JoNova

A science presenter, writer, speaker & former TV host; author of The Skeptic's Handbook (over 200,000 copies distributed & available in 15 languages).


Handbooks


Advertising


Australian Speakers Agency



GoldNerds

The nerds have the numbers on precious metals investments on the ASX



The Skeptics Handbook

Think it has been debunked? See here.

The Skeptics Handbook II

Climate Money Paper



Archives

Books

2000 Mules: The election was “organized crime”

2000 mules is in 300 US theatres from Saturday May 7th.  It premiered last weekend to reviewers.

Instructions far below on how to watch it since it might be a while before Warner or Disney pick it up. Dinesh D’Souza has to reinvent a whole new way of distributing it.

 Tierney: They have proof

I saw Dinesh’s movie “2000 Mules” last night. It provides massive evidence and concrete verifiable proof (digital & video) that the election was rigged. An informant from Arizona also detailed how she participated in the scheme and explained how it worked.

At the conclusion of the movie, two well-respected Salem radio hosts — Larry Elder & Dennis Prager — who have both vehemently DENIED voter fraud up to this point — were totally convinced that America was robbed — and ANGERED that they had been played. The theater applauded!

They have proof that the scheme took place in large counties in Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. These are all states that President Trump won in 2016 but mysteriously flipped to Biden in the middle of the night in 2020.

The mules averaged 38 visits during the 2020 election, with an average of five ballots per visit. They were paid an average of $10 per ballot – and True The Vote could track them making multiple drops across county lines. The scary thing is that honest voters actually watched the thieves stuff ballot boxes and did nothing!

The documentary has an insider informant.  2000mules.com

Trump Reveals Trailer of Explosive ‘2000 Mules’ Ballot Harvesting

Matthew Boyle, Breitbart

On-screen graphics tell viewers that True The Vote used cell phone GPS geo tracking data across the battleground states.

“We identified in Atlanta 242 mules that went to an average of 24 drop boxes,” Phillips says. “In Philadelphia alone, we’ve identified more than 1,100 mules.”

When D’Souza asked Engelbrecht to define a “mule,” she replies by saying they are a “person picking up ballots and running them to the drop boxes.” “This is not grandma out walking her dog,” Phillips says. “Bad backgrounds, bad reputations. They are interested in one thing: That’s money.” “In no shape, in no way, in no time is that legal,” Engelbrecht adds.

 “This is organized crime,” Phillips says. D’Souza asks them next if they have “video evidence,” to which Phillips replies True The Vote has obtained “four million minutes of surveillance video around the country.”

 

Sundance: There’s no moving on from a fraudulent election

Many people have pushed a narrative that essentially says we must move on from the 2020 fraud.  However, there is no moving beyond the illegal activity that surrounds a completely fraudulent election.

EXAMPLE: Motor-voter registration (including the issuance of drivers’ licenses to illegal aliens) is used to manipulate the voter roles…. that fraudulent registration creates ballots….. those ballots are then used by political activists to generate votes….  those votes are not from the illegal voter, they are from political groups who then drop them in ballot boxes or voting precincts.   In many cases illegal aliens are not physically doing the illegal voting, the ballot is cast by political activists using the identity of the alien registration.   Everything starts with corrupted voter roles.


Dinesh D’Souza explains how to watch a legitimate copy for as little as $5 with other subscriptions and rental options. It’s important because we don’t just need more people to see these documentaries, we need more people to make them.

His official store.

TrueTheVote.org

h/t Scott of the Pacific, Krishna Gans, Old Ozzie.

9.7 out of 10 based on 107 ratings

185 comments to 2000 Mules: The election was “organized crime”

  • #
    Simon

    It is not illegal to drop off a ballot on behalf of another voter, e.g. for voters with disabilities or the elderly. Using cellphone data to count how many times someone comes near a ballot box proves nothing either, ballot boxes tend to be in busy locations.
    https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/may/04/faulty-premise-2000-mules-trailer-about-voting-mai/

    7139

    • #
      Vlad the Impaler

      “There are none so blind as those who will not see.”

      1093

    • #
      b.nice

      Deep in denial.. as you would have to be.

      Politifact is a very far-left propaganda unit… just the sort of stuff that you continue to fall for because it matches your morality and warped ideology.

      924

      • #
        Richard C (NZ)

        >”Politifact is a very far-left propaganda unit”

        Still a vestige of objectivity, for example Greg Greenwald quoted this:

        Biden’s Hopeless Disinformation Police
        You can’t trust the Department of Homeland Security’s truth cops.
        by JACK SHAFER, Politico’s senior media writer.
        https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/04/29/dont-trust-the-government-00029103

        Who among us thinks the government should add to its work list the job of determining what is true and what is disinformation? And who thinks the government is capable of telling the truth? Our government produces lies and disinformation at industrial scale and always has. It overclassifies vital information to block its own citizens from becoming any the wiser. It pays thousands of press aides to play hide the salami with facts….Making the federal government the official custodian of truth would be like Brink’s giving a safe-cracker a job driving an armored car.

        Both articles, from the left wing note, are read worthy.

        40

    • #
      William Astley

      Simon you are completely missing the point. It is the requirement of the every democratic government to ensure there is not mass cheating in elections. A voting system that has been set up to allow mass cheating is illegal. The film provides evidence that the US voting system was changed to allow mass cheating and that mass cheating happened.

      The US is the only ‘Democratic’ country that mails out blank ballots and allows the blank ballots to be filled in by anyone without ID check and allows filled in ballots to be dropped off in ballot boxes at night with no witnesses or security.

      “They were paid an average of $10 per ballot’ So the facebook get out the vote money was used to pay mules and others who have jobs to facilitate the cheating scheme.

      In Canada for example… Ballots are only valid if they are filled out in a secure voting room (mostly school gyms) with witnesses. The ballot must then put into a seal numbered official ballot box which always has a witness guarding it to ensure only one ballot is place in the box by the voter before another voter is allowed to vote. There is list of all eligible voters in each voting district. The voters name is crossed off when the voter receives their ballot to vote. Picture ID and voter registration is required to obtain a ballot. A ballot or ballot box cannot be removed from the secure room. The counting of ballots is done in the same secure room with witnesses and multiple counts by different people to ensure there are no errors.

      1022

      • #
        Klem

        All of that is true, and when the counting is complete the ballot data is input into Dominion Voting machines. Sweet.

        401

      • #
        Simon

        It’s no different to postal voting, which most countries allow. Remember too that these elections were during a pandemic; many did not feel safe lining up in close proximity to others.

        598

        • #
          b.nice

          Wrong again.

          Collecting ballots on mass, filling them in and stuffing them in multiple booths, is not postal voting.. ITS ELECTION FRAUD

          971

        • #

          They way you do it is important.

          90

        • #
          ColA

          Simon,

          Did you follow the 2020 election? I did, do you really believe that Joe Biden got 81,000,000 votes? 7,000,000 more than President Trump who had the HIGHEST NUMBER OF VOTES FOR A SITTING PRESIDENT EVER?? by a significant margin (over 10,000,000 more than 2016)
          You honestly believe Biden who hardly campaigned, who couldn’t draw an audience, who couldn’t fill a rally had 81,000,000 people so enthusiastic that they couldn’t wait to get to vote, REALLY??

          One thing is certain, there ain’t no 81,000,000 now, he’d be lucky to get 18,000,000!
          The cheating Dumbocraps with loose both houses in November which hopefully will muzzle Bidens’ damage.

          Me? I’m watching Harris!!

          675

        • #
          ColA

          Just a few numbers for you Simon! 3,000,000 suspect votes in just 6 states of the 51 US states!

          Biden margin of victory vs known incidents of voter fraud in the 6 questionable swing states accused of election fraud as discovered by audits and post election canvasing.

