Recent Posts


Nothing says “Safe and Effective” like destroying all the data from Australia’s giant abandoned vaccine study

City, future, doom, apocalypse, decay.

By Jo Nova

“Follow the science” they say, right up until they destroy it

In August 2021, as the masses were being coerced and cajoled into vaccinations, the government announced a gigantic long term study with 10,000 Australians that would run for five years. They promised they would include the vaccinated and unvaccinated, and generate 100,000 samples, and 11 million datapoints. No stone would be left unturned to make sure the vaccines were safe and effective. “The Science” was being used to reassure the people.

Less than two years later the data must have looked terrible, because they suddenly stopped the study. They muttered something about archiving the data until more funding was available. (Sure, sure). Now,  they want to quietly destroy the data and make sure no one can ever use it, or find out the secrets it hides with an FOI application. The cost of the entire project was $20 million, a pitifully small fraction of the $18 billion we spent on Australia’s Covid 19 treatment experiments, and it’s nothing compared to the human cost of suffering involved. Now, we’re trying to save a few dollars because the National Archives can’t afford to buy another 8 Tb hard drive from Officeworks or spend 0.1% of the Covid budget renting a cool room in a warehouse. Does anyone believe these excuses any more?

Tell the children, “Government ScienceTM” is nothing more than a tool of persuasion and marketing. It’s just a brand-name abused for profit and power.

A cynic might say those who set this study up did it purely for the purpose of  “radiating confidence” in vaccines, and they never intended to finish it. But we know that if a miracle happened and the results had turned out well, they’d be running adverts, going on talkshows and sending a star recruit with a QoVax badge on a spaceflight with Katy Perry.

Destroying data is always a travesty. This experiment can never be redone:

Queensland Government to destroy ‘globally significant’ Covid vaccine study biobank

By Rebecca Barnett, Canberra Daily and at Dystopian Downunder

Coronavirus-vaccine. PhotoExperts and participants have since been calling for the resurrection of the QoVAX project, but in a letter to study participants last month, Metro North Health confirmed that the study will be permanently shuttered, with all samples and data to be destroyed.

“Metro North Health has determined that, for a range of reasons including the many mutations of the COVID-19 virus and similar studies from Australia and worldwide, there is no longer a scientific and public health need to retain these biological samples for future study,” said the letter, sent 19 March 2025.

“Therefore, these samples will be appropriately sterilised and disposed of. All study data collected as part of the QoVAX-SET study will be archived for the specified time-period as required by law however, it will not be accessed or used for any future purpose.”

The excuse that the virus has mutated now and that there are “similar studies” elsewhere doesn’t wash. There is probably no other dataset like this one in the world, because for the first four or five months there was almost no Covid transmission in Queensland to complicate the analysis. If people got “long covid-like symptoms” we’d know it wasn’t from Covid. Elsewhere Pfizer and others “unblinded” the tests, making sure the unvaccinated got vaccinated, so there were no ethical concerns about them missing out. But that didn’t need to happen in Queensland.

Professor Davies called the decision, on which she was not consulted, “incredibly disappointing.”

“It’s a terrible example of research wastage and loss of a globally significant opportunity to realise benefits and generate knowledge through research based on the unique samples provided by the 10,000 Queenslanders who gave consent and participated,” Professor Davies, who heads up the Allergy Research Group at QUT, told Canberra Daily.

Indeed, QoVAX was unique in that it was one of the only real-world studies to have access to a ‘comparison set’ of participants who had been vaccinated, but had not been infected with the Covid virus, which only took off in Queensland after the state borders opened in December 2021.

Who knows what new assays or techniques we might come up with in the next ten years to reanalyze those samples (if they were not destroyed). The answers to questions like: “Who will benefit the most” from vaccines and who is at the greatest risk of side effects are probably hidden in that data. We might realize a certain gene puts some people at more risk of neuropathy, or clots, or allergic reaction after vaccination, but we won’t be able to confirm that if the data is incinerated.

