By Jo Nova
Brave scientists at the CSIRO and BoM have dug hard through the sacred Arc of the Climate Covenant, CMIP-6, to discover the horrible truth that we only have seven years (just seven!) until we pass through the sanctified Target-of-Paris on Halloween of 2031.
Channel Nine shares this “harsh deadline for humanity” and tells us the chance to limit global warming to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5 degrees “will expire” then, like 2 for 1 sale coupon. They don’t quite explain what happens on November 1st, 2031 — but most people will assume it’s just like what happened after Prince Charles and Al Gore and the UN said we only had ten years to go (which was nothing).
But the horror show continues, not in our climate, but in our science: where the work of past scientists is deleted, and dubious datasets get adjusted with secret algorithms and thermometers near incinerators and over hot bitumen carparks that may be 1,000 kilometers away. The CSIRO-BOM Blob have massaged Australia’s temperature record so it can fit their favourite climate model. Dishonestly, both institutions hide the heat of the Federation Drought, where places all across Australia recorded temperatures over 50 degrees in 1896. BoM and CSIRO delete the cooling trend their own experts recorded from 1900 to 1950 in Australia. (Deacon et al).
The BOM and CSIRO pretend the temperatures are accurate in the graph above. They don’t tell Australians that they keep adjusting the data, even a hundred years after it happened. Some poor towns didn’t know they were two degrees colder in World War I until the BoM “discovered” that in 2014. The people of Marble Bar thought they had the hottest heatwave in world history in 1923 until the BOM traveled back in time to delete it, I mean “correct it”. Temperatures in 1910 have fallen 22 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 10 years.
At the current rate of decline, the 1920 miners of Marble Bar will be in an ice age by the end of the century.
The irony is that the BOM ignore the hot temperatures of the 1800’s because they were not in standardized modern Stevenson screens, yet the BOM is happy to take those lauded Stevenson screen measurements from 1920 and drop them in a high speed homogenization-blender to adjust them by as much as 2 degrees.
So the BOM can “adjust” the data to get any trend they want. Then there’s the added heat of a million tons of concrete and brick keeping our cities warm. And on top of that scientific hamburger, thermometers boxes shrank from 230 litres to 60 litres, and glass instruments became electronic ones. They don’t mention that their super accurate new gizmos can pick up brief changes in temperature that the old glass ones can’t. And possibly they can pick up the airport radars too.
Maximum record temperatures may be a one-second-record, literally there and gone in a moment, and if it was radar interference, not even there at all.
When asked, the BOM say they have calibrated and tested the thermometers side by side, to but they won’t release the data. As if the thermometer readings at Canberra airport are a national security issue.
They also don’t mention that scientists in Australia were reporting that Australia was cooling from the 1890s to 1952. (Deacon et al) The ghastly heat of 1896, the Federation Drought, and the 50C record temperatures all over Australia all go down the memory hole.
Lest we forget, those historic heatwaves.
Not surprisingly, after we adjust all the records, we find extreme heat events are increasing
And this is the shocking graph the BOM-CSIRO blob gave us in 2024:
But ten years ago the BOM showed Australians a different graph, one which looked like this, til they took it off their own website. So there is bound to be some excuse. A different permutation or combination of variables, an older dataset, some plausible deniability.
But the fact remains, that the BOM-CSIRO-blob are not trying to give Australians the whole truth and nothing but the truth:
Reading the tea-leaves on rain in Australia
By selecting some contrived permutation the BOM-CSIRO-Blob can create the illusion that something unusual is happening. Here, they show the April to October rainfall in one particular part of the country as if this has some special meaning. (Their climate models fail on rainfall trends nearly universally). The Blob can cherry pick permutations until they find something. But here, even the best trend they can get doesn’t resemble our CO2 emissions. Why was the winter rain almost as low in 1940? The BOM don’t know. They could make up some reason post hoc, but they can’t predict it.
If the BOM-CSIRO-blob wanted, they could show Sydney-siders the total rainfall record for the last 130 years. But they can’t because it would be obvious to everyone that it has nothing to do with CO2. It could just be noise in the system, oceanic oscillation, or cycles controlled by the sun.
