JoNova

A science presenter, writer, speaker & former TV host; author of The Skeptic's Handbook (over 200,000 copies distributed & available in 15 languages).


Handbooks


Advertising


Australian Speakers Agency



GoldNerds

The nerds have the numbers on precious metals investments on the ASX



The Skeptics Handbook

Think it has been debunked? See here.

The Skeptics Handbook II

Climate Money Paper



Archives

Books

How’s that censorship working out ?

The Democrat-n-Tech-Giants pretend there is no evidence of fraud while they award themselves a non-gendered Pronoun of the Year Prize — apparently for creating the “most extensive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”

The Supreme Court decision has really helped calm the mood tonight in Washington.

They do not look like they will go quietly into that good night.

Word of the Swamp corruption is seeping out, despite the bans. If the Democrats wanted to heal the nation they would listen and investigate the grievances. They would check the signatures.

Some institution needs to investigate the fraud. The media has failed, the FBI failed, and The Supreme Court.

SCOTUS may get another chance to solve this. Let’s hope there is a peaceful way back.

h/t Stephen W.

Another Bitchute video of the Proud boys arriving in Washington. (How long will the Youtube one above last?)

UPDATE: At least 4 Stabbed, 23 Arrested After Protesters Clash in Washington

Epoch Times:

At least four people have been stabbed and police officers injured on Saturday night after clashes between different groups of protesters broke out in Washington D.C.

The violent confrontations, which followed a “Million MAGA March,” appeared to be between alleged members of the far-left Antifa group and the Proud Boys group, which was established by libertarian Gavin McInnes. Both groups have regularly attracted media attention for being involved in violent encounters with one another.

D.C. authorities told local media that four people were stabbed in the intersection of 11th Street and F Street in downtown D.C. All four individuals have been sent to the hospital with critical injuries, reported WUSA9.

9.2 out of 10 based on 70 ratings

112 comments to How’s that censorship working out ?

  • #
    John R Smith

    Thanks for this.
    Feeling pretty low.
    I’m not that far away and have heard nothing.
    Makes me feel good.
    Getting that kind of turnout in No Va is impressive.
    I was taught the fight starts when there is no choice.
    Death, loss, pain, opinion, love, hate, become irrelevant.
    The V has added this dangerous overlay.

    202

    • #
      Saighdear

      I empathise ‘ the fight starts when there is no choice. Death, loss, pain, opinion, love, hate, become irrelevant.’ Yet we live in a ‘Civilised’ part of the world in the 21st Century. I AM sick of the patronising phrases ‘we should be restrained as we know better, or don’t drop down to their Level, etc’ but I think that even in the Bible it has been spoken of as turning the other cheek is not an option. This has gone on for too long.
      A civilised Society SHOULD NOT place it’s members in such a position of despair. Hullz Bells man! the PC brigade are hell-bent on tearing up Societal controls in the name of Bullying. What is this, then, when the Ballot is wasted?

      132

      • #
        John R Smith

        Saighdear,
        PC brigade true story.
        My wife teaches art at a small liberal arts college.
        She presented to her class the work of Joseph Beuys, a significant 20th Century conceptual artist.
        He also happened have fought in the German military in WWII.
        Opting out not an option for young men of his generation.
        A students wrote a 400 word complaint about having been exposed to a N__i.
        Alleging that two students cried for hours from the upset.
        She may suffer administrative discipline as yet undetermined.
        The hell is being bent danger close for me.

        140

        • #
          Yonniestone

          Don’t give up hope John R Smith, many around the globe share your passion for free speech, as long as we draw breath the fight is not over, regards the silent majority Australia.

          40

          • #
            John R Smith

            Free speech used to be about awful people not being silenced.
            An effective immune response for a healthy culture.
            We’re way beyond that.
            Free speech is not about suppression of history and science.
            I wouldn’t necessarily define it as a passion for free speech.
            Reality itself is under attack.
            Evil’s super weapon appears to be convincing us that it doesn’t exist.
            Let’s erase wisdom from the past because the past was imperfect (according to college students).

            30

  • #
    John F. Hultquist

    From about E-Day +3, I have – more less – projected the trajectory of the Harris/Biden duplicitous path toward their mal-administration.
    [ Note my continuing projection. ] Expect a “President”Harris in two years.
    I’ve based this on the fact that there are 50 separate states that establish voting procedures within their borders. “States Rights” have been important since the founding of the Republic, and there would not be a USA had that not been the case “in” the founding.

    Thus, the Supreme Court found “Texas lacked Article III standing to file suit against other states regarding how those states conduct their elections.”
    While something else might be tried, don’t expect it to work.

    The only good news is that because DJT has fought this outcome several aspects have been forced through the turgid swamp. See Jo’s heading regarding censorship.

    170

    • #
      RossP

      ” Expect a “President”Harris in two years.”

      My guess would be two months John. They are effectively throwing Biden under the bus already.

      320

      • #
        Matthew Bruha

        I think they covered up the hunter Biden stuff until now so Harris can be promoted asap

        190

      • #
        David Maddison

        I was thinking three months. I once thought he’d be forcibly removed under the 25th Amendment but now I think he’ll “resign” because due to his cognitive deficit he’ll likely sign any piece of paper his controllers put in front of him.

        It is possible that Harris will serve two full terms plus the remainder of Biden’s so she might be President for nearly 12 years. However, by that time, the United States as we know it will cease to exist and she and her useful idiot army of Leftist morons will make her President for Life.

        At that point Americans will find the true reason for their Second Amendment rights and exercise them, possibly under the leadership of a Rebel general, Donald Trump Jr.

        40

    • #

      ”Expect a “President”Harris in two years.”