          Arizona
          Discovered illegal votes: 245,722
          Biden Margin of victory: –10,457

          Georgia
          Discovered illegal votes: 601,130
          Biden Margin of victory: –11,779

          Michigan
          Discovered illegal votes: 446,803
          Biden Margin of victory: –154,818

          Nevada
          Discovered illegal votes: 220,008
          Biden Margin of victory: –33,596

          Pennsylvania
          Discovered illegal votes: 992,567
          Biden Margin of victory: –81,660

          Wisconsin
          Possible illegal votes: 553,872
          Biden Margin of victory: –20,682

          702

        • #
          Kalm Keith

          At last you’ve seen it.

          “many did not feel safe lining up in close proximity to others”.

          I can understand that:

          Most of those southern border jumpers look pretty tough and hyper-vigilant.

          192

        • #
          Ian G

          Trump was 13 points ahead in Pensylvania after the walk-in votes. The next morning his lead had almost gone. At one voting centre, after the scrutineers had been told that there would be no more counting that night, they came back in the morning and found they wouldn’t be allowed in.

          352

      • #
        Antoine D'Arche

        Simon gets the point, alright. His job here is to provide this information, sew doubt, and undermine confidence in evidence. He does this across several domains, including the US election, climate change and energy security.

        532

        • #
        • #
          William Astley

          Simon did not use a fact or a group of facts, to produce a logical argument. He made a statement which is true. The 2020 US election cheating has not as of yet, resulted in criminal charges.

          That statement is correct, however, the Hunter laptop info and emails has not as of yet resulted in criminal charges either. The implication (accepting the evidence as true and damning) is that the US legal system/FBI have been compromised by Democratic presidents/states and their appointees, and by the Democratic party.

          The US 2020 election was setup to allow election cheating. That fact is now becoming known to the US general public and the outside world, in a professionally made film. Outside funds were given to the Democratic party for the so called get out the vote work in the same regions where there is hard evidence of 2020 election cheating.

          For Trump to gain the support of all American, he needs to make the argument that the Democratic party is a rogue party and that they are trying to damage the US. That is why they must cheat to win US elections. If they were helping the US, the US population would vote for the Democratic party of America.

          The US/EU/UK by brainlessly sanctioning the Russians have started an economic war which has started to critically damage the world economic engine and the US economy. It is as if the idiots do not understand how countries run, and feed their people and what happens when there is sudden inflation, worldwide material/energy shortages, and now worldwide ship shortages because the ships are tied up waiting to load or unload. That new sad reality (a broken world economy and economic war and green energy madness crippling countries) which cannot now be undone, will change the US election. It is the end of a ‘dream’ world, a propaganda created world.

          272

          • #
            Richard C (NZ)

            >”The 2020 US election cheating has not as of yet, resulted in criminal charges. That statement is correct, however, the Hunter laptop info and emails has not as of yet resulted in criminal charges either”

            The wheels of justice turn very slowly in the US if at all, let alone equitably. Fast track for likes of right wing j6 protestors or Roger Stone who was apparently so dangerous the FBI needed twenty-nine heavily-armed agents in nineteen vehicles, lights flashing and CNN serendipitously on hand to film the raid.

            Durham is only now getting traction with Clinton’s “opposition research”:

            John Durham Wins First Part of the Fight to Obtain “Privileged” Fusion GPS Documents in Huge Blow to Clinton Campaign
            https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/john-durham-wins-first-part-fight-obtain-privileged-fusion-gps-documents-huge-blow-clinton-campaign/

            But no news on Clinton’s illegal basement server prosecution. Free pass apparently.

            120

        • #
          b.nice

          “and undermine confidence in evidence”

          On the contrary .. If Simon says.. then you can always assume pretty much the opposite.

          He is almost always diametrically oppose to reality.

          His comments, thus, reinforce the information given.

          91

      • #
        max

        It is the requirement of the every democratic government to ensure there is not mass cheating in elections.

        When you start with false premises, when you buy into fraudulent narratives, you get what we are witnessing in our country today, and all other western states.

        H. L. MENCKEN
        “every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods.”
        “by the time election day is past there is nothing much to do save turn the sitting rascals out and let a new gang in.”

        “The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections.” ― Lord Acton

        100

      • #
        Kalm Keith

        “Simon you are completely missing the point”.

        Was he ever looking for it?

        90

    • #
      Kevin Kilty

      I have no idea if Simon is American or Australian or whatever, but he sounds just like the most blinkered of U.S. leftists I know. They can be convinced of nothing opposing their beliefs. No evidence is strong enough to shake their beliefs until their beliefs suddenly change for sake of expediency. They will offer the most childish defenses of indefensible positions forever. And the topic doesn’t matter — energy, elections, basic biology, epidemiology, economics, money/debt, abortions, civil liberties, public health, history, you name the topic they have unparalleled ignorance combined with unequalled hubris and self-confidence …

      There is evidence that the shenanigans of 2020 are actually used in every election cycle someplace in the U.S. One of the best examples is the 1982 Illinois gubernatorial election where 100,000 faudulent ballots were filled out by precinct captains, or people under their direction, in Chicago alone. The circumstances that made these 100,000 faudulent ballots possible were in place again in 2020 across the U.S. for reasons of “covid safety”. Thus, let us ask Simon this. If a political party known to engage in electoral fraud on a huge scale in the past were offered unfettered access to unknown numbers of blank ballots and unguarded drop-off boxes, would they cheat again?

      Simon, my friend, it is not legal to collect the ballots of unlimited numbers of people in most U.S. jurisdictions even if the ballots are legitimate.

      722

      • #

        ‘I have no idea if Simon is American or Australian …”

        In America, ‘postal voting’ is ‘voting by mail’, so my guess is either Australia or the UK. None the less, the blinkered self righteousness of leftists is not limited to American leftists. It seems to be an acquired character flaw that can develop in people of all races, creeds and nationalities.

        361

      • #
        Kalm Keith

        Kevin, he obviously doesn’t believe in anything; what he/she/it demonstrates is pure Cancel Culture, the object being to destroy all logic and our modern civilisation.

        So far they are doing very well with most formerly civilised nations not far from collapse.

        171

      • #
        Forrest Gardener

        Heck Kevin, I doubt Simon is even real.

        171

      • #
        max

        There is evidence that the shenanigans of 2020 are actually used in every election cycle someplace in the U.S.

        correct.

        Gary North:
        In the days before the Civil War, the American government was so weak, and had so little money to spend, that the President was peripheral.
        What can you tell me about America from 1700 to 1757? Nothing? That’s because there was no United States. There was no voting for President. There was no national government. But there was peace. There was enormous liberty. There were hardly any taxes. There was almost no state or local regulation of the economy.
        What matters is the form of civil government.

        90

    • #
      paul courtney

      Mr. Simon: Which state? You’re so well versed in U.S. election law, you know without even looking up the law in…… which state again?

      251

    • #
      Wet Mountains

      Boy or Boy Siman. You are either the most gullible person on plant earth or the most willfully ignorant.

      181

    • #
      Ian G

      Trump was 13 points ahead in Pensylvania after the walk-in votes. The next morning his lead had almost gone. At one voting centre, after the scrutineers had been told that there would be no more counting that night, they came back in the morning and found they wouldn’t be allowed in.

      160

    • #
      Stephen Harper

      Simon,

      The acid test is this: If Trump and not Biden had won the 2020 election under the same circumstances: mules stuffing thousands and thousands of ballots into ballot collection boxes,
      Democrat observers being excluded from the vote count or kept at a ridiculous distance away so that they could not see what was going on, windows being blocked out by Republicans
      so that Democrat observers could not scrutinise the vote count, trucks of votes coming in the middle of the night, vote counters puling out suitcases of bogus ballots after excluding Democrat
      scrutineers on spurious grounds (a water leak), the same vote counters running the same vote batches through the machines multiple times, vote dumps in the early hours of the morning
      (say, 150,000 votes for Trump and none for Biden) – would you say that all was ok? I ask because we must discover if there is a principle which underpins your scathing scepticism that the
      2020 election was stolen due to fraud.