As Rebecca Weiser explained two years ago, this data collection is extraordinary:

The Spectator

The QoVax team didn’t just collect the standard data. Participants provided information on environmental and social determinants of health and biospecimens of blood and saliva that have been used to derive genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic datasets that will shed light on how the novel vaccines impact the immune system.

The secure digitally integrated biobank has 120,000 biospecimens: serum, saliva and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, in three -80 degrees Celsius freezers and three liquid nitrogen dewars. The linked data repository has four million linked data points and more than 500 whole genomes.

In addition, the biobank has access to real-time electronic medical records. With 70 per cent of hospitals in Queensland storing medical records electronically, the study was intended to allow long-term digital surveillance of health outcomes related to Covid-19 vaccinations, and intersections between vaccine responses and Sars-CoV-2 infection.

14,000 Australians died of some mystery we can’t explain in 2022, and the side effects and deaths continue to this day. Likewise, all over the world.

The people who want the data destroyed are always the ones covering something up.

Ht Matthew L

Image by Julius H. from Pixabay

Photo of needle by Hakan Nural on Unsplash

 

 

10 out of 10 based on 112 ratings

86 comments to Nothing says “Safe and Effective” like destroying all the data from Australia’s giant abandoned vaccine study

  • #
    Steve of Cornubia

    Governments are no longer accountable to the people.

    660

    • #
      Spitfire

      They haven’t for a long time, if ever they were. They’ve just lost the ability to pretend, or they just don’t care that the mask is off.
      I suspect it’s the latter, and in their hubris they think that we won’t bite back in sufficient numbers to make life difficult for them.

      300

    • #
      David Maddison

      I find it remarkable that Australian Governments no longer care if we know they are incompetent, corrupt or wasteful, usually all three and more.

      They know that we know and they know they can get away with it because the whole system is corrupt and rotten to the core. And the Lamestream Media are a big part of that. Decades of dumbing-down society and destruction of traditional morality and patriotism, a carefully orchestrated plan by the Left did it.

      Only a leader of the magnitude of TRUMP with his loyal lieutenants can fix something like this and Australia doesn’t have any.

      380

      • #
        Ian

        “Only a leader of the magnitude of TRUMP with his loyal lieutenants can fix something like this and Australia doesn’t have any.”

        Do you really want a leader who consistently changes his mind, is a bully as he showed when talking to the Ukrainian leader, a felon who takes revenge against those wh oppose him?

        [This is all off topic. – Jo]

        116

        • #
          Fat boy

          What’s wrong with changing one’s mind if it’s for the betterment of the people that voted for you? Does negotiation not involve changing of mind?
          Why shouldn’t he be a bully towards Zelensky when he comes begging, cap in hand, for more U.S. money? Especially when Zelensky couldn’t account for the lost $billions he’s received so far?
          A “felon” who only got charged when he started running for president, yet those who charged him had decades to do so prior? And exactly what was he guilty of?
          Why wouldn’t he seek revenge on those who tried to get him off ballots, jail him for life and kill him? Are those that wronged him not corrupt enough to deserve retribution?

          30

        • #
          Froggy

          He is not a felon you fool……34 outdated, statute changed , bogus charges all aimed to impede his progress in a hostile NYC environment that is Deep Blue and Anti -Trump. As for Zelensky….no trouble when pudding brain was Pres…..bit different now. I could go on but what is the point TDS is VERY real. I wish we had a Businessman running this place, not the 1/4 wit Socialists in charge and soon to be worse with more Commies in control (Greens) with them. I despair for my Country.

          [Good reply, but let’s get back on topic? – Jo]

          30

      • #
        Fran

        Thankfully Canada still has a first past the post system. It gives hope that the current election can deliver real change. The various proportional representation systems sound good but prevent the possiblity of a U-turn.

        10

  • #
    Neville

    Amazing that we’re about to waste trillions of $ on toxic, unreliable W & S and yet we can’t spend a pittance on storing medical material and records that cover just a few critical years.
    If this isn’t a cover up then what is it?

    580

  • #
    david

    It will never change. There is no accountability for anything anymore. With the up and coming election there are only a hand full of politicians worth voting for and most are in a minor Party we are all familiar with !

