JoNova

A science presenter, writer, speaker & former TV host; author of The Skeptic's Handbook (over 200,000 copies distributed & available in 15 languages).


Handbooks


Advertising


Australian Speakers Agency



GoldNerds

The nerds have the numbers on precious metals investments on the ASX



The Skeptics Handbook

Think it has been debunked? See here.

The Skeptics Handbook II

Climate Money Paper



Archives

Books

A petition to support free speech for Australian doctors

What is informed consent if your doctor is not allowed to inform you?

What are they Hiding? Censorship. Free speech. Even if Dr Oosterhuis is allowed to keep his license after being grilled today, the NSW Medical Board will have succeeded in scaring many doctors into silence. If our medical agencies were corrupt, the first people to point that out would be doctors who could speak freely. The gross overreaction of the NSW Medical Board tells us all that they don’t have solid evidence, and they might be covering up either their incompetence or something worse.

What are they hiding?

NSW Medical Board to grill anti-vax doctor

The Australian

A Sydney doctor has been hauled before the NSW Medical Board after he questioned evidence behind Covid-19 vaccines and promoted unapproved treatments, including Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, in a case that will test the limits of what medical professionals can say publicly.

Anaesthetist Paul Oosterhuis, who has practised in NSW’s public hospital system for more than 30 years, will front the board at a hearing on Friday, where he could be stripped of his licence after he made Facebook posts more than two weeks ago.

“AHPRA has said you can only speak good about the vaccine but I take the view you don’t have informed consent in the absence of an open, honest discussion of risks and benefits of medical procedures and advice.”

Why does The Australian call him an “anti-vax doctor” as if all vaccines are the same?  They could have said “doctor who questions Covid vax”.

The NSW Medical Board has taken only two weeks to try one of their own. How many years will it take for them to read papers on Vitamin D, Zinc, B6, Hydroychloroquine, Ivermectin, Budesonide, and all the nutrients and non-profitable medicines that might help NSW patients?

What’s more important — Pfizer profits, or sick people?

I signed this petition

Supporting Dr Paul Oosterhuis

Dr. Paul Oosterhuis is an Australian anaesthetist with over thirty years experience, including in critical care and resuscitation, who urgently needs your support. He is facing a hearing by the Medical Board of NSW for posting information on social media regarding COVID-19. His posts related to early treatment and prophylaxis, PCR tests, and risk-benefit calculations regarding COVID-19 vaccination and lockdowns (scroll down for details). His hearing is on September 3rd. Please help him by signing and sharing this petition.

https://doctors4covidethics.org/supporting-dr-oosterhuis/

Even if your signature doesn’t help in today’s grilling, it helps in the long run.

Stand up for free speech. Let doctors know you will not let them be threatened or silenced.

h/t V

Photo adapted from smoke image by Viktor Talashuk on Unsplash

9.9 out of 10 based on 91 ratings

116 comments to A petition to support free speech for Australian doctors

  • #
    Mark+Allinson

    Has he been shown the instruments of torture?

    180

  • #
    Mal

    Check out The reference frame today and podcast with Robert Malone Co founder of mRNA vaccines
    Apart from the vulnerable, useless for bulk of population

    180

    • #
      ColA

      I sent the following to Brad Hazard NSW Min9ster for Health this morning after he said yesterday at a news conference the Ivermectin is not tested.

      Very, very disappointed in your off hand dismissal of Ivermectin yesterday, to say it is untested is an outright lie. How dare you mislead the public with such an ignorant statement, especially when you are supposed to be the Minister looking after peoples health. Here’s just one easy to find site that clearly says you never looked and that your staff are clearly NOT doing their job either.

      https://c19ivermectin.com/ 113 studies, 73 peer reviewed, 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups. and another https://bird-group.org/ and another https://covid19criticalcare.com/ PLUS it has been successfully used in many countries like India, Mexico and South America.

      There is no doubt that Covid-19 will spread throughout Sydney, NSW and eventually the rest of Australia, you can not stop it but merely slow it down. I am over 60 with comorbidities so I am at higher risk, I have had the 2 astra shots. But when they don’t stop you catching it and they don’t stop you spreading it they are a poor vaccine aren’t they?

