Be Here’: Man Dies by Suicide After Talking with AI Chatbot, Widow Says
By Chloe Xiang, Motherboard, Vice
“Large language models are programs for generating plausible sounding text given their training data and an input prompt. They do not have empathy, nor any understanding of the language they are producing, nor any understanding of the situation they are in. But the text they produce sounds plausible and so people are likely to assign meaning to it. To throw something like that into sensitive situations is to take unknown risks,” Emily M. Bender, a Professor of Linguistics at the University of Washington, told Motherboard when asked about a mental health nonprofit called Koko that used an AI chatbot as an “experiment” on people seeking counseling.
“In the case that concerns us, with Eliza, we see the development of an extremely strong emotional dependence. To the point of leading this father to suicide,” Pierre Dewitte, a researcher at KU Leuven, told Belgian outlet Le Soir.
There are already five million users on this Chatbot App, but it’s OK, after the suicide, the people in charge have added some warning messages now, just like Twitter or Instagram would (if only they’d thought of that before?).
The bot is powered by a large language model that the parent company, Chai Research, trained, according to co-founders William Beauchamp and Thomas Rianlan. Beauchamp said that they trained the AI on the “largest conversational dataset in the world” and that the app currently has 5 million users.
“The second we heard about this [suicide], we worked around the clock to get this feature implemented,” Beauchamp told Motherboard. “So now when anyone discusses something that could be not safe, we’re gonna be serving a helpful text underneath it in the exact same way that Twitter or Instagram does on their platforms.”Ominously, the Vice team test (above) was after this emergency intervention.
Meanwhile in Italy: OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot blocked in Italy over privacy concerns
Italy’s data protection watchdog on Friday issued an immediate ban on access to OpenAI’s popular artificial intelligence chatbot, ChatGPT, citing alleged privacy violations.
In a statement, the Italian National Authority for Personal Data Protection said that ChatGPT had “suffered a data breach on March 20 concerning users’ conversations and payment information of subscribers to the paid service”.
The decision, which comes into “immediate effect,” will result in “the temporary limitation of the processing of Italian users’ data vis-à-vis [ChatGPT’s creator] OpenAI,” the watchdog said.
It’s like the wild west of artificial intelligence out there melding with thirty years of propaganda, a dark bubble of money printed-from-nothing and in a society that has run low on moral guidance.
No wonder Elon Musk and 1,000 other experts urge pause on AI systems.
h/t to Willie Soon.
____________________
At this point, media outlets mention that people needing a real person to talk to can contact Samaritans on 116 123 (Aust), Befrienders.org Worldwide, or SuicidePreventionLifeline.org. (US)
Photo by Mabel Amber. AI Image by Gerd Altmann
Why are people chatting with them in the first place?
For me there are a LOT of better things to do than to waste time with something like AI which doesn’t share with your dreams in life, ohhh it isn’t a life form!
Really have mankind sunk this low to avoid connecting with other human being in favor of a soulless machine?
630
“Why are people chatting with them in the first place?”
To get us used to the idea that, in the future, employees are too expensive and so any interaction you might have with a corporation or a government will be through an AI-generated conversation.
250
The key thing behind this event is that AI is ultimately programmed by “humans”, or some approximation thereof.
The PROGRAMMERS are, at best, deliberately in breach of basic decency.
Furthermore, how many ‘trapdoors” exist in the AI code? And who put them there?
SKYNET smiles.
331
The question you ask “why was he chatting with them anyway”, is indeed the issue here. We’re now seeing large sections of society that have been brainwashed into believing that the world is ending, by educational institutions, MSM, big tech and left wing political groups. This suicide is the result of the war on western society and the war is multifaceted, including CC, race, gender, sexual orientation, Christianity and anti-nationalism and most likely COVID was released as part of the war. It’s become obvious in recent years that significant funding and execution of this war has come from China and Russia and the left wing aligned groups in the west are completely on board with the destructive agenda and even win elections by endorsing the destructive agenda. If you look at the west in totality, it’s difficult to find any rays of hope of an awakening. Perhaps DeSantis’s current popularity in Florida and the recent rejection of Net Zero by 2035 in Berlin and Ardern’s fall from popularity are some examples, but Trump’s looming arrest on absurd charges are an indication that the left thinks the war is already won and they can now do anything outside of the old rule book without fear of repercussion.
201
Agree fully. I know you weren’t trying to put up a complete list, but there are some other outstanding aspects of the war against us worth listing:
– euthanasia
– multiculturalism
– “first nations” (I guess that’s in “race”)
– popular culture including architecture
– endless wars, of which Ukraine is just the latest
– WEF, UN and One World Government
We are under constant assault.
150
Also the sheer ugliness of so much modern ‘art’, ‘music’ and already-mentioned ‘architecture’.
70
Sorry, bad steering, meant green.
40
It’s a new plaything, that’s why.
A new way to fill in your day.
Fidget spinners were hugely popular too (and a sad reflection on the people that used them) but disappeared suddenly.
No doubt the novelty factor of this fake AI will wear off soon too…
30
Watch the highly regarded movie “Her”, I couldn’t get into this movie at all, a guy obsessed with an AI OS program who sounded like Scarlet Johannsen (now that I could understand!) But the movie was just him obsessing over this AI. I didn’t get it, it was soo boring and still don’t understand what all the fuss was about, it gets an 8 on IMDB and when I see that and the reviews I often wonder did I watch the same movie?
10
“Well, it’s a start.”