      If you think that all of the above examples of fraud amount to nothing when Biden wins, do you agree then, based on the principle that such occurrences amount to nothing, that if the roles
      were reversed and Trump won under the same circumstances, all claims of fraud would be spurious? Given the manufactured hysteria over the “Russia collusion” claim that Trump stole the
      2016 election (based on exactly zero evidence) we can imagine how Democrats might react if there were actual, real fraud. The difference between me and your type is this: I have principles. If the
      Republicans did to Biden what the Democrats did to Trump in the 2020 election I would be just as outraged. That’s because I have principles. Fraud is fraud – no matter who commits it. And therein
      lies the fundamental divide between the unprincipled left (your kind) and those on the right (my kind) who think the we should play fair. Unfortunately, the cheaters often get away with it as they take
      advantage of the good nature of their opponents.

      The Democrats have been doing this for years. It’s like 10 paces at dawn. A Democrat and Republican, pistols at the ready, stand back to back and set off in opposite directions, counting their steps,
      one, two, three, four…On the count of nine the Democrat turns and shoots his Republican challenger in the back who is still following the rules and is about to say, ‘ten’ and turn around. As the Republican
      falls to the ground from his mortal wound, the Democrat’s second erupts in joy and exclaims “Well, done!. Good Shot!”. The media who are covering the duel praise the Democrat’s clever tactic and pronounce
      the event clean and fair. Meanwhile the Republican, who trusted in the sanctity of the rules, lies dead on the ground.

      242

      • #

        Except those things didn’t happen.

        321

        • #
          b.nice

          “Except those things didn’t happen.”

          True, the Republicans never did do those things….

          But the Democrat malfeasance and illegal activities were all caught on camera.

          241

    • #
      Jeremy Poynton

      But BAGS of votes. Repeatedly? You think that’s OK? Really? None so blind as those who don’t want to see. During the election, the extraordinary statistical anomalies that occurred in many counties in swing states was enough to convince me. USA is on the edge of complete democratic collapse

      130

    • #
      Dean

      Yep, it could be innocent as you say. But equally it could also be not innocent.

      We also don’t know which candidate the votes were for.

      But it is clear that using this method of voting makes it wide open to fraud.

      60

  • #
    Simon

    Plus the ‘mule’ would have to intercept everyone’s voting papers without their knowledge and hope that the voter doesn’t query why they weren’t received. This is no different to the Dominion voting machine conspiracy theory, there is no concrete proof and it is all done to perpetuate the big lie that the 2020 election was somehow stolen.

    582

    • #
      b.nice

      Massive amounts of proof, its just you are scraping your left ear on the ground and have two eye-patches on.

      These are collected votes almost certainly coming from a common source. That will be the next step.. find the source.

      561

      • #
        Chris

        We have seen the trucks turn up in the middle of the night from out of state, with boxes of ballot papers. At other centres boxes of ballot papers pulled out from under the covered tables and fed into the machines after most people had gone home.

        291

    • #

      It’s not the mule that intercepted the ballots in this scheme, but insiders who fabricated the ballots, never delivered them to the otherwise ineligible voters, and then paid the mules to cast the ballots for a particular candidate.

      462

      • #
        Simon

        Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

        341

        • #
          Boambee John

          Then provide the proof.

          291

          • #
            Ian

            “Then provide the proof.”

            Biden is President Trump isn’t. As there is no evidence of fraudulent voting at the moment That surely is enough, at least for starters.

            434

            • #
              b.nice

              Ian, stop pretending you don’t know there was massive fraud in the 2020 election.

              You are not as dumb or naive as Simon. !

              100

              • #
                Kalm Keith

                Simon is not dumb or naive; he’s just strongly into Cancel Culture.

                Obviously there’s money involved.

                90

              • #
                b.nice

                “Simon is not dumb or naive”

                Sorry, but I have to disagree.

                No-one can be so consistently wrong about everything, just by bad luck !

                120

            • #
              Disco Stu

              Actually burden of proof rests on the government to ensure that the election was free and fair. Since that has not been done and every option taken to stop investigations or whitewash them, it is clear that 2020 was not a free and fair election.

              141

            • #
              Hanrahan

              There is a mountain of evidence. Ignoring it is NOT disproving it.

              120

        • #
          Kevin Kilty

          It is most assuredly not an extraordinary claim to say that election fraud occurs in any particular U.S. election. It’s about as extraordinary as saying the sun rises in the east. Probably dozens of people are indicted every election cycle in some juridiction or another. In most cases these involve minor offices so they are of no more than local interest. The most recent Presidential election impacted by fraud was in 1960 where organized ballot stuffing in Texas (by Democrats) and Illinois (by Democrats) put JFK in office.

          151

          • #
            Richard+Jenkins

            And the Democrats had Nixon’s plane bugged in 1960. That was far more serious than Watergate. But JFK was a Democat and that makes all the difference.

            121

          • #
            Richard C (NZ)

            >”It is most assuredly not an extraordinary claim to say that election fraud occurs in any particular U.S. election.”

            >”Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

            An ordinary claim with ordinary proof.

            Philly is a case in point. Trump – “a rotten history on election integrity”.

            One of the city’s largest cases of fraud was in 1993, when a federal judge had to overturn the results of a state senate election after it was concluded that Democrats had forged hundreds of absentee ballots. (from Newsweek)

            In March, a former elections judge in Philadelphia admitted to accepting bribes to tamper with the results of primary elections over multiple years. The judge, Domenick Demuro, was convicted for his “role in accepting bribes to cast fraudulent ballots and certifying false voting results” during the 2014, 2015 and 2016 primary elections in Philadelphia.

            Thursday, May 21, 2020
            Former Philadelphia Judge of Elections Convicted of Conspiring to Violate Civil Rights and Bribery
            https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-philadelphia-judge-elections-convicted-conspiring-violate-civil-rights-and-bribery

            In 2017, Philly had a case of fraud during a special election for a statehouse seat. Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro charged polling-place workers in one location with intimidating voters, casting fake ballots and falsely certifying results.

            And so on.

            Election fraud in Philly is a political science.

            171

        • #
          Richard C (NZ)

          Simon >”Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.”

          Here tis:

          True The Vote has RICO Ballot Trafficking Evidence May 2, 2022
          https://uncoverdc.com/2022/05/02/true-the-vote-has-rico-ballot-trafficking-evidence-americans-should-care/

          A Timeline Of The Investigation

          Obstruction From Kemp and GBI

          November 30 Complaint: Why Identities Should Not Matter

          Raffensperger Gives Investigation the Green Light

          More To Come

          The focus of this column has been the trafficking of ballots in Georgia. However, as previously mentioned, the TTV/OPSEC ballot trafficking investigation was not limited to Georgia. Multiple investigations were conducted using cellphone data paired with geofencing technology in five states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan, and Georgia) and multiple jurisdictions within each state. The evidence collected is not only stunning, but it is also about as close to incontrovertible proof of election fraud as one can collect. Dinesh D’Souza’s movie 2000 Mules, telling the story of this investigation, will be released this first week of May.

          I await your strenuous denial.

          141

          • #
            Richard C (NZ)

            November 30 Complaint: Why Identities Should Not Matter – excerpt from previous article

            “John Doe” confessed, among other things:

            A network of non-governmental organizations (“NGO”s) that worked together to facilitate a ballot trafficking scheme in Georgia. He claimed to have been one of many individuals paid to collect and deliver absentee ballots during the early voting periods of the November 2020 General Election and the January 2021 Runoff Election.