      That means the she effectively gets twelve years as President, the remainder of President Biden’s term, and two terms of her own.

      Tony.

      60

      • #
        John F. Hultquist

        Correct Tony.
        My first thought was to let Poor Joe preside until after the 4th of July; a big deal in the USA. Then, before September put Harris in and she gets to “nominate” a new VP, who almost immediately would be confirmed by the House.
        Then someone suggested the 2 years + 2 terms thing.
        So now I think this was the Dem’s plans since she withdrew from the original pack of candidates.

        50

      • #
        Ian

        Hopefully you’re correct as anything will be better than the appalling DJT

        124

        • #
          Another Delcon

          Given what you are clearly hoping for , perhaps you could move to Venezuela straight away . That way you could experience what you intend to impose on your fellow citizens tomorrow . Or is it that you somehow think that you will float above the misery , poverty and death that you want to impose on the ordinary plebs ?
          The democrat Party is flyblown with the maggots of Marxism and no sane person should vote for them , most didn’t . You must be one sick unit !

          130

      • #
        John in Oz

        Her length of term will depend on what she does to the US economy.

        How much pain will even the Democrat voters take before they rebel?

        00

      • #
        John in Oz

        Her length of term will depend on what she does to the US economy.

        How much pain will even the Democrat voters take before they rebel?

        00

        • #
          Russ Wood

          But HOW can the ‘Democrat voters’ rebel? The Party is forever, and they’ll ensure that by fixing the whole voting system.

          00

    • #
      Serp

      Spare us the histrionics about the horrors of Kamala Harris running the US presidency; let’s wait and see who is actually inaugurated.

      At the end of the week a crucial report will be delivered according to Executive Order 13848 and CCP agents such as Zuckerberg will likely be clapped in irons –spend almost half a billion dollars subverting the presidential election and think to get away with it, nah!

      10

  • #
    PeterS

    Who cares about censorship. People who can and do think for themselves will not change their minds no matter how much censorship is smothering the world. As far as I’m concerned they can censor everything they like and it will not change my mind on certain matters. Only zombies and lazy gullible fools will accept lies without doing their own research. If and when the world falls for more and more lies, it will crash and burn anyway to cause the real reset and flush out the traitors.

    191

    • #
      David Maddison

      However, when there is censorship even those of us who are of the Right and thus free and independent thinkers cannot find out the truth because most or all communications channels are blocked. This phenomenon will only get worse with Leftists in control in North America and Europe. The social(ist) media even delete the messages such as Tweets (or restrict distribution or visibility) of the most powerful man in the world, Trump. Not even he can get his message out on many occasions.

      61

      • #
        Ian

        “even those of us who are of the Right and thus free and independent thinkers ”

        You cannot be serious.

        213

        • #
          David Maddison

          I am totally serious. We of the Right can tolerate alternative ideas and don’t require everything to be censored and controlled like Leftists do. We think for ourselves.

          And we don’t get “triggered”. And don’t need “safe spaces”…

          91

  • #
    PeterS

    This guy who is an expert on Constitutional Law (doesn’t mean he is right necessarily) explains how TRUMP STILL WINS!

    90

  • #
    Dave in the States

    For every Rubicon that is crossed on the road to Biden/Harris taking over, there needs to be one of these. Not just in DC, but also all the across the country. This is especially true on inauguration day. Indeed the inauguration route needs to be flooded with people so they can not pass. Even barricades put up. Such would be cleared but it would send a message.

    If I still lived in NOVA I would have been there myself. God bless these people. Time to get organized and begin communicating is now.

    150

    • #
      OriginalSteve

      Correct.

      Time to start using basic text messages to share information around, and use anything except

      – farcebook
      – Twit
      – Yooftoob

      Good alternatives are :

      – Parler.com
      – Gab.com
      – Brighteon.com

      Spread the news….!!

      20

  • #
    Broadie

    Memory is a ‘Bad’ thing.

    Remember the Tea party Movement? Picked off one by one by the IRS.

    Remember the Hong Kong Resistance? Picked off one by one and now being removed for re-education by the bus load.

    This is a new experience for civilization. Surveillance has become very efficient with the internet, people submitting their details and bio metrics to large central databases and the prevalence of cctv and smart phones.

    The ‘Swamp’ is well organized and well prepared, having centralized the levers of control and mass produced propaganda on the scale that was not previously possible.

    Let us hope the ‘We the People’ with their Second Amendment have the strength and conviction to resist what is an attack on their Nation and its Constitution. They are all that stand between the Free World and an Evil Empire.

    200

    • #
      Greg Cavanagh

      The difference as I see it, is that the Left fight hard to win and will do anything to win. No low is too low, they’ll commit any crime or fraud or deception. Their goal is singular… To win by any means necessary.

      The Right are trusting, honest, patient, forgiving, hopeful and just want to get about their own lives.

      It’s little wonder it has come to this. As the old proverb goes, every great civilization collapses from within.

      00

  • #
    Peter Fitzroy

    “us” vs “them”? for viewpoint?

    318

  • #
    RossP

    Here is an interesting video with the guy who patented Que Code telling how legal ballots can be distinguished from illegal ballots. His team has developed ways to check millions per day.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs&feature=emb_title

    100

    • #
      Serp

      “The trail is there” No way will the CCP-Biden gang allow this testing of the suspect batches.

      70

      • #
        David-of-Cooyal-in-Oz

        G’day Serp,
        I’m hoping the evidence has already been collected, even in real time, based on my understanding that the good guys have been (very?) active since Sept 2018. So it’s already too late for for the perps.
        I further suggest that the trigger event scheduled for Dec 18 is the receipt of a rather detailed report of the crimes committed on or about Nov 3, with rather strong, admissible evidence, and maybe arrests soon after.
        Cheers and in hopefully ,
        Dave B

        30

  • #
    Simon

    The Department of Justice found no evidence of fraud. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency found none either. Trump’s lawyers submitted no evidence of fraud. The Kraken and Texas lawsuits were summarily dismissed and provided no evidence, just hearsay and supposition.

