<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax &#187; Matthew England</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joannenova.com.au/tag/matthew-england/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joannenova.com.au</link>
	<description>Tackling tribal groupthink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Funded arrogance</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2009/06/funded-arrogance/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2009/06/funded-arrogance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JoNova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic & Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argument by Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Fielding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Kinninmonth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=2437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Professor Matthew England <p>The debate that Senator Steve Fielding started continues, this time between heavyweights in Australian climate science. Yet again, the side with the funding, the power, and the large claims is unable to answer basic polite science questions. The pompous arrogance is evident. Why not just answer the question?</p> <p>Professor Matthew England&#8217;s research teams have received nearly $2.5 million in funding from the Australian government, much of it for studying oceans and climate change. So when we need good answers on the topic, he would be the man. If a school student asked for help, we might expect only a two line reply passing on a link. But when the question comes from one of the most informed climate scientists in the country, with 12 years as head of Australia&#8217;s National Climate Centre, and it&#8217;s about a graph at the centre of legislative negotiations, it&#8217;s inexcusable that the reply was vague, poorly reasoned and didn&#8217;t answer the question. All this, in a conversation that England himself started.</p> <p>If indeed &#8220;a Nobel Prize is there for many of the ideas the skeptics champion if only they were true&#8221; as England claims, then opportunity is knocking, and England is [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=0.0" /></div><div>Rating: 0.0/<strong>10</strong> (0 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2009/06/funded-arrogance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>311</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/26 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 309/350 objects using disk: basic

Served from: joannenova.com.au @ 2012-02-11 01:09:59 -->