            He does not seem to understand the unlawful nature of his conduct nor that it might constitute organized criminal activity. Instead, he saw it as a “job and thought it was appropriate to be paid for services rendered.”

            The assignment included collecting ballots, both from voters in targeted neighborhoods and from NGOs that had their own ballot collection processes, delivering those ballots to other NGOs, picking up designated ballot bundles from the same group of NGOs, and depositing ballots into drop boxes spanning six counties in the metro Atlanta area. Each dropbox delivery would typically include between 5 to 20 ballots. John Doe described a payment validation process that involved taking cell phone pictures of the dropbox where ballots were deposited. Participants were compensated, typically at a rate of $10 per ballot. John Doe was paid directly by one of these NGOs.

            And,

            The letter clearly states TTV’s reasons for its hesitance to reveal the whistleblower’s identity. The complaint says, in footnote 1, that TTV does “not have the resources of the State, and [is] unable to provide any safety guarantees to those individuals willing to provide information other than to keep our word that their identity will not be disclosed.” Footnote 1 below makes it clear to Raffensperger why TTV has prioritized the safety of their whistleblower: [See Footnote 1]

            80

            • #
              Richard C (NZ)

              >”Why [whistleblower] Identities Should Not Matter”

              Another reason:

              Hunter’s Laptop: Adam Schiff, CNN, Politico And Daily Beast Sued By Repairman Who Blew Whistle
              https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hunters-laptop-adam-schiff-cnn-politico-and-daily-beast-sued-repairman-who-blew-whistle

              “Twitter initially labeled my action hacking, so for the first day after my information was leaked, I was bombarded with hate mail and death threats revolving around the idea that I was a hacker, a thief and a criminal,” said Mac Isaac, who added that Schiff “has some explaining to do.”

              Mac Isaac was forced to shut down his Delaware repair shop after it was pelted with ‘vegetables, eggs and dog excrement,’ after which he moved to Colorado to hide for a year.

              The Left hates their side being outed and will stoop to anything to get revenge.

              100

        • #
          GlenM

          Have an open mind Simon. Watch the doco and then get back. I suspect rather that you’re so rusted on that it will make no difference.

          60

        • #

          Simon.Extraordinary evidence as in Russian interference?Or perhaps ” there is no Hunter laptop”.Thats the extraordinary you refer to?

          60

    • #
      paul courtney

      Mr. Simon: You sound like Mule # 2001. Why? Don’t you get that the methods you approve here can be used against dems?

      231

    • #
      Kevin Kilty

      You don’t understand. Ballots were mailed in excess of valid voters to old addresses, multiples to a same household, to non-residences, etc. In many cases, especially in apartment buildings where people move in and out frequently, there were ballots in “piles” as some people have attested to. The voter roles are a mess because Democrats fight every attempt to clean them up.

      Easy peazy.

      391

    • #
      Tel

      It does not matter where the votes came from, because vote harvesting is illegal from any source.

      Therefore this was fraud, and clear evidence of fraud right there.

      You can add that to the white van that dropped off crates of votes in Detroit at 3:30AM … multiple eye witnesses saw it, and also on security camera.

      Also the illegal counting of votes in Atlanta’s State Farm Arena after their fabricated “burst pipe” story sent the scrutineers home … all of that is on security camera. Ballots cannot be processed without scrutineers watching, end of story.

      331

      • #
        Forrest Gardener

        Agree except to add that scrutineering by one side is not scrutineering at all. And that’s what was recorded on video in numerous cases. One team fraudulently excluded the other.

        202

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      Simon, your impotent interjections merely go to show that some blokes really are smarter than others.

      82

      • #
        Ian

        “Simon, your impotent interjections merely go to show that some blokes really are smarter than others.” Indeed they do

        120

        • #
          b.nice

          So Ian, why are you so intent proving yourself to be at Simon’s level ?

          ie.. pretty much at the bottom rung

          110

    • #
      Binny Pegler

      Simon, The loser doesn’t need ‘concrete proof’ the winner cheated.
      The winner must provide ‘concrete proof’ he couldn’t possibly have cheated.
      That’s how elections have been done for centuries, anything less undermines faith in the system.
      More than anything else election are about ‘faith’ in the system – Even the vague possibility that cheating ‘might’ have happened can destroy that ‘faith’.
      You don’t have to convince the winning side o anything. You do HAVE to convince the losing side the election was fair.
      So far all I’ve seen from anyone on the winning side (media ect) is the middle finger.

      20

    • #
      Yarpos

      Still clutching at straws

      20

  • #

    The story goes waaaay deeper than a corrupt democratic party fortifying an election. Where was the republican party in all of this? Why does this have to be compiled and produced by independents using their own money? Where was Bill Barr as AG? Where was the FBI? Do you think the movie captures all of the fortifications? Was their fortification using the Dominion machines potentially by foreign actors?

    431

    • #

      I suspect that many didn’t want to believe that the changes to voting laws in response to COVID would amplify voter fraud to the extent that it would affect the election, even as many of those changes were purpose built to enable fraud.

      Many don’t want to accept the possibility that enough fraud to flip a national election is possible, even as only the ignorant would claim that voter fraud doesn’t exist at all.

      Most importantly, it was never considered how cheating would be justified in the minds of the hateful minions that based on confirmation bias alone, accepted the continuous stream of lies and Trump hate spewed by the media.

      261

    • #
      paul courtney

      Mr. Glen: “Where was the republican party in all this?” Good question that few folks even think about. Two things: 1) Trump, as an outsider, did not have a built-up machine, he spent too little time recruiting locals who work in election operations. 2) what machine there was may have helped elsewhere, but the republicans who serve on election boards in some areas (Philly, Detroit, Atlanta etc.) were Trump haters (I surmise). Those Rs let it happen. Think about republican election watchers who let dems “close” the counting and usher them out!
      The combination of the two meant Trump had no presence in certain counties where it was needed. Once the dems got false paper ballots in the pot, they can’t be separated, totally frustrating any chance of Trump winning in Court in a matter of weeks. It has taken real journalists years to track this down (I recommend The Federalist”), but I could see what they did in the days following Nov. 3. Dems stole ’20 with paper ballots, no question.

      201

  • #
    Curious George

    Let’s hope that this proof stands in a court. Why is it coming so late?

    191

    • #
      Jojodogfacedboy

      The Democrats are doing a ‘look at the Pretty butterflies’ move with pretending to be outraged at the Supreme Courts Decision.
      All it’s doing is stating that this decision should have stayed into the individual States to decide and shouldn’t have been the Supreme Court by the Constitution.

      See why the Mainstream Media’s Narrative isn’t bringing this out?

      271

    • #
      Foyle

      Establishment really really wants this to go away, after all the politicians in control of state police, FBI and DOJ ‘won’ the election in question. The evidence has been provided to multiple law enforcement agencies that have mostly then just sat on it. Georgia is finally starting to investigate (but only because Gov Raffsenburger is down in polls). This movie is a way to bring it to a wide audience to force law enforcement and judiciary to stop looking the other way and act.

      251

    • #

      George, “why is it coming so late.”

      The revenue stream for profiting off people’s gullibility was still there but they needed to upgrade the production values so that it looks new. That takes time.

      617

  • #
    NoDox

    The difference between normals and ‘progressives’ is that normies are open to changing their minds when presented with proper evidence, because their goal is objective truths reached via proper practice and process.

    Modern ‘progressive’ epistemology holds that a) there is no such thing as truth because everything is a malleable social construct and b) the function of social ‘justice’ is to lift the ‘marginalized’, and by any means necessary, rather than defending the rights of all regardless of class/race/sex etc.