    535

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      >”Trump’s lawyers submitted no evidence of fraud. The Kraken and Texas lawsuits were summarily dismissed and provided no evidence, just hearsay and supposition.”

      Yes, “summarily dismissed” but other than that, complete BS. No court has yet even looked at what has been presented.

      Giuliani

      “This is outrageous what they’re doing. The American people should have the benefit of hearing these facts … The facts have been kept from them,” he continued.

      “Not a single court decision has had a hearing yet. They haven’t heard from a single witness. They haven’t looked at a single tape. They haven’t listened to a single recording. There are thousands of them. They haven’t even bothered to look at the tape in Atlanta, Georgia, which is dispositive. It shows an ongoing voter theft of 30,000 votes, enough to change the election.”

      301

      • #
        OriginalSteve

        President Lincn had whole State parliaments and courts arrested for failing to follow federal directions.

        All Trump has to do is invoke martial law to have the evidence viewed by a military court and it stops here , now.

        I think he is giving the Scotus another opportunity to cone to the party before he starts martial law.

        30

    • #
      Serp

      Don’t kid yourself that that’s the end of it; this fraudulence is intolerable and shall be rooted out.

      101

    • #
      Simon

      Yet another lost case:
      https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/12/us/trump-election-lawsuit-wisconsin.html
      In his ruling, Judge Ludwig wrote that Wisconsin’s election officials had followed state law, which clearly says that the state’s electors should be chosen by a popular vote. Even though they instituted changes like allowing drop boxes for absentee ballots and loosening restrictions for certifying ballots, the moves were not illegal, Judge Ludwig wrote, and officials used acceptable ways to implement the law.
      Judge Ludwig also noted that the Trump campaign was aware of these changes months before they were put in place and should have sought to challenge them before the election, not after Mr. Trump lost.

      413

      • #
        Richard C (NZ)

        >”Wisconsin”

        Judge Ludwig might have to bat away some more if he’s assigned WI:

        Sidney Powell Announces Emergency Filings in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Wisconsin
        Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit

        Powell – These cases raise constitutional issues and prove massive #fraud.
        Our plaintiffs have #standing

        # # #

        Kraken appears to be warming to the task.

        100

        • #
          Richard C (NZ)

          ‘Safe Harbor’ Has No Practical Effect on Trump Lawsuits: Jenna Ellis
          Jack Phillips, NTD

          “The only fixed day,” they said, “in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the president on January 20 at noon.”

          Ellis, in an interview with Newsmax on Tuesday, said the Dec. 8 “safe harbor” deadline “actually has no practical effect on the litigation.” She added that the Dec. 14 Electoral College vote also “really doesn’t” have an effect, citing the Ginsburg opinion.

          “Jan. 6 is the date we’re looking at, so we still have a ways to go in this, Grant,” Ellis added. “And it’s really just the fake news mainstream media that wants to rush this to judgment.”

          # # #

          I suggest that there is many more than just the “fake news mainstream media” that would REALLY like all this to just go away.

          50

        • #
          Richard C (NZ)

          From a different hearing at the Wisconsin Supreme Court:

          ‘Highlight from Today’s Wisconsin Supreme Court Hearing on Election Fraud – Two Judges Claim Trump’s Post Election Strategy Was Racist’
          By Joe Hoft, Gateway Pundit

          President-Elect Okie Eleven – Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing was a sham! The judges are arrogant and liberal hacks. Rebecca Dallet was all focused on saying this complaint should have been raised before election.

          Okie again:

          Omg watching Wisconsin hearing! #JillKarofsky #RebeccaDallet are the worst! Two arrogant witches! Political hacks running wild!

          20

      • #
        DOC

        ‘Judge Ludwig also noted that the Trump campaign was aware of these changes months before they were put in place and should have sought to challenge them before the election, not after Mr. Trump lost.’

        So this is the standard of the law now? Nothing to do about actual legality or Constitutionality? I always understood these justices get extremely well paid for life to sort out matters of the law. Not about matters subject to timing of when an objection is made. No! It’s all about when one objects, even in a matter as mind-bogglingly important as a US election, and especially one which has one side arguing for a complete change in the direction of philosophy followed, promising Constitutional change and changes in the way the US is run.

        IMO, this is the greatest abrogation of duty by the final arbitor of the law in the most powerful nation on the planet. If the Supreme Court refuses to hear any strongly supported, factually based claims of injustice in the rules and running of the most important event in the calendar of any democracy, an event which is the basis of any claim to be a democratic nation, then what protection does that nation have to save itself from a malevolent take over?

        From what one has seen over the last four years from the USA, culminating in all the media based censorship and State based changes in ‘rules’, this looks to be a truly malevolent take over of Federal governance. The intentions had been broadcast about increasing numbers of States, ‘adjusting’ the Supreme Court itself, changing Presidents, post election – which means the Biden was never the intentional President for whom people were truly voting; they were voting without knowing it, for Trump versus Ms 8%er Harris. Pelosi even announced she was investigating how to remove a President for ‘ill-health’. It seems apparent there is no reason to change the Supreme Court at all. This is what we can all expect from Courts that are not dependent on black letter law, but on personal political philosophies of the justices themselves. We have sen it at many levels of legal processes, but this one must be the most fundamental of all.

