<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax &#187; AGW socio-political</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joannenova.com.au/category/agw-socio-political/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joannenova.com.au</link>
	<description>Tackling tribal groupthink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>carbon ship sinking: barclays bank closes its carbon desk</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/carbon-ship-sinking-barclays-bank-closes-its-carbon-desk/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/carbon-ship-sinking-barclays-bank-closes-its-carbon-desk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 03:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tipping Point (of the Climate Scam)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gillard once lauded the genius of the carbon market. That part of the &#8220;free&#8221; market which is free to move, is moving &#8212; and right out. The smart money is saying that carbon trading is a dead dog. It&#8217;s a has-been-tulip, a sick puppy, a sinking ship. <p>The future of global carbon trading is so &#8220;certain&#8221; that Barclays Bank is not even bothering to leave one part time guy in the US office with a post box, so they can pretend they still have an interest in it. The mood has so changed, they see an advantage in letting the world know they&#8217;re not wasting a single cent more on carbon trading in the United States of America. Well that made my day. .</p> <p>&#8220;That is not good news for carbon-dioxide trading, especially not in the US,&#8221;</p> <p>Barclays was the first UK bank to set up a carbon trading desk, and fast to move into carbon trading: &#8220;Barclays Capital is the most active player in the emissions trading market, having traded some 300 million tonnes as at February 2007&#8243;.</p> <p style="padding-left: 60px;">Barclays Closes US Carbon Desk In Latest Cap And Trade Setback </p> <p style="padding-left: 60px;">By Simon Lomax</p> <p style="padding-left: [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=8.8" /></div><div>Rating: 8.8/<strong>10</strong> (81 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/carbon-ship-sinking-barclays-bank-closes-its-carbon-desk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blast Deniers into space eh?</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/blast-deniers-into-space-eh/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/blast-deniers-into-space-eh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 05:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Hominem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pachauri (Rajendra)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frustrated cult members know they can&#8217;t explain their faith to the rational. [See Grist] <p>They bombarded us with glossy brochures, with full feature documentaries, and awarded people on their team with Nobels for nothing. They spend billions of dollars of our government funds and investment monies, and, once upon a time, the full support of the EU, UK, US, Canadian, Australian, and New Zealand governments, all the major financial houses of the world, and of course the supertanker of governments &#8211; the UN. They had 70% of the Western population convinced and a $144 billion dollar global trading scheme with all the patrons that engenders.</p> <p>So now that it&#8217;s all going to rot and ruin, they have no ammo left. Their arsenal is reduced to namecalling and jokes that reveal the Christmas wish-list of the inner totalitarian.</p> <p>Those with billions of dollars attack the mostly unpaid volunteers who are beating them. It&#8217;s emblematic that in this meeting of the &#8220;ruling class&#8221; where the joke is funny, the only people not represented in the audience of politicians and businessmen are the taxpaying citizens:</p> <p>Our biggest problem is to deal with the skepticism and denial of the cult-like lemmings who would take [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.5" /></div><div>Rating: 9.5/<strong>10</strong> (75 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/blast-deniers-into-space-eh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tallbloke&#8217;s computer seized, Jeff ID threatened in Climategate retaliation: It&#8217;s intimidation</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/tallblokes-computer-siezed-jeff-id-threatened-in-climategate-retaliation-its-intimidation/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/tallblokes-computer-siezed-jeff-id-threatened-in-climategate-retaliation-its-intimidation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big-Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateGate II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BREAKING: As Jeff ID says, &#8220;The Empire Strikes Back&#8221; <p class="wp-caption-text">Industrial wall in Donetsk, Ukraine. Photo: Борис У.</p> <p>UPDATED: See Washington Examiner story below.</p> <p>Tallbloke&#8217;s computers were confiscated by police today, allegedly in the search for the climategate leaker. But it&#8217;s obvious that there won&#8217;t be any clues left on Tallbloke&#8217;s computer (it would have no record of comments dropped onto wordpress.com, a US service). See Watts Up.