    So you wind up with comments like those from Simon. The best part is he’s posting here where we respect free speech even for lousy arguments, rather than a leftist site where they either have no comments because that may show dissent, or they allow comments but censor all dissent

    431

    • #
      b.nice

      Yep, its great to let people like Simon post.

      The exposure of far-left ideology and their willingness to accept all sorts of illegal activity in their cause..

      … shows everybody just how bereft of morality, how slimy and despicable and anti-democratic the left really are.

      402

      • #
        Ronin

        … “shows everybody just how bereft of morality, how slimy and despicable and anti-democratic the left really are.”

        Every now and then, we get a snapshot of this right here on the pages of our site.

        201

      • #

        This is why we need virtually unfettered free speech.

        Let the idiots make their comments, and they will be judged on them.

        191

    • #
      scott

      I dont understand why people still still refer to the woke left as “progressives” its basically an oxymoron use of the term. They should be referred to as regressive’s which is more in line with their views.

      Its the same with renewables should be referred to as unreliable’s

      222

      • #
        Custer Van Cleef

        The left are only progressive in the sense of making progress towards a one-party state, where no dissenting views will be tolerated; and everything is centrally controlled.

        That’s where their version of “progress” always leads.

        131

      • #

        Progressive Marxist is more descriptive than Progressive Democrat. The regressive evil arises from Marxism as the Progressive label wraps it in a false benevolence.

        Progressive’s like to use descriptive labels, which dependent on political aims, makes something seem far better or far worse than it really is, starting with the label they’ve assigned to themselves.

        121

        • #
          Richard C (NZ)

          >”Progressive Marxist is more descriptive than Progressive Democrat.?

          Fascist Marxists now given the corporate-state hookup, not unexpected:

          When fascism comes to America, it will not be in brown and black shirts. It will not be with jack-boots. It will be Nike sneakers and Smiley shirts – George Carlin

          Couldn’t coexist in 1930s Germany or WWII but seem to be pals now.

          70

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      My feeling is that Simon, Peter Fitzroy, Gee Aye, Ian and company have never persuaded anybody of anything but I would like to see an ignore button. And in reverse they are psychologically inert.

      They collectively provide about as much entertainment value as a vuvuzela at a soccer match.

      132

      • #
        Richard+Jenkins

        Their contribution is entertaing and provdes great insigh into the ‘thouhts’ of how mindless easily led sheep process information. Consider the polls in Victoria for Dan Andrews.

        151

        • #

          Mindless sheep who believe a trailer because they were told to?

          425

          • #
            Richard+Jenkins

            Yes you do believe a lot of illogical concepts and paste posts to zealots.
            I am impressed with the bredth of your reading. Your sleection of what you chose to accept indcates religious like predjudice.
            Please keep it up it’ motivates sintelligent clever responses that could wake you up.
            Stealing a paragraph is plaguarism. Stealing thousands of them is a PhD.

            111

            • #

              Wow… nailed me there. Or is it projection as usual?

              114

              • #
                Richard+Jenkins

                Perhaps there is some projecion. I do state often that I am skeptical about everything and always consider the probability, the data ad the motivation. Looking at the data exposed in 2000 Mules there is no sense in the apologetics suggesting the right to drop another persons ballot into a drop box. That could make sense but to drop bundles of ballots into various drop boxes in the middle of the night, check for witnesses and photograph the drop box. That is damning evdence.

                110

          • #
            Forrest Gardener

            Wow GI. That’s lame even for you.

            83

            • #

              If there was something of substance to reply to I would have put in more effort.

              213

              • #
                b.nice

                “I would have put in more effort”

                Now that would be very unusual.

                Your comment are almost always “non-comments” just like the several on this thread.

                70

          • #
            b.nice

            So Gee, no argument as usual.. just your petty innuendo.

            60

          • #

            And so tell me how many times have you watched An Inconvenient Truth?

            50

          • #
            b.nice

            Mindless sheep that believe in AGW, even though there is no scientific evidence.

            Just “believe…”… because that is what their minders tell them to.

            60

  • #
    Erasmus

    The mules are only part of the story. There is ample evidence of fake ballots by the box full being run through the machines, plus evidence of manipulation of the machines and the totals to a degree not supported by reality.
    The subsequent cover ups, obfuscation, lawsuits and even deletion of records speaks loudly of corruption.
    Audits have been hampered by some bad actors in the battleground states, but the audits which have been done reveal dodgy votes so numerous that if corrected would have seen Trump win.
    Statistical analysis by one of the experts at the post-election symposium showed that results were obtained which exceeded records going back a hundred years.

    321

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      Agreed. The fraud was designed in many parts and was designed well enough that the fraud could survive even when one or more of the elements was discovered.

      112

  • #
    Lawrie

    I haven’t watched my copy yet but received my receipt on the 27 April. Login is via Citizens United Movies and then apply your password. I think it is a brilliant way to bypass the usual controllers of what we can see and hear and to pay the producers directly. The crime of the century and subsequent cover up including the shutting down of inquiry and comment has spawned a completely new way of spreading the word. The MSM has signed its own death warrant. I am anxious to see the deniers deny the truth, people like Andrew Bolt who has always rubbished Trump’s claim the election was stolen. There are none so blind as those that do not want to see.

    261

    • #
      Brett

      Spot on Lawrie, it will be fun watching them backpedal, let’s see how many admit they were wrong

      50

    • #
      GlenM

      So when Andrew Bolt and his mentor Sheridan dissed as conspiracy the alleged election fraud I tuned out. Faux conservatives at SKYnews don’t do it for me. Bolt can’t even get his head around the basics of climate change, except round on Flannery. SKY won’t mention this at all and that indicates how p.ss poor they are.

      80

      • #
        Strop

        Why are they faux conservatives if they don’t think the evidence of voter fraud stacks up?

        Whether you think the evidence shows fraud or not shouldn’t have anything to do with which side of politics you’re on.
        Clearly there are some commenters here who have chosen their opinion of the evidence based on their bias. That includes both sides with some reasonable evidence (but not necessarily proof) being poo pooed by the “leftist” here, and some examples of very weak evidence being championed as iron clad proof by some on the “right” here. I’m not saying all the evidence is weak. Just saying there have been some very weak examples promoted as proof.

        Bolt or Sheridan not seeing evidence the same way you do doesnt mean they’re not really conservatives. But perhaps you accusing them of not being conservatives simply for having a different opinion on the evidence suggests your bias is over the top.

        40

  • #
    Rick

    At the moment all the indications are that Trump and his sympathisers will have a landslide victory in the mid terms. However unless control of the entire electoral process is taken out of Democrat hands completely, all we will see is a repeat of the 2020 debacle, and yet another election will be stolen from right under our eyes.

    182

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      My impression but the dem frauds seem pretty relaxed about the whole situation. And broadly speaking the repubs are pretty relaxed as well.

      My guess is that both sides have skin in the cheating and know that the whole house of cards will collapse if one side or the other actually makes any real progress in cleaning up the game. The dem fraud and riot squads are on standby awaiting orders. The repubs have negotiated their price to keep quiet.

      61

  • #
    Rosco

    Statistically speaking the fact that Trump led by double digit percentages at the close on election night but was losing the next morning after god knows how many votes fell almost exclusively to Biden is highly suspicious.

    You would fail any statistics course in University if you did not find this to be not credible. The votes returned after the closure favouring Biden by a huge margin is just not credible mathematically.

    351

    • #
      ghl

      Rosco
      It is because lefties are creatures of the night. They get out of bed after lunch and vote late.

      71

    • #

      I was watching sky news election night and good old Richo threw a hissy fit ranting about the Dems putting up a hopeless candidate in Biden.That it was Trump for another term.His lead seemed unassailable at midnight our time.Could not believe the result next morning.Im not in any way statistically skilled but the numbers seemed odd indeed!