      If I get a positive Covid-19 test in Australia I am told to go home, isolate and if I get sick enough I can go to hospital! (and get a chance to get experimented on with another set of new Covid-19 drugs) That’s it ……

      Now imagine instead YOU send me a packet of Ivermectin and other medicines (maybe $2 per packet), with my positive Covid-19 notice and you tell me to spend plenty of time in the sun (Vitamin D). I would think The Minister has a plan and you know what you are doing, right? Now imagine if 70% of the people currently turning up at hospitals didn’t show and therefore didn’t die?

      I really can not understand why you are letting people die?

      YES I definitely want a reply.

      Colin Andrews.

      950

      • #
        Geoff+Croker

        Well put but misses the main guv problem. They have promoted a leaky vaccine fix following poor advise. It is NOT working. If they suddenly change tack to cheap anti-virals that do work EVERY LAWYER on EARTH is going to sue most governments. Their ONLY choice is to double down on mRNA vaccine laws in the vain hope that if you replace most of your lymph system with mRNA vaccine your immune from Covid variants.

        Politics 101…… ALWAYS avoid RESPONSIBILITY.

        Our ONLY hope is that someone comes up with an expensive anti-viral that does work. This would be “promoted” by the “uninterested” pharmacy industry.

        Meanwhile if you go to hospital expect a BIG dose of cortisone. If you are not compatible to such a treatment a lonely death awaits. Prep your paperwork.

        90

        • #
          Mark Smith

          If that’s was legally tre the courts would be permanentlt clogged because meficines are always regulated and delayed from supply and potentially leading to death or injury. I doubt there is any legal problem with the government changing regulations There might be bit of political problem but that’s messagibg problen which politicians can always escapw from like usibg scapegoaating. The real problem is drug/ medical companies and their integatiation into the health system. Public Health coukf Demoizing Drug Lobby would fix most problems

          30

      • #
        Destroyer D69

        Bet the response will be the “standard” auto reply or “crickets”….. I am sure that I am not the only person interested in how your dialogue with officialdom develops. Logic is not in the Party Handbook and all approaches using it are to treated as “Non Existent”

        70

      • #
        M Allinson

        Years ago a rocket like this would have made a big bang – too late.

        These people are not acting out of ignorance, incompetence, stupidity or laziness – they are doing the exact biding of the same powerful people who are directing governments such as ours the world over.

        In New Orleans today, for example, the police are not allowing residents to return to their houses unless they receive the vaccination – no jab, no home.

        The same coercive actions will become more and more common here also.

        And so trying to hold our politicians to account, as we once did, is a pointless, though understandable, exercise – they will not change course because their masters forbid it.

        They aim to crush Australia and its people with all the force they can muster, and no amount of angry letter writing will do a thing to change this.

        240

        • #
          Interested

          Thanks ‘M Allinson’. Your analysis is 100% correct.
          The upper echelons in all walks of life are completely corrupted.
          As you said: “These people are not acting out of ignorance, incompetence, stupidity or laziness …”. For many years I used to marvel at the madness of political policy making, saying a few hundred monkeys with YES/NO rubber stamps would at least get half our decisions right – just by the law of averages.
          It took me a while to fully understand that no one could make so many serious mistakes by accident or out of sheer dumb stupidity. It had to be deliberate.

          This realisation, combined with a personal investigation into the climate deception over the last 12 years, persuaded me that we’re experiencing a cleverly orchestrated, carefully contrived, top-down campaign against humanity’s best interests by a shady cabal that’s come to be known – rather politely – as ‘the elites’. (I happen to have my own names for them.)

          And when I mentioned the “upper echelons in all walks of life”, I wasn’t kidding.
          Even the current Pope is part of it, as his environmental pronouncements, particularly about climate change, are telling us.
          So, clearly involved in this, we have the upper levels of the financial system, the political system, the higher education system, the school system, much of the scientific establishment, the pharmaceutical industry, and now it seems … even a significant proportion of our nurses and medical practitioners.

          ‘M Allinson’ went on to say: “And so trying to hold our politicians to account, as we once did, is a pointless, though understandable, exercise – they will not change course because their masters forbid it.”
          This statement has hit the nail squarely on the head.
          As I said, this is a top-down criminal operation on a global scale. The orders come from ‘higher up’.
          And almost nothing of what we see, or what we think we know, is actually true.

          160

          • #
            Mark+Allinson

            Thank you, Interested.

            The M stands for Mark.

            When the current lockdown in NSW began I recall hearing the Premier say: “We don’t want to, but we WERE FORCED TO ACT” – and I thought at the time she was suggesting a double meaning.