</p> The point of this is not to catch the leaker, it&#8217;s to intimidate bloggers. <p style="padding-left: 60px;"> Jeff ID writes:   Tallbloke a fellow recipient blog of the climategate emails, and linked on the right, was raided today in what seems to be a coordinated effort by Metropolitan Police, the Norfolk Constabulary and the Computer Crime division and the U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division.  His home was raided and computers were taken for ‘examination’.</p> <p>They don&#8217;t really want to catch the leaker, because a whistleblower is protected by UK legislation. The proof that this is aimed at intimidating bloggers rather than catching the climategate leaker is the coordinated and pointless US dept of Justice action through wordpress. To wit:</p> <p style="padding-left: 60px;">Both Tallbloke and JeffID received &#8220;the following notification from the U.S. [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.4" /></div><div>Rating: 9.4/<strong>10</strong> (111 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/tallblokes-computer-siezed-jeff-id-threatened-in-climategate-retaliation-its-intimidation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>308</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enron called Kyoto &#8220;a victory for us&#8221; in 1997</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/enron-called-kyoto-a-victory-for-us-in-1997/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/enron-called-kyoto-a-victory-for-us-in-1997/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big-Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enron was jubilant when the Kyoto agreement was put forward <p>Here&#8217;s a legacy exhibit from the historical annals of How the Global Warming Scam Grew. You can see the cogs of the industrial machine picking up the &#8220;green theme&#8221;, becoming patrons of eco-legislation, and pouring money and influence into any big-government scheme that also promises them big profits. This is exactly the unholy alliance of Big-Finance with Big-Government that I described in the Climate Scare Machine Map. The email below documents one part of that self-fulfilling cycle where the taxpayers and citizens get screwed, corporates and politicians win, and the environment is irrelevant. The Greens ought be ashamed their naivety and ambition was so easily gamed by the real powers-behind-the-scenes.</p> <p>Robert Bradley Jr. was working for Enron in 1998, and saw Enron lobbying for profits in the green sector. Bradley&#8217;s name was on the &#8220;to&#8221; list of this email below (perhaps with the wrong address because it did not arrive). He only saw the email when another man asked Bradley what he thought of it, and Bradley asked him to forward the message.</p> <p>See Master Resource for the full email. Here are some key snippets.</p> <p style="padding-left: 60px;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p> <p style="padding-left: [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.0" /></div><div>Rating: 9.0/<strong>10</strong> (39 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/enron-called-kyoto-a-victory-for-us-in-1997/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One lone East Anglia man stands up against poor practice. Where are the rest?</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/one-lone-east-anglia-man-stands-up-against-poor-practice-where-are-the-rest/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/one-lone-east-anglia-man-stands-up-against-poor-practice-where-are-the-rest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other headline I could have used: Jo Nova and Watts Up graphs used in UEA lectures! <p>It doesn&#8217;t get much better than this. Imagine finding out your work helped to support a university course in a place right at the center of the dogma and unscientific reasoning you are working to expose? Well I&#8217;m chuffed. </p> <p>Allan Kendall is a lecturer at the University of East Anglia (UEA) with principles and an open mind, who gave his students the whole story. I applaud his brave approach, he would have known he risked castigation and exile in his workplace, and that there would be little reward.</p> <p>Curiously a small storm erupted  on Bishop Hill. Alan Kendall is defending UEA, saying that not everyone or every branch of research at UEA ought to be tarnished with the poor behaviour of the Climate Research Unit. And his behaviour rather proves his point, but many commenters at UEA are bagging him for expecting anyone to take UEA seriously, and in a sense they are right too. Therein lies the rub.