<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax &#187; Global Temperatures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joannenova.com.au/tag/global-temperatures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joannenova.com.au</link>
	<description>Tackling tribal groupthink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Has CO2 warmed the planet at all in the last 50 years? It’s harder to tell than you think.</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/05/has-co2-warmed-the-planet-at-all-in-the-last-50-years-its-harder-to-tell-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/05/has-co2-warmed-the-planet-at-all-in-the-last-50-years-its-harder-to-tell-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 08:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKitrick (Ross)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Temperature Trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temperature Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temperature trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=21332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joint Post: Jo Nova and Tony Cox <p>Even most skeptics agree that the world has been warming during the last 50 years, but there is apparently no significant underlying warming trend in 46 out of 47 years of data. Something decidedly unusual happened to the world in 1977 and we don&#8217;t know for sure what it was. The world got warmer, and the change &#8220;stuck&#8221;. But there were no extra emissions of CO2 in that year, so there is no reason to pin this to CO2.</p> <p>It’s difficult to believe we are not sure – but the last 50 years of warming trend depends on that single stepwise leap in 1977. Look at the graph below. Does it show one strong underlying warming trend, or is it really a trend so insignificant that it wouldn&#8217;t exist if there was not a step change that artificially bolstered it?</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">A series of two flat lines can appear to be a continuous warming trend if a linear trend line is fitted because it ignores the step change. McKitrick and Voselgang</p> <p>This step effect was first noted by David Stockwell in 2009</p> <p>The continuous warming appears to be obvious in the records of [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=8.8" /></div><div>Rating: 8.8/<strong>10</strong> (75 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/05/has-co2-warmed-the-planet-at-all-in-the-last-50-years-its-harder-to-tell-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>258</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global cooling coming? Archibald uses solar and surface data to predict 4.9°C fall (!)</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/global-cooling-coming-archibald-uses-solar-and-surface-data-to-predict-4-9c-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/global-cooling-coming-archibald-uses-solar-and-surface-data-to-predict-4-9c-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Archibald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archibald (David)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cycle Length]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>David Archibald, polymath, makes a bold prediction that temperatures are about to dive sharply (in the decadal sense). He took the forgotten correlation that as solar cycles lengthen and weaken, the world gets cooler. He refined it into a predictive tool, tested it and published in 2007. His paper has been expanded on recently by Prof Solheim in Norway, who predicts a 1.5°C drop in Central Norway over the next ten years.</p> <p>Our knowledge of they solar dynamo is improving, and David adds the predicted solar activity &#8217;til 2040 to the analysis. Normal solar cycles are 11 years long, but the current one (cycle 24) is shaping up to be 17 years (unusually long), and using historical data from the US, David predicts a 2.1°C decline over Solar Cycle 24 followed by a further 2.8°C over Solar Cycle 25. That adds up to a whopping 4.9°C fall in temperate latitudes over the next 20 years. We can only hope he&#8217;s wrong. As David says &#8221; The center of the Corn Belt, now in Iowa, will move south to Kansas.&#8221;</p> <p>He also predicts continuing drought in Africa for another 14 years, with droughts likely in South America too.</p> <p>If he&#8217;s right, [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=8.0" /></div><div>Rating: 8.0/<strong>10</strong> (79 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/global-cooling-coming-archibald-uses-solar-and-surface-data-to-predict-4-9c-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>239</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Messages from the global raw rural data. Warnings, gotcha&#8217;s and tree ring divergence explained!</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/10/messages-from-the-global-raw-rural-data-warnings-gotchas-and-tree-ring-divergence-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/10/messages-from-the-global-raw-rural-data-warnings-gotchas-and-tree-ring-divergence-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lansner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lansner (Frank)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=18275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you wondered what the global raw rural data tells us? <p>What did those thermometers say before the adjustments, smoothing, selection, and averaging?