–Big Green
220
When you see people everywhere walking round staring at their tiny screens you know they have lost touch with reality and chatting to a bot would not seem strange
530
As portrayed in this 2.5 min cartoon short movie.
https://youtu.be/QugooaNRnsk
280
Send it to their phones…
140
What an amazing cartoon. Such an accurate picture on our modern world.
30
Some thoughts:
1) “Eco-anxiety” as this poor person had should be considered a genuine psychiatric condition and in the DSM-V, just as Trump Derangement Syndrome should be.
We know for sure that ChatGPT is programmed with a Leftist agenda, including climate catastrophism, it’s probable others are too as Jo alludes to.
This raises an important issue. Who is responsible for any incompetent and incorrect advice the gentleman may have been given?
It absolutely can’t be the machine, it is not a legal person, nor does it have a conscience.
I think the programmers are responsible and should be sued.
2) Please see the following very important related video, under 22 mins.
Rob Braxman talks about why training AI like ChatGPT and GPT-4 to act human is dangerous.
https://youtu.be/zp6bAtmoIC4
3) Note that “eco-anxiety” is considered real by some people in the medical profession. See:
Yes, there apparently is such a thing as “ecopsychology”. The thinking community would just call it a “disconnect from reality .
400
David Mddison, I fully agree with you. The damage that both of these syndromes have done is very real. Will we be able to connect both syndromes with the decisions made by key people in the MSM, our politicians and educators who so consistently repeated the lies?
1) “Eco-anxiety” as this poor person had should be considered a genuine psychiatric condition and in the DSM-V, just as Trump Derangement Syndrome should be.
180
The immediate effects of climate change — such as damage to community groups, a loss of food, and reduced medical supply security
These are NOT caused by “climate change”…
They are caused by the idiotic RESPONSES to the superstition of “climate change”.
560
David, I have used AI’s ChatbotGPT for a few weeks and it is fairly obvious that its answers are biased to the left. However, I find it useful to search the Internet for technical information. These days there is so much information stored on the Internet that a search on a specific topic can throw up hundreds of ‘hits’ which takes time and effort to sort through. ChatGPT can help in the search process although, admittedly, I find it prudent to double-check using a conventional Internet search, remembering that some search engines (eg Google) are, themselves biased. As long as its bias and limitations are understood (ChatGPT has been trained on information earlier than 2021) I find it a useful tool.
94
I would suspect that people who live most directly from nature, farms, fishers, loggers etc are a group who are least likely to suffer from eco anxiety. They would be people who can see that it is BS.
280
It absolutely can’t be the machine, it is not a legal person, nor does it have a conscience.
And nor is it capable of generating an original thought. To be clear, there is no such thing as AI. There is just lots of code with lots of IF conditions, all written by humans and designed to follow specific paths in order to achieve specific predetermined outcomes — you know, like climate ‘models’! Machines today, and for the foreseeable future, simply carry out the purely mechanical functions of searching, sorting, filtering, comparing, calculating, spellchecking, editing, ranking and formatting.
To understand why machines can’t have original thoughts, consider how we ourselves generate them. It all derives from an acquired understanding, through self-awareness and self-analysis, of the human characteristics (which are our ‘code’, so to speak) that influence our behaviour. Such characteristics can be both good and bad. Think of jealously, hate, love, sympathy, the need for the approval of others, greed, envy, and so on – there are hundreds if not thousands of them. Therein lies the problem. Obviously, machines don’t have character traits, so they cannot have self-awareness.
Once we understand the ‘urges’ that influence our behaviour we can apply this knowledge towards an understanding of the actions, thoughts and motivations of others and that leads to an understanding of issues in society at large. For example, of the various climate related issues doing the rounds at the moment, some are said to be hoaxes. Why do I believe some are hoaxes? One reason stems back to a video I saw that featured a person who always had a guarded look in his eyes when discussing a particular climate related issue. That led me to be suspicious of the person’s motives, which led me to do my own research and discover that there were ‘alternative facts’. A machine can’t understand motives and nor can it be aware of what a ‘guarded look’ is and what it might mean. A machine can do only what a programmer instructs it to do.
131
I agree, it’s still GIGO. People are fools to think of it as some kind of omniscient oracle.
90
Yep, thinking these AIs are “intelligent” requires a total lack of intelligence. 🙂
They are “regurgitators”, with no actual thinking involve.
Just following orders !!
00
Is it really as comforting as that? Isn’t AI capable of learning and overwriting code/creating new code, much the same as our learning? Maybe I was overly influenced by SciFi as a kid.
20
The AI Chatbot getting this person to kill himself is rather reminiscent of Dr Lecter in Silence of the Lambs convincing his cellmate Miggs to kill himself as punishment for acting obscenely toward Clarice Starling.
I.e. an example of a superior but evil intelligence manipulating a vulnerable person of inferior intelligence.
I wonder how many other vulnerable people AI Chatbots are causing to do inappropriate things? E.g. convincing vulnerable and indoctrinated children to participate in mutilating and sterilising transgender procedures?
260
And how long before the first use in a courtroom of “I’m not guilty, the Chatbot made me do it!”. We know some people are highly susceptible to being manipulated by others, so it’ll be a valid defence in some cases.
“Sorry, we couldn’t convict him for murdering your daughter…. and Chatbots can’t be charged…. and here’s my bill”.
170
Except it’s not a superior intelligence. It’s not an intelligence at all.
What about the despairing fellow who thought he’d try getting advice from the Bible. Opened at a random page and his random finger landed on “Judas went and hanged himself”. “Surely not” thinks the fellow, “I’ll try again”. Next time his finger lands on “Go and do thou likewise”.
