Comments on: Massive climate funding exposed

By: ES

ES — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:25:46 +0000

According to your sources, this funding also goes to land use research, water cycle research, climate research (not related to warming), ecosystems research, etc, etc…

Isn’t it very dodgy to try and claim that all this money goes to global warming research?

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Emission Trading - Page 113 - Renovate Forums

Emission Trading - Page 113 - Renovate Forums — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:30:08 +0000

[...] into this area of research globally over time, which is unprecedented in human history. See herefor an idea of just some of the dollars being [...]

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Mike M

Mike M — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:53:59 +0000

Thomas T S Watson: I have positively established a formula that connects the magnetic involvement of the internal atom to what science is applying as Gravity.

Are you basically declaring that you have succeeded where Einstein failed with a unified field theory”?

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Mike M

Mike M — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:36:54 +0000

Here? I’m ‘here’ and there’s vitually nothing left to dismiss anymore because even the liberal state run media MSM who foisted the hoax on us have been caught chuckling at it at press conferences. Polls indicate public concern towards AGW being any sort of ‘crisis’ has sunken to an unprecedented LOW. Gore has become the butt of jokes and is no where to be found anymore. State run MSM barely mentions the issue anymore because they are afraid of the backlash from an enlightened populace who at least knows that the science is FAR from ’settled’ and that the only people who were saying the ‘debate is over’ were those who were unarmed to debate it in the first place. Even some corporations that had thought the ‘writing was on the wall’ that they’d have to get behind the ‘Green’ movement in order to survive high priced energy – are now backing out because they see the ride turning and don’t want to be associated with the HOAX.

How in the world you can even attempt to connect Enron and Haliburton into the discussion can only be described as hilarious! Radical environmental leftists in non-profit groups, (WWF, Audubon, Sierra, etc.) and in universities, (eg USC Berkley) started lining up behind the idea in the late 70’s LONG before even G. H. Bush was elected; James Hansen started grunting about AGW back in 1988.

Maurice Strong, close friend of Al Gore and the man who FOUNDED the UN’s initial self-serving involvement into environmental isues said back in ~1998:

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”

He doesn’t have a leg to stand on and either do you…

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Bhazor

Bhazor — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:24:59 +0000

You do realise that the funding was risen during the Bush years right? As in the Bush family? As in Enron and Haliburton? As in the most oil soaked administration in US history? So it’s a government conspiracy that happens to directly attack its own government?

No body here is even trying to dismiss the science anymore.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Thomas T S Watson

Thomas T S Watson — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:42:52 +0000

[Phillip Bratby] Phillip. i agree. This money has been applied to convince the world that Carbon Dioxide is the villain and has caused this Climate Change without any proven scientific evidence, other that the botched scientific evidence that was presented by the IPCC and Mr Al Gore. Their so called evidence has been disproved and our Earth is now COOLING since 1998. The evidence I have shows without doubt that our climate has been changing since 2001 and that our Climate change is totally influenced by our Sun’s heliosphere reversal on the 15 February 2001. Our Sun’s Heliosphere reversal also directly affects the barometric pressures that directly affects cloud heights and this is the base reason why our climate has drastically changed. Carbon Dioxide has had absolutely nothing to do with this climate change.

Like or Dislike: 1 0

By: Thomas T S Watson

Thomas T S Watson — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:16:11 +0000

[Thomas T S Watson] As of 1 October 2009, I changed my email address from ttsw@datafast.net.au to ttsw@bigpond.com. because of dial-up restrictions.

My conviction to my theory is slowly growing and a member from the University Of West Australia gave me a challenge to submit a scientific paper to the Journal Geophysical Research. This is now being prepared. I am confident of my findings and now need peer review to prove my theory is practical by showing why our Earth has a moon, oscillating between or hemispheres. My theory also referrers to the fact that our solar system has a basic alignment to each other planet and is supported by the study of five members from South African, showing our Earth’s spiral orbital patterns are confirmed with graphics by: WJR Alexander, F. Bailey, D B Bredenkamp, A van der Merwe and N Willemse of Journal of South Africa – Vol 49 November 2 June 2007

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: teddy bear

teddy bear — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:09:27 +0000

Do you truly think that is true? You did an excellent job stating your point, but I think you must put a little more thought in this debate and maybe post an answer to the opposite side of this post.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: dave ward

dave ward — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:10:57 +0000

Jo, I have had a quick look through one of the “leaked” CRU documents – a .XLS spreadsheet entitled “pdj_grant_since_1990″ which gives a breakdown of some £13.7million funding to them. I make roughly £10.5million of that coming from UK government or quango sources. The rest seems to be EU/US Government funding, with a few grants from companies. There is a text version viewable here:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/16992057/Climatic-Research-Unit-pdj-grant-since1990

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Show me the money! « TWAWKI

Show me the money! « TWAWKI — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:00:53 +0000

[...] the Global Change Research Act had $5 billion at its disposal in 2004. Joane Nova has a piece on Massivc climate funding exposed. Also SPPI report – Government grant system = more an inhibitor of truth and innovation. [...]

Like or Dislike: 0 0