    390

  • #

    It’s amazing that anyone at all still trusts government … including those in government.

    390

  • #
    David Maddison

    Australian Governments are not only anti-energy, they are anti-science (as well as many other bad things).

    Destroying scientific data is just as bad as burning books or the digital equivalent thereof, as practiced by our e Safety Kommisar.

    Australia is governed by some very wicked and/or stupid people.

    571

    • #
      Jon Rattin

      I’ve asked myself a number of times in recent years in relation to medical bureaucrats. Where does the incompetence end and where does the corruption start?

      Some were following the prevailing health advice blindly whilst others have had their decision making influenced by profits to be made.

      160

    • #
      Mike Jonas

      Wicked or stupid? Yes.
      Stupid? No.

      50

  • #
    David Maddison

    Why can’t they just donate this data into the public domain?

    I’m sure plenty of people would be able to host it given its high value for (genuine) science and medicine.

    And how is the Australian Government destroying valuable data fundamentally any different to the followers of the seventh century warlord destroying artworks? In both cases, the participants are at war against Western Civilisation.

    450

  • #
    Shy Ted

    There were 158,493 registered deaths in Australia in 2018.
    There were 161,300 registered deaths in 2020
    All deaths 2022 2023
    All deaths 190,939 183,131

    In 2024, there were 185,766 deaths
    Sorry for the messy data but ABS… Begs the perennial questions – how do you die from dementia (you don’t). How do you die from Convid? (you don’t)
    Lies, damned lies and statistics

    160

    • #
      Broadie

      In 1973 a MIT research team predicted this increase in deaths in 2020. The peak of the Baby Boomers population were reaching their use by date. The Club of Rome is aware of this and links it in 1973 to pollution, diminished resources and falling quality of life.

      The only question is which control lever should they pull to save the planet?

      Is there a time the presenter asks when Governments should seize control from private enterprize?

      70

      • #
        Robert Swan

        Broadie,
        What a hoot that segment was! Those MIT researchers were right up there with Nostradamus.

        So quality of life *peaked* in 1940, did it? Doesn’t get better than living in a world war. And pollution should be skyrocketing right now, they reckoned, cutting lives short. Well, maybe in China, but not in the USA or here AFAICT.

        Watching it gives a taste of what it’ll be like when people in 2050 look at climate alarm videos from 2010.

        80

      • #
        Thomas Sash

        The Club of Rome as soothsayers! The elite Malthusians can indeed see the future!

        That video should be offered as prima facie evidence that you NEVER let experts decide policy.

        NEVER let experts get anywhere close to levers of power!

        50

  • #
    John in Oz

    As there are many long covid clinics being established in Australia one would think that this data could perhaps be of use to them.

    281

  • #
    Vicki

    It is hard to express just how deeply destructive the Covid years have been to my confidence in the government and the bureaucrats who advise it. For a while I thought the depth of my dismay was peculiar to me and others of anti mRNA vaccine beliefs. But the evidence for a massive loss of community confidence not only in politicians, but specifically the medical profession is spectacular in a nation that once viewed doctors as “gods”.

    The destruction of evidence is just an extension of the incredible policies of government and medical autocracy that we saw emerge in the Covid years. It is heartbreaking that those injured by irresponsible and breathtakingly stupid and callous policy will have few avenues for redress.

    Never forgive and never forget.

    680

  • #
    David Maddison

    If the professional Leftist political propagandists who call themselves “journalists” (sic) were doing their job, this would be a major news item.

    330

  • #
    Broadie

    What are they covering up?

    There is common knowledge of side effects experienced by recipients of these vaccines. So many people were driven to having these clot shots so they could visit hospitals and nursing homes to support sick or dying relatives. It was like a trap that kept resetting itself. ‘Next Please’! We to this day are still running into the coal mine to save those trapped inside. We are being told to ignore the dead canary, the mine atmosphere has a safe effective protection system.

    This study could be like the canary in the coal mine. A dire warning that this mechanism of genetic modification should cease or when the results of the study analysed to see if as it as it appears the dire side affects were limited to certain batches. Doses that may have simply suffered from contamination during production. Maybe this study will prove the gene therapy works brilliantly for those genetically disposed to this form of long term protection from pathogens.

