Report this

00

An awful lot but we can never know of course, but we know of carbonatite lavas in Africa, and kimberlite eruptions that come from the mantle are also supercharged with CO2, so there seems a prodigious amount of carbon down there, some of it reaching the surface as diamonds, but mainly as natural gas and petroleum. We happen to be the carbon life form that’s adapted to the most of the Earth’s surface.

Honestly though, no one knows how much carbonate is down there, since the only samples we have are the rocks brought up via the various kimberlites around the Earth. But a volcanoe comprised totally of Carbonate, and there are a couple in Namibia, as well as in the Rift, suggests there is quite a bit.

Report this

20

However the Abiotic scientists have demonstrated by experiment that petroleum spontaneously forms when Iron oxide, calcium carbonate and distilled water are subjected to the PT conditions of the mantle.

Out of curiosity, how much carbonate do you think is down there?

Report this

20

Report this

21

you sent me not one but *three* abusive emails and have been back to hounding me since. you really are a vindictive little twerp and if you continue this I may just be inclined to publish those emails and tell you boss about them, ok? get over it. I made one snark at you and you’ve been spending the last few months trying to get back at me. get some psychiatric help.
http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/05/08/legal-eagles-take-flight/

Keep supporting people like him, Wallace. Reputation-wise it’s always a good idea to associate with and defend the more dishonest among us. Lol

Report this

22

Anyone can speak about science. I don’t see it as a free speech issue. However Nova doesn’t publish her stuff on scienceblogs and doesn’t deliberately lie like the Deloid dwarf. See here:

U

K Daily Mail journalist David Rose comments:

I realise that nothing I write here will make a scrap of difference to you.

Lambert – a university lecturer (true!) – responds:

David Rose admits that he has no credibility … in a comment left here David Rose has admitted that he has no credibility, conceding that “nothing I write here will make a scrap of difference”.

Unable to ever show he understands the subject on hand the Deltoid dwarf simply lies.

As I said Lambert has only recently published in his own field after a 10 year absence casting doubt, in my mind, whether he’s even able to talk in his own area.

As shown with the above example he poisons everything he touches which is why he’s also known as the venomous cherub..

Report this

22

Just making sure, since the idea of two of you is somewhat of an appalling scenario.

Report this

41

Louis what is this obsession you have with SJT?

I do recall a bit of a mad man on that blog went by the name of Hissink… I assume you are the same guy;)

Report this

19

SJT was also prone to posting soliquys on he Marohasy blog – as you seem to here. Not a doppleganger of SJT are you?

Report this

30

Hi Joanne,

You might like to have a read of my piece, Lord Moncton’s genocidal overkill, regarding his grossly unfair spin on biofuels policy.

I’m rather surprised you aren’t aware of the deep ambivalence within the environmental movement towards even biofuels per se, let alone those made out of food crops. Monckton has committed the most foolish of errors in blaming the wrong people and the wrong reasons for biofuel production from food crops.

The question I ask myself is: If Monckton can get a relatively simple issue like biofuels so wrong, why on earth should I assume he’s so clever and brilliant on the far more complex matters of climate science.

Report this

37