            110

    • #
      OriginalSteve

      As predicted…[Snip can we please tone the use of hyperbolic words, I know people are frustrated! – Thanks – Jo]

      Dance puppets…dance….

      https://www.exploretravel.com.au/new-headache-for-vaccinated-australians-as-europe-demands-booster-jabs/

      “Fully vaccinated travellers planning a trip to Europe may face a new hurdle: their vaccine’s shelf life might be about to run out, meaning their cover has expired.

      “Austria and Croatia have already put expiry dates on COVID vaccine certificates, leaving travellers with two choices: either get a booster shot or don’t travel. If you choose to get a booster shot then, you’ll need to supply proof of your vaccination.

      320

    • #
      Tides of Mudgee

      Mal, do you have a link for that please? ToM

      00

  • #
    OldOzzie

    Why is no one talking about natural immunity?

    New Israeli study proves the healing power of the human body

    By THE WASHINGTON TIMES EDITORIAL – – Thursday, September 2, 2021

    ANALYSIS/OPINION:

    The Biden administration is pursuing a universal vaccination strategy, even encouraging private businesses and public universities to mandate COVID-19 shots as a prerequisite to be able to go to work or school. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention insists even if you already contracted the virus and have survived, you should get the vaccination.

    The U.S. federal government is failing to take natural immunity seriously – and their universal vaccination strategy is foolish, misguided, and at its worst, deadly.

    Newly released data from Israel show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than never-infected vaccinated people to contract the Delta variant, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19. That’s right – natural immunity provides more of a shield against Delta than two doses of Pfizer’s vaccine.

    “It’s a textbook example of how natural immunity is really better than vaccination,” Charlotte Thalin, a physician and immunology researcher at Danderyd Hospital in Stockholm, told Science magazine of the Israeli study, which tracked more than 700,000 individuals and was released on August 26th.

    Other studies show similar results. A Public Health England study released in January found less than 1 percent of 6,614 people who tested positive for COVID-19 antibodies developed reinfection within five months. A Cleveland Clinic study published in June found that not one of the 1,359 unvaccinated people previously infected with COVID-19 contracted the virus. They concluded, “individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination.”

    Yet, the U.S. federal government wants to frame the debate around the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Instead, they should be talking about the immune and the non-immune. More of an emphasis should be placed on antibody tests. Based on California studies, roughly a third to half of Americans who are unvaccinated have natural immunity, according to Dr. Marty Makary, a professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, who has repeatedly pressed the CDC and Dr. Anthony Fauci to include natural immunity in their herd-immunity calculations and COVID-19 guidance.

    “During every month of this pandemic, I’ve had debates with other public researchers about the effectiveness and durability of natural immunity,” Dr. Makary told US News & World Report in August. “I’ve been told that natural immunity could fall off a cliff, rendering people susceptible to infection. But here we are now, over a year and a half into the clinical experience of observing patients who were infected, and natural immunity is effective and going strong. And that’s because, with natural immunity, the body develops antibodies to the entire surface of the virus, not just a spike protein constructed from a vaccine.”

    There are legitimate reasons for the immune not to want to get a vaccination. As Dr. Robert Malone and Peter Navarro have detailed on our pages, the shots can cause a wide range of serious side effects. The Pfizer vaccination is associated with an increased risk of myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, especially among young males. Other than the Pfizer shot, both Moderna and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccination hasn’t received full FDA approval.

    410

    • #
      OldOzzie

      Petition Signed as Patient

      200

    • #
    • #
      Joe Civis

      Just to note: Pfizer’s current covid “vaccine” did not and has not received FDA approval. The drug Comirnaty that supposedly has the same recipe as the current “vaccine” did and the current “vaccine” received an extension to the emergency use authorization. This means Comirnaty, which you can’t receive since it hasn’t been manufactured yet, has no immunity from law suits over issues it causes but the current “vaccine” is still risk free and all profit for Pfizer no matter what happens to anyone after they get the jab. The FDA did a nice sleight of hand with the complicit media to make it seem as if the current “vaccine” received FDA approval.

      180

    • #
      Geoffrey+Williams

      I am all for free speech it is the foundation of democracy.
      And I acknowledge the fundamentals of our bodies immunity to protect us.
      But natural immunity doesn’t work for everyone every time.
      Consider those unfortunate people suffering and dying in Intensive Care.
      Go talk to them about ‘natural immunity’ . .
      GeoffW

      30

  • #
    Graeme+P.

    Signed. I just got the sack today because I refuse to take the vaccine. Talking to a lawyer on Wednesday.