        60

  • #
    David Maddison

    AwakenWithJP’s latest video. Very funny!

    https://youtu.be/b-LHdEUrGa8

    40

  • #
    OldOzzie

    Robert Barnes
    @Barnes_Law

    Any lawyer who takes “standing” as a serious & legit legal doctrine is not a lawyer I ever take seriously as a legit legal thinker. Standing is a judicially invented doctrine that is just a bogus excuse to play Pontius Pilate & evade decisions judges want to avoid making.

    190

  • #
    RossP

    This is a case where you need a “leaker”. The audit of the machines from Antrim County , Michigan found how the Dominion machines disguised how fraud was committed. But they are trying to block the release of the investigation.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-dominion-disguised-fraud.html

    100

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      Attorney Matthew DePerno on Newsmax re Antrim:

      Attorney Matthew DePerno CONFIRMS Dominion Voting Machines in Michigan County CHANGED VOTES From Trump to Biden
      Gateway Pundit

      Haven’t seen a written report yet but I assume there will be one. Don’t know how Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson could block it but seems anything is possible now.

      70

  • #
    OldOzzie

    From Thread below

    OldOzzie
    December 13, 2020 at 7:00 am · Reply
    Supreme Court Refuses to Consider Texas Election Lawsuit Based on Original Jurisdiction

    The position of the Supreme Court raises an important question that now sits unresolved. If an individual citizen is determined not to have standing to challenge an election result; and if a group of citizens represented by their interest in a state, any state, is also denied standing to challenge an election result; then who can constitutionally challenge an election, any election, that is mired in controversy and demonstrable evidence of fraud?

    From the Alliance:

    – An individual voter does not have standing to sue for election misconduct. (He/she is only one person and everyone cannot sue all the time for all elections.)
    – An official who may be adversely affected, cannot sue before an election in anticipation of bad conduct because it is speculative (not ripe)
    – An official who was adversely affected, cannot sue after an election claiming bad conduct because it is too late (latches)
    – A state does not have standing to sue on behalf of its citizens to remedy other states’ bad election conduct (no standing)

    My untutored mind is having difficulty figuring out just who, and under what circumstances, has a legal right to a fair election.

    It seems the current answer is: no-one.

    260

    • #
      TdeF

      Well reasoned.

      None of this is new to lawyers. Their job was to frame the complaint with knowledge of the constitution such that the Supreme Court is forced to consider the case. The argument that the complainant had not demonstrated their right to complain about elections in another state would seems fair but they argue the constitution does not support their right to complain about elections in another states. You could say the Supreme Court is signalling that the action needs to be more focused with a really compelling argument for mandatory intervention founded in the Constitution. Given that the complaint was so explosive, the older judges of the Supreme Court ducked and the three Trump appointees did not even comment. They ducked. Now the plaintiffs know what to do, argue standing, necessity, obligation using precise Constitutional references and precedents.

      The plaintiffs need Constitutional experts to quickly reframe the action so that it has standing, probably in the parts of the Constitution which deal with resolving disputes between the members States which is the exclusive realm of the Supreme Court.

      The core complaint must be about the unfairness and even illegality of contributing to a national election where which four or more states engage in fraudulent voting which obviously affects the rights of other states. A Constitutional expert, exactly like those sitting in the Supreme Court, would know how to do this. And which implied threats, short of succession, might guarantee a response. Otherwise clearly the Court is going to take the easy path rather than be center of a massive controversy.

      There have only been three Contingent elections in 1801, 1825 and 1837. It must be presented as the only fair way to resolve an unfair election with widespread corruption of new computer collation of votes, even overseas. The collation of votes has been allowed to be automated in the US with seemingly little legal oversight and has clearly defeated the time honored system of observers. As has been written, compilation of votes over the internet by computer servers in Serbia and Germany is beyond belief. The Court appears to be miles behind the times in making sure the US Presidential election is beyond interference. Two hundred years of tradition are worth nothing in an internet world and the Supreme Court appears not to have noticed.

      The way in which this election has been conducted electronically must be addressed in those provision which must promise a free and fair election to National office. And whether the appropriate approvals have been given for radically changing the method of vote collection and collation, especially with the mail in voting.

      It should be argued that a Contingent election is the only clean and fast remedy for an unprecedented election widely perceived to be corrupted by electronic interference not considered in the Constitution or previous elections.

      70

      • #
        TdeF

        I mean the Supreme Court might be shocked to learn that American votes were transported out of the United States to countries on the other side of the world where the Constitution does not reach or American authority of any sort. This may well be illegal in principle as it must have been implied in the Constitution that a National Election was conducted in America by Americans with some provision for Americans who are overseas but not to send the votes of Americans to Serbia!

        Surely a theme through the US Constitution is that the election in each US state has people in each US state voting and those votes being handled by people in those same states and reported to Washington.

        Who could have dreamed that domestic votes would go to commercial enterprises overseas? I would ask for the election to be invalidated by this fact. And you can be sure that no one has Supreme Court approval to take the American election outside America for tallying. The Founding Fathers would be aghast for their votes to be counted in London or France or Serbia.

        Consider that US Presidential election is totally invalid because it was not valid in the first place, regardless of cheating or foreign interference. It is invalidated by the fact that the votes of US citizens were taken overseas to be compiled by unknown people and their computers in another country. (You could also ask the simple question as to why this was done if not for the purpose of tampering.) You can be sure that while it is unlikely anything in the US Constitution explicitly prohibits this, it is clearly beyond the dreams of the founders more than two centuries ago but they would not have allowed it. It should not be allowed today, for a thousand obvious reasons. Commerce and communications can leave the county, not votes. And how this came to happen needs to be investigated. And who was behind introducing computer collation of votes, something which was not necessary before this century and therefore not necessary today.