This was the total rainfall in Sydney from 1840 to 2019, and the total number of rainy days, the peak amount of rain that falls in a single day and the intensity of the downpours. Why isn’t it in the State of the Climate? Why haven’t the BOM updated this graph? (From the Ashcroft paper of 2019).
The exact same pattern is visible, by the way, in rainfall records from Melbourne and Adelaide too. But almost no one in Australia would know that. The ignorance isn’t an accident.
Thank the BOM. Thank the CSIRO. Thank the ABC.
REFERENCES
LindenAshcroftabDavid J.KarolyacAndrew J.Dowdyb(2019) Historical extreme rainfall events in southeastern Australia, Weather and Climate Extremes Available online 10 May 2019, 100210
Deacon, E.L. (1952) Climatic Change in Australia since 1880, Australian Journal of Physics, Volume 6, Pages 209-218. [PDF]
State of the Climate 2022, Bureau of Meteorology
State of the Climate 2022, CSIRO
State of the Climate Report CSIRO 2014. CSIRO
Previous State of the Climate Reports, CSIRO
And even more droughts and trends graphs here.
WHY did they start at 1910/1920?
One would think that the start point is significant if you’re predicting the end of the world 🙂
Cheers,
140
I believe this date was chosen because the BOM claimed that not all temp measurement sites had the correct setup. But as Jo and others have pointed out, many sites did have the standard setup well before this date, so surely their readings should be included.
50
Around 1910 it was particularly cold. That makes it a really good starting point. For cherries.
50
Late 1800s to early 1900s severe heatwaves recorded, example Bourke NSW Post Office weather station records that BoM ignore.
1895 Federation Drought
20
Federation Drought 1895 to 1902
00
They can fudge temperature but not precipitation.
‘We identify several extreme daily rainfall events in the pre-1900 period in Sydney and Melbourne that warrant further examination as they appear to be more extreme than anything in the modern record.’ (Ashcroft et al)
140
And the Report only reports “Doom and Gloom”. It does not cover the benefits of Global Warming” (Climate Change) such as more rain for Australia as well as greater crop yields and more trees (even though the Authorities are chopping more down for the Transmission lines and Renewable plantations).
The Greens should love more green…….
140
Johnny
Re “The Greens should love more green…….”
Not if it was useful they wouldn’t!
00
All of the Climate Alarmist predictions have yet to eventuate. Now the goal posts have moved once again. Another 7 years to go until they are proved wrong Big Time once again.
150
I still love this 6 month average temp record from the summer of 1910-1911 that I think Strop posted a while back , last I looked it was still on Bom’s site .
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=meanave&year=1911&month=2&period=6month&area=nat
30
If you look at that hot days graph, the latest version, it seems extreme since 2010, a rapid increase. So you would expect people on the street to be talking about it, how hot it is now. But you don’t. No one complains of the hot summers we get now. No one. In fact since 2019 the summers have been very mild. Notably so. The original version seems to portray what I’ve felt.
Furthermore, this rapid increase in heat, what effect has this had? I live in the same forest I did in the 1970’s and it is EXACTLY the same. More pythons and wildlife than there used to be, but that’s about it, the plants are identical. So even if the graph shows a rapid increase and let us pretend it is legit, it makes zero difference to anything.
It’s all smoke and mirrors. Clearly.
131
Well done Jo, an all time classic piece summarizing the malfeance/incompetence of the CSIRO:BOM. Or as you more eloquently describe them – the “ blob”. To make the article more perfect, there’s an unneeded “ to” in paragraph 9.
100
And, “fewer wet years than in the 20th century”. Interesting. We own a swamp at the back of a floodplain, and usually when it gets dry we mow it for low land grazing. Haven’t been able to get into it for the last 4 years, it just won’t dry out before a big downpour comes. Annoys me because I like mowing that swamp.
But I guess you make these conclusions when you’re a 25 year old “scientist” who lives in a lab. (Did anyone see the picture of the CEO of the “climate Council”?) Go outside, get away from the computer, the ecosystem is doing just fine. In fact very good. This year has been the most ideal season for farming, you can’t get better.
90
Philip, it might have been the most ideal season in your area, but for others (eg graingrowers in SA, Nth Vic) it’s been a relatively dry winter/spring. Plus, a lot of crops frosted. No joy there. But is it a sign of the dreaded “CC”? No, those areas have just come off a number of very good years.