</p> <p>This just might be the first time anyone has publicly compared the global raw data to published adjusted data sets in this way.</p> <p>Frank Lansner has been dedicated in the extreme, and has developed a comprehensive Rural Unadjusted Temperature Index, or RUTI. One of the most interesting points to come out of this extensive work is the striking difference between coastal stations and inland stations. Frank kept noticing that the trend of the inland stations was markedly different from coastal stations and island stations.</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Fig1. Red-Blue lines mark regions where there was a different coastal to inland trend. In green areas the two trends were similar.</p> <p>What he finds is perhaps not so unusual: The coastal areas are heavily influenced by the sea surface temperature. Inland stations record larger rises and falls in temperature, which is hardly surprising. But, the implications are potentially large. When records from some stations are smoothed over vast distances (as in 1200 km smoothing), results can be heavily skewed by allowing coastal trends to be smoothed across inland areas. What Lansner [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.1" /></div><div>Rating: 9.1/<strong>10</strong> (14 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/10/messages-from-the-global-raw-rural-data-warnings-gotchas-and-tree-ring-divergence-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>164</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It wasn&#8217;t CO2: Global sea levels started rising before 1800</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/07/global-sea-levels-started-rising-before-1800-jevrejeva/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/07/global-sea-levels-started-rising-before-1800-jevrejeva/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jevrejeva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Ice Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tide Gauges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=16222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Fans of man-made global warming frequently tell us seas are rising, but somehow forget to mention the rise started 200 years ago, long before our coal-fired electricity plants cranked up, and long before anyone had an electric shaver, or a 6 cylinder fossil-fuel-spewing engine. Something else was driving that warming trend.</p> <p style="text-align: left;">Here is the data from tide gauges going back 300 years from a paper by Jevrejeva et al 2008. </p> <p style="text-align: center;">[Graphed by Joanne Nova based on data from Jevrejura et al located at this site PMSML]</p> <p>This graph was calculated from 1023 tide gauge records [Jevrejeva et al., 2006] going back to 1850.The 2008 study extended the record further using three of the longest (though discontinuous) tide gauge records available: Amsterdam, since 1700 [Van Veen, 1945], Liverpool, since 1768 [Woodworth, 1999] and Stockholm, since 1774 [Ekman, 1988]. Obviously since there are only three old records, the error bars are a riot.</p> <p>The Jevrejeva paper is also useful for portraying the 60 year rolling cycle. The regular ups and downs are obvious when the rate of change is plotted (see below).</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Source: Jevrejeva 2008</p> But wait&#8230; there must be a tipping point? <p>While the graph [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=8.2" /></div><div>Rating: 8.2/<strong>10</strong> (5 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/07/global-sea-levels-started-rising-before-1800-jevrejeva/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>256</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was 2010 the hottest ever?</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/03/was-2010-the-hottest-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/03/was-2010-the-hottest-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=13879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Was 2010 &#8220;the hottest year ever&#8221; as the PR machine repeats ad nauseum? Yes &#8212; but only if you ignore three of the four main global datasets and those awkward questions about why nobody thought to put thermometers in better places.</p> <p>Run your eyes down this page to see how the GISS temperatures pan out compared to all the other compilations. This is James Hansen&#8217;s group, and GISS stands for the Goddard Institute of Space Studies &#8212; and in the topsy-turvey world of climate change, that&#8217;s apt &#8212; the space centre and hot bed of rocketry calculates world temperatures by ignoring &#8230; satellites. For GISS, measuring the world temperature, calls for irregularly spaced, unique, non-standardized temperature stations (sometimes near air-conditioning vents and concrete). And no sir, not the satellites that scan the Earth 24 hours a day, over land and sea, and which are usually not too close to exhaust vents, or buildings, or (thank goodness) fermenting vats of sewage either.