        The plaintiffs must demand a Contingent Election as the only remedy for an illegally conducted election and it is illegal simply because it is not approved. The Founding Fathers did allow for quick resolution of a contested popular election. Then there would be no question of interference.

        61

  • #
    OldOzzie

    Phil Kline Outlines Massive Targeted Expenditure From Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to Influence Election

    Many people recognize there was an underlying organizational network operating within the key regions in the 2020 election, but few people have outlined the specific network and how it operates. In this video Phil Kline, former Attorney General of Kansas and current director of the Amistad Project, testifies to Wisconsin State Legislature about the corrupt and unequal influence of Facebook and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in the 2020 election.

    60

  • #
    Richard C (NZ)

    >”The Supreme Court decision has really helped calm the mood tonight in Washington.”

    Yes, the anger’s palpable. Soon there’ll be rioting, looting, shooting, beating, autonomous zones, ….did I miss anything?

    Expect an immediate crackdown from the authorities too – can’t have uncivilized behavior like that in a civil society.

    70

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      >”Expect an immediate crackdown from the authorities too”

      Some PP vs Antifa fights and police everywhere:

      ‘Proud Boys Brawl with Antifa Goons Near BLM Plaza in DC’ (VIDEO)
      Gateway Pundit

      Not seeing the rioting and looting though.

      40

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      Gateway Pundit (no links)

      Reports of At Least Four Stabbed in DC Following Stop the Steal Rally, Multiple Officers Injured (VIDEOS)

      Antifa Coward Allegedly Stabs Multiple Trump Supporters…Proud Boys Beat The Hell Out Of Him…DC Cops Stand By And Watch [VIDEO]

      Chaos in DC: Antifa Attacking Trump Supporters With Fireworks, Mace — ‘Thousands’ of Proud Boys Patrolling the Streets (VIDEOS)

      BREAKING: A Proud Boy Member Was Stabbed by Antifa in Washington DC Tonight – LIVE STREAM

      20

  • #
  • #
    John Smith101

    For anyone feeling a bit down about things at the moment, I suggest you have a look at this: Leigh Dundas On The Effect Of A 2018 Trump Executive Order On The 2020 Presidential Election Worth ten minutes of your time.

    40

  • #
  • #
    OldOzzie

    Trump greeted at Army-Navy game with chants of ‘USA! USA!’

    Game hosted at West Point due to COVID-19 pandemic

    70

    • #
      RickWill

      Wow – that must be tremendous encouragement for Trump. Very powerful reception! You get the impression that he has better than strong support within the military.

      Very interesting time in the US.

      10

  • #
    OldOzzie

    Trump responds to Supreme Court defeat: ‘Fight on!’

    President expresses disappointment at justices’ refusal to review Texas case but tells lawyers to find alternate strategy.

    “The Supreme Court really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage!” Trump tweeted.

    “You can’t get ‘standing’ before the Supreme Court, so you ‘intervene’ with wonderful states that, after careful study and consideration, think you got ‘screwed’, something which will hurt them also,” he added. “Many others likewise join the suit but, within a flash, it is thrown out and gone, without even looking at the many reasons it was brought. A Rigged Election, fight on!”

    70

  • #
  • #
    OldOzzie

    How NBC News Helped the Biden Campaign Ruin an Innocent Man and Bury the Hunter Laptop Story

    The pro-democracy news outlet Apple Daily, based in Hong Kong, used an earlier 40-page version of the report and was the first to report on its findings. In response, NBC News launched a coordinated attack on one of the publishers of the report, Christopher Balding. This attack had all the appearances of being coordinated with the Biden campaign and it had the effect of benefiting the C CP.

    On his blog, Balding provides a summary of all the things that should deeply worry American voters:

    Key Points of the Report:

    1. Joe Biden’s compromising partnership with the Communist Party of China runs via Yang Jiechi (CPC’s Central Foreign Affairs Commission). YANG met frequently with BIDEN during his tenure at the Chinese embassy in Washington.
    2. Hunter Biden’s 2013 Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership was set-up by Ministry of Foreign Affairs institutions who are tasked with garnering influence with foreign leaders during YANG’s tenure as Foreign Minister.
    3. HUNTER has a direct line to the Politburo, according to SOURCE A, a senior finance professional in China.
    4. Michael Lin, a Taiwanese national now detained in China, brokered the BHR partnership and partners with MOFA foreign influence organizations.
    5. LIN is a POI for his work on behalf of China, as confirmed by SOURCE B and SOURCE C (at two separate national intelligence agencies).
    6. BHR is a state managed operation. Leading shareholder in BHR is Bank of China which lists BHR as a subsidiary and BHR’s partners are SOEs that funnel revenue/assets to BHR.
    7. HUNTER continues to hold 10% in BHR. He visited China in 2010 and met with major Chinese government financial companies that would later back BHR.
    8. HUNTER’s BHR stake (purchased for $400,000) is now likely [to] be worth approx. $50 million (fees and capital appreciation based on BHR’s $6.5 billion AUM as stated by Michael Lin).
    9. HUNTER also did business with Chinese tycoons linked with the Chinese military and against the interests of US national security.
    10. BIDEN’s foreign policy stance towards China (formerly hawkish), turned positive despite China’s country’s rising geopolitical assertiveness.

    40

  • #
    Rick

    Several months ago I could see that civil unrest or even civil war was was almost inevitable. With black politicians now openly encouraging the murder of whites in general and Trump supporters specifically, the threshold is nearing.
    The SCOTUS and everyone else in a position to sort out the malfeasance in the election is either denying it or ducking for cover, which only makes things worse.
    One historian, in reference to the French Revolution, said, “When the time for change has come, nothing can stop it and everything serves to advance it.”
    It is still true today and all it will take is one shot to start a bloodbath.

