Report this

00

Report this

00

Report this

00

Report this

10

Report this

00

Report this

10

“what did Tim do? – says Harry (trying to produce hadcru 3.0))

How about the general public find out that:

The General public are told that this is the warmest year on Record:
How can you deny this global warming!!!!

What tells them that: 3 global datasets, Hadcru, nasa, giss

Tell the public: HAdcru dataset – Climate research Unit )

Global raw data into a black box: (their code)
Global Adjusted, homogenised, tortured, data out… we have global warming…

The CODE that adjust the raw data has never even been IT PEER reviewed outside of CRU.
How many other researchers have used it!!!1

Eco green christian (with a geography degree) and phil jpones and one or two others wrote the code…

Climategate scandal Harry_Read_me.txt, and the CODE freely available to any it profeesional to see:

MAny issues..

It is crap code.
It does some very dodgy things to the data:
to quote a techy guy, that didn’t just torture the data – they waterboarded IT
The whole methodology, gridding, assumptions,
loss of weather stations.

Send that message to any IT professonals, and they will be appalled
AND they can check for themselves!!!!

It totally destroys the warmest year on record lies….
Didn’t I just see that NASA had been caught out adjusting Australia weather stations rather a LOT.

Everybody has been talking aboutthe emails, Ipcc reports.
Little talk been talking about Harry_Read_me.txt, and all th erest of the code..

The UK has a terrible record of useless publically funded IT systems.

Billions wasted!!!!

Tell the public that half a dozen ‘climate scientists’, with probably no IT qualification between them.
Not complying with any recognised governmentprocedure for, qa, documentation, software design, data integrity, data archiving, etc,etc processes and procedure.
Are responsible for one of three global temperature datasets that says ‘Global Warming’

And tell the public, they won’t let anybody check IT!!!

Report this

00

It clearly was political from the start. Someone picked up an old theory and tried to make hay out of it. But I think there was quickly more than one cook in the kitchen, each hoping to further their own agenda.

They were undisciplined and accountable to no one. And that leads to all sorts of interests getting in — corruption too. Politicians (include the UN) saw power. Actually the UN saw the realization of their dream of governing the world. Money grubbers, as you said, saw dollar signs. Environmental interests, the extreme ones in particular, saw a way to save the planet. It’s an unfortunate accident that this one old theory could fit all those desires so nicely.

I’m not quite sure where Phil Jones et al, James Hansen, Michael Mann and even Al Gore and some others, fit in all this. But I think they really believed they were doing the right thing. Not so for everyone though.

I may be wrong about Hansen.

This is the way I see it from watching what’s been said and what’s going on over several years now. Others may see it differently and that’s good. A little debate about it can’t hurt.

Report this

10

The worse scenario is that the real ‘Convenient Truth’ was known
before the UN IPCC report was released, and they ignored it. I wonder why? Because India for starters had invested millions in Carbon Credit trading hoping that ETS taxes would reap in
trillions… Bad Hat eh?

Report this

00

CO2 is a very small percentage of Greenhouse gases, 98% is water vapor – like those fluffy little things that float across the globe, sometimes delivering rain? With me?

Green house gases keep this ‘ice planet’ warmer at night and cooler by day. That’s why frost doesn’t form at night when there is a cloud cover. Why desert regions are boiling hot
during the day and freezing cold at night, savvy?

Cosmic radiation/rays also help generate clouds, but sun or solar activity sometimes deflect them, hence …. I have to admit folks on this blog, I am getting so bored with these believers that as Carl Sagan said, You can’t change what a believer believes in, because their whole world view would change..

Sea level rises, they do come and go, the moon has something to do with it too, like king tides, etc.

However the big crunch is that the Australian government have
a blow out with rebates re solar panels etc., carbon credits
trading… It is believed that there are considerable loses,
so no wonder … the con artists like Al Gore et al, are responsible for giving well meaning people the impression his
predictions are right… yet he buys a 4 million dollar condo
in a area he predicted would be inundated by rising sea levels.

Florida: I lived in Bermuda. Now if sea levels were a threat
to your part of the globe, they would also effect Bermuda, considering it’s low above sea level islands. Now I don’t see
all those tax dodging billionaires selling up and moving back to New York or your part of the woods?

Captain Marvel, on this site, like MattB, we don’t like
the Carbon Credit supporters who are afraid that their shares
are plummeting and they have lost millions of dollars. You should have done your own independent (and scientific) research before you invested. Yet I believe those who have, must in someway feel let down, and I am sorry this happened to you?

I can tell when it is 85% F during the day, some of my plants
wilt because of transpiration rations. Come back during the
evening though.

Report this

00