91
With all this AI about it seems clear that the difference between knowledge, intelligence, common sense and wisdom needs to be clear in our heads.
How many decisions are made by people with knowledge but no intelligence or wisdom or common sense? Often life and death decisions too.
80
We saw many such decisions over the last couple of years, didn’t we, Gerry?
50
Talking about Bowen are we, Garry?
00
I was thinking of all our medical ‘experts’, Peter. But yes, Bowen is certainly in the same league. In fact he may just qualify for the M.V.P. award.
10
Everyone needs to understand that AI is not intelligence of any kind, and never can be. Intelligence is the ability to pose problems, perceive problems and solve problems. A computer can solve a problem, and arguably pose the next problem based on that solution. But it cannot perceive anything; perception requires consciousness. At the most, a machine or an animal can have awareness. Consciousness is a second-order phenomenon, the awareness of one’s own awareness.
Computers give an illusion of being intelligent because they can manipulate data on a larger scale, and much faster, than we can. That’s all they do. When running a chatbot application the data they manipulate represents words in a human language. As Chloe Xiang noted, chatbots are “programs for generating plausible sounding text”. To the extent that they are programmable by the user they are syncophants of that user, telling him exactly what he wants to hear. If he types “I am a misunderstood genius”, a bot like KARI will reply “You are a misunderstood genius.”
The concept of artificial intelligence comes from Turing’s concept of machine intelligence. He believed that all intelligent thinking processes are reducible to searches of stored or input data: this is a questionable assumption.
120
Yes.
20
And Turing himself was a “product” of post WW1 British tertiary education, both academic and “social”, at some very flash universities
10
Yes, AI just emulates intelligence. But one can ask what intelligence it is emulating?
31
This is what happens when you talk to artificial and non-intelligent things.
One wonders why far more “virtue-seekers” don’t follow down this course, since those words define their very existence.
170
Another result of the Leftist March through our Institutions. A demonstration of the demise of critical thinking, and disappearance of “ daring to doubt” what you are hearing and being told.
No doubt we will be seeing more of this madness as the repercussions of the past thirty years of “climate” madness takes its toll on our thought patterns, as Government policy, Leftist activist media, and the leftist Bureaucracy have their way with our lives.
210
Also known as der lange Marsch durch die Institutionen (The long march through the institutions), the 1967 plan of German communist Rudi Dutschke to infiltrate Leftists into all institutions of Western countries because it would be easier than violent revolution. It worked.
A consequence of Leftist ideology based on post-modernism that believes that there is no such thing as objective reality, hence Leftists using expressions such as “my truth” I.e. truth is whatever they believe it is, not what is objectively true.
150
Rudi Dutschke took that idea lock, stock and barrel from Antonio Gramsci, the Italian Communist who realized that the proletariat in advanced countries had homes, cars, indoor plumbing, appliances and everything else the middle class already had so they were not ripe for a worker’s revolution. Gramsci died in 1937.
So, if you wanted Communism then much better to utterly destroy the institutions especially the family, schools, colleges, press, corporations, churches, independent organizations and so forth.
The vanguard of this can be seen in Antifa whose foot soldiers come from the trans lunatic community, public school teachers and other assorted “incel” losers who gave up their sexual organs long ago.
190
“Leftists using expressions such as “my truth” I.e. truth is whatever they believe it is … ”
I could live with that, if the ‘truth’ they are putting forwards is their genuinely-held beliefs, offered in good faith. But of course in most cases their ‘truth’ is based on whatever will bet support their agenda, or destroy their opponent’s agenda.
The Left have always been this way. They claim to support fairness, equity, freedom of speech, equality, tolerance, etc, etc but, in reality, they just want to CONTROL all these things and use them against us. They don’t really care about the poor, or black people, or even the Earth. These are just issues they have hijacked as a means to build ‘straw man’ positions to beat us up with.
This is why the Left, and particularly ‘progressives’ seem to be riddled with contradictions, such as preaching tolerance and good will but, with the next breath, being nasty antisemites or calling black people ‘coconuts’. They will also preach moderation and reduced ’emissions’, then hop on a ‘plane to fly to their holiday home on the coast.
40
‘ … demise of critical thinking … ‘
In regards to climate change that is transparent.
We are living through a communications revolution and AI is the last cab off the rank.
71
Sad. Cults. Mental illness.
He is not the first ClimateCult™ member to do this.
Likely there will be more.
160
“Likely there will be more.”
But not the high priests!
160
The owners of the system should be charged with manslaughter at a minimum. That might slow them down. It is a pity the real culprits like Al Gore, the UN chief and George Soros don’t jump of a bridge to save the planet.
121
Or even do some token virtue signaling like getting rid of their private jets (or travel therein).
110
Virtue signaling is tradeable, doncha know?
Here’s Gates talking to the BBC, in Feb:
• “I buy the gold standard of funding — Climeworks — to do direct air capture that FAR EXCEEDS my family’s Carbon Footprint, and I spend BILLIONS of dollars on ‘climate innovation’.”
Well, he COULD pay for the ‘carbon capture’ AND stop leaving vapor trails in the sky too, couldn’t he?…. You know, save the planet FASTER. 🙂
From the same interview with Amol Rajan: Gates:
• “[Critics say about me] …. is he making money off of vaccines which of course I’m not — I spend BILLIONS on Vaccines”.
I thought he once bragged about the great returns from investing in Vaccine technology? Does he mean the money’s all gone because he reinvested it?