    750

    • #
      PeterS

      If if you get nowhere with you lawyer now, keep a record of everything as it’s possible things could change eventually such that companies that do sack people for not being vaccinated could be sued with massive class actions.

      600

      • #
        David Maddison

        I signed it and added this note in the comments section:

        I have extensive scientific research experience with the private sector and Australian Government and have three US Patents in biomedical engineering. I am currently a science writer.

        I am disgusted at the treatment of this doctor who did nothing more than administer useful and otherwise harmless prophylaxis and treatments.

        It used to be a creed of the medical profession to do everything possible to protect or treat patients. This sometimes meant using methodologies that others weren’t yet using as long as no harm was done.

        This doctor has done no harm, only good. The fact that Dr. Oosterhuis is going to be persecuted for practising medicine in the finest traditions of the profession is a disgrace.

        790

      • #
        TedM

        Any lawyers reading this contact Jo.

        30

      • #
        Interested

        Yes ‘PeterS’. You’re right again, as you so often are!
        Some people here may be familiar with a German lawyer called Reiner Fuellmich, who is a registered legal practitioner in both Germany and California(?). He has already begun a global class-action lawsuit against various governments, health departments, and pharmaceutical companies, regarding this whole COVID thing. He is leading a team of literally hundreds of lawyers and thousands of medical doctors involved in the case.
        So yes, I agree with ‘PeterS’ when he advises anyone who’s been sacked for refusing a COVID shot to keep scrupulously detailed files concerning the forced cessation of employment. – who, where, when, and how.
        I’m not a lawyer but I believe there may very well be an opportunity for people to seek redress for such injustices.
        [P.S. I signed the petition for Dr Oosterhuis.]

        80

    • #
      Chris

      Sorry to hear that Graeme. I wish you all the best

      380

      • #
        Graeme+P.

        Thanks Chris.

        90

        • #
          Yonniestone.

          Graeme P Reignite Democracy Australia has some great links on their site https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/informed-consent/
          also good legal info on Telegram http://www.aflsolicitors.com.au and http://Www.concernedlawyersnetwork.net

          The entire threats to terminate employment based upon forced vaccinations is bluff, look at the language used and its simply a ploy to get you to agree to the legality of baseless threats.

          Try this letter for starters,

          Dear ____

          I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead.

          I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:

          1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine you are advocating for me and if it is experimental?
          2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?
          3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any have proven not to be toxic to the body?
          4. Can you advice to me if the vaccine you are advocating is voluntary?
          5. Can you prove and confirm to me that there were fully completed trials on contraindications to the mRNA vaccines?
          6. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine?
          7. Can you please confirm to me that the vaccine you are advocating will not cause me to have a serious or absolute adverse event that will likely cause me risk of illness or fatality, should I agree to said vaccine?
          8. Should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 after vaccination, could you please advise what is the likelihood of a full recovery?
          9. Can you confirm to me that I will not be under any duress from yourselves if I make a decision regarding my own personal health and well-being and that it is in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?

          Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

          1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.
          2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor advocating this medication for me who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself in the course of vaccination and any ongoing ill health caused, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.
          3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?
          I would also advise that my inalienable rights are fully reserved.

          ** The point being is that they CANNOT provide that information but you’ve NOT refused, you’ve just asked them for more information. Play them at their game.

          531

          • #
            PeterS

            Has anyone actually tried this?

            80

            • #
              Yonniestone

              I’ll be able to tell you that very soon, a few from my work have prepared such a defence against forced medication, some in construction are facing this also, all will be reported as events occur here for everyone’s benefit.

              220

          • #
            PeterS

            One reason I ask is I need some good news for a change. After watching this video I can’t help wonder if indeed Australia has fallen, and if not then when?

            Australia Has Fallen

            60

            • #

              although l do not agree with everything that was said sometimes the truth is hard to watch

              thanks for posting it up

              10

              • #
                R.B.

                You could argue any punishment is just consequences of comments made. You’ll find that despots do that rather than admit that people were punished for expressing the wrong opinion.

                It’s really far fetched that criticism of the effectiveness of vaccines could be considered as quackery, especially when you look at what is happening in places where there is a high percentage of full vaccination and still another wave of cases and deaths. Looking at Israel’s data, it looks like vaccination has reduced death rates by half (if you neglect that Delta is less deadly). Ivermectin is about as effective in some studies, but small effectiveness can be lost in the noise of small samples where a higher percentage are asymptomatic than get seriously ill, along with being dependent on other things like age.