50
7 years?!
What happened to 5?
This can only be attributed to End of the World Catastrophe inflation.
It used to take only 1,825 days to get to catastrophe.
Now it takes 2,555 days.
I blame Trump.
120
Does anybody know why there are two rainfall gauges in Mitcham (Melbourne). One is 586006 and the other is 86074. They appear to be located on the same site, or at least in the same vicinity as they are both on the same Dot on the BOM weather chart (top and bottom). One is named Mitcham Reservoir, and the other is Mitcham. On regular occasions they record massively different totals ie: on the 19/10/24, 586006 recorded 5.2mm and 86074 recorded 22mm. I have taken photos of the charts at various times to show people but no one seems to know. I live near this area, and I vouch for 86074.
40
Thanks again to Jo Nova for clearly stating the facts.
Again we live in the safest world in Human history and yet we hear so much today about the terrible floods in Spain.
The loss of life is very sad but deaths from floods and droughts since 1960 are very low today and yet we’ve increased global population by over 5 billion over the last 64 years.
Use your mouse to highlight deaths since 1900 from all decadal disasters at OWI Data link. Deaths are per 100,000 people.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/decadal-average-death-rates-from-natural-disasters
30
Lomborg has recently written about deaths from extreme weather events and here’s a quote from one of his artcles in the Daily Telegraph.
“Yet the impression this barrage of catastrophe gives is wildly misleading. It makes it harder to get climate change policy right. Data show climate-related events like floods, droughts, storms and wildfires aren’t killing more people. Deaths have dropped precipitously. Over the past decade, climate-related disasters have killed 98% fewer people than a century ago”.
“This should not be surprising because the trend has been evident for many decades, although it rarely gets reported. A century ago, in the 1920s, the average death-toll from weather disasters was 485,000 annually. In 1921, the New York Herald headlined its full-page coverage of droughts and famines across Europe with “Deaths for Millions in 1921’s Record Heat Wave.” Since then, almost every decade has seen fewer deaths, with 168,000 average dead yearly in the 1960s and fewer than 9,000 dead each year in the most recent decade, 2014-23”.
40
Does Whim Creek in Western Australia still hold the record for the most rainfall in 24 hours in Australia ?
30
Dutton as PM needs to commence criminal prosecutions of BOM executives and staff over this.
They must be punished for confecting and publishing lies which harm Australia in so many ways.
Public servants are not allowed to create deliberate lies.
They are not allowed to commit fraud. This is fraud.
121
We demand an audit, then we can see how they have manipulated data to get a warming trend. Not sure if Dutton has the bottle to take on the scientific (sic) high priests, it depends on what Trump does.
50
Again here’s Australia’s rainfall since 1900 and check out the improved rainfall trend from 1949 to 2023.
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/climate/change/timeseries.cgi?graph=rranom&area=aus&season=0112&ave_yr=7&ave_period=6190
40
The great climate shift of the 1970s was not caused by rising CO2. My first instinct is to look at natural variability for the increase in precipitation.
‘The shift in climate regimes around 1970s caused an overall enhancement of precipitation extremes across the globe with a specific spatial distribution pattern.
‘We used gridded observational-reanalysis precipitation dataset and two important extreme precipitation measures, namely Annual Maximum Daily Precipitation (AMDP) and Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP).
‘AMDP is reported to increase for almost two-third of the global land area. The variability of AMDP is found to increase more than its mean that eventually results in increased PMP almost worldwide, less near equator and maximum around mid-latitudes. Continent-wise, such increase in AMDP and PMP is true for all continents except some parts of Africa.’ (Sarkar & Maity 2021)
20
The climate change soap opera continues with the usual cast staying on script . Occasionally they change the cast , but almost no one leaves . The truth doesn’t get in the way of the story and if it did it would be labelled “misinformation” and memory holed . The list of failed predictions keeps growing but the media ignores it . Welcome to the mendaciumacene age .
50
If bulldust was music BOM/CSIRO a full blown symphony of sadness. Funny how this is released just as Albo & Co are writhing on a stick of reality. It’s almost as if a distraction was required?
90
Hot week. Big storm. Floods. Why? That’s what people have always demanded (I’m 87 so “always” means for me ‘for a very long time’). It has become so easy for “experts” to answer “climate change”.
