UPDATE: The claims from the Data Integrity Group in the Georgia Senate Hearing about votes being withdrawn need to be confirmed.
I had some frivolous fun with the post for a few hours, but these claims need checking before anyone takes them further. Tel raises the point that Putnam County is small and the alleged “flips” are very large. In Putnam there were only about 17,000 votes in total, so a flip of 6,000 votes is nearly a third of all votes. Further investigation suggests a flip of 17,000 votes in Dougherty County is about half the vote. In Dodge County, Georgia, there were only 8,000 voters in total. Bibb County is the largest county with around 70,000 voters — but even there a 12,173 vote flip is still 17% of the vote. These are big claims. Perhaps too big.
In light of that, until these flips get confirmed or explained in relation to the size of the county, lets stick with the many examples of voting irregularities that are easier to verify. The graphs and discussion are left here below in case someone can shed light either way on the situation.
_________________________________________
Did Trump lose votes in Georgia Counties?
The volunteers from the Data Integrity Group analyzed different datasets from the US election in Georgia and claim to have found at least 3 instances where the Trump voting totals went backwards, an impossible act in the known Democratic universe, and the Biden tally went up by the same amount at the same time, which all looks very suspicious.
Strange appearance of anti-matter-ballots destroying Trump Votes in Bibb County. In just 8 minutes Trump lost 12,173 votes which magically appeared in the Biden tally
Here 5,935 votes allegedly get removed in Putnam County Georgia.
Putnam County Georgia
Allegedly, 17,650 votes are flipped in Dougherty, but this is half the total vote?
Watch American Citizens voting rights vanish in an instant.
The testimony:
,,,
GA Hearing: Data Scientists Provide Clear Evidence of Vote Manipulation in 2020 Election
CharlieKirk Staff
The DIG group provides all their data to show their work when they post election videos. So far, no one has debunked their findings.
“As someone who has studied data for many years, I am perplexed that no one else is looking at the numbers to find the answers to this election,” said Mealey. “With so many people making anecdotal comments and conjecture, there is a lot to be gained by looking at the numbers. The numbers are non partisan, have no party alignment, and it’s a universal language. With data we can see the errors, corrections, anomalies, whatever you want to call them — we see that they occurred. We are not here to point fingers, we are just here to explain that it happened, and that voting is an additive process. There should never be negative vote swings, and here we saw them frequently in the data time series affecting President Trump’s votes.”
The DIG Team
Lynda McLaughlin from the Data Integrity Group
Justin Meale: nine years in the US Navy as a Electronic Warfare Technician, Cryptologic Technician, and Arabic Linguist. He’ s also done CIA work.
Dave Lobue: 12 years of number crunching specializing in AI.
“Based on our findings, Georgia should not have been certified,” said Lobue.
Copy of the original post.