    To hide, distort or destroy data would demonstrate a possible cross contamination of the science by climate scientists.

    240

  • #
    Ross

    These actions and inactions are all being done very quietly or buried. We had the Bureau of Stats whitewash the excess mortality data. Recently, the Human Rights Commission did a review of the anti COVID government measures and found them mostly harmful and abusive. But was there any major outcry or further actions- nope. We’ve still not had a major COVID-19 Royal Commission. At least to find out why previously instituted pandemic plans were ignored. The only political people that have tried to hold some of the government officials accountable are Gerard Rennick and Alex Antic. Perhaps also Malcolm Roberts. Now this study is being buried and probably never to be heard of again. It was such a sensible study but must have wrinkled big pharma stooges in Australia. Anyone who was slightly curious back in 2020/21 discovered that yes, mRNA tech had been around since the 1990’s but that all previous attempts at mass production and safe use had failed. Hence, it was untested technology with no long term safety data. All the regulatory authorities should have asked for these type of studies in every country where mRNA was used. That should have been the job of the Australian TGA, but that organisation seemed to be seriously compromised or incompetent or maybe both.

    310

  • #
    de Grouchy

    It is clear that the enemies of the nation govern Australia, and that the elected government has little or no power. Any dissent by elected members from the hidden powers leads to their removal and expulsion. Think Abbott.

    The only hope for Australia is to vote for One Nation or similar patriotic parties in sufficient numbers to restrain the now treasonous self interested elected major parties.

    190

  • #
    David Maddison

    And Australia could have saved numerous lives and billions of dollars and vast amounts of unnecessary human suffering and loss of freedom and jobs and businesses if only real science was followed:

    1) Correct vitamin D deficiency. Don’t lie and say Vitamin D is useless.

    2) Use IVM and HCQ according to published protocols, don’t ban them.

    And (1) and (2) were known even before the faux vax was available.

    Why hasn’t any politician or senior public serpent or medical official gone to jail over their policies which cost lives and caused huge economic destruction when they had repeatedly been told by (genuine, not self-identified) experts about (1) and (2)?

    360

  • #
    Tony Tea

    Craven New World.

    70

  • #
    Spitfire

    I can imagine the meeting where this study was conceived…

    “Hey, let’s do a study to settle once and for all how Safe and Effective™ these vaccines are. We’ll be lauded by governments and the scientific community worldwide. Not to mention the pharmaceutical companies.”
    “Yeah, great idea.”

    2 years later:
    “Oh shoot… Anyone here still got one of those backyard incinerators? Asking for a friend.”

    200

  • #
    John

    There’s a lot of noise about covid from people who are ignorant of the medical side so let me set the record straight

    1 – covid vaccines had “emergency approval”
    At the time no-one knew what would happen if there was no medical defence (i.e. vaccine) against covid and governments were not prepared to take a risk with public health. Note that the UK vaccine was withdrawn as soon as the possible side-effects became apparent.

    2 – the scale of the vaccination caused more adverse reactions
    With all vaccines a small percentage of people have adverse reactions, probably no higher than 1 in 100,000. The public doesn’t notice this because of the relatively small portion of the population being vaccinated often just one. Covid vaccines had a higher adverse reaction rate but the big issue was that the number of people being vaccinated, most multiple times, meant higher absolute numbers of adverse reactions.

    3 – the virus mutated
    the vaccine initially targeted 4 of the 26 different protein chains in the spike of the virus. By this I mean they aimed at having your body quickly recognise those 4 and take defensive action with antibodies. The problem was that the virus mutated, changing some of the 4 key proteins, which meant the vaccine became less and less effective. (There’s nothing new about this. The flu virus changes multiple times every year and the flu vaccine often has multiple parts that target different parts of at least three vaccines. Just occasionally you get new widespread mutations after the vaccine is developed and the vaccine’s effective is reduced even to the point of being useless.)