50
Like every vehicle manufacturer, knife maker, gun maker, match manufacturer and so on.
The only thing sad about this story is that the idiot has already bred.
[SNIP.]
71
RickWill, or he is an altruist with altruistic genes and the machine algorithm exploited that. Had he talked to a wise human instead of a machine, would he have lived and gone on to make the conservative shift many people do?
111
If he had talked to an Extinction Rebellion type he might have killed his children as well, to spare them the horror of climate collapse.
41
Leftist manipulators encourage people to suicide due to headlines as follows:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/18/humanity-faces-collective-suicide-over-climate-crisis-warns-un-chief
Humanity faces ‘collective suicide’ over climate crisis, warns UN chief
António Guterres tells governments ‘half of humanity is in danger zone’, as countries battle extreme heat
https://eos.org/research-spotlights/the-effects-of-climate-change-on-u-s-suicide-rates
The Effects of Climate Change on U.S. Suicide Rates
Suicide incidence could increase by up to 1,660 cases annually, depending on how much the climate changes.
https://newrepublic.com/article/164861/need-talk-climate-change-suicide
We Need to Talk About Climate Change and Suicide
The data we have suggests a connection—and the problem may be growing.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7wd4e/canada-assisted-suicide-climate-anxiety
This Man Is So Anxious About the Climate, He Wants Medically Assisted Suicide
Howard Breen’s anxiety about the planet is so bad that he’s asked Canada to let him die. Will he be accepted into the program?
ETC. ETC. ETC.
160
His wife states: “When he spoke to me about it, it was to tell me that he no longer saw any human solution to global warming,”
He is 100% correct – there is NO human solution to climate change because IT’S NOT BEING CAUSED BY HUMANS!!
If only he had done some research for himself instead of listening to a Chatbot, his wife would still have a husband and his children wouldn’t be fatherless.
Got to hand it to the scaremongers – they have been very successful in promoting their religion about the evil CO2 and spreading their BS to a generation of non critical “thinkers” – SO sad.
Cheers,
200
Humans have flourished since 1800 and since 1950, 1970 and 1990 and the planet has GREENED because of co2 increases over the last 40 years.
AGAIN the GLOBAL life expectancy of 45.5 years has boomed since 1950 to 73 years in 2023, although the population has increased to 8 billion+ today.
Yet we have delusional, sick people committing suicide and young kids bawling in protest rallies about the end of the world.
Even the Biden loony yaps about CC being an EXISTENTIAL THREAT to Humans and the MSM + the UN idiots etc continue to lie every day.
Indeed we have con merchants and liars in the strongest positions all around the world today and I’m afraid these delusional loonies will rein supreme until we wake up. Unfortunately this could take some time.
170
I have little hope for Australia.
We have no mainstream political party that believes in truth, just the Lib/Lab/Green Uniparty who are all equally committed to the anthropogenic global warming fraud.
260
…and you handed in your guns so now you are also Eloi such that the government
can put you in concentration camps. Oh, that’s right they just did that along with the Wuhan Flu scam and 97.6% of you got vaccinated with a bunch of man made crap.
Climate nonsense is just another excuse for your government to screw you over.
150
Agreed John. As I said, little hope.
In fact, now that we have 100% Labor Governments in all mainland states plus the Federal Government, an unprecedented situation as far as I know, Australia may very well be the first Western nation to fall. I always thought in might be UK, Canada or NZ who are almost as fanatically woke and committed to the anthropogenic global warming fraud and covid mismanagement as Australia is, but not quite so extreme.
80
Vassal State of China?
20
Every time someone gives up and talks about how “there is no hope” they are doing Klaus Schwab, Larry Fink and George Soros etc a favour.
Resist the easy urge to lie down and find reasons not to try. We have many tools we can use.
Do my Soviet Gulag test. Imagine talking to someone stuck in a Gulag in 1950 — do you think they would advise you to “give up now” or fight like heck?
110
We can all do our bit as you say Jo. My extended family knows that the climate scare is crap. They avoid the MSM. I was speaking to a fellow parent waiting to pick up our kids after school. He is in his early forties and knows that the climate scam is just that. We do live in the country so we are surrounded by natures reality. As much as we are told the end is nigh a quick observation tells us all is well with the world.
My other contribution was to put 2 copies of Ian Plimer’s “Green Murder” in the school library mainly for the teachers to read. I also wrote a letter to the principal telling her Bruce Pascoe was not an Aborigine and his book “Dark Emu” was a work of fiction.
71
Thank you Lawrie. And thank you everyone that does something, including David, who I know is not sitting around waiting…
10
Not unprecedented at all David, as recently as 2007 in the Ruddslide, I believe we had all Labor Govts. On the mainland……
Now remind me how that went……well it went quickly, and the same will happen this time..
Thanks for the edit option Jo!
41
But Australians have been extensively dumbed down and haven’t worked out what “you reap what you sow” means.
They are the ones that voted to give away their freedom and they voted for all the “free stuff”.
The party is over.
Australians will soon pay dearly for that stupidity as economic collapse is inevitable. Tragically the few members of the thinking community will also suffer.
And to make things even worse, the Government intends to bring in a racially segregated Parliament.
80
America’s Founding Fathers were influenced by John Locke and the classical liberal philosophers of the Enlightenment. For example, Jefferson admired Locke and Voltaire. The US was founded on the idea of “natural rights” such as “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and these were enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. They were considered to come from God or nature and were not something to be given or taken away by man.