</p> <p>So, indeed, the only sane answer to the cherry picking crowd who crow triumphantly about their outlying most favorite result, is that &#8220;No&#8221; 2010 was not hotter than 1998, not according to the satellites. And even if it had [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=2.0" /></div><div>Rating: 2.0/<strong>10</strong> (1 vote cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/03/was-2010-the-hottest-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>166</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The SOI still rules</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/02/the-soi-still-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/02/the-soi-still-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMO (Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Length of Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leyland (Bryan)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Decadal Ossilation (PDO)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDO (Pacific Decadal Ossilation)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Cycle Length]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=13158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Who would have thought that if you knew the air pressure in Darwin and Tahiti in June, you could figure out that the start of 2011 might be a Stalingrad Winter up North and a cooler wetter summer down south (Not that people in Sydney feel all that cool right now). But the air pressure ratios are reported as the SOI (Southern Oscillation Index) and it&#8217;s the handiest thing if you like predicting global temperatures 7 months ahead. Look at that correlation.</p> <p>Since June last year Bryan Leyland has been using the simple connection described by Carter, De Freitas, and McLean in 2009 to predict up and coming temperatures.</p> <p>So far, for what it&#8217;s worth, he&#8217;s right on track.</p> <p style="text-align: center;"> <p style="text-align: center;"> <p class="wp-caption-text">...</p> <p>Such is the power of the stored pool of cold that is the bottom three-quarters of the Pacific Ocean. And when you look at how vast the Southern Pacific ocean is, is it any wonder it has such an influence? All that heat capacity&#8230;</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">The Pacific Ocean from space. This is a &#34;full-disk&#34; image of the Earth taken from the GOES-11 satellite at 8 a.m. EDT on Aug. 12. Credit: NASA/GOES Project</p> [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=1.0" /></div><div>Rating: 1.0/<strong>10</strong> (1 vote cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/02/the-soi-still-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Warmest Year Antidotes</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/01/the-warmest-year-antidotes/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/01/the-warmest-year-antidotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocene]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=12847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What do you say when the Big PR bell is rung? You know the litany: &#8220;2010 was the warmest since measuring began, and the previous decade was also the warmest decade on record.&#8221; (eg The AGE)</p> Sure, and the world has been warming for 300 years, long before the industrial revolution. The trend hasn&#8217;t changed as our emissions rose. No one knows exactly why it started rising back then, but it wasn&#8217;t CO2. Sure and 150 years of &#8220;records&#8221; is not long. It was warmer 1000 years ago, 2000 years ago, 5000 years ago and 130,000 years ago. In fact its been warmer for most of the last 10,000 years than it is today, and it&#8217;s been warmer for most of the last 500 million years. Only people who think CO2 matters keep repeating that it&#8217;s warmed from 1850 to now without pointing out the bigger perspective. Sure, and the records have been set with thermometers like this one (next to concrete and exhaust vents &#8212; see below). There probably weren&#8217;t too many car parks or air conditioners in 1880 either. Not to mention the non-random adjustments, and that mystery about how 75% of thermometers are ignored. <p>Nothing about the [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=0.0" /></div><div>Rating: 0.0/<strong>10</strong> (0 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/01/the-warmest-year-antidotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>131</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptop beats Met Supercomputer: SOI index (at record high) scores a win.</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/01/laptop-beats-met-supercomputer-soi-index-scores-a-win/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/01/laptop-beats-met-supercomputer-soi-index-scores-a-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leyland (Bryan)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McLean (John)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=12757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back on August 6, 2010, when the UK BOM was predicting a warm winter, and every Met Agency in the West was already declaring that 2010 would be the hottest year ever, Bryan Leyland predicted (on a global scale) that before the end of the year, there would be significant cooling. As you can see from the chart, this is exactly what happened.</p> <p>The UK Met Office has a gigantic supercomputer, 1,500 staff and a £170m-a-year budget, but a retired engineer in New Zealand armed only with Excel and access to the internet and with the McLean is et al 2009 paper, was able to get it right.</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Parking the SOI index (the blue line) 7 months into the future suggests things may get cooler still as the temperature (red line) often follows the trend. (Click for a larger image.) Note, the SOI is shifted 7 months forwards in time, and the scale is inverted.