    122

  • #
    Fuel Filter

    Hmmmmmm….Now, just wait a minute…

    Did I just watch a whole lot of American Patriots marching in D.C. which is a notorious city for, well, just take a gander at the demographics of that place…and the Mayor, and her history.

    And nobody broke windows? Nobody set fire to cars and looted local businesses? Nobody was seen, or much less caught carting off flat-screens or Michael Jordan sneakers? No random violence?

    Nobody made D.C. look like Portland or Seattle or the South Side of Chicago?

    Ya don’t say.

    (I particularly loved the chants of “F…AntiFa” and that big black flag that one dude was flying! Just wish they did the same BBQ of Burn Loot and Murder.)

    220

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      I noted the dichotomy too at #15, in an oblique way.

      20

    • #
      Analitik

      Plus where was the coordinated assault against the police that were monitoring the demonstration? And against bystanders not taking part in the march?

      I guess these “white supremacists” are clueless at rioting, pillaging and attacking those who disagree with them. It seems it takes leftists to form a proper mob.

      30

  • #
    OldOzzie

    The week before Election Day, RedState published a series of articles about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, based on a 64-page report from researchers who combed public records to reveal how compromised the Biden family is to the [email protected] Communist Party

    100

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      HUNTER BIDEN SUBPOENAED OVER BURISMA, TWO DOZEN OTHER ENTITIES AS PART OF FOUR INVESTIGATIONS
      Zero Hedge

      “We’re sure Kamala Harris is genuinely concerned over the outcome of this investigation and hopes it doesn’t result in Joe Biden’s unceremonious exit from the teleprompter scene.”

      70

      • #
        Greg Cavanagh

        Umm, We’re sure Kamala Harris has orchestrated the sudden interest in Biden’s laptop within the msm and poor old Joe will need to step down soon after inauguration for his court cases. Long Live Kamala!

        00

  • #
    Fuel Filter

    This is a very significant post by Vox:

    Sounds like something PDJT, Gen. Flynn and a few of his Brothers in Arms might just have up their sleeves.

    *****

    A non-military war

    [this is Vox introing the quote]

    Unbeknownst to most of his supporters, that is what the President is presently fighting.

    [what follows is a quote from an unknown source. Vox is usually quite careful to include hotlinks to other writers and sites, but he did not on this occasion. No idea where this came from, but it sure reads like an authoritative article.]

    *****

    “As practically existing, the age of wars being a matter of moving weapons and soldiers has still not been translated into history, but as a concept it has already begun to noticeably fall behind. “

    [big snip]

    “I would argue that you cannot possibly understand what has been happening for the last twelve years, or understand the nature of the current Constitutional crisis, if you have not read UNRESTRICTED WARFARE by Qiao Lang and Wang Xiangsui, first published in English in 1999. Ignore the histrionic subtitle of the 2017 edition, it is not “China’s master plan to destroy the USA”, but rather, a brilliant explication by two Chinese colonels of the then-new concept of “Total Dimensional Warfare”, to which I prefer to refer as “comprehensive warfare” and is, regardless of what one calls it, the real 5th Generation Warfare that so many glory-seeking would-be William S. Linds have attempted, incorrectly, to coin.”

    [there is a hotlink to the Chinese authors in the original]

    *****
    The current election crisis is not about Biden, or the Democrats, it’s not even about the Constitution. It is actually about defeating the world’s dominant military and rendering it hors de combat without firing a shot.
    *****

    [snip; AND don’t forget to lookup the French meaning…]

    As per, RTWT. This dude is rarely wrong.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/12/a-non-military-war.html

    70

  • #
    OldOzzie

    THERE it is! Politico: Biden transition team ‘quietly brings on Facebook, Google employees’

    Here’s a bit of news that might surprise a grand total of zero people who have paid attention to events as they unfolded (or weren’t allowed to unfold as it were) in the last several months as it concerns the election:

    Biden transition is quietly putting Google and Facebook employees into its transition landing teams.

    70

  • #
    OldOzzie

    Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson note that Hunter and James Biden ‘have refused to cooperate with their committees’

    Catherine Herridge
    @CBS_Herridge

    #HunterBiden Senators
    @ChuckGrassley
    @SenRonJohnson

    “Attorneys for Hunter + James Biden have refused to cooperate with the committees. It should be noted that, collectively, President Trump’s family + associates produced documents + agreed to appear at interviews…”
    @CBSNews

    60

  • #
    Terry

    If the Democrats wanted to heal the nation they would listen and investigate the grievances.

    Why do you think Democrats want to heal [unite] the nation? Because they said it?
    They mean to destroy the nation. By their deeds you will know them.

    130

  • #
    Fuel Filter

    No idea if anyone here knows about, or much less follows the great Diana West.

    She’s been on this election from the git-go like white-on-rice.

    I’ve read her major opus, “American Betrayal” going on my second time around and am going to order M. Stanton Evens’ book “Blacklisted by History” when I can find the time.

    (For all you guys in OZ, didja know that at the outset of WW II FDR withheld military aid of ALL KINDS in the Pacific theater to give the Soviets and “Uncle Joe Stalin” as much as he could? A telling quote in the first chapter quotes FDR as saying {paraphrase here} “ I would rather lose Australia…” {that is a direct quote} and the other areas General MacArthur was fighting in than let Russia fail. Thought that was an interesting titbit. And yes, she has citations…)

    Anyway, here’s her latest take on SCOTUS failing the American people (once again) with lots of links.