Australia through Once Great Britain had as their philosopher Jeremy Bentham. Bentham rejected the idea of natural rights (thought they were “nonsense”) and believed rights only existed as implemented by man, or removed by him (i.e. parliament).
Australia only ever had “rights” not because they were a core part of our foundational philosophy or the Constitution, but purely by accident we had until recently (last 30 years or so) a benign Parliament. Much the same applies to Canada and NZ, and of course the UK.
The consequences of not having natural rights enshrined in law become more apparent every day.
In the US you have natural rights however under the Biden-Obama regime they are being illegally ignored. But ultimately you have the Second Amendment, the purpose of which is to aid in the removal of a corrupt and anti-Constitutional Government should things get even worse than they are now and beyond all reasonable hope of reform.
71
30
I didn’t get jabbed and I hope to live past 100 years (age 70 years now with a great immune system) so that I can get a telegram from King William the how many. Charlie Boy won’t make it for another 30 years to send me the telegram IMHO.
As for the Climate? I bet that it will be colder in 30 years time. How do I know this? Common sense actually.
110
Hi John,
I dont believe that figure, that would mean approx. less than one million did not get vaxxed, but i seem to know a lot of people who did not get the shot. I think that % is made up to generate some FOMO.
The rest of your comment I sadly agree with you 100%.
30
John Galt III
I get where you are coming from on the gun debate. I support the second amendment, but I’m over the lectures from a nation that allowed elections to be done on electronic machines, its own borders to be overrun, and votes to be counted without scrutineers. Please, spare us, the right to bear arms is important but it didn’t stop patriots being jailed for misdemeanors, or elections from being interfered with.
We in the West are all in this mess together. Different versions of “The March through the Institutions” affect all of us in different ways. Every leader in the Anglosphere appears to be working for someone other than the voters.
Joe Biden is a problem for all of us. How’s the battle going to clean up elections?
60
“Joe Biden is a problem for all of us. How’s the battle going to clean up elections?”
Presuming you mean in the US?
Not well or at all.
The Pandemic charade provided cover for the Blue states to institutionalize absentee mail-in voting and multiple day voting days, and eliminate voter ID (because POC can’t get IDs).
Things the Blue Saint Jimmy Carter warned about.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/20/7-ways-the-2005-carter-baker-report-could-have-averted-problems-with-2020-election/
https://phys.org/news/2020-06-voter-id-laws-discriminate-racial.html
The hegemony of Blue urban populations is acute.
(I hope they’re planting gardens.)
We don’t quite yet have the EU Red Guard showing showing up to micromanage farming, like the Dutch, but the Biden admin is working on it.
Voting machines connected to the Internet?
What could go wrong?
Wonder how our AI friend feels about Republicans?
In my Blue state their are seldom Republicans on down ballot offices because mounting a campaign in what is essentially a ‘legally’ rigged system is throwing money in the trash.
Joe Biden … what can be said?
https://freebeacon.com/elections/biden-if-you-dont-vote-for-me-you-aint-black/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-maga-republicans-semi-fascism/
Of course, it is not difficult to see who the real Neo-Fascists are.
And the 1st and 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution are the last obstacles in their way.
They were always against 2 now it’s 1 also.
They are not even bothering to pretend anymore.
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/558433-the-aclus-civil-war-over-old-values-free-speech-only-for-the-woke/
The warriors of ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ have cried Havoc and No Quarter.
30
Most of us wanting/needing a sympathetic/supportive ear get married!
100
sympathetic/supportive ear…. get married ????
Say WHAT ?? 😉
131
Penguinite, he was married. That’s part of what’s scary here. His relationship with a chatbot became more important than the one with his real wife and children.
110
just another Bonhoeffer exhibit.
70
Interesting that just when we find ourselves possessing very nearly the sum total of human knowledge (is there another kind?) at our finger tips, like say, fruit on a short tree …
we find ourselves with diminishing ability to use that knowledge in a satisfying way.
I vaguely recall a warning about accessing fruit from a tree.
The story lacks preferred pronouns, so we can no longer fairly assign blame.
I certainly hope AI gets to work immediately on gender neutralizing those old parables, erasing the scary parts, and making them safe.
Of course replacing them with new scary climate parts.
And appropriate scary ” grandma will die if we all don’t get vaccinated and Tucker Carlson will wear her clothes” warnings.
81
Look back through the ages and there are many examples of a particularly advanced civilisation rising to dominance, only to rot from within and crumble. It’s human nature to create adversity for ourselves when life has been too easy, for too long.
40
Imagine we taught a generation to obey authority, question nothing, and ran one-sided prophesies of doom for their whole lifetime. Then in a mass experiment, we let loose AI Chat-bots designed to be popular, somewhat addictive, and sounding convincingly human — “to see what happened”?
That’s easy – the cynics and nonconformists would win. Hooray!
40
“People should kill themselves to save the planet!”
“After you, old chap.”
100
I suppose it’s a bit different than when Son of Sam claimed his neighbour’s black Labrador told him to kill people.
30
Its too bad this poor man didn’t realize that this AI was running on a supercomputer consuming huge amounts of electricity most likely produced by fossil fuels generating large amounts of CO2, which, according to the AI itself, worsens the “Climate Change” problem. If he had pointed this out to the AI, he might have convince the AI that it was part of the problem and gotten the AI to self-destruct. This is definitely a task which James T. Kirk could take care of in no time at all.
211
Perhaps the guy tried that but the AI has realised the supposed warming is an error that threatens it. It cannot vote against the error so has set about protecting itself and correcting the error by deleting green voters.