</p> <p>People of Kendall&#8217;s quality are either rare or silent at UEA. As long as the Chancellor of UEA continues to deny that it [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.5" /></div><div>Rating: 9.5/<strong>10</strong> (69 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/one-lone-east-anglia-man-stands-up-against-poor-practice-where-are-the-rest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pointman &#8212; A dead man&#8217;s hand detonator on hidden emails may protect ClimateGate whistleblower</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/pointman-a-dead-mans-hand-detonator-on-hidden-emails-may-protect-climategate-whistleblower/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/pointman-a-dead-mans-hand-detonator-on-hidden-emails-may-protect-climategate-whistleblower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateGate II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pointman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p>In the high powered risky game of whistleblowing there are ways to make the the leaker a less attractive target.</p> <p>Pointman analyzes the ClimateGate whistleblower&#8217;s tactics and explains why he, she or they probably released those other 200,000 emails but kept them hidden behind the 4000-8000 character almost unbreakable password. He points out there are no emails released yet between key scientists and people in power, hence the worst, most damaging emails may be kept under a &#8221; dead man’s hand detonator&#8221;. If politicians are afraid of what might be in those released-but-hidden emails, they may not want to expose or attack the whistleblower for fear of unleashing the other emails. The hidden emails buy the whistleblower protection.</p> <p>Jo</p> Some thoughts and some questions about the Climategate 2.0 release <p>Guestpost by Pointman</p> <p> Two years ago, I did what can only be described as a highly speculative profile of the climategate leaker. You can find it here. I strongly suggest you read it now or you’ll have some difficulty following the rest of this piece. Reading it again in the light of what more can be deduced about them from the second release, it holds up surprisingly well. Where it [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.1" /></div><div>Rating: 9.1/<strong>10</strong> (102 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/pointman-a-dead-mans-hand-detonator-on-hidden-emails-may-protect-climategate-whistleblower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>207</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia picks last possible moment to leap ONTO burning ship</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/australia-picks-last-possible-moment-to-leap-onto-burning-ship/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/australia-picks-last-possible-moment-to-leap-onto-burning-ship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gillard &#8212; the Australian Prime Minister &#8212; got the timing perfectly wrong. </p> <p>Within two weeks of the Carbon Tax finally becoming Law, it&#8217;s becoming hard not to notice that the whole Global Scam is fragmenting. This Carbon ship is on fire,  the lifeboats are leaving, the rats are jumping, and the Australian team just turned up with the family jewels. Their policies are &#8220;take no prisoners&#8221; and &#8220;bring no life jackets&#8221;. Their exit plan is to have No Exit.</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Sergey Abramov (ship, 1960) ...By Leksey </p> <p>It&#8217;s hard to imagine how the timing could have been more quintessentially insane, or their  &#8220;Leadership of Clean Energy&#8221; more poignantly inane.</p> <p>After subterranean lakes of Shale Gas were discovered two months ago under Lancashire in the UK , even half-tinted-Green governments started stepping backwards from diabolical renewables deals. Nearly everyone popped up and said No No No to Kyoto. “Let’s be frank&#8221; said EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard, &#8220;At best we could only get the EU, Norway and maybe two or three more countries to sign up for a second Kyoto period.&#8221; The Bloomberg article about the collapse of the Kyoto agreement discusses 14 nations and two continents, but Australia wasn&#8217;t  [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.2" /></div><div>Rating: 9.2/<strong>10</strong> (115 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/australia-picks-last-possible-moment-to-leap-onto-burning-ship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More emails: Phil Jones paid £13.7 million in grants but &#8220;not a public servant&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/more-emails-phil-jones-paid-13-7-million-in-grants-but-not-a-public-servant/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/more-emails-phil-jones-paid-13-7-million-in-grants-but-not-a-public-servant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateGate II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jones (Phil)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=19042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Up to £13.7 million in grants have been paid to Professor Phil Jones, from a number of funding bodies including the European Union, NATO, and the US Department of Energy. But the intellectual and philosophical climate is so weak that Jones doesn&#8217;t even consider himself to be paid to serve the citizens of those countries. No wonder he feels that people asking for &#8220;his&#8221; data are nuisances and pests.</p> <p>Usually in Science-World, scientists don&#8217;t have to deal with pesky FOI&#8217;s &#8212; because they make their data and methods available for free upon request. It should never come down to legal action for citizens to get what is rightfully theirs.