      60

  • #
    Mark Allinson

    I have been watching US elections for decades but in 2020 I had never seen a more certain victory on the way for the incumbent President, Donald Trump.

    In fact, so huge was my confidence I placed a $1000 bet with Sportsbet for his win. I never usually bet, but this was surest thing I had ever seen.

    Imagine my surprise when Joe Biden, who had spent most of his campaign in his basement or giving short passionless talks to scores of people standing in marked circles in school halls, won the most votes for President in US history!

    And I will never forget the sneering, scathing rejections of Trump’s “cry-baby story” from virtually EVERY major journalist and newspaper in Australia.

    Even Andrew Bolt advised Trump to give up his pathetic claim of being robbed.

    352

    • #
      el+gordo

      In the mid term elections its clear that if you want a Republican win then we’ll have to convince women that CO2 doesn’t cause global warming.

      ‘In this survey, independents — an important swing group, particularly in suburban areas — said they favor Republicans by 7 points, 45% to 38%. There is a significant gender gap overall and in suburbs, with a majority of women favoring Democrats and a majority of men wanting Republicans in charge.’ (NPR)

      51

      • #
        Mark Allinson

        ” … if you want a Republican win …”

        But what would that mean?

        Very little difference in the current direction, I would bet.

        The GOP is as gung-ho as the Dems in supporting the Deep State war against Russia in Ukraine.

        The Brits thought they were voting for their “Conservative Party” in their last election, but what they got was virtual Stalinism.

        We believed that our LNP was a Conservative party also – but again we got medical totalitarianism.

        There are a handful of good Republicans, still faithful to the Constitution, but the Mitch McConnells et al will soon deal with them.

        80

      • #
        Dave in the States

        NPR? Consider the source.

        Co2 a big concern of American women? Only in NPR World.

        NPR World is tiny fraction of the electorate.

        51

    • #
      paul courtney

      Mr. Allinson: An honest book woulda scratched all bets, on account of five states’ false certifications. But then the dems would have closed that book for spreading “disinformation”.
      I have been paying attention here in the U.S.A. since 1980, when Reagan was a (pretty) sure bet; in ’84, even more sure. In ’96, Clinton may have looked sure but I despised him so I didn’t get it (until it happened that very night!). Obama looked good in 2012. But I agree that Trump also appeared to be a lock in ’20. He (and the economy) was sailing before covid, while dems hoped some one other than Biden would look half-assed (oops!). During summer, Dems were the party of riots. The polls were giving Biden 6 pts xtra (he was 6 pts ahead in PA; even in OH; yet they knew the steal would be in (mail everybody a ballot) PA, not OH (where we kept mail ballots tighter). Thanks for your comment, I happen to think you won your bet. The fact that the Dems call it “the big lie” is confirmation that Trump won.

      151

    • #
      Philip

      Bolt is also shilling for proxy war in Ukraine.

      30

  • #
    David Maddison

    It is obvious and verifiably true, hopefully to a standard of proof a correctly operating court will accept, but then what?

    Early attempts to bring evidence of election fraud met with failure because the US courts themselves are mostly corrupt and anti-conservative in general after decades of infiltration by the Left.

    Also, no one is going to remove a sitting President, even if it is proved that the election was fraudulent. There is US legal precedent for this, not for President, but for other instances when officials have been proven to have been fraudulently elected, and even the court accepts the fraud. The rationale is that you can’t undo history or the laws already made and acted upon.

    What is the way ahead after the exposure of this fraud?

    172

    • #
      el+gordo

      ‘What is the way ahead after the exposure of this fraud?’

      Introduce compulsory voting.

      68

      • #
        David Maddison

        It is immoral to force people to vote who have no clue about politics or the political system.

        Just look at what compulsory voting has done to Australia.

        We have almost no one worthy of voting for. At least America produced a genuine alternative between the good Donald Trump and the puppet of evil, Biden.

        Trump won but wasn’t appointed due to the coup d’état.

        81

        • #
          FarmerDoug2

          You don’t have to vote formaly, you have to get your name ticked off. This greatly reduces “shoveing a few extra balots in”.

          50

      • #
        David Maddison

        Incidentally compulsory voting has only existed in Australia federally since 1924 and preferential voting since 1918.

        50

        • #
          el+gordo

          Australia has a little voting fraud, but not enough to change results.

          Our Westminster system is completely different to the US presidency, it doesn’t produce charismatic individuals like Donald.

          21

          • #
            John Connor II

            So…you can offer evidence of fraud?

            Even if elections are valid it doesn’t factor in financial payments & political allegiances for the pollies. ie WEF.
            I’d LOVE to see lie detector and competency tests if all political candidates on national tv.
            That’d be the end of 99.9% of them.

            60

            • #
              Richard+Jenkins

              There is evidence of elecion fraud in Australia and it is wisely kept quiet. You hear vote early and vote often.
              Some people do. The AEO know that. People’s names are ued more than once. Dead people vote. How do we know which vote was legitimate? Public announcements would only promote the practice.
              The number of fraudulent votes was announced briefly on 3AW for the Hewson electiion. If they went to ALP in close seats there was plenty to cost Keating the election. I followed the news all day and across all tv channels and it never got another mention. That was a good thing as without ID we must not encourage this behaviour. No charges are made as there is no way to trace the cheats and if your name has been used you are an innocent victim.
              LETS DEMAND ID voting in Australia.
              Two ALP classics Garrett, “That’s what we say now but it’s not what we will do…”
              Richardson, “Of course we lied bu we won didn’t we”

              80

            • #
              el+gordo

              They are career politicians in a democracy and the media is biased, its the best we can do.

              China has democracy only at grass roots level and in Russia the electorate has been disempowered.

              US democracy is flawed and should be reinvented.

              01

      • #
        yarpos

        How does compulsory voting fix it? The have a system where they can record more votes than registered voters and just shrug and move on. They have dead people vote and just shrug and move on. Some States dont take the simplet steps to have accurate voter rolls. How adding everybody to that mess would improve things is difficult to see.

        30

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      The way ahead? Find enough good people to do enough good things to restore as much integrity and security to the political system as possible.

      If the good guys are successful the script will flip so that the voting public will see integrity measures for what they are and see those resisting integrity measures as the frauds they are.

      The world will get a progress report in November.

      61

      • #
        Richard+Jenkins

        If Nov 3 2020 is not addresed and punished 2022 is pointless!

        30

        • #
          el+gordo

          Forget the last election and focus on the Midterm, a lot of people who voted to oust Trump won’t show up in 2022. The Republicans should benefit by their absence.

          21

    • #
      Ross

      The whole US electoral system just seems a mess – looking at it from an outsider in Australia. You have each state with its own individual system and processes. A system , particularly for Presidential elections, which should have been cleaned up decades ago. But it seems that probably both sides of politics in the US may in fact benefit from that confusion. Basically you have a system which is being gamed. At this stage I would say the Dems are gaming the system better than the GOP. It’s easier for them because they largely have the backing of the US media.

      90

  • #

    I have just finished reading James A Michener’s longest novel Texas for a second time, (the first back in 1998) and again, he wrote it in his usual style, weaving fiction around intensively researched fact.

    In the novel, there was a continuing early thing about voting in Texas, and keep in mind that the setting here was in the late 1890s and early 1900s, and while Theodore Roosevelt was shaking up the North East, Democrat Politics in Southern Texas went on as usual, with the same political power brokers doing what they always did.

    At elections it was ‘routine’ for vote froared to be in place. At virtually every election in some districts, a couple of apparatchiks would receive a call saying that the candidate needed sometimes hundreds of votes, and then, lo and behold, as Midnight closed in, a ‘forgotten’ cache of votes would mysteriously just turn up with the Democrat candidate receiving enough votes to get over the line, usually averaging hundreds to one in favour of the Democrat.