    Another person everyone here should follow.

    https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/4119/Election-News-39-SCOTUS-Woofs.aspx

    30

    • #
      Dave in the States

      “(For all you guys in OZ, didja know that at the outset of WW II FDR withheld military aid of ALL KINDS in the Pacific theater to give the Soviets and “Uncle Joe Stalin” as much as he could? A telling quote in the first chapter quotes FDR as saying {paraphrase here} “ I would rather lose Australia…” {that is a direct quote} and the other areas General MacArthur was fighting in than let Russia fail. Thought that was an interesting titbit. And yes, she has citations…)”

      Yes, FDR had a history of being soft on communism. The New Deal was basically socialism and his VP, Henry Wallace, was an avowed socialist. Less well known was his aiding and abetting Mao, through his rigid anti-Japan hardline stance. He was either a complete fool or in collusion when it came to socialism.

      Be aware, nonetheless, that the agreed upon Allied grand strategy was Germany First.

      10

  • #
    Richard C (NZ)

    ‘UNHINGED’ DEM REP. URGES PELOSI TO BLOCK 126 REPUBLICANS FROM CONGRESS FOR SUPPORTING “INSURRECTION OR REBELLION”
    Zero Hedge

    Jonathan Turley – Pascrell’s call is utterly unhinged from any logical or constitutional foundation. Rebels do not storm the courts with legal filings. They overthrow courts with the rest of the constitutional system.

    Those who lack faith or fealty in our constitutional system are those who label litigants “rebels” and legal filings as forms of “rebellion” and “sedition.”

    60

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      Turley – I previously denounced Pascrell for his “dangerous form of demagoguery.” This latest call shows the demagoguery has reached a level of utter delusion.

      20

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      Turley – Pascrell’s move against his colleagues mirrors language in the response of Pennsylvania’s Attorney General Josh Shapiro calling the Texas lawsuit “seditious.”

      30

    • #
      Richard C (NZ)

      >”Pascrell accused the 126 Republicans who supported the Texas lawsuit of “insurrection or rebellion” – or at least, of supporting “insurrection or rebellion” – against the Constitution.”

      John Cleese on Twitter

      One should never forget the first principle of the old KGB

      ” Always accuse your enemy of exactly what you are doing “

      70

  • #
    David Maddison

    Two plus two equal five.

    Are you living the Orwellian nightmare yet?

    https://youtu.be/5BdmvWz7fBs

    00

  • #
    Furiously curious

    It’s been mentioned a few times higher up, that “now the election is over”, the Democrat civil war is on! Joe Biden’s family corruption is now popping up on MSM. That’s going to get ugly, as the Establishment and Wall St, fight with the progressives. Mind you the word is that Harris doesn’t have any ideology or values, so she’s probably an easier target for Wall St. Hubby is into wealth as well. They are probably candidates for the Establishment. Revolution? Yeah naah.

    30

  • #
    RickWill

    It appears that nothing was set on fire, no shop windows broken, no one punched or kicked to the ground and no shots fired. Is this even a real protest? If not for the loud chanting, it could easily go unnoticed.

    What’s to report here?

    80

  • #
    Graeme P.

    And what do ya know…..no burning looting and bashing bystanders.

    20

  • #
    Crakar24

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/highlight-todays-wisconsin-supreme-court-hearing-election-fraud-two-judges-claim-trumps-post-election-strategy-racist/

    If you question election fraud you are a rayyycist, the US political system is plumbing depths Chavez never reached

    51

  • #
    Neo

    Really, when you get reports like this on mainstream media like the NYT:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/12/us/as-bids-to-overturn-vote-fail-pro-trump-demonstrators-stick-with-him.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

    What censorship are you lot on about??

    Interesting that the allegations of “fraud” floated so far by Trump and supporters all seem to be just that…allegations.

    Allegations that such and such might have been able to happen…and where there have been allegations that such and such DID happen (like the ballots/suitcases/tables thing) those allegations have been well answered, as they should be.

    Courts seem to be taking the attitude that just because its possible something could have happened that isn’t justification for widespread disenfranchising of voters. Bring on specific instances, prove that they occurred and mean what you think they do, or dont waste peoples time.

    210

  • #
    Crakar24

    In other news the deep state has thrown Biden under a bus as the laptop non story is suddenly a story.

    Is this the first sign of panic?

    60

    • #
      Annie

      Or first sign of bringing in Harris?

      40

    • #
      RossP

      No Cracker24 –all part of the Democrat plan. But they better be careful, Harris is named in emails on the laptop.

      30

      • #
        Crakar24

        That cannot be right (too early for this), you link hunter to China then everyone knows they covered it up before election and Joe bananas is guilty too. This will simply garner more support for trump……unless it’s trump releasing the info?

        10

    • #
      DOC

      No. It’s just part of a well-prepared plan. If Joe won’t go, Pelosi has already looked into constitutional matters of how to ‘retire’ a health-impeded President. This was announced publicly pre-election. Joe’s position is precarious on two levels; his health, and by being alleged to be the ‘Big Man’ in the Hunter Biden reports.

      Even Joe knows the game is up. He probably just ever wanted the title POTUS before he moved on. He served a purpose in the election to cover for the unelectable Harris. I believe if he becomes POTUS and was found to be criminally culpable in the alleged Hunter matter, he will never see the inside of a gaol. As a POTUS, he would be given a pardon by his successor, as the US would never want a history of a POTUS going to prison.

      31

  • #
    Roger Knights

    Here are the last four paragraphs of three comments I made on another site:

    My solution for the present is that the Supreme Court or congress or both should call for a new presidential election in those four states. This would of course be off-script constitutionally, and difficult to organize in time, especially given the pandemic. But it’s what I think the Founders would call for, were they here now, because it is TRULY statesmanlike. I.e., it would be acceptable to both sides and would not leave whoever wins tainted with illegitimacy.

