Comments on: Global confusion: Turns out global warming doesn’t cause wandering Jet Stream “extreme weather”

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:43:12 +0000

The tribunal,

http://joannenova.com.au/2020/02/royal-commission-on-fires-based-on-myth-of-hotter-drier-summer/#comment-2280601

0 0

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:21:45 +0000

Massive computing power isn’t important.

The Big issue in modelling is factorial analysis.

If you miss out one that’s important no amount of computing power will save you.

Any CO2 heating effect, if it exists, is so small in comparison with other known factors that are poorly quantified that you are essentially “modelling” an unknown pile of garbage.

Error analysis of factors beside CO2 is an unknown issue of such magnitude that the idea of modelling CO2 effect in the atmosphere is a joke.

Unfortunately it’s not a joke, it’s much more sinister than that.

Just look at Scomos latest tribunal to get a glimpse of the direction we are being taken.

The mainstream media term “massive computing power” is simply misdirection.

btw can anyone guarantee me that there is an operating mechanism by which CO2 can take in heat over and above its scientifically acknowledged share governed by the gas laws.

0 0

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:01:56 +0000

Sarc.

1 0

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:42:17 +0000

How Dare You

Intrude on Zoe’s thread.

Really!

1 0

By: Gee Aye

Gee Aye — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:35:43 +0000

they are debating it because they can’t handle the truth.

1 1

By: mwhite

mwhite — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:51:06 +0000

The sun is ignored because changes in the TSI are so small. The solar wind is ignored, CMEs are ignored, etc. All ignored.

0 0

By: mwhite

mwhite — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:47:47 +0000

Check this out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEWoPzaDmOA&list=PLHSoxioQtwZdP64kv7PmAJbadWEpcH6B1

0 0

By: Zoe Phin

Zoe Phin — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 03:51:25 +0000

“Part of learning is to acknowledge that there maybe some issues that you don’t have a good grasp of.”

That’s funny because all my critics have no idea what conductive heat flux is, how it’s calculated, and how irrelevant it is to emission at the surface boundary.

“You can’t just take a thermodynamic equation like the S,B from a text book and plug in stuff.”

That’s ironic because my critics like to take the conductive heat flux and plug it into SB equation.

2 0

By: Zoe Phin

Zoe Phin — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 03:33:19 +0000

I take it you won’t be any more specific because I will easily refute it.

2 1

By: Zoe Phin

Zoe Phin — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 03:30:44 +0000

Do you at least recognize that satellites can not detect radiation moving away from it?

2 0

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 02:44:10 +0000

There’s no such thing as a model that links atmospheric CO2 with air temperature.

They are politically sanctioned constructs.

2 0

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 02:40:50 +0000

No.

It was your attempt to use surface evident energy from the Earth’s core, mixed with a few other factors to calculate another factor.

Two unknowns were involved; the one you were solving for and the other one you overlooked.

1 1

By: WXcycles

WXcycles — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 02:16:41 +0000

The OLR map is 24 hours.

1 0

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Sat, 22 Feb 2020 21:59:51 +0000

Group ,,,, ground.

0 0

By: Kalm Keith

Kalm Keith — Sat, 22 Feb 2020 21:57:40 +0000

Lance, good diagrams from the past which illustrate the nominal logarithmic effect.

It is important to acknowledge that this is not a runaway, out of control thing, but actually a shutdown effect.

But even more importantly I would like some stronger academic confirmation that the statement about CO2 giving the world an extra 30C degrees of heating.

This is the heart of the issue, that a convincing confirmation of this greenhouse effect does not exist.

Everything that I understand and observe in this tells me that the atmospheric CO2 heating effect described in not real.

Many reasons exist to prove that the primary mechanism at work heating the air at ground level is conduction, or impact of atmospheric gases with the group which has received energy from incoming Solar UV.

For me the above outline is simply saying that IF the effect exists Then we can stop worrying because it is a progressively diminishing effect.

The whole thing from an engineering and scientific understanding is that it is a human origin Faeries Story.

The whole thing is a disgusting nonsense.

0 0