    4 – vaccines for new strains weren’t created fast enough
    We were told that mRNA vaccines would be easy to tweak. That didn’t happen and the new vaccines didn’t appear until about 2023 (late in the year IIRC). I haven’t heard if these vaccines underwent proper testing or not, but I suspect they did because the knowledge about covid improved over time and threat level became better understood.

    When you take all these into account the handling of covid vaccinations was decent overall given the circumstances.

    246

    • #
      Robert Swan

      John,
      Your 1: vaccines are not a defence. The immune system is the defence and vaccines are meant to “train” it. Odd though, that official advice to immunocompromised people is to dose-up on COVID vaccines. It’s almost like governments *want* to put them at extra risk.

      Your 3: yes the virus mutated. Coronaviruses are notorious for mutating (weird that the name has stayed “Omicron” for so long, has it really stopped changing?). This is just one reason that vaccination was a *DAFT* approach to handling the epidemic.

      What made sense in the beginning still makes sense now:

        (1) Keep the sick away from the well.
        (2) Do your best to treat and cure the sick.
        (3) Let the well get on with their lives.

      If you’re pinning your hopes on vaccines it’s because you didn’t do a good enough job with (1).

      180

    • #
      crakar24

      I suspect John is an AI bot so this information is for everyone else.

      1 – covid vaccines had “emergency approval”

      No they did not, the EUA approval was based on the results from the initial trials, these vaccines were made in a lab and were pristine in nature this was called “process 1” the vaccine used to inject 5 billion people was manufactured through “process 2” which was more akin to brewing beer. These vaccines were full of chopped up SV40 a known cancer promoter. This vaccine did not have “emergency approval”, therefore vaccine manufactures liability indemnity is null and void.

      2, the scale of the vaccination caused more adverse reactions

      This is complete rubbish, billions of people have received the MMR vaccine, Polio vaccine, meningitis vaccine etc etc etc and none of these vaccines have produced such a negative safety profile. This statement is false, you know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

      3 – the virus mutated

      Again complete rubbish, yes the virus mutated but that is not the issue there are three main reasons why the vaccine failed.

      The cell will normally only make one copy of the protein when instructed however, the vaccine manufacturers changed this so your cells would produce untold numbers of spike proteins over and over again, people still have circulating spike proteins 18 months after vaccination therefore.

      a, Your body produced IGG4 anti bodies instead of IGG3, IGG4 is used to reduce inflammation and is not used to fight infections (think bee keepers getting stung all the time)
      b, Due to the manufacturers changing the amount of proteins from one instruction your ribosomes experiences something called frame shifting this means the ribosomes will randomly skip an amino acid and produce junk proteins, these proteins could target your natural cells causing massive anti inflammatory symptoms or it could cause dementia type symptoms
      c, The vaccine does not produce any long term protection, none, nothing, nada, zip. In short the vaccines was a piece of junk.

      4 – vaccines for new strains weren’t created fast enough

      The MRNA experiment was a failure, no matter how fast you make the next batch of your junk injections they still wont work, 97% of Australians had 2 or 3 shots before their natural infection, for most of them their immune systems are now compromised, some severely and you think all they need is to “get up to date”.

      Your comments are beyond dangerous, this is most egregious act ever conducted against the general public

      280

    • #
      Broadie

      Where did his come from?

      With all vaccines a small percentage of people have adverse reactions, probably no higher than 1 in 100,000.

      University of Basel results after vaccinating their staff. Nearly 3 out of 100 with evidence of damage to heart muscles. Just had a contractor doing some welding, his sister was working in Aged Care and had 5 patients die after injections with strokes. Same thing with a good friends Mother Jab, than hit the slab in a Nursing Home, just because she was sick of being locked in her room and wanted to be allowed on the bus.

      And what was the result?

      We recorded elevated cardiac troponin levels in a higher percentage of vaccinated individuals than expected. From the previous passive observation of severe cases, it had been concluded that around 35 out of 1,000,000 vaccinated individuals would develop myocarditis. In our study, we found evidence of temporary mild damage to cardiac cells in 22 of the 777 participants – 2.8% instead of the anticipated 0.0035%. So there’s slight damage to heart muscle cells in almost 3% of the cases, which shouldn’t be overestimated, but also not ignored.