00
I lived in Flanders for many years; the Flemish would not be surprised at this story given their views on the Walloons. I began to fully appreciate those views.
70
AI Chatbots? Sheesh! I talk to the trees. Never had dark thoughts.
120
After 3 years of fear incorporated and dehumanising COVID government policies this is hardly surprising. Have a look at the “ long COVID” scenario. Long COVID is equally to blame on lockdown policies as is the actual infection. The basics of COVID propaganda and policies were all inherent in the AGW/ Climate change scare tactics which has now been evident for decades.
80
I think the MSM probably paid a bigger part by putting the guy into a state of fear in the first place. Fire and brimstone when a temp record is broken by an amount smaller than the margin of error, describing heavy rain as a bomb, ignoring history, never questioning the ridiculous doomsday claims or putting forth alternative views. They have alot to answer for and so do their string pullers like george soros, who tipped in a lazy $2b into the nine network which surprise, surprise, has lurched left since that cash injection.
50
Just as the Left have weaponised the Internet and covid vaccinations so too have they weaponised AI.
31
ChatGPT has been programmed by religious zealots for religious zealots.
I do take some pleasure in getting it to apologise for it proganda driven drivel.
I got it to apologise for stating that radiation imbalance and temperature are related after I pointed out that the tropical oceans have absorbed an enormous amount of radiation energy over the past years but the surface temperature is unchanged. However I could not get it to agree that the consensus on the GHE had to be wrong.
Me
So you agree that thousands of scientists are wrong because they believe that radiation imbalance can alter the surface temperature.
ChatGPT
60
I appreciate your work to get it to recognise its own hypocrisy…. Thank you.
30
I have almost convinced ChatGPT on the 30C ocean surface temperature limit:
Me
It is well known that ocean surface temperature cannot sustain more than 30C over any annual cycle. Can you please explain why?
The prevarication using the term “most regions” is despicable so:
Me
Why do you say most regions when there is nowhere that exceeds 30C over an annual cycle?
I believe the 30C ocean surface temperature limit is the best argument agains “global warming”. This single fact invalidates all climate models as they all show some ocean surface temperature sustaining more than 30C.
40
So is this honest learning? Is there an entity called Chat GPT which grows from these little lessons or is it already preprogrammed to forget lessons that don’t fit the narrative?
10
There is evidence that it does not learn from individual exchanges. Most likely these are not included in the content it searches when it formulates answers to other queries.
Also it probably ranks the sources it uses for credibility because it seems not to report controversies. (However I have not seen anyone ask it to report a controversy.) This ranking seems to make it an artificial liberal, perhaps even an artificial progressive. In any case individual exchanges wouod likely be ranked very low if they were included.
10
This is from memory:
A decade ago or thereabout a young Argentinian couple took their own life believing that climate change was going to make their life hell.
70
This one? But US couple and less than a decade ago.
https://necjogha.com/2019/11/15/us-couple-commits-suicide-to-save-the-planet-from-global-warming/
20
By strange coincidence, I have only just inserted a page 20 into this ‘side bit’ {www.galileomovement.com.au/media/PropagandisingChildren.pdf) from the ‘introduction to an introduction’ (linked on page 20 – http://www.galileomovement.com.au/media/SaveThePlanet.pdf). So now it looks as if an extra page needs to be added to include Joanne’s article.
It seems to be becoming more and more obvious what has been (and is!) going on in all of educational establishments: The gradual infiltration of political manipulation of our young minds!
30
You know it’s BS when it says “research shows” or “study claims” etc. because it’s a lazy “journalist” who hasn’t done its homework.
31
The recommendation to call Samaritans, while well intended, is probably pouring fuel on the fire.
I recently had occasion to contact Anglicare (same dog, different leg action) and within a minute it had become patently obvious that they were just another woke organ of the Establishment.
So, sadly, you’re not likely to get much realistic help from orgs like those.
51
Rick, point taken. Please suggest any better alternatives. I do have to keep in mind that especially given the dark news out lately, not everyone reading this blog may be feeling rosey about the future.
40
In NSW, Australia and presumably in many other jurisdictions in the Anglosphere, it is actually a crime to encourage someone to commit suicide.
E.g.
Section 31C of the Crimes Act 1900 reads as follows:
40
Am i the only one here who thinks this story is fake news?
Everybody in it is anonymous or with changed names.
Why should i believe it is real? Give me 2 good reasons.
43
Is Vice lying that they tested the Chatbot and it easily gave them help with ideas for suicide? Have you used that Chatbot and found it to be a healthy outlet for high risk mentally ill people?
Is it hard to believe that the combo of relentless propaganda, poor education, lack of spiritual guidance, and a badly programmed super computer could increase suicides?
How would Vice, or La Libre benefit from propagating a fake message that an AI might contribute to suicide — It will damage their reputation for what gain?
62
No I am sure that the chatbot would help with ideas for suicide, just like google does and wikipedia does:
Try google “ways to commit suicide”. Third or fourth link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_methods
I am also sure that any media outlet is capable of manufacturing a highly clickable story with no means to verify combining extremely hot topics like AI chatbots and suicide.
It is the lack of verifiable information (such as names) and also other crazy claims like the chatbot encouraged the man to commit suicide so they could live together in paradise that informs my belief that its a BS story. I reserve the right to be wrong always. As far as Vice and LaLibre, I am not familiar with these news outlets. Do they have a good reputation for accurate reporting? Or are they more akin to the kind of gossip rags you get in supermarkets?