Scientists, to my shame (I am one), joined the easy path early in the piece. It’s the lazy way. The scientists who showed the curiosity, tenacity and scepticism needed to be any good at their jobs found the statistics of extreme weather events very demanding and the analysis impossible to convey in simple terms to the whole world. It was much easier to decide that convincing the population to give up fossil fuels is the moral imperative that justifies any short cuts that may be needed.
And so it came to pass. Scientists had a new role. Scaring the population became their mission in life. And they became surprisingly good at it.
I don’t know the answer. We now have seen two quite different contemporary events where science-based exaggerations rapidly gave rise to damaging national panic — climate change and Covid. The forces at work seem to be irresistible. Perhaps the next challenge will be met more calmly. One can only hope.
100
China and India are going their own way and they are truely irresistible. Reality eventually prevails. The current Climate Emergency™ will make sceptics of the younger generation.
There is no risk globally that CO2 production will decline year on year for a long time. Even Australia is doing good in this regard with literally exporting boat loads of carbon to China, Korea, Japan, India and others so they can produce CO2.
CO2 production is strong. Those not making commitments to burning carbon are becoming less resistible and having less influence globally.
20
Again here’s Lomborg’s graph of global deaths from extreme weather events since 1920 and note much lower trend over the last 60 years.
This just proves how much safer the world is today, while population has increased by a further 5 billion people.
https://humanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/chart-2.jpg
10
About that latest scary deadline: Pretty safe to say we can take a raincheck on that one.
20
The BoM and CSIRO are scammers trying to support their scam. They are globalist useful idiots with very limited understanding of any science at all. Their globalist agenda is leading Australia down a deep, dark hole.
There is reliable evidence that shows Australia is warming on average. I looked at the UAH data globally for the change in summer and winter conditions. The extremes in temperature commonly occur in February and August but opposite seasons in either hemisphere:
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/UAH_Summer_Winter-1724985960.4364.png?fit=720%2C1040&ssl=1
What UAH has observed is much warmer winters in the southern half of Australia but cooler summers. These trends are consistent with changing sunlight over Australia. The peak December sunlight at 30S has declined 4W/m^2 since it peaked 1500 years ago while the peak June sunlight has increased by 2W/m^2.
Convective potential across northern Australia today is higher than it has been since 2018. The precipitable water for Nov 1 across southern Australia lhighest since 2021..
An interesting observation in southeast Australia over the past week has been the persistence of coastal cloud. Every day over the past week has seen light cloud forming and sometimes building to local rain by midday then dissipating. I have not observed conditions like thisbefore.
30
Clicked on the “Deacon et al” and went back via the time machine. Way back to 2014. Possibly around the time I first started reading Jo’s blog. A number of contributors still here today. Well done TdeF, Richard C NZ etc, still going strong. But so many commentators no longer here. But nothing has really changed in 10 years has it? The BOM: CSIRO and media just keep ploughing on with their climate alarmist predictions. Still keep ignoring all the good data from before 1910 and still keep batting away all the criticisms of their methodology. They say the truth will out, I just wish it would hurry up.
30
Great post Jo. 10+ from me. I will share with many.
30
There is one place where the corruptors hold no sway: the weather records reported in newspapers. Perhaps Oz needs an effort to collect all those newspaper reports in your libraries and assemble a database.
BOM weather records are made with public money, hence they are public property. Corrupting those records is equivalent to destroying them. Destroying public property is a criminal offence. Prosecute these people and sent them to jail.
.
30
“A deadline, a deadline, we have another deadline!”
Sing along…
Actually the timeline is right but the event wrong. 😉😎
A Recap:
1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989
1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources by 2000
1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
1970s: Killer Bees!
1970: Ice Age By 2000
1970: America Subject to Water Rationing by 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
1972: New Ice Age By 2070
1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
1974: Another Ice Age?
1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life
1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes
1980: Peak Oil In 2000
1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not) 1996: Peak Oil in 2020
2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy 2002: Peak Oil in 2010
2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
2005: Manhattan Underwater by 2015
2006: Super Hurricanes!
2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos
2019: Hey Greta, we need you to convince them it’s really going to happen this time.
“Most people are not just comfortable in their ignorance but hostile to anyone who points it out.”
– Plato
00