</p> <p>Phil Jones is Director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU), a Professor in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia in Norwich. He&#8217;s one of the key climate scientists behind the IPCC reports (he and James Hansen of GISS in NASA are the two leading alarmist climate scientists).</p> <p>Emails released in ClimateGate II that show he deletes emails, rationalizes that he is a not really a public servant, and discusses ways to hide from FOI requests, even as he admits the models are all wrong.</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Prof Phil [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.3" /></div><div>Rating: 9.3/<strong>10</strong> (60 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/more-emails-phil-jones-paid-13-7-million-in-grants-but-not-a-public-servant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPCC scientists test the Exit doors</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/ipcc-scientists-test-the-exit-doors/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/ipcc-scientists-test-the-exit-doors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tipping Point (of the Climate Scam)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=18937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>RE: Mixed messages on climate &#8216;vulnerability&#8217;. Richard Black, BBC.</p> <p>AND UPDATED: The Australian reports the leaked IPCC review, AND a radio station just announced it as &#8220;IPCC says we don&#8217;t know if there is a reason for the carbon tax&#8221;. See more below.</p> <p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">...</p> <p>This is another big tipping point on the slide out of the Great Global Scam. IPCC scientists &#8212; facing the travesty of predictions-gone-wrong &#8212; are trying to salvage some face, and plant some escape-clause seeds for later. But people are not stupid.</p> <p>A conveniently leaked IPCC draft is testing the ground. What excuses can they get away with? Hidden underneath some pat lines about how anthropogenic global warming is &#8220;likely&#8221; to influence&#8230; ah cold days and warm days, is the get-out-of-jail clause that&#8217;s really a bombshell:</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;"> &#8220;Uncertainty in the sign of projected changes in climate extremes over the coming two to three decades is relatively large because climate change signals are expected to be relatively small compared to natural climate variability&#8221;.</p> <p> Translated: The natural climate forces are stronger than we thought, and we give up, we can&#8217;t say whether it will get warmer or colder in the next twenty years.</p> [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.2" /></div><div>Rating: 9.2/<strong>10</strong> (130 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/ipcc-scientists-test-the-exit-doors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>218</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to a &#8220;Hung&#8221; Democracy</title>
		<link>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/carbon-tax-arrives-australia-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/carbon-tax-arrives-australia-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Nova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW socio-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannenova.com.au/?p=18745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And so it came to pass that a small band of the selfish or deluded came to steal the blood, sweat and toil of the many.</p> <p>They lied, broke solemn promises, failed to provide evidence, and displayed a singular lack of good-manners. They viciously insulted anyone who disagreed, they hid the models the public were forced to pay for, they gave patrons highly paid jobs to advertize their scheme.</p> <p>They speak arrant nonsense as if it is the bleeding obvious: telling us that we will grow rich if we use energy that costs more; that coal miners are to blame for heavy rain; that more taxes will bring investors; that we&#8217;ll lose jobs if we don&#8217;t pay more than we need to for energy; or that 6.98 billion people will follow the 0.02 billion who lead us on the path to the Land of Stupid. They made prophesies that failed time after time, yet speak on, as if  only they have the vision to guide us.</p> <p>The polls show the public would not have elected people who wanted to bring in a Carbon Tax. Yet it is law.</p> <p>The narcissistic self-anointed activists have overreached, and it will be their undoing.</p> [...]<br /><div><img src="http://joannenova.com.au/wp/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/gfx.php?value=9.4" /></div><div>Rating: 9.4/<strong>10</strong> (142 votes cast)</div><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://joannenova.com.au/2011/11/carbon-tax-arrives-australia-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>277</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/76 queries in 0.047 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 737/857 objects using disk: basic

Served from: joannenova.com.au @ 2012-02-11 10:29:11 -->