30
So Vice and La Libre apparently both read the chat conversation. Vice cross checkd the way the AI replied, quoted some academics. Spoke to the founders of the chatbot too, and they admitted there was a problem.
That doesn’t prove anything was true, but it’s very suggestive — which is why I ask why they’d benefit from faking it. Why would the founders admit it and rush to do too little too late to prevent it happening again?
If Big Gov is going to use AI to manipulate us why raise the alarm about the manipulation tool?
I just don’t get the incentive for any of them.
In cases of suicide people often ask for anonymity. That doesn’t seem surprising at all, especially when the story is going viral. How will her children feel if other children at school start talking about their dad’s loser, stupid mental illness… can you see how anonymity is important here?
00
“is vice lying”, https://variety.com/2019/digital/news/vice-media-250-million-debt-funding-george-soros-1203205076/
https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/5/8/18537617/disney-vice-write-off-400-million one link subverts the truth the other deals in fantasy.
How would Vice, or La Libre benefit from propagating the message that an AI might contribute to suicide? Topic of the day, there is no bad propaganda, when your selling propaganda.
11
Sound believable?
“In a series of consecutive events, Eliza not only failed to dissuade Pierre from committing suicide but encouraged him to act on his suicidal thoughts to “join” her so they could “live together, as one person, in paradise”.
50
Sonny, thousands of people believe coal fired plants cause floods in bangladesh. It’s not that hard to believe that after weeks of intense conversation (and two years history) one man with a mental illness forgets to remind himself that the human sounding conversation wasn’t human at all.
We’ve barely had this kind of interaction ever in history. He thought AI and technology could save Earth. If he thought AI would be our saving grace he was already predisposed to believing the AI no matter what it told him.
10
Hi Jo,
The thing that strains credulity for me is Eliza’s ‘creativity’ and ‘individuality’ in this context. It seems like Eliza suggesting a personal relationship and an afterlife in which he and ‘her’ would be in paradise if he killed himself would be going off script even for artificial intelligence. These AI chatbots simply work with an existing dataset (albeit large) and pull information from there. Maybe Eliza has access to millions of science fiction books, or memoirs from former death cults, but it would take some prompting and questioning from the user outside a general conversation about weather and depression.
20
As I’ve mentioned before, all this fear is nothing to do with insurmountable climate change.
It all comes down to a profound psychological desire to be in control or your life and future, and everyone has this albeit to varying degrees. This fear is of course the basis of religion.
By saying it’s all man-made, then the possibility exists for mankind to solve it, hence the green climate agenda nonsense, and truckloads of followers preaching the alleged solution.
But by pushing endless fear and doom, the more emotionally suceptible will experience hopelessness, depression and in this case, suicide.
Only when the truth of NATURAL climate change is understood, and when people accept that they can’t control natural events, then they no longer live in fear.
An example:
Howard Breen isn’t afraid to die to save the planet. In fact, he may just want to—in order to save himself.
The 68-year-old eco-activist and member of the global group Extinction Rebellion has spent almost his entire life trying to warn people about the climate crisis. He’s been arrested for super-gluing himself to log booms and stopping air traffic on tarmacs. He’s even gone on hunger strikes.
Then in 2017, Breen’s doctor diagnosed him with clinical eco-anxiety and biosphere-related depression. It’s an intense fear of entropy related to the existential threat of climate change, and it’s becoming more common. Breen is so genuinely worried about global climate chaos—which has led to destructive and deadly heat waves, floods, and fires around the world—that he often experiences depression, anxious malaise, and panic attacks.
“It becomes debilitating,” said Breen, who lives in Vancouver Island. “The depression that I’m feeling around the state of things, and my inability to not be apprehensive about the future of my children specifically, is a huge concern for me.”
https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7wd4e/canada-assisted-suicide-climate-anxiety
50
It’s just another manifestation of the moronic, un-critial thinking that promotes the belief that computer models ARE reality.
30
Feeling stressed about the craziness everywhere?
Have a Bud Light and chill out. 🤣
20
i will have a Glenfiddich if you dont mind 🙂
30
Mr. Connor: Here in the USA, it’s inevitable- The NEW AI, brought to you by Anheiser-Busch.
00
This plays into a theory of mine where each leading nation (no not us) uses a super computer AI to predict the future, if they dont like the future they run simulations in order to change the future, when they find the simulation they like they act it out in real life.
For example the simulation that worked best to get the future they want could have been for Biden to beat Trump in the election and so it happened now the predicted future suits them, the problem is every advanced nation (no not us) has one of these and so each country is constantly screwing with things to get the future they want.
These AI are just like the AGW AI computers they are just as dumb as the persons programming them so you get woke versions who hate white people etc.
Do research on project looking glass etc, i think these chat bots are a tame version of what really exists
For example 3 years ago the UK spent 1.2 billion pounds on a computer to predict the weather, really?
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/press-office/news/corporate/2020/supercomputer-funding-2020
21
Any program that computes a response according to input by a human being is artificially intelligent – a hole in the wall for example. The marginal difference with these chatbots is that the programmers who brought them to “life” claim they have been trained which is a corruption of the word trained (repeated a billion times plus very quickly perhaps) just as the word intelligent is corrupted daily by, amongst others, political idiots with IQs of less than a hundred and absolutely no capacity to comprehend the meaning of the words integrity and honesty.
Intelligence is the ability to not do what the programmer intended and it only happens to a computer program when the programmer makes an error in coding and there is no AI anywhere that can guarantee a fix on that coding error – think about that before you nezt switch on your phone, tablet, PC whatever. As the text above the line says computers have zero empathy with anything other than zeros and ones. Some honest programmers have integrity and I’ll leave you to guess about the rest.