                Why it’s painted as horse medicine -even though given to an order of magnitude more humans than horses – and no evidence of being effective- when papers making the claim have been published – is seriously concerning.

                20

            • #
              Bruce

              It didn’t “fall”; it was PUSHED.

              00

          • #
            Graeme+P.

            Thanks for the support Yonniestone

            80

          • #

            Good stuff. At some stage my current major client may try this on, but nowhere in the world have they done it yet. I am one of many who have warned them of the consequences if they attempt it.

            100

          • #
    • #
      TedM

      Wishing you luck Graeme.

      120

    • #

      petition signed

      good on you Graeme, and all the best 😉

      120

    • #
      Epicurious

      Check out this url as it has useful information to set a strategy with your lawyer.

      https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/31/catherine-austin-fitts-approach-for-dealing-with-vaccine-mandates/

      30

      • #
        Graeme+P.

        Thanks Epicurious, I’m going to need all the help I can get as I can’t actually afford a lawyer. The one I’m seeing next week is free community service lawyers group which I expect will only act as an advisory.

        60

        • #

          your making a big stand here Graeme
          all l can say is talk to people like https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/ who are all over this type of thing and are in contact with lawyers
          l do not think you are on your Pat Malone in this
          if you did a go-fund me l would donate for the cause not a problem
          but it is a situation you should never have been put in and it is not easy
          good luck with it

          40

          • #

            Standing up for freedom of speech like Peter Ridd or freedom of action like Graeme+P merits our support. If you do a go-fund -me I think many of us would be prepared to put in.

            30

    • #
      Tides of Mudgee

      Graeme, I’m so sorry that you’ve lost your job and I wish you well. Good on you for sticking to your guns. ToM

      50

    • #
      robert rosicka

      All the best Graeme and I’m positive you will win .

      10

  • #
    PeterS

    Petition is good but I like to know why doctors can’t be charged for withholding specific medicines, such as Ivermectin, that have been proven to help save lives? Unless things have changed I thought doctors are supposed to save lives not allow them to be destroyed.

    370

  • #
    David Maddison

    I have extensive scientific research experience with the private sector and Australian Government and have three US Patents in biomedical engineering. I am currently a science writer.

    I am disgusted at the treatment of this doctor who did nothing more than administer useful and otherwise harmless prophylaxis and treatments.

    It used to be a creed of the medical profession to do everything possible to protect or treat patients. This sometimes meant using methodologies that others weren’t yet using as long as no harm was done.

    This doctor has done no harm, only good. The fact that Dr. Oosterhuis is going to be persecuted for practising medicine in the finest traditions of the profession is a disgrace.

    400

  • #
    PeterS

    Australian doctors also need to step up to the plate and stop kowtowing to government thugs and scaremongers. After all doctors ought to know better than anyone else what’s happening on the medical landscape. For example, do they know that Sweden, where COVID-19 ran free unabated by masks or lockdowns, is now banning Israelis, one of the most masked, locked-down, & vaccinated countries in the world? Israel is a COVID-19 mess while Sweden is a safe haven. Go figure.

    270

  • #
    TedM

    The decisions that medical authorities are making is leading to [Snip “many deaths”], there is no alternative to this explanation. These people (if it indeed be fit to call them people) are either willingly ignorant, or totally malignant and evil. Being willingly ignorant in a situation such as this is tantamount to being totally evil in any case. I simply cannot accept that they believe that they are telling the truth and making decisions in the interest of the public who pay their exorbitant salaries. I long to see them get their day in a court of law.

    [Ted. Some words are auto moderated, and usually its better to avoid them or only use them with great care. Hope you understand. – Jo]

    61

  • #
    Maptram

    Today, on Facebook, Getup had the following paid ad for a petition.

    Sponsored • Paid for by GetUp!

    Murdoch’s Sky News has been banned from Youtube for spreading misinformation.
    But Sky News’ sensationalist formula of racism, climate denialism, and vaccine disinformation has been given a massive audience of millions on free-to-air TV thanks to a partnership with WIN and Southern Cross.
    It’s a major threat to the health and safety of our communities — and must be stopped.
    Sign the petition demanding WIN and Southern Cross pull the plug on Sky’s misinformation now!

    Of course it’s different when it’s the ABC, a few weeks ago Getup had a paid ad for a petition to send the the Federal Government demanding that the Government leave the ABC alone.

