<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JoNova &#187; Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joannenova.com.au/category/globalwarming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joannenova.com.au</link>
	<description>Trying to keep us out of the second stone-age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Deutsche Bank &#8212; A Wunch of Bankers</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/deutsche-bank-a-wunch-of-bankers/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/deutsche-bank-a-wunch-of-bankers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;
If this was Exxon pushing a PDF promoting skeptical views, it would be on the front page tomorrow. Where are the front page headlines? 
&#8220;Bankers feed scare-mongering report&#8221;
Instead it&#8217;s just Deutsche Bank try to save the world their profit line.
Just in case you are missing your daily dose of being spoon fed propaganda by Bankers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/deutsche-bank-a-wunch-of-bankers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia can meet it&#8217;s 2020 targets with just 35 nuclear power plants or 8000 solar ones!</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/australia-can-meet-its-2020-targets-with-just-35-nuclear-power-plants-or-8000-solar-ones/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/australia-can-meet-its-2020-targets-with-just-35-nuclear-power-plants-or-8000-solar-ones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia's Energy Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloncurry Solar Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pielke Jnr (Roger)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Pielke, Jr. has looked closely at Australia&#8217;s ETS targets and helpfully put some numbers into the hypotheticals.
With all their subsidies, goodwill and fervent wishes, solar, wind, and geothermal produce just 3% of our energy needs. Fossil fuels produce a whopper 94%.   And &#8220;energy&#8221; on these grand continental scales is measured in quadrillion BTUs which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/australia-can-meet-its-2020-targets-with-just-35-nuclear-power-plants-or-8000-solar-ones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election news: Independents split &#8211; Labor Wins.</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/election-news-katter-backs-the-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/election-news-katter-backs-the-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
UPDATE: Oakeshott and Windsor go with The Labor Party.
Why? Because more than anything they want a long stable government. They like both packages from both parties, but the deciding factor appears to be that they think the Coalition would be more likely to call an early election because they&#8217;d be more likely to win it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/election-news-katter-backs-the-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hamilton rages on, Monckton replies</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/hamilton-rages-on/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/hamilton-rages-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamilton (Clive)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clive Hamilton, the Australian &#8220;public intellectual&#8221;, and failed Greens candidate is a busy man: leave no ad hominem unsaid, no law of logic unbroken. The man has a predictable formula. Rule one:  Make an unsubstantiated claim; cast aspersions on all who so much as question it &#8212; dig deep for an attempted character assassination if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/hamilton-rages-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unthreaded &#8211; September</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/unthreaded-september/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/unthreaded-september/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unthreaded]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And a small operational note: I&#8217;ve set up an email address support AT joannenova.com.au which goes direct to the fabulous helpful volunteers who moderate. If you see a comment that needs reporting, that&#8217;s the email to use. Likewise, if your comment disappears into the spam autofile,  you can email the moderators who can set it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/unthreaded-september/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pachauri admits the IPCC just guesses the numbers</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/pachauri-admits-the-ipcc-just-guesses-the-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/pachauri-admits-the-ipcc-just-guesses-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pachauri (Rajendra)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Such is the pressure finally beginning to bear on the IPCC that Pachauri has been forced into the ridiculous position of trying to rescue credibility by contradicting most of their past PR campaign. He&#8217;s taken the extraordinary step of admitting they don&#8217;t have hard numbers, hey, but it&#8217;s all OK because the IPCC is really [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/pachauri-admits-the-ipcc-just-guesses-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A spot of Australian news this week</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/a-spot-of-australian-news-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/a-spot-of-australian-news-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia &#8211; The Sunburnt Country going Green around the Gillards?
Will we or won&#8217;t we? Each day for nearly two weeks we swing politically&#8230; looks like Labor&#8230; looks like the Coalition&#8230; One side has more seats, then the other; one side has a higher primary count, then the other; the three crucial independents say things that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/a-spot-of-australian-news-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax versus Trade</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/tax-versus-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/tax-versus-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax vs Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like I keep stating the obvious.  A carbon tax is bad because it&#8217;s unnecessary and nobody wastes money better than big government, but a carbon trading scheme is worse. The latter is a fake market that feeds corruption and creates it&#8217;s own vested industry of financial brokers who profit no matter what the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/tax-versus-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The word Skeptic is back!</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/08/the-word-skeptic-is-back/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/08/the-word-skeptic-is-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Spectator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unskeptical Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unskeptical Skeptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a devout follower telling off his own kind for showing their &#8220;faith&#8221;.


&#8220;Beyond Belief&#8221; (Climate Spectator)


The &#8220;believers&#8221; have suddenly realized how uncool it is to talk about &#8220;beliefs&#8221; when it&#8217;s supposed to be about science. So the rush is on to post articles warning believers to hide their &#8220;faith&#8221; and to throw in token comments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/08/the-word-skeptic-is-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>149</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canberra (the ACT) will cut emissions by 40% (!) by&#8230; 2020</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/08/canberra-the-act-will-cut-emissions-by-40-by-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/08/canberra-the-act-will-cut-emissions-by-40-by-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canberra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=10033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[File this one under: Experiments in Green Government. Watch this box.
There&#8217;s a spot in Australia called The Australian Capital Territory, where our National Capital, Canberra, sits and which has it&#8217;s own anachronistic government: a kind of glorified local council and  junior &#8220;state&#8221; government at the same time*.
In 2008 they were lucky enough to elect a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2010/08/canberra-the-act-will-cut-emissions-by-40-by-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