    It would seem that nothing is new in U.S. politics.

    As I read, it puzzled me that it seemed to be exactly what went on in this case.

    Incidentally, great book. 1300 plus pages though of much finer print than usual, around 140,000 words his longest novel, and so many things currently happening are a mirror of what has always been going on in Texas.

    Tony.

    241

    • #
      Philip

      The question is then, why didn’t they do it with Hillary ? Why not against Bush ?

      (Genuine question, not a criticism)

      40

      • #
        Vlad the Impaler

        Hi Philip,

        I do not recall the source (it has been a while), but the source indicated it had evidence that ” … the fix was in … ” for the 2016 election as well. The problem was, the quantity of the ‘fix’, assuming it did, in fact, exist, was overwhelmed by the level of support for Trump. The short version is, they were ‘caught with their pants down’, and could not counteract the tsunami of support for DJT.

        Fast-forward to 2020, and not only was the ‘fix’ in, they were not going to be caught asleep at the wheel again, hence the level of fraud had to be, well, just look at the analysis at #1.3.2.4. The amount of “just-in-time” votes to put Let’s Go Brandon over the top is much too coincidental.

        I’m not tech-savvy, but there’s a picture circulating here in the States that says, “The price of [petrol] is rising faster …”

        … then it shifts to a smaller font size, and continues …

        “… than votes for Biden at 3 AM”

        If I knew how to post such things, I would, but you get the idea.

        Regards

        Vlad

        50

  • #
    Ross

    I’m hoping that this film gets more coverage than “Planet of the Humans”. That film by Michael Moore which revealed some of the absurdities of renewable energy, electric Vehicles and the whole green blob. A film that should have been broadcast on “our ABC” in that time slot where 4 Corners is normally shown. They showed that rubbish 3 part series about Trump being a Russian spy and have never issued an apology or retraction. Planet of the Humans should also have been on Netflix and all the other subscriber channels. Should have been shown in schools like Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” was. My guess is that this film wont even have any fierce pushback by election fortifiers – it will just be crickets in the MSM. In Australia the film probably wont even be mentioned.

    150

    • #
      New Chum

      There is another film NEWSMAX TV is broadcasting this weekend ‘Climate Hustle 2: The Rise of the Climate Monarchy’ US May 8 2022 8 PM Eastern Time.
      A CFACT film

      90

  • #
    Furiously+Curious

    If Trump wins, so what. I keep saying, ‘there is no team in Trump’. OK. He was very good overseas, where he can go one on one, with other leaders. But internally he is standing on totally white-anted foundations. Or a bottomless swamp! Sure, he appoints heads of organisations, but when the smurfs are leaning in one direction, things clog up, nothing gets done. If he does find someone to break the log jams, he’d likely fire them for taking his spotlight. And the elite will fight him to the death. I’d love to be surprised, but aren’t hopeful. There’s 20% right, 20% left, but the left have had a good 2 generation start at ‘educating’ the other 60%. I wonder if people can realise before the shite totally hits the fan? Not hopeful.

    61

  • #
    Andre+Thomas+Lewis

    They did not even bother with stuffing them in unsupervised ballot boxes or mailing them in in many places. Just loaded Biden votes into suitcases and delivered them to the counting room at 2am.

    111

  • #
    David Maddison

    What are the chances that the next US elections, the midterms and the next Presidential election will be free and fair?

    71

  • #
    Honk R Smith

    Ballot rigging is almost the mundane part of the story.
    The dark scary part is the Alphabets’ involvement.
    They just created a new ‘governance board’ for the purpose of keeping it dark.
    It woud seem that the Alphabets view American Greatness as anti-American.
    Who knew?
    But I only have two eyes.

    111

  • #

    Nice for someone else apart from the ex president to make some money of the conspiracy heads. Why should all the grift go to him?

    Did any of you donate to the freedom rally ?

    521

  • #
    David Maddison

    Remember that the same people who dismiss evidence of US election fraud also dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop saga as “Russian disinformation” or the imagination of “far right tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists”.

    Now even the New York Times admits it’s true and Facebook doesn’t automatically censor discussion of it.

    Even with election fraud, many Democrat voters would have switched their vote if the Left hadn’t censored true news about the laptop and other scandals, perhaps enough to swing the election even with fraud.

    This and other suppressed scandals are discussed at

    https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/24/poll-one-in-six-biden-voters-would-have-changed-their-vote-if-they-had-known-about-scandals-suppressed-by-media/

    171

    • #

      The same people who dismiss the evidence of climate change also dismiss the fact that the US elections were conducted fairly etc etc. What a pathetic argument.

      326

      • #
        David Maddison

        Did you mean “climate change” of anthropogenic origin?

        I and most others on this blog would happily consider any evidence or proof you care to provide for this claim.

        191

        • #
          John Connor II

          Did you mean “climate change” of anthropogenic origin?

          I was going to say that but couldn’t be bothered.
          Or as I like to call them “fake climate change” and “natural climate change”.

          120

          • #

            I couldn’t be bothered writing it as it was obvious what I meant

            214

            • #
              b.nice

              You couldn’t be bothered producing any evidence.. is that what you are saying.?

              You don’t seem to have the slightest clue what you are babbling about.

              121

      • #
        el+gordo

        Climate change is a universal issue and the MSM has consistently blamed a harmless trace gas for the increase in world temperature.

        There may have been voter fraud in the US election, but it was irrelevant to the outcome. The reason Biden won is because a lot of ordinary people (who rarely vote) were encouraged to vote.

        29

        • #
          Kalm Keith

          One woman in Cincinnati is reported to have said;

          “I’ve just found out that my father, a life long Republican, voted Democrat.

          He never would have done that when he was alive …

          170

        • #
          Ted1

          “a lot of ordinary people (who rarely vote) were encouraged to vote.”

          In truckloads!

          40

      • #
        el+gordo

        The Americans should adopt our system, the AEC has integrity.

        https://www.crikey.com.au/2017/02/15/how-bad-is-voter-fraud-in-australia/

        02

        • #
          Hanrahan

          Conservative politicians in Australia are also obsessed (like their US counterparts) with potential electoral fraud and are keen to introduce voter ID, but Australian Electoral Commission data recently provided to Parliament suggests it is much less of an issue than the scare campaign indicates.

          Must have missed that. I have only seen casual references and from non-politicians.

          50

      • #

        The simplest evidence available that climate change is natural and not caused by carbon dioxide.

        From NASA data. The simplest way of proving that “Pressure-induced Thermal Inertia” is the true cause of the “Greenhouse Effect” , and not “Radiative or Gravitational Forcing”, is the fact that the average temperature at the one bar pressure points on each of the planets, is the same, adjusted for distance from the Sun, despite the different main gases, Nitrogen for the Earth & Titan, Hydrogen for Jupiter, Neptune, Saturn & Uranus and Carbon Dioxide for Venus.

        This is because the random vibrations of the molecules are half towards and half away from the radiation and gravity. So add up to zero heat production.

        So its Carbon Dioxide on Venus that proves its a “Hoax”. In addition, Donald Trump says “We must reject the perennial prophets of doom and their predictions of the apocalypse. They are the heirs of yesterday’s foolish fortune-tellers.”

        Also, Climate deniers have nothing to deny. I cannot say that Gee Aye or anyone is a Denier, because you cannot deny that to which you are ignorant. Evidence or proof Gee Aye could care to provide to David Maddison & me, for the calibration of carbon dioxide warming on Venus, Mars or the Earth, does not exist on Google Scholar. So there isn’t anything for us to deny.

        80

        • #

          You are the one who brought up deniers.