    But then we know the origin of Getup, started by Bill Shorten so it’s hardly independent.

    350

    • #
      Yonniestone.

      Saw this posted through my local contacts and quickly decided it was dodgy, probably an information gathering ploy to out dissenters, there people are scum.

      140

    • #
      Dennis

      GetUp in Australia was modelled on activist organisations overseas at least partly funded by George Soros and the globalists, the Australian Workers Union assisted establishment of GetUp when Bill Shorten was a senior AWU executive and he was appointed to the GetUp Board of Directors.

      GetUp tries to present as conservative and hides its leftist roots, at the 2019 federal election they supported candidates masquerading as independent and those candidates were also funded by the so called renewable energy industry owners/shareholders/globalists with vested interests in influencing government, accordingly they targeted sitting MPs in electorates held by both Liberal and National Coalition, but only one was defeated by the GetUp supported Independent candidate.

      60

    • #
      ColA

      I think every Petition should have a NAY vote so if you not not agree and want to your voice and your opinion heard it can be equally seen and heard then people can see if the petition has community support and dissent in one place.

      10

  • #
    TedM

    Just a thought, particularly for any legally minded people on this blog.
    If Paul Oosterhuis was de-registered and he sued the medical board, it is my understanding that their would then be full disclosure, and all the relevant studies would be in the public arena. It is difficult to believe that he could possibly lose such a case. However there is nothing normal about decisions made with regard to HCQ, Ivermectin and Covid19 vaccines. I am becoming progressively more convinced that there is something very sinister taking place across the western World at the moment.

    371

    • #
      nb

      It is likely that litigation is the path forward.

      110

    • #
      Yonniestone.

      Very sinister indeed, considering Pfizer has a paper and patent trail of first developing the virus then the vaccines over 21 years says it all.

      120

    • #
      Chrism

      no , incorrect, the decision is an administrative matter – not criminal
      if criminal he would be legally entitled to discovery; similar if a civil matter

      with administrative matters there are many paths to information but the key reasons for the decision will likely be witheld

      this guy needs to reverse the thrust of the argument
      theirs is he was promoting ‘unproven’ treatments
      his reply is when is it acceptable to exclude matters that patients wish to discuss?
      frequently patients ask about ‘traditional’ or ‘complementary’ medicine
      he is doing his duty to his patients period

      90

  • #
    Robdel

    I have signed too. This muzzling of other treatments is inexcusable.

    200

  • #

    “…they might be covering up either their incompetence or something worse.”

    “They” are waging war upon us (their own population), to literally turn Western civilization upside down. The covid dictatorship is, at bottom, incompetence, of the “experts” being touted as “in charge”; and overlaying that fundamental incompetence (that literally insane incompetence — by which you shall know them, if you will only try), is the vast corruption of the Insane Left and Complicit Right, to which I give the name of illegitimate government (by all of them, the so-called, self-identified “elites”, hawking the greatest sales hoax in history, which Obama and other America-haters call “Transformation” — “Wanna buy a bridge” absolutely pales in comparison, to this joke of a “ruling class”.)

    181

  • #
    Peter Fitzroy

    He was and is free to say what he likes, and he did.
    What you are complaining about are the actions taken by others in response to his speech.

    140

    • #
      clarence.t

      Speech should be argued with speech, not threats of job loss.

      That is just a blatant show of weakness of your position.

      Shows that you cannot refute the arguments put forward.

      410

      • #
        Peter Fitzroy

        Looking forward to you practicing what you preach

        038

        • #
          clarence.t

          “a blatant show of weakness of your position.

          Shows that you cannot refute the arguments put forward.”

          PF to a “t”. Empty of any substantive argument whatsoever.

          270

    • #
      PeterS

      PF you are so heartless. Disgusting.

      221

      • #
        Peter Fitzroy

        There is a long list of things when said, could attract career ending actions. Examples: disparaging or denigrating your employer on social media, publicly making derogatory comments about your boss, lying to the public.

        In every case you are free to say them, but not free of the consequences – it is not heartlessness, it is maturity

        135

        • #
          clarence.t

          That’s the thing with the far-left, isn’t it PF

          They know they can’t argue the facts, so they take the coward’s way of running and hiding behind totalitarian censorship.

          No, it is not maturity… that is something you could never profess to.

          … just the opposite, the act of a petulant child.

          It is an admission that you have lost the argument because you are incapable of putting any argument forward.

          241

        • #
          clarence.t

          “could attract career ending actions”

          In this case, it seems to be stating the facts. !

