Comments on: Big News.The Hacked Climate Documents — “ClimateGate”

By: ANGRY

ANGRY — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:45:18 +0000

Subject: The Great Global Warming Hoax?

Have a read of this very informative article about this global warming science fiction:-

http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.html

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: ANGRY

ANGRY — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:42:32 +0000

Subject: CLIMATE CHANGE ‘FRAUD’

Hi All,
Here is a very informative article regarding more information about this global warming HOAX.

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/143573

Cheers

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Vg

Vg — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:14:36 +0000

You should go to WUWT and CA the game is really up now that the DATA is being analyzed. Complete and utter fraud it seem ALL the NATURE ect publications would have to be withdrawn

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Cade Foster

Cade Foster — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:40:18 +0000

Dear Kevin Rudd, Al Gore, IPCC et al

CLIMATE-GATE HAS ARRIVED !
THE JIG IS UP !
TIME TO PAY THE PIPER !

Now we know why the “climate alarmists” had not been transparent with their raw-data and source-codes.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: allen mcmahon

allen mcmahon — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:34:51 +0000

Matt
Thankfully most people act irrationally on occasion or one would be bored senseless and may a thousand from that camel etc etc.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Lionell Griffith

Lionell Griffith — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:45:58 +0000

Matt,

At least you are in touch with reality on that one point. I suggest being very careful with such things. Letting one point of reality into your mind is like letting your camel put his nose into your tent. Just as the camel will soon fill your tent, reality can flood your mind with what actually is rather than what you want it to be or what the sacred *other* says it should be. Do you really want that to happen?

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Matt Buckels

Matt Buckels — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:54:48 +0000

allen don’t apologise too much – no one else here thinks I’m rational.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:47:52 +0000

I agree, neither would I, Tel; that’s why I also mentioned your life. Would you fight for your life & liberty, Tel? Because that’s the bottom line with all this. Elitists, who want to be able to tell you and me how to live, use junk science to point to a crisis which only their ideas can remedy. Why do you think governments around the world are jumping onto the cap & trade bandwagon? This involves a lot more than just peer review, my friend.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Tel

Tel — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:50:40 +0000

Carl, I would not fight for the prize of my purse, the taxman has already cut a big hole in the bottom.

Mike, I’m so glad I’m not Harry. I’d reckon Harry didn’t see much of that grant money, and now he will be blacklisted (no doubt the in-people can figure out exactly who Harry is).

If the journals had even come close to demanding data integrity and archival standards then Harry wouldn’t have been in such a bad situation. I strongly suspect that the CRU results are completely unreproducible, even by the researchers themselves.

Hopefully the majority of scientific publication moves onto WWW pages and self-publication and the entire journal industry atrophies and fades into the past. It serves no purpose any more. More than anything else, this whole sad episode just shows how little the current peer review process is worth.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: allen mcmahon

allen mcmahon — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:41:17 +0000

My apologies Matt I stand corrected. I agree that some commentators at WUWT are less than rational but the same can be said for commentators at RC and many other pro and anti sites that I visit.

Like or Dislike: 0 0