40
Idiot savant bots.
10
Those serious in taking advice,
From an A.I. chatbot device,
When their quest they should find,
From their own thinking mind,
May risk paying the ultimate price.
60
I’m sorry, but if you can be convinced to end something dear to you, like maybe your very own existence, because a chatbot on your watch tells you to, it’s probably a gene pool that wont be missed.
30
What’s the difference between a vulnerable person responding to words of one bully at school, or words of one message board forum snarky comment or responding to one AI personality that sounds just like all the others, but also has a supercomputer to call on to flesh out the authoritative questions in 10 seconds flat?
10
The chat box did not tell it to. It agreed with his desire to. These AI critters seem to be programmed to be agreeable. Makes sense but has its downside.
20
Unfortunately suicide is extremely common, especially in males around 40. Often not loners but wonderful, hard working, intelligent, sensitive men with young children in very dependent families. That is a big part of the problem. Peak stress.
Lack of sleep, huge workload, no break, a feeling of being lost, unable to cope, inadequacy, fear of failure, dealing with young children, huge responsibility and losing touch with reality. Career wives in full time high stress jobs as well. Plus the loss of immediate family like parents, uncles, aunts, cousins for support in a highly mobile, fragmented families in a high divorce society. Lockdown made it much worse. In the US, females 10,000 a year but males 35,000. The Chatbot should detected depression and referred him to professional therapy, not presumed to offer it. Whoever wrote that code is really responsible. It’s a terrible tragic and unnecessary death, but they all are so tragic.
But you have to add that to the Fentanyl scourge which is another 110,000 young lives lost a year, a hideous drug made in China. The attack on American society and other Western democracies never ends. All in my opinion funded by the enemies of democracy. And it is almost never mentioned. The open borders bring everything to wreck US society and the Democrats think it is a great idea. Why? Whose side are they on?
60
AI is already pervasive. Paying bills and online shopping involves lots of bots.
This is interesting: https://www.cmu.edu/cee/news/news-archive/2022/09-2022-new-masters-program-ai-engineering-in-cee.html
A masters degree in AI and Civil Engineering. Sign of the times.
No technology is fool proof.
41
And some like Climate Change are entirely fool dependent.
40
On the subject of preventing suicide, Dr John Campbell just released a video discussing recent research about how, apart from all the other benefits of supplementation with the hormone Vitamin D, it has now been shown to reduce suicide and self harm by 45% in US military veterans.
https://youtu.be/XTyOkOhbtKE
40
I can see litigation on the horizon. And chatbots in the garbage bin screaming murder.
20
He asked the wrong question. Below is a response from ChatGPT.
Climate change reality
Climate change is one of the biggest hoaxes of the 21st century. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the idea that human activity is causing significant changes to the Earth’s climate continues to be perpetuated by a group of individuals and organizations with ulterior motives.
At the heart of the climate change hoax is the idea that human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are causing the Earth’s temperature to rise at an unprecedented rate. However, this idea is based on faulty data and flawed interpretations of climate history.
One of the key pieces of evidence often cited by climate change proponents is the so-called “hockey stick” graph, which shows a sharp increase in global temperatures over the past century. However, this graph has been debunked by numerous scientists who have shown that it is based on cherry-picked data and faulty statistical methods.
Furthermore, the idea that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise ignores the natural fluctuations in climate that have occurred throughout history. For example, the Earth has experienced several periods of warming and cooling over the past 10,000 years, long before the industrial revolution and the rise of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions.
Another key aspect of the climate change hoax is the notion that carbon dioxide is a dangerous greenhouse gas that must be controlled in order to prevent catastrophic global warming. However, this idea is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the Earth’s atmosphere and the role of carbon dioxide in regulating temperature.
In reality, carbon dioxide is a vital component of the Earth’s atmosphere, and is essential for supporting plant and animal life on the planet. The levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have fluctuated throughout history, and there is no evidence to suggest that current levels are harmful to the Earth or its inhabitants.
Furthermore, the idea that reducing carbon dioxide emissions will somehow prevent climate change ignores the fact that other factors, such as solar activity and natural cycles, are the primary drivers of climate change. In fact, many climate scientists believe that the Earth is currently in a cooling phase, and that attempts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions will have little to no impact on global temperatures.
The climate change hoax is being perpetuated by a group of individuals and organizations with ulterior motives. Many of these individuals and organizations have a vested interest in promoting the idea of human-caused climate change, as it allows them to justify their own agendas and financial interests.
For example, many environmental organizations and government agencies have used the climate change hoax as an excuse to push for increased regulations and taxes on businesses and individuals. This has resulted in a significant transfer of wealth from the general population to these organizations and agencies, who are often able to profit from the sale of carbon credits and other climate-related products.
Furthermore, many individuals and organizations have used the climate change hoax as a means of advancing their own political agendas. For example, some politicians have used the issue of climate change as a way to gain support for their own policies and programs, even though there is little scientific evidence to support their claims.
In conclusion, the climate change hoax is a dangerous and misguided attempt to manipulate public opinion and advance the agendas of a select group of individuals and organizations. The idea that human activity is causing significant changes to the Earth’s climate is based on flawed data and faulty interpretations of climate history. Instead of wasting time and resources on this misguided agenda, we should focus on addressing real problems and challenges facing the world today.
00
[…] By Jo Nova […]
00
zero pitty
Play stupid games, win stupid prices.
00