    My solution for the future is that the US should mandate, by a constitutional amendment, ranked-choice-voting in federal elections. If we had had that option this year, neither of the two leading candidates, both extremists, would have won a majority of the votes, and so a middle-of-the road candidate (put up hopefully by a reformed Reform party) would have won in the second round.
    ——————

    If evidence of cheating is assembled soon and looks convincing, GOP politicians and notables could “pay back” the “winners” by pledging to boycott the Inauguration, state-of-the-union addresses, and other presidential appearances, to highlight the winner’s illegitimacy. If this pledging starts now, it might influence the Supreme Court in the upcoming cases (on substance, not procedure), that it will be ruling on. That’s unlikely; but such boycotting could be a very powerful weapon in other ways—and could be a means of letting off steam short of violence.
    ————————

    PS: Another way to avoid violence would be for a large group of state legislatures to declare their opinion that the election result is illegitimate. This would at a minimum induce the new administration to tread cautiously. And it would deter future blatant cheating. And it would get YouTube to undo its censorship of this issue. Perhaps it would accomplish more.

    40

  • #
    Analitik

    neither of the two leading candidates, both extremists, would have won a majority of the votes

    I don’t see either candidate as being extremist.

    Biden is merely corrupt so beholden to controlling entities like big business and foreign governments (some of which would wish for extremist policies).

    Trump is more center right than anything else by my reckoning and is a constitutionalist to boot.

    The true extremist is Kamala Harris who will take over as unelected president once Biden is either forced to resign due to Hunter’s indiscretions being fully revealed or is declared unfit for the role under amendment 25 of the constitution. She would seem to have no compunction in introducing highly authoritarian, oppressive policies in support of the globalist, hard left.

    91

  • #
    Peter Fitzroy

    First it was the courts, and they proved to hold law above ideology. Now, and somehow it’s a political party which is hiding evidence, and on and on and on. Meanwhile stocks are doing great, the wealthy are happy, and the president is presiding over the worst response to the covid epidemic anywhere in the world. Way to go

    215

    • #
      RossP

      C’mon Peter , you know as well as everyone else on here, the individual states have all or most of the power re Covid. Just like Morrison cannot tell individual states to open their borders in Australia.

      70

    • #
      Analitik

      And how are those states with Democrat governors doing coping with Covid vs those with Republican ones? Statistics show very little difference?

      And when Trump put the travel lockdown from China in place back in January, recall that Pelosi and other senior Democrats protested against this “racist” action.

      I do agree that the wealth disparity caused by continued loose monetary policies has been a failing of Trump’s. It’s the biggest disappointment of his term in office by him. There has been plenty of disappointment due to the deep state obstructing his attempts to: reduce US involvement in international conflicts, remove carbon emission legislation, re-establish merit based assessment rather than identity politics based quotas and other push backs against other leftist, globalist agenda.

      40

  • #
  • #
    David Maddison

    I don’t think most people realise the serious consequences of a Barris presidency. They will destroy the United States as we now know it and permanently entrench Leftism via extensive censorship and control with the help of their Socialist Billionaire partners who control social and legacy media. Also they will do thus by structural changes such as the addition of two new states as they have already said they will do plus stacking the USSC with their own sycophants. In addition, an open borders policy will ensure a permanent supply of lifelong welfare recipients who are sure to vote for the Left until such time as they abolish elections as well. This is the last chance for the forces of freedom to win the Presidency.

    62

    • #
      Analitik

      Barris = Barack/Harris?

      00

    • #
      William Astley

      The object is not to win the Presidency. Trump proved the US system is not functioning. The US has existential problems that requires a functioning US government, today, not in ten more political cycles that tear the country apart, as we spend ourselves to death and are taken over by the Chinese.

      This is, the last easy chance to stop an existential threat to the US and it is more than one existential threat.

      …. And all of the US existential immediate problems, the Chinese attack on the US, the US out of control money problem, a predicted nasty economic war, the constant pointless political fighting in the US, and so on.

      …require an immediate solution to the government problem. (Things had to get really, really, bad before the Milt took action. There were multi red lines crossed by China and by the Dems).

      Protests or letters to politicians will not fix the ‘political’ system. The US Milt does not want to encourage any angry or violent protests. Happy protests, sure.

      This is going to easy not hard to fix.

      Our team will fix (there are no sides, so we cannot win, we fix something that is broken) the US System, without violence or risk of damaging the US system.

      The US Milt looked for and found evidence of CIA direct interference in the 2020 US election.

      At that time, on the same CIA server, the CIA found felony evidence involving almost all Dem candidates and their campaign team. That evidence and evidence the Milt have of a Chinese/Dem conspiracy, can and will be used to ‘fire’ the Dems.

      This is not an attack on the Dems. This will in time end the class of work…. professional politician. This will end party politics and end secret special interest group interference in the government.

      The government has been designed to find and select only optimum solutions. The new government can without risk, end all pork barrel programs. The new government is required to fix the money problem. The new system will easily, without drama, solve the US state and people’s problems, by finding the most equitable and as effective solutions. The system will search for and find the optimum good solutions for all problems. It is a good smart system.

      The US people will see that the system decisions makers are regular good, honest, non political US citizens, who are proud to be part of team to do a job for the US. Many of the new team have young families.

      And the US Milt is going to get good PR for a great team and a great solution.

      The US people do not respect or trust most professional politicians. The US people will all trust and respect the new team.

      10

  • #
    Serp

    Should Zuckerberg and Dorsey escape hanging and end up sharing a cell in Gitmo I’ll send them a Scrabble set with which to beguile the coming decades.

    60