      How many people are you saying should be killed by a mandated gene theraphy. 1 in two hundred thousand would be cool with you?

      120

    • #
      MeAgain

      When your mate is dead, one in 100,000 – it can never be painted decent.

      The psychological campaign was as bad as what was in the vials.

      70

  • #
    crakar24

    There is a court case currently underway in AUS with citizens suing the FED government for vaccine injuries, the GOV claim they dont have standing in the case because THEY DO NOT HAVE A DUTY OF CARE TO THE AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS

    Just let that sink in for a moment, once it does everything becomes so much clearer and provides answers as to why GOV behaves the way it does, it explains why every politician except Riddick and One Nation voted against an enquiring into the increase in excess deaths, it also explains why NO ONE should vote for Labor/Green/Liberal party.

    But alas we are a stupid nation and a good example of that is 35% of people are less likely to vote for Dutton because of Donald Trump for Albanese it was 20 odd %, just how stupid do you have to be to think like that?

    260

  • #
    NZer

    This might be the kind of real raw data escape that they are terrified of? It could provide inconvenient evidence (labelled “misinformation” – always take this to mean “missing” or “missed out” information until proven otherwise) if not properly “adjusted” by a “data expert”, to obscure what has really occurred.
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1841990/statistician-arrested-new-zealand-covid-vaccination

    90

  • #
    Graham Richards

    This stinks of the dictatorial intentions of the UN / WHO / WEF cabal of world government protagonists together with our left leaning political parties.

    The LNP is crawling with left learners & would be or probably are ALP sympathisers.
    Hence the Uniparty label! Remember Greg Hunt the WEF stooge. There are still at least 30% of the LMP party who are WEF protagonists.

    Therein lies many of the problems Australia is facing. Let’s hope Dutton isn’t of the same ilk considering his reluctance to abandon the UN hoax of Net Zero.

    160

    • #
      PeterPetrum

      And don’t forget that Hunt also refused Dutton’s order to investigate the BoM over changing historical records and creating temperature measurements from missing weather stations. Little weasel indeed.

      150

  • #
    Geoff Sherrington

    Destruction of research material is to hide guilt.
    It is as unacceptable as dynamiting coal fired power stations to demonstrate a certain ideology favouring windmills.
    People complain that governments are no longer expressing the will of the majority of citizens, witness the “voice” referendum.
    Complainers, blame yourselves first. Your complaints are too weak and too rare to make a difference. You need to form protest groups, to take to the streets to show solutions that have had experienced input to their designs.
    In other words, spend some of your own money, time and effort to cause beneficial change. Just writing short notes on social media does not work. Get off your asses and cause clamour with strength to get results. It is what I have done, to assure myself that one person with a good idea can cause change with enough effort. Example, one person can start a Court action that attracts the attention of many others. Geoff S

    200

  • #
    Geoff Sherrington

    Articles by Prof Robert Clancy on Quadrant Online and elsewhere need to be read and understood by all people concerned with these “vaccinations” as Jo Nova has noted several times. I endorse and thank Jo for her leadership.
    There have been disgusting attempts by some “authorities” to silence him, but his experience is not to be silenced.
    You will be better informed and possibly quite concerned by the politicisation of this life-affecting topic. Geoff S

    220

    • #
      Vicki

      Agree, Geoff. Bob and also Phillip Altman are heroes. They persisted in getting their arguments against the mRNA experiment published in Quadrant and other publications.

      100

      • #
        ExIronCurtain

        True. I praised and supported them on Q, but:
        They could only afford to be outspoken because they were retired – at least one of them.
        There was nothing anyone could do to make them lose their registration or livelihood.
        Perhaps there were others who knew and did their work silently spilling the Pfizer into the sink. Some still prescribed IVM even on telehealth. The Resistance.
        Perhaps those were true heroes.
        It was a time of true tragedy, 2 years of the reign of terror turning even family members against each other, asking children to dob in parents, doing the full 1984 in real life.
        NEVER FORGET – NEVER FORGIVE!