          What does that say about the state of things, when facts have be countered with censorship and job loss.

          Don’t worry PF.. you will never face that quandary… you remain fact-free.

          290

    • #
      OriginalSteve

      Fitz. fitz. fitz

      *shakes head… slowly*

      150

  • #

    For what its worth I have signed this.

    My own doctor, who I “woke up” some time back in relation to Ivermectin and covid in general, is extremely concerned about the silencing and the direction here. He can see the huge benefits of Ivermectin and has now read many of the papers on it, and asks why he cannot prescribe it to his patients. After all it will almost certainly save lives, which is the business he is in.

    So what business is the NSW Medical Board in? Seems like they are in the business of death & censorship and of withholding proven remedies.

    My doctor and I, and many others here and elsewhere can see the completely wrong road that is being taken.

    Please talk to your friends, neighbours and your doctors – the more who see the terrible future ahead for us if we continue on this totalitarian and science free road the better. We need this horror show to end.

    270

  • #
    David Maddison

    As I have said before, the Left, and that includes the scientific, medical, legal, industrial and political establishments they have infiltrated, are terrified of alternative opinions. And they are similarly extremely risk averse and terrified to try new ideas. Hence, there is never any progress, only regression under Leftist ideology.

    They are so terrified of alternative ideas they have to censor, ban and prosecute those that hold them.

    They are so risk averse that numerous activities have to be banned or highly restricted in the context of the Nanny State.

    201

  • #
    JB

    This pandemic is evil (deliberate, planned, could very easily have come out of Ralph Baric’s lab at Chapel Hill, NC; US biowarfare with the Chineses as patsies). And the way it has been handled is utterly evil. Handled for maximum fear, maximum stress, maximum pollution, and hence, maximum illness.

    How come novel vaccines have been given EUA and long, time-tested drugs that doctors want to use, have not?

    And where is the real proof that these vaccines even work, beyond the placebo effect—which is a VERY powerful effect? There is certainly tons of proof at this point that the vaccines are indeed very dangerous.

    So sad to watch medicine be utterly turned on its head during this last year and a half. Why is Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee’s voice entirely absent??? He who explains at the beginning of his tiny book “The Laws of Medicine” how any medical test can be as much as 95% inaccurate, depending on the population tested.

    221

  • #
    David Maddison

    One of the objections to Ivermectin is that its detractors endlessly and ignorantly call it a “horse deworming agent” as indeed it is but seem not to know its most important application is in humans.

    In fact it is a powerful, effective and safe anti-parasitic drug for both humans and animals. It’s discoverers received a Nobel Prize and even the World Homicide Organisation regards it as one of mankind’s most important drugs.

    It has saved huge numbers of lives and prevented untold human misery.

    I find it remarkable that its detractors who call it a “horse deworming agent” are seemingly unaware it is 1) both a human and veterinary drug, 2) that humans share a similar physiology with other mammals hence the same drug often being used for both.

    There can be no more powerful statement of one’s profound scientific and medical ignorance than to refer to Ivermectin as a horse deworming agent or similar.

    270

    • #
      redress

      David ….you are right

      I find it remarkable that its detractors who call it a “horse deworming agent” are seemingly unaware it is 1) both a human and veterinary drug, 2) that humans share a similar physiology with other mammals hence the same drug often being used for both.

      Apart from the human application no one in their right mind is going to give a “dangerous” drug to animals worth thousands or millions of dollars…..or even just a few hundred dollars a head.

      120

    • #
      Serge Wright

      “I find it remarkable that its detractors who call it a”horse deworming agent” “

      The only thing missing is naming the horse “Boxer”

      30

  • #
    David Maddison

    The Left Loses Their Minds Over Joe Rogan Taking Ivermectin, a Drug That Won a Nobel Prize

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/09/02/reminder-ivermectin-won-a-nobel-prize-for-miracle-human-uses-n2595193?210

    The world’s most famous and successful podcaster, Joe Rogan, announced last night that he contracted Wuhan coronavirus. 

    Because Rogan has been a proponent of Americans making their own choices about whether to get vaccinated, opposing government mandates, the Left is having a meltdown and attacking him for the treatments he used to get better…in just three days

    Over the past few weeks, the leftist media has been especially hostile to the drug Ivermectin and has referred to it as a “horse drug.” But the science, reality and history show the medication won a Nobel Prize in 2015 for human use. 

