When the unvaccinated die of Covid they get turned into advertising material for Pfizer. But when people died in the weeks after after getting the vaccines, the companies, the institutions and the media did their utmost to hide it.
A group of doctors and researchers wanted the 326,000 pages of FDA data used to approve the Pfizer vaccine, but neither the FDA or Pfizer would give it them. So the doctors put in an FOIA, and again the FDA hid the data, so the doctors sued the FDA for withholding it.
Serving Big-Pharma with all the funds they can get…
But when pressed they said they needed 55 years to redact out all the juicy bits so “people couldn’t cherry pick” or something like that. When pushed, the FDA told the judge they really needed 75 years to provide it. This was the same FDA that supposedly read all those 326,000 pages in detail in just 108 days in order to speedily approve the vaccine “with the utmost of care”.
The intrepid doctors group calls itself the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency or PHMPT. And they are finally getting somewhere. In January a Texas Judge ordered the FDA to produce documents at a blistering speed (compared to the previous 75- year-schedule). It really is an avalanche of information — with something like 50,000 pages a month due out each month.
The first of those secret batches came out last week. So after millions of people have been injected with the Pfizer vax, now we find out that in just the first three months of use (from December 2020 onwards) there were 42,000 reports of adverse effects and 1,223 deaths.
This is justice delayed. People have lost their jobs and some have lost their lives. The data should have been public from the beginning.
But it’s a denominator free zone
As John Campbell points out below, we don’t know how many people were vaccinated in total. Even the number of doses shipped in those three months has been redacted. Were deaths a one-in-one-thousand thing, or a one in a million? Who knows? Pfizer does. So does the FDA, and so possibly do elected representatives. But the punters getting injected don’t.
Pfizer Vaccine data (Document 5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf)
Steve Kirsch points out that the code (b) (4) (in the gray box in the image above) is legal speak for “Trade secrets” telling us the profits are at the start, middle and end of everything about this. It’s not about public health.
Who has informed consent?
Table 1 (Click to enlarge)
Why did it take court orders to get information used to force a medicine on millions of people?
John Campbell has built quite a following and is fully vaccinated himself. He’s conscientiously assessed the risks according to the publicly notified data. He’s a very honest player, just the kind of person we’d want training nurses. But when he describes these documents below, he’s not a happy camper. From about 18.2 minutes, he’s quite flummoxed. There is some soul searching going on.
“I would have thought this was a complete scandal. The mainstream media don’t seem to be interested…”
He’s very troubled, framing this as equivalent to something like Watergate and in the context of the hippocratic oath: It appears we’ve done some harm.
It’s just destroyed trust.
This is just the beginning of the RedPill for the West. Oh boy has trust been lost.
More info: Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency
h/t Sharon W, Scott of the Pacific, Brenda, MP, Another ian, Old Ozzie, StJohnof Grafton, Jill J.
_______________
PS: There is talk that Pfizer has delisted. But it’s not clear that this is anything other than a technicality. Advice welcome.