        70

    • #
      Jon Rattin

      I laughed (it was a cringing laugh with notes of incredulity) when so-called experts used to dismiss Robert Clancy’s opinions because he wasn’t an epidemiologist. Suddenly, in the time of a pandemic, epidemiologists were the only credible experts in the world and accordingly they had regular appearances in the MSM bulletins.

      Why listen to an absolute expert on immunology when you can listen to an epidemiologist who can make any number of broad recommendations that will never get questioned?

      40

  • #
    David Maddison

    Back in the day, in any traditional scientific institution (not in dumbed-down contemporary ones) destroying research data because it doesn’t conform to the expected results would have been considered an extremely serious matter, if not illegal in certain situations, especially medical.

    180

  • #
    Honk R Smith

    In some ways doesn’t this make things easier.
    The likely truth is whichever narrative the government attempts to silence.
    “Safe and effective” … a good guess it’s the opposite.
    Then they create the option to zap us with a real wolf.

    This has been the status quo for a while, like since 1981*, the Pandemic fiasco just confirmed it for the previously inattentive.
    BTW …
    they’ve gotten away with it.
    And many made major bank off the gullible public’s credit card.
    (Like, right in front of us.)

    There is a bit of sardonically tragic entertainment in watching them congratulate themselves and LARP ‘Science’ and hero ‘public health’ servant.

    The control ‘misinformation’ strategy is doomed.
    I’m noticing a turn to ‘poisoning the well’.
    Flood the public mind with a continuous avalanche of BS so that it becomes pointless to keep up,

    *CIA Flashback: “We’ll Know Our Disinformation Program Is Complete When Everything the American Public Believes Is False.”
    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/cia-flashback-well-know-our-disinformation-program-is-complete-when-everything-the-american-public-believes-is-fals

    I must go now, I think there’s a drone/UAP thingy hovering over my house.

    150

  • #

    There can be no doubt – the Federal Government Health Department web site showed that the Covid deaths followed after the vaccinations. In 2021-22 the death rate climbed after the vaccination rate getting worse over time and continued on as shown by the Excess Deaths rates.

    80

  • #
    Old Goat

    There is so much gaslight now I have to wear shades. The MSM is glowing…

    80

  • #
    Penguinite

    Nothing says craven failure like destroying evidence that might be detrimental to your case!

    In a court of Law this would indicate GUILT!

    110

  • #
    John F. Hultquist

    When taking chemistry classes in the early 1960s each student had a notebook for each class. One recorded experiments and results. If a mistake in procedure or anything else was made and you wanted to start over, you did not rip those pages out. Mistakes were/are allowed in science – covering them up is not.

    150

  • #
    Ronin

    ‘Safe and effective’, oh wait, quick, hide the evidence.

    90

    • #
      John Connor II

      This experiment can never be redone

      “This experiment can never be undone.”

      There, fixed it!
      And for that matter, “This experiment MUST never be redone”

      Yes, let’s build $B data centres to track everything about everyone but destroy a few GB of incriminating vaxx data.

      I wonder if there’s a whistleblower with a conscience out there or maybe one who wants payback for the loss if a loved one to the scam.

      How long before they destroy the top secret contract with Big Pharma?
      How many $B in govt assets were agreed to there if/when things come undone?

      110

  • #
    John Connor II

    “Each and every person that ever encouraged, pressured, coerced, or threatened reprisal for one of these COVID-19 vaccines is complicit in a crime against humanity, and that crime is mass negligent homicide.”

    https://x.com/McCulloughFund/status/1911422680064029021

    60

  • #
    STJOHNOFGRAFTON

    MASS NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE

    “Each and every person that ever encouraged, pressured, coerced, or threatened reprisal for one of these COVID-19 vaccines is complicit in a crime against humanity, and that crime is mass negligent homicide.”
    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/04/15/mass-negligent-homicide/

    20

  • #
    John Connor II

    Here from a 1981 book by Bilderberger Jacques Attalli is an
    example of the Elite’s mindset:
    “The future will be about finding a way to reduce the population… Of course, we will not be able to execute people or build camps. We get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good…We will find or cause something, a pandemic targeting certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus affecting the old or the elderly, it doesn’t matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb to it. The stupid will believe in it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having panned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution. The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse alone.”