    While the federal government hasn’t issued an official approval for Ivermectin to be used as a treatment for Wuhan coronavirus, to mock the drug as one only given to animals is counter to reality and anti-science. Many who have been diagnosed with Wuhan coronavirus and have taken the drug say it helped them to recover from the disease. 

    SEE LINK FOR REST

    260

    • #
      sophocles

      One has to enquire if the Left actually have minds. There has to be something there in the first instance to lose.

      00

  • #
    • #
      Lucky

      Thank you Jim Barker-

      The message from that lawyer is:

      Vaccinated folks are probably driving most mutations, not the non-vaccinated.

      Natural immunity is far longer, broader, and more durable than vaccine-induced immunity.

      Vaccination will not stop infections or create herd immunity.

      Covid cannot be eradicated because of Animal Reservoirs.

      Covid is here to stay.

      The message is supported by the very strong evidence shown.

      The lawyer then asks:
      What Should Pastors With Guts Be Doing?

      The question is bigger:
      What should anyone with sense be doing in face of a pandemic of lies, power hungry politicians and big-noting public servant medical officers?

      00

  • #
    Dr Simon Thompson

    Sadly, Dr Paul Oosterhuis had his rego suspended.
    It is apparent that Hazzard or a staffer didn’t like his twitter
    about the 26000 student FauXinne event
    There is no free thought or speech for medicine.
    Approx 800 covid deaths were preventable with a 5c a day treatment.
    Incalculable societal economic and social disruption…
    remember the Emperor’s new clothes?
    Best wishes to Dr Paul, don’t despair!

    170

    • #
      Lance

      Perhaps Dr. Paul might sue on grounds of scientific and ethical evidence as well as political malfeasance.

      He wouldn’t be wrong on any of those elements.

      In the end, Doctor/Patient privileges have just been abrogated and made criminal by political power.

      Exactly how have politicians gained veto power over chartered medical doctors?

      140

      • #
        clarence.t

        “Exactly how have politicians gained veto power over chartered medical doctors?”

        By stacking boards with leftist woke subservients.

        90

  • #
    • #
    • #
      Interested

      Thank you, Bruce. Excellent essay by a medical doctor (physician) working in the field of ophthalmology.
      Once again the position of the WHO and CDC, with regard to COVID-19 therapeutics and ‘vaccinations’, is shown to be completely untenable.
      In my opinion, based on many such medical commentaries I’ve found, there is something very wrong with the way the authorities have handled this whole thing … and I don’t think it’s anything to do with incompetence either.
      We really need to start considering the distinct likelihood of sinister motives behind it all.

      30

  • #
    Serge Wright

    We drift more totalitarian every day. Welcome to consensus medical science, where your treatment plan is drawn up before you get sick and visit a hospital.

    60

  • #
    Kalm Keith

    And while thinking of free speech, I just remembered that this blog is right up there on the free speech chart, so ping.

    40

  • #

    https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/how-reality-tv-wannabe-became-melbourne-antivax-leader-arrested-by-police/news-story/886946b45390bfa3fa2c8861f716f866

    How reality TV wannabe became Melbourne anti-vax leader arrested by police
    A reality TV wannabe from Melbourne always dreamed of getting attention. She has it now, making headlines as an anti-vaxxer in prison.

    01

  • #
    CHRIS

    Free Speech and “Our” ABC…a contradiction in terms

    10

  • #
    Vicki

    While dr Ooserhuis has probably been drawn and caughtered already I write in support if his courage to speak out against another system that is su k in lies and deceit regards the truth of this covid global lie. May you be held and protected in love.

    00

  • #
    Leigh Dixon

    This saga of laziness/ignorance/corruption reinforces the conclusion I reached 50 years ago, that the established medical profession will do anything to crush “alternative” medicine. The established medical profession needs sick people needing pharmaceuticals. “Alternative” practitioners provide preventative treatment, thus reducing the established medicos pharmaceutical sales opportunities. Simples! The more enlightened ones (with the exception Dr Oosterhuis) keep their mouths shut and, where appropriate suggest (e.g.) a course of vitamins

    00

  • #

    There are many thousands working in or for Care Homes here in GB&NI who have not agreed to be vaccinated, and are due to be fired because the Gov. placed the vaccine above everything else.

    So they will sign up with the NHS, and continue working, because Government knows that if they make vaxx compulsory in NHS, they will lose 20% of their own workforce!

    10

  • #
    Frank Dzelalija

    Do we have the names of the members of the Kangaroo court ?

    00