          09

          • #
            b.nice

            Paul then pointed out that they don’t actually exist.. learn to read !

            When it comes to the climate change agenda, here is no science to actually deny.

            The only “climate deniers” are those AGW scammers that deny the natural variability of climate.

            70

      • #
        Kalm Keith

        Pathetique.

        40

      • #
        Kevin Kilty

        What an invalid comparison.

        50

      • #
        b.nice

        “who dismiss the evidence of climate change”

        You, or any other climate wannabe, have ever produced any evidence of human CO2 caused climate change… so there is nothing to dismiss.

        61

      • #
        b.nice

        “US elections were conducted fairly “

        It is patently obvious that the USA election was not conducted fairly.

        “dismiss the evidence of climate change”

        It is patently obvious that there is no evidence of human CO2 caused climate change.

        ….

        Seems these people you refer to, are totally correct on both counts.

        70

  • #
    John Connor II

    I wonder if it’s just coincidence that the Roe v Wade leak happened just before the release of 2000 Mules this w/end.
    Yet another nicely timed distraction to shift public attention away from important issues?

    Even if 2000 Mules proves election fraud it’s irrelevant for the US government/congress/deep state/deep government will NEVER overturn the election or call for another.
    A non-swamper (Trump) got in once but they’ll never let it happen again.
    Knowing the sociopathic loony left as we now do, can you even imagine what would happen if Trump was declared the rightful winner and Biden got booted?
    Civil war #2 that’s what.
    Those with quality sources & information plus functioning non-leftwing brains know the truth already. Trying to convince others is an exercise in futility and not even entertaining 😉

    151

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      Just my $2 because 2c doesn’t buy much any more.

      I think the timing of the leak was a coincidence. The forces of evil a bit like a swarm of flies. Having one make you miss your putt by flying up your nose at just the wrong time isn’t evidence of anything so much as that there are a lot of annoying flies.

      I don’t think the 2000 mules film will be overly influential. People already know the election was corrupt.

      It is not possible to declare Trump the winner because it is impossible to know which votes were legitimate and which were not (a key feature which made the steal so easy even a democrat could do it). And then you have the fuster cluck that is the various courts, state legislatures and governorships.

      Civil war #1 was fought on traditional regional boundaries. The next big conflict will be between corrupt cities and the regions within states fed up with the corruption of cities. And maybe Florida and Texas will lead a secession of whole states and parts of California will secede from LA and San Francisco. And stuff …

      71

      • #
        Vlad the Impaler

        Hi Forrest,

        Much as I hate to admit it, I do believe there is a potential for something to emerge within a very short period of time, say, one-to-two-years, give or take.

        What ever it turns out to be, I do not think it will be pretty. I do know there is an undercurrent of some who would view secession as a desirable alternative to an armed conflict. There is a county in western Maryland that has petitioned Annapolis (the State Capitol) to become part of West Virginia, as their needs are not being met by the Democrat-run State.

        Weld County, Colorado has petitioned Denver to let it become part of Wyoming (my State); portions of Eastern Washington State and Eastern Oregon have asked their State Capitols (Salem and Olympia, respectively) if they can become part of Idaho.

        Much as I fear for the worst, I do hope that some good can come from efforts such as this one (the movie), to awaken the sheeple from their stupor. Maybe it will, maybe it won’t.

        Vlad

        60

      • #
        Hanrahan

        I don’t think the 2000 mules film will be overly influential. People already know the election was corrupt.

        We here do but we are atypical. My GUESS is that less than half of US voters have come to that conclusion.

        30

  • #

    Watched Farage on GB News. The last ten minutes were blanked out and censored. Farage was talking to Emma-Jo Morris of the New York Post about the MSM censorship of Hunter Bidens Laptop. She was talking about a Ukrainian company called Burisma. Hunter Biden is earning over $50,000 a month (not) working for Burisma, and Hunter Biden received a $3 million payment from the widow of the Mayor of Moscow. But then it began to mention MSM censorship and the fact that what started out as a report about corruption by the President of the United States and his Son, ended up on 14th October 2020 as “corruption of an entire system (Blank-Censored) including the security state, including Big Tech, including the legacy media and including the Democratic Party” to protect the Biden family. The legacy media “do not want to go so far as to implicate Jo Biden or acknowledge that he —–(Blank- Censored for ten minutes)”. So GB News was off air for 10 minutes from 7.50pm to 8pm.

    Are the authorities afraid of us seeing the truth? Was the plug pulled by GCHQ, The Counter Disinformation Cell or the 77th Brigade in Britain, or was it the CIA, NSA or the Disinformation Governance Board in America?

    171

  • #
    RoHa

    Do Australian elections count as disorganised crime?

    51

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      A bit from column A and a bit from column B.

      My strong opinion is that those who seek positions of power should never be permitted to be elected (or appointed).

      71

  • #
    Dipole

    It took 12hrs for twitter to delete @2000mules…….they must be slowing up
    Come on Elon, do your stuff.

    71

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      Is Twitter in Musk’s ownership yet? I would have thought it would take a while to do the transfer.

      71

      • #
        Hanrahan

        May take the rest of the year. There are always regulatory hurdles among other things.

        10

  • #
    Forrest Gardener

    Interesting to see the number of single down votes today. It is as though the avalanche of down votes earned by resident nuisances has stung somebody into mindless action.

    72

  • #
    UK-Weather Lass

    Catherine Engelbrecht began a brave campaign against election fraud with her founding of True the Vote in 2014. The personal attacks upon her, and upon her family, by federal agencies immediately following this suggest we have US governments with something to hide since why else would anyone want to NOT improve voting security unless they are serving regimes similar to those in places that have a great deal they don’t want us to see, hear or know?

    If Biden were exposed to Ms Engelbrecht’s questions about the 2020 vote live and on every US outlet he would not last five minutes, but at least the public will know not just the lies they think they already know but the real truth that has been hidden from them for perhaps a decade or more.

    80

    • #
      Dave in the States

      The idea that Deep State controlled governance and its agendas, enabled by fraudulent elections, is illegit causes severe cognitive dissonance. To the Deep state and their advocates there is the fear that the people will refuse to be governed if they know the truth. And there is the fear that the Deep State Gravey train will be derailed then crash and burn. To some there is confusion of love of country and love of the established Deep State.

      60

  • #
    CHRIS

    Ballot rigging, pork barreling, gerrymanders…all part of elections world-wide for almost 200 years (ever since the UK Reform Act of 1832). I’ll give a garden party whenever we have a fully honest, open election in this country.

    41

  • #
    Strop

    I find it odd that the “lefties” dismissing the 2000 Mules theory don’t say, “This needs to be looked into thoroughly because election integrity is crucial. Biden would have won by more if the Republicans had cheated this way”.

    Instead, they immediately get all defensive and claim that any potential weakness in the voter system doesn’t exist because they know the fraud (if any) is more likely committed by their side.

    60

    • #

      They don’t say, “this needs to be looked into”, because it is one of several thousand baseless “theories” (it is not a theory btw).

      08

      • #
        Strop

        Are you suggesting it’s not a theory because you classify it as fact? 😉

        I know people get hung up on the definition of theory, but it’s mostly accepted that a theory is an attempt to explain something.

        50

  • #
    gowest

    Story repeated on Tucker Carlson this morning – Maybe One nation could demand the AEC use our extensive surveillance resources to check the same did not happen over the last couple of state and fed elections. Test that vote early vote often statement!

    00

    • #
      yarpos

      How do you see the same happening here? How would you go about it? I see the chance for people playing silly buggers on the margin but mass fixing requires a totally corrupt AEC.

      10

    • #
      Hanrahan

      Postal votes here are regulated and in person votes are on paper and hand counted. Our issues are limited to illegal registrations.

      20