</p> <p>Before anyone scoffs that the El Nino&#8217;s are usually followed by cooling, and the SOI indicator is well known, ponder that the well fed agencies of man-made-climate-fame weren&#8217;t telling the public that a big-chill was on the way and they ought to stock up [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=1.0" /></div><div>Rating: 1.0/<strong>10</strong> (1 vote cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/01/laptop-beats-met-supercomputer-soi-index-scores-a-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Western Climate Establishment Corrupt? Part 4: Past Temperatures</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/10/is-the-western-climate-establishment-corrupt-part-4-past-temperatures/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/10/is-the-western-climate-establishment-corrupt-part-4-past-temperatures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption (science)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evans (David)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAR (IPCC First Assessment Rep)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures (last 2000 yrs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Post (Dr David Evans)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Ice Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loehle (Craig)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medieval Warm Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR (IPCC Second Assessment Rep)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">The public might not understand the science, but they do understand cheating</p> <p style="text-align: center;">Dr. David Evans</p> <p style="text-align: center;">6 October 2010</p> <p style="text-align: center;">[A series of articles reviewing the western climate establishment and the media. The first and second discussed air temperatures, the third discussed ocean temperatures.]</p> <p style="text-align: center;">Click to download a pdf file containing the whole series</p> They Don’t Tell You: The Current Global Warming Trend is Over 300 Years Old <p class="wp-caption-text">A Scene on the Ice by Hendrick Avercamp, circa 1600</p> <p>Satellite data only goes back to 1979, and global land-thermometer records only go back to 1850. Before that we have to resort to “proxies”, which are various natural phenomena from which temperature can be deduced. As we go further back in time, the errors and uncertainties increase.</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Charles III of Habsburg, 1707 Francesco Solimena</p> <p>Here is a best estimate of the global air temperature for the last 2,000 years, using the best available source for each period:</p> 1979 – Now: Satellite data (UAH, as per Figure 14). 1850 – 1979: Land thermometer record (HadCrut3, from the UK Met Office Hadley Centre and the Climatic Research Unit, slightly less tricked up than the [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=1.0" /></div><div>Rating: 1.0/<strong>10</strong> (1 vote cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/10/is-the-western-climate-establishment-corrupt-part-4-past-temperatures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Western Climate Establishment Corrupt? Part I</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/10/is-the-western-climate-establishment-corrupt-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/10/is-the-western-climate-establishment-corrupt-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption (science)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evans (David)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Post (Dr David Evans)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts (Anthony)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>For months now, behind the scenes, David and I have discussed just how powerful questions can be. Sometimes it&#8217;s not what you know, but what you ask that makes the most powerful point.</p> <p>For his Heartland presentation last Friday, David delivered a themed compilation of example after example of the Western Climate Establishment allowing mistakes, errors or biases to accumulate &#8212; each factor on it&#8217;s own might be hard to pin down, but the sum total of actions (and inactions) forms a wholly consistent pattern.</p> <p>This is Part I. These photos speak for themselves, but as far as I know, they haven&#8217;t been assembled in one web page before and David stopped waiting for me to get the time to annotate them and has helpfully used red arrows so even the less technically minded will &#8220;get&#8221; the implications.</p> <p>You don&#8217;t need to have a PhD to know that the thermometers used to measure global warming are not placed well. There are at least Two Great Burning Questions here:</p> <p>Burning Question 1:</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;"> NOAA is a $4 billion dollar agency. If they were determined to get the most accurate, reliable measurements possible would they leave so many sensors [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=4.0" /></div><div>Rating: 4.0/<strong>10</strong> (2 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/10/is-the-western-climate-establishment-corrupt-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/31 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 709/709 objects using disk: basic

Served from: joannenova.com.au @ 2012-05-24 16:50:07 -->