    The book is called “Verbatim”, and in French.
    It’s an old plan, now manifested…

    80

    • #
      Old Goat

      John,
      If that fails there is always war . The bonfire that everyone throws fuel on. Biological weapons are both . V is for Vendetta is a movie not an instruction manual.

      10

  • #
    David Maddison

    Is the 8 terabyte size of the database plausible for something with a million data points?

    I wonder if that’s also inflated as an excuse not to archive the data?

    Not that it’s very big in terms of storage capacity or costly by today’s standards anyway.

    20

    • #
      Ross

      Was just at Officeworks, picking up stuff for work. A 2TB external storage disk was about $120. So you could store all this data for $500 + costs/year. What a crock. Best hope is that someone within Qld Health leaks the data. Wikileaks anyone ?

      71

  • #
    Old Goat

    Dr Jeanett Young has failed up spectacularly (now QLD governor) and need to avoid this ://www.twistedknotwoodshop.com/PDF%20Files/flowchart.pdf

    30

  • #
    Ronin

    I was out in the car and heard a discussion on their ABC Radio national about the law pertaining to ‘No body, no parole’, some female perfesser with a speech impediment was moaning about how the no body rule is unfair, making sentences so much longer, something about a discount if you have disposed of the body in such a way that it can never be recovered, like putting it in a wheelie bin and it gets buried with half a cubic kilometer of other stuff, or dumping the body in a croc infested river.
    I was flabbergasted, might try to look it up on a podcast and have a better listen, it was on after lunch today 16/4/25.

    50

  • #

    […] Nothing says “Safe and Effective” like destroying all the data from Australia’s giant abandone… […]

    20

  • #
    Roy

    If nobody in Australia will save the data how about asking Robert Kennedy? Is there any prominent official in the world with such a concern for vaccine safety? Given that the data is, at least potentially, of world wide significance, Kennedy’s department would surely be interested in ensuring that the data was preserved and analysed thoroughly.

    30

    • #
      David Maddison

      Good idea.

      I’m sure someone in the United States would be prepared to archive the 8 terabytes of data – and again make Australia look like the Stupid Country.

      30

  • #
    another ian

    FYI

    “Nothing says “Safe and Effective” like destroying all the data from Australia’s giant abandoned vaccine study”

    https://joannenova.com.au/2025/04/nothing-says-safe-and-effective-like-destroying-all-the-data-from-australias-giant-abandoned-vaccine-study/

    00

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    A thought –

    Anyone in a position to do this is likely a multiple-jabee.

    So, hidden or not, they are going to be “packing polenta” waiting for it to get them

    10

  • #
    JB

    Worth a read. It seems to me that governments around the world are still working gung ho on this:

    https://nobulart.com/the-frequency-war/

    EXCERPT

    … THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government. How they are doing this is pure genius and pure evil.

    To achieve this plan, my chance encounter asked how would I do it? how would you turn every citizen of every country against their own government? I really have no idea. So they laid out the basics for me.

    -There must be a global engineered ‘sickness’
    -There must be mass fear, panic and paranoia …

    20

  • #
    Another Delcon

    The deep state at work . Not answerable to anybody . Supposedly , the elected politicians are in charge of their portfolios and are aware of and understand what the bureaucrats are doing . But that is a bit too much like work so many don’t bother . Some are quite happy that the deep state is solidly entrenched and doing the work of the globalists such as the UN and WEF .
    People need to make sure that the people who are elected to represent them are actually doing that . That’s our job , to watch the b-stards .
    Most don’t bother .

    00

  • #

    There are no real autonomous countries
    What we are taught about nation states stopped applying after ww2.
    It’s all clandestine multinational corps/deep state and banks running things.
    The population-side civics is just s façade to corral the public.
    The innovation of mass media has proved to be a mind control medium for a large enough swathe of voting demos to remove opposition to the most powerful.

    20

Leave a Reply to David Maddison Cancel reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>