Comments on: The climate industry wall of money

By: jokes - Page 2 - TheEnvironmentSite.org Discussion and Information Forums

jokes - Page 2 - TheEnvironmentSite.org Discussion and Information Forums — Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:01:04 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Monday Meltdown: March 15th 2010 « The Daily Bayonet

Monday Meltdown: March 15th 2010 « The Daily Bayonet — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:58:43 +0000

[...] DeSmogBlog blames Big Oil for the increase in public skepticism. That argument used to work well, until the lid was blown off Big Green and the megabucks behind the scaremongers. [...]

Report this

0 0

By: Saint

Saint — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:10:58 +0000

“In my country, the oil and coal companies spent $500 million last year just on television advertising just on these questions.”-Al Gore
Al Gore, you’ve spent a similar mass of money on Seaside real estate. Don’t make me laugh.

Report this

0 0

By: Gary

Gary — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:33:55 +0000

If you want to “follow the money” or apply the Cui bono” test then you need to move well beyond the Warmists and their fellow travellers who are but mere puppets in the scheme of things. Look to those who would “hide in plain sight”…

Crashing Towards a New World Social Order 2012

Report this

0 0

By: Erik

Erik — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:24:16 +0000

Very good article, but I think you may want to dig even deeper. A good friend and coworker of mine consistently uses the argument of “trusted advisor” and falls back on the Union of Concerned Scientists. I have seen references that this particular organization has been funded by competing oil companies and industrialists to provide a “trusted” group to discount or fight the use of nuclear power and the “evils of Exxon.” BP is after all one of their backers, so they might as well get something out of it.

Report this

0 0

By: Bruce

Bruce — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:08:03 +0000

Al Gore was quoted as saying, “In my country, the oil and coal companies spent $500 million last year just on television advertising just on these questions. There are now five anti-climate lobbyists on Capitol Hill in Washington for every member of the House and Senate. So it’s been a very massive, organized campaign.” in an interview with a Norwegian talk show described in the following article, http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/03/al-gores-climate-groups-unite-as-he-sees-massive-opposition/1
This seems to be in conflict with the 23 million that Exxon spent. Maybe he is confused with the 600 million Exxon is spending on biofuels research.
Any Comments?

Report this

0 0

By: Mark D.

Mark D. — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:04:47 +0000

Louis, since a human body is a wet body, the water evaporated is part of that cooling hydro vapor cycle. Should be a net 0 forcing.

Well it sounds good anyway……

Report this

1 0

By: MattB

MattB — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:15:23 +0000

Eddy in #93 – I just noted a twisted post of yours. Pleas re-read the Drum and note that the comment “You are not a top climate scientist either” was made in response to a skeptic saying so and so was not a climate scientist. Note the word “either”. Miond you after your agreeing with the distorted version of Pinker then I’m not surprised you choose the distoted version here too.

Report this

0 1

By: Louis Hissink

Louis Hissink — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:44:58 +0000

George,

very good and I’m surprised the factor of human body heat hasn’t been invoked by the environmentalists or the AGW panic merchants – after all it’s real, and, and….

Much more interesting re-reading Tommy Gold’s Deep Hot Biosphere book – and watch out for my next Henry Thornton article – should be up during the next day or so. Should put a lion among the camels here.

Report this

0 0

By: george

george — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:59:57 +0000

…”Aah, but Monsieur, zey are not my camels”

Report this

1 0